Market power1 ECON 4930 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 9 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trade1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 6 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Advertisements

Theory of the Firm Firms want to maximize profit This implies minimizing cost Need to identify underlying technological relationships between inputs and.
 Introduction  Simple Framework: The Margin Rule  Model with Product Differentiation, Variable Proportions and Bypass  Model with multiple inputs.
IENG313 Operation Research I
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS.
Monopoly. Monopoly: Why? u Natural monopoly (increasing returns to scale), e.g. (parts of) utility companies? u Artificial monopoly –a patent; e.g. a.
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy
Economics 214 Lecture 37 Constrained Optimization.
Project 1 Introduction. Monopolies vs. Perfect Competitor Natural Monopoly vs. Temporary Monopoly - price is determined by company - Examples of each?
1 Prof. Dr. Hans-Martin Niemeier Introduction and overview of ongoing research issues GAP Research Workshop Berlin, April Hans-Martin Niemeier.
Perfect Competition & Welfare. Outline Derive aggregate supply function Short and Long run equilibrium Practice problem Consumer and Producer Surplus.
Equilibrium Introduce supply Equilibrium The effect of taxes Who really “pays” a tax? The deadweight loss of a tax Pareto efficiency.
Figure 8.2 How a Competitive Firm Maximizes Profit
Elasticities. Objectives Students will be able to Calculate the elasticity of demand. Calculate the value at which total revenue is maximized. Determine.
Price For Maximizing Profit by Ted Mitchell. Learning Goal Finding the Price that Maximizes the Profit is not necessarily the same as finding the Price.
Transmission1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 8 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Chapter 10 Monopoly. Chapter 102 Review of Perfect Competition P = LMC = LRAC Normal profits or zero economic profits in the long run Large number of.
Environmental Economics1 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 2 Chapter 6 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Water1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2006 Resource Economics Water as a natural resource Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Econ 1900 Laura Lamb Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2.
Market power1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 10 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Hydropower and thermal1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 5 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
CHAPTER 20 ELASTICITY of DEMAND & SUPPLY By: Amanda Reina & Sandra Avila.
Stock pollution 1 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 9: Stock pollution Perman et al. Chapter 16 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
1 System planning 2013 Lecture L8: Short term planning of hydro systems Chapter Contents: –General about short term planning –General about hydropower.
Section 14.3 Further Business Application: Elasticity of Demand.
Review Demand curve, consumer surplus Price elasticity of demand.
AP Microeconomics 12:2 Warm Up: What are the four main market structures? How would you describe the products in each one?
Lecture #9. Review Homework Set #7 Continue Production Economic Theory: product-product case.
06 Network Effects 3 Aaron Schiff ECON Reading: Cabral, Ch 17.
Environmental Economics1 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 1 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Introduction to electricity economics1 ECON 4930 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 1 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Monopoly 13 CHAPTER.
Economics 2010 Lecture 13 Monopoly. Monopoly  How monopoly arises  Single price monopoly.
Monopoly Quiz Recap.
Term paper ECON 4930 Term paper Finn R. Førsund.
Market power1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2006 Resource Economics Market power Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
SUPPLY Chapter 5. What is Supply? Supply is the quantities that would be offered for sale and all possible prices that could prevail in the market.
Reservoir and production constraints1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 3 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Chapter 10 Monopoly. ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 102 Topics to be Discussed Monopoly and Monopoly Power Sources of Monopoly Power The Social.
Calculus Vocabulary 4.4 Modeling and Optimization Strategy for Solving Max-Min Problems 1.Understand the Problem: Read the problem carefully. Identify.
Valuing environment as production input. Production function The Cobb-Douglas function: q: output x: variable input E: environmental quality.
1. THE NATURE OF MONOPOLY Learning Objectives 1.Define monopoly and the relationship between price setting and monopoly power. 2.List and explain the.
Trade1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2010 Hydropower economics Lecture 13 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Chapter 9 Market Power: Monopoly and Monopsony Market Power: Monopoly and Monopsony Slide 1Chapter 9.
ECON 4910 seminar 21 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Second seminar Lecturer Finn R. Førsund.
Chapter 3 Profit and costs1 CHAPTER 3 Profit maximisation, input demand, output supply and duality.
Summing up1 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 12 Summing up Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Summing up1 ECON 4930 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 12 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Constraints1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 4 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
The Basic Models1 The Basic Models of Environmental Economics Finn R. Førsund Department of Economics, University of Oslo THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE.
Economics 2301 Lecture 37 Constrained Optimization.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002 Price Elasticity of Demand Price Elasticity and Total Revenue Determinants of Price Elasticity of Demand Price.
© 2010 Pearson Education Canada Monopoly ECON103 Microeconomics Cheryl Fu.
Lecture notes 1, 4910 spring 2005, FRF Spatial environmental models Spatial configuration Key variable: transfer coefficient a ij a ij Transfer coefficient.
Trade and transmission1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 7 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Lecture 6: Monopoly Advanced Micro Theory MSc.EnviNatResEcon. 1/2006 Charit Tingsabadh.
Seminar 41 ECON 4925 Autumn 2006 Resource Economics Seminar 6 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Reservoir constraint1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2006 Resource Economics Hydro with reservoir constraint Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Arnim Kuhn & Wolfgang Britz
Chapter 5 Theory of Consumer Behavior
BUSINESS HIGH SCHOOL-ECONOMICS
ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 3, Chapter 7 -9
ECON 4925 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 11
MONOPOLY Prepared by Kwabena N. Darfor.
Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund
DEMAND & SUPPLY ONQ 10 QUESTIONS DID THE Jo’s GET THEIR NOTES???
Target Costing and Cost Analysis for Pricing Decisions
EE/Econ 458 Introduction to Economics: Producer’s Surplus
Presentation transcript:

