1 Chapter 6 SAMPLE SIZE ISSUES Ref: Lachin, Controlled Clinical Trials 2:93-113, 1981.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Advertisements

Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample
CHAPTER 21 Inferential Statistical Analysis. Understanding probability The idea of probability is central to inferential statistics. It means the chance.
Statistical Decision Making
ODAC May 3, Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials Stephen L George, PhD Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Duke University Medical Center.
Sample size computations Petter Mostad
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Fall 2006 – Fundamentals of Business Statistics 1 Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing.
BS704 Class 7 Hypothesis Testing Procedures
Inferences About Process Quality
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing II. Chapter Outline  Introduction  Hypothesis Testing with Sample Means (Large Samples)  Hypothesis Testing with Sample.
Today Concepts underlying inferential statistics
Sample Size Determination
Sample Size Determination Ziad Taib March 7, 2014.
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 8 Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample.
Chapter 9 Title and Outline 1 9 Tests of Hypotheses for a Single Sample 9-1 Hypothesis Testing Statistical Hypotheses Tests of Statistical.
Choosing Statistical Procedures
Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing - II
Descriptive statistics Inferential statistics
© 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 7-1 Statistics for Managers using Excel 3 rd Edition Chapter 7 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests.
© 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 9-1 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests IE 340/440 PROCESS IMPROVEMENT THROUGH PLANNED EXPERIMENTATION.
Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap th Lesson Introduction to Hypothesis Testing.
Inference in practice BPS chapter 16 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
The paired sample experiment The paired t test. Frequently one is interested in comparing the effects of two treatments (drugs, etc…) on a response variable.
NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS
Week 8 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests
Inference for a Single Population Proportion (p).
CHAPTER 16: Inference in Practice. Chapter 16 Concepts 2  Conditions for Inference in Practice  Cautions About Confidence Intervals  Cautions About.
Sample size determination Nick Barrowman, PhD Senior Statistician Clinical Research Unit, CHEO Research Institute March 29, 2010.
1 Power and Sample Size in Testing One Mean. 2 Type I & Type II Error Type I Error: reject the null hypothesis when it is true. The probability of a Type.
Sample Size Determination Donna McClish. Issues in sample size determination Sample size formulas depend on –Study design –Outcome measure Dichotomous.
Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing I. Chapter Outline  An Overview of Hypothesis Testing  The Five-Step Model for Hypothesis Testing  One-Tailed and Two-Tailed.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing II: two samples Test of significance for sample means (large samples) The difference between “statistical significance” and.
1 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. 2 What is a Hypothesis? A hypothesis is a claim A hypothesis is a claim (assumption) about a population parameter:
Lecture 7 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. Lecture Goals After completing this lecture, you should be able to: Formulate null and alternative hypotheses.
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing: One Population Value Chapter 8 Handout.
#1 STATISTICS 542 Introduction to Clinical Trials SAMPLE SIZE ISSUES Ref: Lachin, Controlled Clinical Trials 2:93-113, 1981.
Mid-Term Review Final Review Statistical for Business (1)(2)
INTRODUCTION TO SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
Testing of Hypothesis Fundamentals of Hypothesis.
1 Statistics in Drug Development Mark Rothmann, Ph. D.* Division of Biometrics I Food and Drug Administration * The views expressed here are those of the.
Lunch & Learn Statistics By Jay. Goals Introduce / reinforce statistical thinking Understand statistical models Appreciate model assumptions Perform simple.
Chap 8-1 A Course In Business Statistics, 4th © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. A Course In Business Statistics 4 th Edition Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis.
Medical Statistics as a science
1 Interim Analysis in Clinical Trials Professor Bikas K Sinha [ ISI, KolkatA ] RU Workshop : April18,
Fall 2002Biostat Statistical Inference - Proportions One sample Confidence intervals Hypothesis tests Two Sample Confidence intervals Hypothesis.
Power & Sample Size Dr. Andrea Benedetti. Plan  Review of hypothesis testing  Power and sample size Basic concepts Formulae for common study designs.
Hypothesis Testing. “Not Guilty” In criminal proceedings in U.S. courts the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty and the prosecutor must.
1 URBDP 591 A Lecture 12: Statistical Inference Objectives Sampling Distribution Principles of Hypothesis Testing Statistical Significance.
© 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 9-1 Basic Business Statistics (9 th Edition) Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests.
AP Statistics Unit 5 Addie Lunn, Taylor Lyon, Caroline Resetar.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill 2004
1 Definitions In statistics, a hypothesis is a claim or statement about a property of a population. A hypothesis test is a standard procedure for testing.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School, Fall, 2005 © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Sample Size and Power Considerations.
Class Seven Turn In: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 For Class Eight: Chapter 20: 18, 20, 24 Chapter 22: 34, 36 Read Chapters 23 &
1 Underlying population distribution is continuous. No other assumptions. Data need not be quantitative, but may be categorical or rank data. Very quick.
#1 STATISTICS 542 Introduction to Clinical Trials SAMPLE SIZE ISSUES Ref: Lachin, Controlled Clinical Trials 2:93-113, 1981.
BIOST 513 Discussion Section - Week 10
Hypothesis Testing: One Sample Cases
Statistics for Managers using Excel 3rd Edition
Chapter 8: Inference for Proportions
CONCEPTS OF HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Hypothesis Testing.
Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
What are their purposes? What kinds?
Sample Size and Power Part II
Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 6 SAMPLE SIZE ISSUES Ref: Lachin, Controlled Clinical Trials 2:93-113, 1981.

