WKEC STLN Welcome Back! January 29 th, 2015. Congratulations to Jessica and her beautiful family!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
Department of Mathematics and Science
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Supporting the MDC Classroom Trainer Gail Snider, Math Consultant.
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Connecting Literature with the California Science Standards Strategic Science Teaching Kindergarten – Physical Science 1 SST K/Physical Science.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Fraction Progressions PD Module Presented at STAR – July 31, 2013 Casper Hilton Garden Inn Laurie Hernandez, M.Ed. WDE Math Consultant
The 5 E Instructional Model
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Fraction Progressions PD Module Presented to [group/school] on [date] 1 A Multi-State Effort Developed by State Math Leads from KS, KY, MS, UT, & WY WDE.
Comparing Irreversible changes and reversible changes
{ Problem Solving Dr. Melanie Maxwell & Dr. Stephen Sher Pythagoras Project Common Core SMP Event July 29 – August 2, 2013 Transitioning from Teacher Problem.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math and Science Institute Exploring Physical Science Today’s Agenda Review of homework and participant sharing of their ENGAGE components of 5E. Engage.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
5 E’s Lesson Model.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage I: Engaging Stakeholders.
Copyright©2007 Education Service Center Region XIII Mineral Wells ISD 5E CSCOPE Overview.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
ASSESSMENT Collaborative Creation of Assessment Plans.
The 5 E’s Science Lesson Inquiry-Based Instruction.
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance May 7, 2008 Blue Licks State Park Welcome! Please help yourself to some refreshments and make sure you have.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
Examining the Modules: Instructional Practices related to Finding and Using Evidence LT 2a. I can describe the impact of content-rich curriculum on students’
Science Focus Lesson SC.5.N.2.2 Practice of Science/ Replication
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
1 Year 1 Science Teacher Leadership Academy Session 6.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice Class 3 March 14, 2011.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
1 Learning to Lead Mathematics Professional Development.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT - SONIYA JAYARAMAN.
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
Are you looking in the mirror or out the window? Pausing Pausing Paraphrasing Paraphrasing Probing for specificity Probing for specificity Putting ideas.
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership January 28, 2010 We will begin at 9:01.
Alabama Reading Initiative Session 1. Parameters: 1. All participants - no observers. 2. Use time wisely. 3. Stay focused. Please keep sidebar.
Welcome to STLN December, 15 th Today’s Facilitators Dr. Robert Boram Morehead State University Teresa Rogers KDE Literacy Consultant Dr. Katrina.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Welcome Back STLN January 27, Agenda Welcome Recap of November Updates ? What’s Next? Tasks/ Work analysis Break More looking at student work Lunch.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Welcome ETEAMS Teacher Leaders! Common Planning Spring 2016 Browne MS, Schanen ES, Kostoryz ES Dr. Tonya Jeffery & Kim Moore.
To STLN November 30th, Today’s Facilitators Dr. Robert Boram Morehead State University Teresa Rogers KDE Literacy Consultant Dr. Katrina Slone Stem.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Good Morning Please come in and pick a table. At least 2 people need to sit at each table. Take a piece of purple paper out of the basket. Trace your hand.
#kyscinet Welcome Back Scan the QR code while waiting for the meeting to begin to get into the padlet.
Welcome! CKEC Science Teacher Leader Network November 23, 2015
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
Warm-up With your table partners…. Read each others conclusion Use the rubric (green sheet) and critique your partners conclusion. – Things they did well.
Summer Assessment Institute: Linking Data Teams & Quality Assessment August 2015.
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Module 4: Overview of the EQuIP Rubric
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Analyzing Performance Tasks: Turning Results Into Action
To STLN STLN January 19th, 2016.
The Framework for Teaching
Engage Cobb Conference
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
LEARNING TARGETS EQ: How can we use models to help us learn and solve problems? LT: I can describe why some objects sink and others float. SC: Draw a.
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS and PROJECT LEAD THE WAY
Presentation transcript:

WKEC STLN Welcome Back! January 29 th, 2015

Congratulations to Jessica and her beautiful family!

WKEC Office 365 Community Group Have you checked out our new group?

What tools and resources are in your professional toolbox?

Today’s Facilitators Dr. Lynn Patterson, Murray State University Teresa Emmert GRREC Instructional Specialist Brian Womack, Heady Larson, Instructional specialist Christine Duke, KDE Consultant Mike Epperson & team, outstanding teacher leaders

STLN Site Norms Start and end on time Cell phones on vibrate Rule of two feet –Calls (phone and nature) Respect those sharing. Engage-minds on! Pick up around your area when we are finished Others?

