Product Redesign MTAC Update November 7, 2002. Workgroups Joint Meeting of Workgroups –Originally Planning For Early 2003 –Primarily Information Sharing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Systems Management Surface Visibility Presented by USPS at July 10 Packages Subgroup Meeting.
Advertisements

® 1 Mail Prep and Entry Steering Committee Meeting May 14, 2013.
Managing Your Returns Process. 2 Remote Shopping is Growing  December 2002 NRF Sales Data  Direct retail up 18.1%  Store sales up 2.2%  More room.
CO-PALLETIZATION AND CO-MAILING UPDATE Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC), May 17, Update on Co-Palletization and Co-Mailing May 17, 2006.
1 R Mail Preparation Changes NCSC January 18, 2007.
1 Shaping a More Efficient Future Pricing Change Effective Monday, May 14.
1 Product Redesign MTAC Update Cost-Based Rates for Periodicals and Standard Flats February 5, 2004.
Flats Strategy Managing Cost and Maximizing Efficiencies Joe Schick Vice President of Postal Affairs.
1 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Bringing It All Together Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008.
Price Change 2015 USPS Pricing Overview May 2015.
Price Change Effective April 26, 2015 Northeast Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Meeting February 25,
Reduce Postage Costs and Improve Delivery, Combined Mailing Solutions PCC Mailers Forum 2014 September 10 th, 2014 Deborah Damore Fairrington Transportation.
2007 Postal Rates Effective May 14, Attention We have included in our webpage a summary of the 2007 United States Postal Service rate increase effective.
Shipping 101 Shipping Best Practices Southern Tier Postal Customer Council.
MTAC WG 114 MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement Update – May 16, 2007.
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION November 5, FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION Issue #81 MTAC November 5, 2003.
Welcome to the State Mail User’s Forum. Introduction to State Mail & Distribution Services.
FAST for Periodicals MTAC Workgroup 95 Washington, D.C. November 8, 2007.
Network Rationalization Mail Moves, Labeling Lists and Mail Direction File Industry Webinar July 1, 2013 To listen to a recording of this presentation.
Greater New York Postal Customer Council
® Flats Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS Krista Finazzo Manager, Operational Requirements MTAC – November 2010.
Product Redesign Update Mailers Technical Advisory Committee May 16, 2002.
® Flats Track for Periodicals, Catalogs & Printers David Mastervich Manager, Periodicals, Catalogs & Saturation Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS National.
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81 MTAC Report February 5, 2004.
1 MTAC 117 Intelligent Mail Barcodes and Electronic Documentation Workgroup Update.
Corporate Automation Plan PHASE 2 February 4, 2004Washington D.C.
Presented by: Caulette Briggs-Jackson Shipping Solutions Specialist DOMESTIC SHIPPING SPECTRUM The Greater New York Postal Customer Council.
New Mailing Services Prices – May 11, 2009 – Updated March 30 Greater Cleveland PCC April 24, 2009.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
Corporate Flats Strategy MTAC November 7, Slide 2 Presentation Overview Background Near Term Actions (FY 2003 and 2004) Longer Term Planning (FY.
Optimizing Parcel Preparation & Entry for Seamless Acceptance Final Presentation MTAC Work Group # 109 Industry Leader: Wendy Smith USPS Leader: Jim Cochrane.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC #87 Update Washington, D.C. November 2, 2006.
Mailing Industry View and Congressional Update Northeast Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Meeting Joe Schick Vice President of Postal Affairs.
Postal Logistics & Transportation Jeff Kruepke Quad/Transportation Services (414)
® Customer Supplier Agreements Presented by Pritha Mehra Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 17, 2008.
Product Redesign MTAC Update February 6, PRODUCT REDESIGN Bob O’Brien – Industry Co-Chair John DePiazza Joe Lubenow Clarence Banks Robert Lindsay.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
1 Shaping a More Efficient Future Price Change Proposal Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee Stephen M. Kearney Vice President Pricing & Classification.
Mailing Services Prices Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee February 19, 2009 Maura Robinson VP Pricing.
® Flats Symposium 2008 Bill Galligan Senior Vice President, Operations USPS National Postal Forum ® National Postal Forum 2008.
MTAC Workgroup #87 - Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process August 3, 2006.
® Service Standards and Performance Measurement MTAC Workgroup 114 Status Report.
1 November, 2008 Intelligent Mail® Readiness. 2 Agenda Intelligent Mail® Readiness  Full Service Project Schedule/Infrastructure  Recap Full Service.
® Flats Symposium 2008 National Postal Forum ® National Postal Forum 2008.
Workgroup # 120 Communicating Entry Requirements/ In-Home Delivery Dates Solutions/ Seasonality Impacts INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR DALE MILLER POSTAL CO-CHAIR CHRIS.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement Standard Mail Measurement July 30, 2007 Std Subgroup Meeting.
The R Rate Case PRC Recommendation “Cost-Based Rates”
1 Product Redesign MTAC Update November 5, Steering Committee Will Continue To Meet –Regular Updates And Feedback Regarding USPS Activity on Key.
POSTAL DISTRIBUTION The Basics Of Postal Reform PRIMEX ‘02 Conference February 7.
Mail Entry & Payment Technology 1 Release 40 Updates MTAC User Group 1 Thursday, January 15, 2015.
1 Update on Proposed Prices and Standards Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee Steve Kearney Vice President, Pricing & Classification Joe Moeller Manager,
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81 MTAC Report May 6, 2004.
PRESORT OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP February 6, PRESORT OPTIMIZATION Issue #11 WORK GROUP LEADERS Joe LubenowMarc McCrery Industry USPS.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRESENTATION August 2, 2007 Presented By Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
PRESORT OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP November 6, PRESORT OPTIMIZATION Issue #11 WORK GROUP LEADERS Joe LubenowMarc McCrery Industry USPS.
1 MTAC WG #175 Update for Northeast Area Focus Group May 4 th,
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION February 24, FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION Issue #81 MTAC February 24, 2005.
1 Shaping a More Efficient Future Pricing Change Effective Monday, May 14.
USPS 2017 Pricing Overview New York PCC - January 18, 2017.
Price Change 2017 January 2017.
… January 14 – 16, 2014 Wanda Senne NAAD Meeting, February 28, 2014
January 2017 Price Structure Considerations
Standard Mail Volume Profile
Panel 2: Flats Containerization
Price Change 2018 January 2018.
Price Change 2018 October 2017.
Periodicals Simplification Ideas February 23, 2017 Key Points
USPS Proposed Pricing Overview
Price Change 2019 January 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Product Redesign MTAC Update November 7, 2002