2 Sample Size Issues Fundamental Point Trial must have sufficient statistical power to detect differences of clinical interest High proportion of published negative trials do not have adequate power Freiman et al, NEJM (1978) 50/71 could miss a 50% benefit

3 Example: How many subjects? Compare new treatment (T) with a control (C) Previous data suggests Control Failure Rate (P c ) ~ 40% Investigator believes treatment can reduce P c by 25% i.e. P T =.30, P C =.40 N = number of subjects/group?

4 Estimates only approximate –Uncertain assumptions –Over optimism about treatment –Healthy screening effect Need series of estimates –Try various assumptions –Must pick most reasonable Be conservative yet be reasonable

5 Statistical Considerations Null Hypothesis (H 0 ): No difference in the response exists between treatment and control groups Alternative Hypothesis (H a ): A difference of a specified amount (  ) exists between treatment and control Significance Level (  ): Type I Error The probability of rejecting H 0 given that H 0 is true Power = (1 -  ): (  = Type II Error) The probability of rejecting H 0 given that H 0 is not true

6 Standard Normal Distribution Ref: Brown & Hollander. Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

7 Standard Normal Table Ref: Brown & Hollander. Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

8 Distribution of Sample Means (1) Ref: Brown & Hollander. Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

9 Distribution of Sample Means (2) Ref: Brown & Hollander. Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

10 Distribution of Sample Means (3) Ref: Brown & Hollander. Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

11 Distribution of Sample Means (4) Ref: Brown & Hollander. Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

12 Distribution of Test Statistics Many have a common form = population parameter (eg difference in means) = sample estimate Then –Z =[ – E( )]/SE( ) And then Z has a Normal (0,1) distribution

13 If statistic z is large enough (e.g. falls into red area of scale), we believe this result is too large to have come from a distribution with mean O (i.e. P c - P t = 0) Thus we reject H 0 : P c - P t = 0, claiming that there exists 5% chance this result could have come from distribution with no difference

14 Normal Distribution Ref: Brown & Hollander. Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

15 Two Groups ORor

16 Test Statistics

17 Test of Hypothesis Two sidedvs.One sided e.g. H 0 : P T = P C H 0 : P T < P C Classic testz  = critical value If |z| > z  If z > z  Reject H 0  =.05, z  = 1.96  =.05, z  = where z = test statistic Recommend z  be same value both cases (e.g. 1.96) two-sided one-sided   =.05 or =.025 z  =

18 Typical Design Assumptions (1) 1.  =.05,.025,.01 2.Power =.80,.90 Should be at least.80 for design 3.  = smallest difference hope to detect e.g.  = P C - P T = =.1025% reduction!

19 Typical Design Assumptions (2) Two Sided PowerSignificance Level

20 Sample Size Exercise How many do I need? Next question, what’s the question? Reason is that sample size depends on the outcome being measured, and the method of analysis to be used

21 One Sample Test for Mean H 0 :  =  0 vs. H A :  =  0 +  z α = constant associated with a P {|Z|> z α } = α two sided

22 One Sample Test for Mean Under the alternative hypothesis that  =  0 + , the test statistic follows a standard normal variable.

23 One Sample Test for Mean

24 Simple Case - Binomial 1.H 0 :P C = P T 2.Test Statistic (Normal Approx.) 3.Sample Size Assume N T = N C = N H A :  = P C - P T

25 Sample Size Formula (1) Two Proportions Simpler Case Z  = constant associated with  P {|Z|> Z  } =  two sided! (e.g.  =.05, Z  =1.96) Z  = constant associated with 1 -  P {Z< Z  } = 1-  (e.g. 1-  =.90, Z  =1.282) Solve for Z  (  1-  ) or 

26 Sample Size Formula (2) Two Proportions Z  = constant associated with  P {|Z|> Z  } =  two sided! (e.g.  =.05, Z  =1.96) Z  = constant associated with 1 -  P {Z< Z  } = 1-  (e.g. 1-  =.90, Z  =1.282)

27 Sample Size Formula Power Solve for Z    1-  Difference Detected Solve for 

28 Simple Example (1) H 0 : P C = P T H A : P C =.40, P T =.30  = =.10 Assume  =.05Z  = 1.96 (Two sided) 1 -  =.90Z  = p = ( )/2 =.35