Today’s Work Engage in planning an investigation as students Generate “student work” for analysis of investigation plan Use ES Templates to analyze your student work with a partner Engage in 5 Practices Book Study Phenomenon Discussion Reflect on experiences through the lens of CHETL,EQUIP, and FfT Time for collaboration

Teacher Reflection Remember the November ISLN/STLN meeting?

Why do some things float and others sink?

Do Bowling Balls Float? klQGFwhttps:// klQGFw

Why do some things float and others sink? Time to Observe What items (variables) were the same in your observation? Different? What do you not know? How did the ice float???? Did it sink slightly into the fluid or float completely on the surface???

Group Discussion Observations What exactly did we see, hear, smell, feel, or taste? Inferences What can we infer or presume from our observation? Questions What questions does this observation generate?

What do you see???

Journal Questions FA: Thinking questions: Designed to uncover misconceptions and provide insight into student reasoning. –What happened to the fluid level when the ice was added? Why? –Did the amount of fluid change when the ice was added to the fluid? Explain your reasoning. –Imagine the beaker was completely full of liquid and a cube of ice was then added. Describe what would happen.

1. Using arrows to show direction with length to show relative size, draw and label the forces acting on the ice cube: The forces can be labeled as ICE and FLUID. a. (as it floats) b. (as it is sinking) Force Diagrams Are forces balanced in both scenarios? Fluid in Beaker 2 Forces are equal. Forces are not equal. Fluid in Beaker 1

Stating Reasons Using the force diagrams for reference, explain the possible reasons that the ice did not float in the second beaker? Construct your reasons using evidence from the force diagrams ONLY. Thinking questions: You may not be able to answer these yet…. What is another name for the force called Ice? What is another name for the force called Fluid?

Time for Research Understanding why some things float and others sink will require students to research this topic. Topics for research might include “Buoyancy and Archimedes’ Principle, How does ice float?” or “When does ice sink?”.

Collaborative Research Brainstorm with your lab partners and/or perform research for answers to why things float and sink. Buoyancy, and/or Archimedes Principle are good starting points After performing the research/reading, you may revise your possible reasons in number 3 and answer: What is another name for the force called Ice? What is another name for the force called Fluid?

Research Resources

Making the Plan Together, you and your lab partners will develop a plan to accurately and precisely collect the data needed to support your reasoning.

See you in 10 min

Reflecting on the Lesson Large group discussion: –Were there any groups that differed in what they were investigating? –Did we find multiple methods for planning the same investigation? –What was missing in the lesson that would allow students to demonstrate the practice of planning an investigation?

Analyzing the Investigation Planned Again with a partner identify: 1.The practice connected to the lesson. 2.The learning outcomes of the lesson. –Perform a bullet by bullet analysis of the templates as it compares to the work. »Make notes as to what is missing in the work as it relates to the ES template. Would there be value in a rubric for each practice in the templates?

Looking at the Work With a partner, use the rubric for Planning an Investigation to analyze the work for congruency to this practice. Make notes about areas where the work falls short of proficiency (3) on the rubric. –Give evidence why the work is not there YET –Give feedback as to what the work needed to reach proficiency

Cognitive demand of student and teacher during experience Task card 2

5 Practices Book Study Directions Binders Groups (chart) Key focus is on anticipating and monitoring

Phenomena

Card Sort Consider if each card represents a phenomena. Discuss why or why not with your table group.

Are all phenomena phenomenal?

CHETL and FfT Connections

Analyzing the Density Learning Experience using Fft, Equip and CHETL Task Card 1 You will only be responsible for one of the pieces. After you find evidence from the lesson for your piece, you will share out with your table using the guiding questions on the paper.

STORYBOARD for COHERENCE

This work is not meant to be done in isolation! Names: Grade level: Content/standard: SEP: Phenomenon:

Collaborative Work Groups What tools and resources will you use to answer “What is Good Practice?” and “How DO WE KNOW?” Guidance? Tool?

Goal for working groups Determine phenomenon or begin with selected PE(s) Identify learning outcomes (what tools will you use?) Decide how students will show what they know? Create proficiency statements around standards (not the task!)

Share your progress! Tools and resources used thus far to ensure that work is quality Standard/practices/phenomena you selected Now engage in productive talk! Offer suggestions/considerations Discuss the phenomenon that students will explain. What is the science they will address?

To Do

Please Complete Evaluation Thank You!