Workgroups Joint Meeting of Workgroups –Originally Planning For Early 2003 –Primarily Information Sharing –If Get CSRS Legislation Soon, Might Want to Adjust Timing and Content Packages/BPM –USPS Internal Information Gathering Underway –Reactivate Workgroups When Complete PRODUCT REDESIGN

Timing for Implementation of Ideas Ideas That Do Not Require Postal Rate Commission (PRC) Approval –Implement Near Term Small Cases/Experiments/Negotiated Service Agreements (NSAs) –Implement Prior to Omnibus Case Include in Regular Omnibus Rate Case –Dependent on Timing and Complexity of Omnibus Case Full Product Redesign Case Only –Major Changes PRODUCT REDESIGN

For AFSM-100 Compatible Standard Mail Flats Five-Digit Bundles Are Now: –Optional From Pieces –Required Only For 17 or More Pieces Have Received Some “Before & After” Data –Please send any additional data to Cheryl Beller Anita Pursley Will Coordinate Information Gathering on Extent of Use Implement Near Term - No PRC Approval Required PRODUCT REDESIGN A First Step Toward Flexible, Cost-Based Rates

Need Your Help to Learn About Effects Real Mailings, Not Simulated Mailings Make-up at 10-pieces & alternative minimum Constraints on Make-up other than 20 lbs. –Maximum Heights for Bundles in Sacks –Maximum Heights for Production Reasons See Postal Bulletin for Details on Information Needed PRODUCT REDESIGN

Mailer Suggestions Lead to Opportunity for Standard Parcels: Allow DDU entry of Standard Parcels at DBMC or DSCF rates –Improve Service Consistency for Customers –Postal Service Cost Savings Implement With Customer Support Ruling –Allow DBMC Rate With No Minimum –Allow DSCF Rate With 10 pounds for a 5-Digit Ruling Drafted, Internal Coordination Underway Expect to Implement in 2002 PRODUCT REDESIGN Implement Near Term - No PRC Approval Required

Co-palletization: Periodicals Flats Bundles For small volume mailings now origin- entered in sacks Additional incentives for bundles that are newly: –Co-palletized on ADC and SCF pallets and –Drop shipped to DADC or DSCF Settlement Discussions Going Well Small Cases/Experiments/NSAs - Before Omnibus Case PRODUCT REDESIGN

Parcel Select™ Return Service Low cost, no frills merchandise returns service – Capitalize on USPS operational savings Mailer or Consolidator Picks up Bulk Returns at DDU, DBMC, or “Origin” BMC – Allows providers to offer value added services – Credit returns – Redirect merchandise Planned Schedule: –File Fall 2002 (Fall Extends through December 20) –Implement Spring 2003 PRODUCT REDESIGN Small Cases/Experiments/NSAs - Before Omnibus Case

Simplified Preparation Option in Standard Mail Adjust Bundle Minimum At Least for 5-Digt Standard Flats Shape-Based First-Class Rates – Convert Lightweight Flats to Auto-Compatible Letters – Increase Flats Worksharing Incentives for Additional Work-Sharing for Standard Parcels Etc. PRODUCT REDESIGN Possibly Include in Omnibus Case

Until Legislation Passed, Omnibus Rate-Case Preparation Will Continue to Take Priority With Legislation, Major Opportunity for Earlier Benefits from Redesign Ideas One Major Redesign Case or Several “Medium-Size” Cases? Need to Work Through Many “Details” Before Decisions Can Be Made – Internally – Redesign Steering Committee PRODUCT REDESIGN Implications of CSRS Legislation for Redesign