29 Simple Example (2) Thus a. N = 476 2N = 952 b. N = 478 2N = 956

30 Approximate* Total Sample Size for Comparing Various Proportions in Two Groups with Significance Level (  ) of 0.05 and Power (1-  ) of 0.80 and 0.90

31

32 Comparison of Means Some outcome variables are continuous –Blood Pressure –Serum Chemistry –Pulmonary Function Hypothesis tested by comparison of mean values between groups, or comparison of mean changes

33 Comparison of Two Means H 0 :  C =  T  C -  T = 0 H A :  C -  T =  Test statistic for sample means ~ N (  ) Let N = N C = N T for design Power ~N(0,1) for H 0

34 Example e.g. IQ  = 15  = 0.3x15 = 4.5 Set 2  =.05  =  = 0.90 H A :  = 0.3    /  = 0.3 Sample Size N = 234  2N = 468

35

36 Comparing Time to Event Distributions Primary efficacy endpoint is the time to an event Compare the survival distributions for the two groups Measure of treatment effect is the ratio of the hazard rates in the two groups = ratio of the medians Must also consider the length of follow-up

37 Assuming Exponential Survival Distributions Then define the effect size by Standard difference

38 Time to Failure (1) Use a parametric model for sample size Common model - exponential –S(t) = e - t = hazard rate –H 0 : I = C –Estimate N George & Desu (1974) Assumes all patients followed to an event (no censoring) Assumes all patients immediately entered

39 Assuming Exponential Survival Distributions Simple case The statistical test is powered by the total number of events observed at the time of the analysis, d.

40 Converting Number of Events (D) to Required Sample Size (2N) d = 2N x P(event) 2N = d/P(event) P(event) is a function of the length of total follow- up at time of analysis and the average hazard rate Let AR = accrual rate (patients per year) A = period of uniform accrual (2N = AR x A) F = period of follow-up after accrual complete A/2 + F = average total follow-up at planned analysis = average hazard rate Then P(event) = 1 – P(no event) =

41 Time to Failure (2) In many clinical trials 1.Not all patients are followed to an event (i.e. censoring) 2.Patients are recruited over some period of time (i.e. staggered entry) More General Model (Lachin, 1981) where g( ) is defined as follows

42 1.Instant Recruitment Study Censored At Time T 2.Continuous Recruiting (O,T) & Censored at T 3.Recruitment (O, T 0 ) & Study Censored at T (T > T 0 )

43 Example Assume  =.05 (2-sided) & 1 -  =.90 C =.3 and I =.2 T = 5 years follow-up T 0 = 3 0.No Censoring, Instant Recruiting N = Censoring at T, Instant Recruiting N = Censoring at T, Continual Recruitment N = Censoring at T, Recruitment to T 0 N = 233

44 Sample Size Adjustment for Non-Compliance (1) References: 1.Shork & Remington (1967) Journal of Chronic Disease 2.Halperin et al (1968) Journal of Chronic Disease 3.Wu, Fisher & DeMets (1988) Controlled Clinical Trials Problem Some patients may not adhere to treatment protocol Impact Dilute whatever true treatment effect exists

45 Sample Size Adjustment for Non-Compliance (2) Fundamental Principle Analyze All Subjects Randomized Called Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Principle –Noncompliance will dilute treatment effect A Solution Adjust sample size to compensate for dilution effect (reduced power) Definitions of Noncompliance –Dropout: Patient in treatment group stops taking therapy –Dropin: Patient in control group starts taking experimental therapy

46 Comparing Two Proportions –Assumes event rates will be altered by non ‑ compliance –Define P T * = adjusted treatment group rate P C * = adjusted control group rate If P T < P C, 0 PTPT PCPC P T * P C * 1.0

47 Simple Model - Compute unadjusted N –Assume no dropins –Assume dropout proportion R –ThusP C * = P C P T * = (1-R) P T + R P C –Then adjust N –Example R1/(1-R) 2 % Increase % % Adjusted Sample Size

48 Sample Size Adjustment for Non-Compliance Dropouts & dropins (R 0, R I ) –Example R 0 R 1 1/(1- R 0 - R 1 ) 2 % Increase % times%

49 Multiple Response Variables Many trials measure several outcomes (e.g. MILIS, NOTT) Must force investigator to rank them for importance Do sample size on a few outcomes (2-3) If estimates agree, OK If not, must seek compromise

50 Sample Size Summary Ethically, the size of the study must be large enough to achieve the stated goals with reasonable probability (power) Sample size estimates are only approximate due to uncertainty in assumptions Need to be conservative but realistic

51 Demo of Sample Size Program Program covers comparison of proportions, means, & time to failure Can vary control group rates or responses, alpha & power, hypothesized differences Program develops sample size table and a power curve for a particular sample size