Market power1 ECON 4930 Autumn 2007 Electricity Economics Lecture 9 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund

Market power 2 Background The use of market power is a potential problem of the deregulated electricity sector 20 % of the world’s electricity is produced by hydropower and 1/3 of the countries have more than 50% Hydro power is a special case due to zero variable cost, water storage, high power capacity and maximal flexible adjustment

Market power 3 Monopoly Using the simplified model of total water availability based on reservoir constraint not binding Maximising profit over the planning horizon

Market power 4 Difference between objective functions for social planning and monopoly Objective function social planning  Area under the demand function (zero variable costs) Objective function monopoly  Producer surplus: total revenue (zero variable costs)

Market power 5 Solving the monopoly optimisation problem The Lagrangian The Kuhn – Tucker conditions

Market power 6 Interpretations of optimality conditions Assuming positive production in all periods Introducing demand-flexibility corrected prices  Demand flexibility (negative)  Demand flexibility (demand function on price form) is the inverse of demand elasticity (demand function on quantity form)

Market power 7 Interpretations, cont. Optimality condition: flexibility - corrected prices equal for all time periods Market prices will vary with relative elastic periods having lower prices than relative inelastic periods

Market power 8 Bathtub illustration of two periods p2Mp2M Period 1 Period 2 p 2 S = λ S p 1 S = λ S p1Mp1M λMλM

Market power 9 Spilling and monopoly Depending on the characteristics of the demand functions it may be optimal for the monopoly to spill water Spilling can be regulated by prohibition  Introducing an equality constraint Zero-spilling regulation will reduce the monopoly profit

Market power 10 Spilling and zero-spilling regulation p1Mp1M Period 2 Period 1 p2Mp2M Total available energy p2p2 p1p1

Market power 11 Spilling and zero-spilling regulation p1Mp1M Period 2 λ<0 Period 1 p2Mp2M λ<0 Total available energy p2p2 p1p1

Market power 12 Limited reservoir and the social solution Reservoir dynamics: water at the end of a period = water at the end of previous period plus inflow minus release of water during the period Shadow prices on water and reservoir limit recursively related, solving using backward induction (Bellmann) Overflow is waste Social price may vary if reservoir constraint is binding

Market power 13 Limited reservoir and monopoly The flexibility-corrected price substitute for the social price Flexibility-corrected prices may differ if reservoir constraint is binding Social solution may be optimal if constraint is binding Differences with social solution depend on the demand elasticities Spilling may be optimal

Market power 14 Monopoly with reservoir constraint

Market power 15 Solving the monopoly optimisation problem The Lagrangian function

Market power 16 Solving, cont. The Kuhn – Tucker conditions

Market power 17 Interpretation of conditions Assuming positive production in all periods Using flexibility-corrected prices Assuming positive flexibility-corrected prices is a stronger assumption than non-satiation General shifting strategy still valid

Market power 18 Illustration of monopoly solution with r eservoir Period 1 p1Mp1M p2Mp2M A B C D Period 2 p1Sp1S p2Sp2S λMλM

Market power 19 Illustration of monopoly solution with r eservoir Period 1 p1Mp1M p2Mp2M A B C D Period 2 p1Sp1S p2Sp2S 2 M 1 M 11

Market power 20 Illustration of monopoly solution with r eservoir Period 1 p1Mp1M p2Mp2M A B C D Period 2 p1Sp1S p2Sp2S p1Mp1M Spill 2 M 1 M 11 p1Sp1S