Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: 2015-11-09 Slide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SubmissionSlide 1 Proposed Addition to Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Avinash JainQualcommSan Diego858.
Advertisements

A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links
mmWave MIMO Link Budget Estimation for Indoor Environment
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0069r0 January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 MIMO option for NG60 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE / 0431 r0 March 2015 Dmitry Cherniavsky, SiBEAM, Inc.Slide 1 Shared MIMO Architecture for ay. Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0340r1 March 2015 Alecsander Eitan, QualcommSlide 1 SC LOS/NLOS Channel Measurements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.
July 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 July 2015
Submission doc.: IEEE /0808 July 2015 Songnam Hong, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency-independent Digital Precoder for Hybrid MIMO Precoding Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0 Slide 1 Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN Date: Authors: Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR.
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0323r1 Submission March 2009 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 TGad Channel Model Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0627r0 May 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Models for System Level Simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0090r0 SubmissionMartin Jacob, TU Braunschweig January 2010 Slide 1 Modeling the Dynamical Human Blockage for 60 GHz WLAN Channel.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0627r0 May 2015 Hakan Persson, EricssonSlide 1 Beam Selection for Hybrid MIMO Precoding Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0336r0 Submission March 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Conference Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems - Summary.
Submission doc.: /1320r00 Bo, Sun (ZTE Corp), et al Slide 1 11aj 45GHz Link Budget for use cases discussion Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Efficient Beam Selection for Hybrid Beamforming
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: d Stochastic Channel Model for Wireless Data Center Submission Match 2015 Bile Peng (TU Braunschweig). Slide 1 Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
November 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 November 2015
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r0 January 2010 R. Kudo, K. Ishihara and Y. Takatori (NTT) Slide 1 Measured Channel Variation.
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1347r0 November 2015 Filippo Tosato, ToshibaSlide 1 Strategies to reduce MIMO feedback overhead Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 1 Outdoor Stadium Simulation Details Discussion Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2008 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1314r2 November 2015 Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 I/Q Imbalance Impact to TGax OFDMA Uplink Reception Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0112r2 Submission January, 2010 Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 1 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel.
Submission Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRISlide 1 May 2009 doc.:IEEE /0543r0 Measured Channel Capacity and AoD Estimation for Multi-User MIMO Scenarios.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Nov 2014 Link Budget Analysis for 40-50GHz Indoor Usage Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan Liu, Mediatek Inc.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission November 2009 I. Siaud, Orange LabsSlide 1 Path Loss Models for TGad Channel Models: Antenna and Dispersion Impact.
Submission Greg Breit, Qualcomm, et al. June 2009 doc.:IEEE /0699r0 Slide 1 Multi-User AoD Diversity Measurements Date: Authors:
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
Doc.: IEEE /0664r0 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Low Complexity Beamtraining for Hybrid MIMO Date: Slide 1 March 2016 Authors: Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix.
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2009
TGad Channel Model Update
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Simultaneous Beam Training
Joint Processing MU-MIMO
Initial Distributed MU-MIMO Simulations
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
January, 2010 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60GHz (Part 3)] Date: Authors: Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku University.
Proposed Addition to Evaluation Methodology
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
Presentation transcript:

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide 1 Authors:

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Abstract This presentation investigates the feasibility of SU-MIMO using array alignment method based on the channel models adopted in ad. A simulation methodology is proposed for evaluating the performance of SU-MIMO in an ay environment. The condition number of the MIMO channel, the achievable capacity, and the distribution of the capacity are investigated. The effect of antenna array separation and link distance is considered. Slide 2

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 3 Methodology for SU-MIMO Analysis The channel models developed for ad [1] are utilized to generate channel impulse responses between the phased antenna arrays (PAAs). Independent channel impulse responses are generated for each TX and RX PAA link. It is assumed the rays departing or arriving from the backside of the devices are blocked. The array responses of TX and RX PAAs are calculated using the angle-of-arrival (AoA) and angle-of-departure (AoD) of the rays. After applying phase vectors for each PAA, the channel impulse response is calculated and the performance metrics are determined. Performance metrics: 1.Channel capacity 2.Condition number 3.Received signal strength indicator (RSSI)

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 4 Array Alignment Method For the array alignment method, the boresights of each pair of TX PAA and RX PAA are aligned with each other. It is achieved by adjusting the phase of each antenna element [1]. RX PPA 2 RX PPA 1 RX TX PPA 2 TX PPA 1 TX x z y Boresight Isotropic antenna element Boresight

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 5 Simulation Setup for STA-STA Scenario d: Antenna (Array) Distance D: Link Distance

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 6 Result: RSSI & Condition Number in LOS The RSSI results follow the measurement results provided in reference [2]. Low condition number is achievable in a LOS condition if there is a sufficient amount of isolation between the links. This is enabled through high gain beamforming. Low condition number may also be achieved in a LOS condition if the channel vectors are configured or designed to be orthogonal. Channel vectors are orthogonal Isolated links

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 7 Result: Channel Capacity in LOS

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 8 Result: Condition Number in LOS+NLOS The average RSSI and average condition number are calculated based on the wideband response. For each link distance, the averaged results are provided over 500 realizations. The impact of NLOS components on the condition number seems negligible due to the heavy beamforming on the LOS component. Scenario: Conference room Subscenario: STA-STA

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 9 Simulation Setup for STA-AP Scenario AP STA d: STA Antenna (Array) Distance d AP : AP Antenna (Array) Distance D: (Horizontal) Link Distance x y z

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 10 Result: Channel Capacity in LOS More LessIsolation

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 11 Distribution of the Capacity in LOS Fixed location and orientation 2x8 PPA 2 2x8 PPA 1 RX Directions of PAAs at STA 2x8 PPA 2 2x8 PPA 1 TX Directions of PAAs at AP Scenario: Conference room Subscenario: STA-AP Random location and orientation

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 12 Result: Distribution of the Capacity It is more likely to have better SU-MIMO performance when the links are not isolated. This is due to the fact that the receiver can exploit the energy from the interfering link if the condition number is low. Isolated links Isolated links

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Summary In this study, we analyze the feasibility of SU-MIMO under the strategy of array alignment method. Given the PAA configuration presented, when the links are isolated by decreasing the link distance or increasing the distance between PAAs at TX and RX, the condition number gets closer to 1. When the arrays are aligned with each other, the links may not be isolated. In this case, the condition number of the MIMO channel fluctuates depending on the link distance and the physical separation of the PAAs at TX and RX. When the links are not isolated AND the condition number is close to 1, the SU-MIMO channel capacity can be achieved. Slide 13

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Slide 14 References 1.A. Maltsev, et al, “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems,” IEEE doc /0334r8. 2.A. Maltsev, et al, “Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU- MIMO,” IEEE doc /0632r1. 3.G. Venkatesan, et al, “TGay Evaluation Methodology,” IEEE doc /0866.

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Appendix Slide 15

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Channel Model (1/2) Slide

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Channel Model (2/2) Slide 17 x z y d x d y Antenna element