3/16/2016rd1 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 13  Replacement Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 15 Replacement Decisions Replacement Analysis Fundamentals Economic Service Life Replacement Analysis.
Advertisements

Chapter 12 - Replacement Click here for Streaming Audio To Accompany Presentation (optional) Click here for Streaming Audio To Accompany Presentation (optional)
Impact of Taxes on Replacement Decisions
Chapter 9: Replacement Analysis
Engineering Economics in Canada
CHAPTER 9 REPLACEMENT ANALYSIS.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 11-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Asst. Prof. Dr. Mahmut Ali GÖKÇE, Izmir University of Economics Spring, 2007 (c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Replacement.
ENGM 401 & 620 –X1 Fundamentals of Engineering Finance Fall 2010 Lecture 26: Other Analysis Techniques If you work just for money, you'll never make it,
INFO 630 Evaluation of Information Systems Prof. Glenn Booker Week 8 – Chapters INFO630 Week 8.
MIE Class #6 Manufacturing & Engineering Economics Concerns and Questions Concerns and Questions Quick Recap of Previous Class Quick Recap of Previous.
ENGG 401 X2 Fundamentals of Engineering Management Spring 2008 Chapter 7: Other Analysis Techniques Dave Ludwick Dept. of Mechanical Engineering University.
Lecture No. 47 Chapter 14 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5th edition, © 2010.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
Chapter 5 Present Worth Analysis
Chap 10 Depreciation is a decline in market or asset value of physical properties caused by deterioration or obsolescence. It represents a legal loss of.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Replacement Analysis Fundamentals Lecture No. 56 Chapter 14 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
Depreciation October 1, Observation: most things lose value over time… …though a few things do not…
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Generalized Cash Flow Approach – Lease versus Buy Lecture No. 42 Chapter 10 Contemporary Engineering.
Chapter 11 Replacement Decisions
COMPARING ALTERNATIVES
Engineering Economy IEN255 Chapter 10 - Replacement Analysis  4-6 best investment alternative  How to add profit  but what about not increasing sales,
Chapter 15 Replacement Decisions
Machine Replacement or Retention Pertemuan 21 s.d 22 Matakuliah: D 0094 Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2007.
Project 2 Team #13: Replacement Options. Team #13 Members Summarizer - Eddie Robles Organizer- Arin Saghatelian Technical- Sumeet Kals.
Chapter 11 Replacement Analysis.
CHAPTER 9 Replacement Analysis.
Engineering Economy: Eide (chapter 13) & Chase (pages )
DEPRECIATION-AFTER/BEFORE TAX RATE OF RETURN Exercise:An automobile manufacturer is buying some special tools for $. The corporation will pay
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill All Rights Reserved 11-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 11 Replacement.
ENGM 661 Engineering Economics Replacement Analysis.
1 CHAPTER M6 Making Decisions Using Relevant Information © 2007 Pearson Custom Publishing.
Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fourteenth Edition By William.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Replacement Analysis with Tax Consideration.
Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives & Capital Budgetting Ref: Chapter 5 & section 10.4.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Replacement Analysis Fundamentals.
1 Reviewing Complex Flow Perpetuity If there is a mix of recurring and non-recurring or one-time cash flows that must be capitalized for perpetuity: 1.)
Lecture No.20 Chapter 6 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
1 Modeling Economic Life… Total EAC = EAC of Ownership + EAC of Operation Objective is to determine the optimum number of years to own an asset that minimizes.
1 Replacement and Economic Service Life Replacement Analysis When to replace an asset, and what to replace it with? Outsider’s Perspective… What would.
1 Replacement Decisions How should an asset be replaced? If an asset can be overhauled and used a little longer, should those funds be invested in the.
Cost/Benefit Analysis Review Cost/Benefit can done using NPW or EAW, pick one! (choose whichever method is easiest for the problem statement) Criteria:
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Generalized Cash Flow Approach –
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Replacement Decisions Lecture No.
1 Reviewing Complex Flow Perpetuity If there is a mix of recurring and non-recurring or one-time cash flows that must be capitalized for perpetuity: 1.)
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 11-1 Developed.
Lecture No. 46 Chapter 14 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5th edition, © 2010.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Applying Annual Worth Analysis Lecture.
12/13/2015rd1 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 11  Depreciation.
Ch 10-1 © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ Ostwald and McLaren / Cost Analysis and Estimating.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 When Projects Require Only Operating and Investing Activities Lecture No. 39 Chapter 10 Contemporary.
What is this course about?
Project cash flow n A B Example 1: Consider the following two mutually exclusive investment projects. Assume.
Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 Replacement Analysis Course Outline 10.
2/20/2016rd1 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 8  Incremental Analysis.
2/27/2016rd1 Present Worth Analysis 1. Mutually Exclusive at MARR of 7% A B First cost$1500$1600 Salvage value Life (years) 5 5 PW A =
1 Replacement Decision Models Lecture No. 28 Chapter 11 Fundamentals of Engineering Economics Copyright © 2008.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
Comparing Economic Alternatives Using time value of money to choose between two or more options.
Replacement Analysis and Economic Life Should we replace an asset that we own now or later?
Comparison of alternatives
Replacement Analysis Lecture No. 46 Chapter 14
Applying Annual Worth Analysis
Engineering Economics
Engineering Economy: Replacement Study
Chapter 9: Replacement Analysis
REPLACEMENT DECISIONS
Cost/Benefit Analysis Review
OUTLINE QUESTIONS? NEWS? REMINDERS: EVALUATIONS
Engineering Economics
Presentation transcript:

3/16/2016rd1 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 13  Replacement Analysis

3/16/2016rd2 … from the Deacon/s Masterpiece by Oliver Wendell Holmes … Now in building of chaises, I tell you what,- There is always somewhere a weakest spot,—- In hub, tire, felloe, in spring or thill,- In panel, or crossbar, or floor, or sill,- In screw, bolt, thoroughbrace,—lurking still,- Find it somewhere, you must and will,—- Above or below, or within or without,—- And that's the reason, beyond a doubt,- A chaise breaks down, but doesn't wear out. You see, of course, if you 're not a dunce, How it went to pieces all at once,-- All at once, and nothing first,-- Just as bubbles do when they burst. -

3/16/2016rd3 Reasons for Replacement Analysis Physical Impairment (Deterioration) Altered Requirements (Obsolescence) Technology (Obsolescence Financing (taxes, lease versus buy) Replacement study is designed to decide to retain or to replace now. If to replace, then done. If not, then revisit annually.

3/16/2016rd4 Types of Lives Economic life – resulting in minimum equivalent uniform annual cost (EUAC) Ownership life – date of acquisition and date of abandonment or replacement Physical life – original acquisition to disposal Useful life – time an asset is kept in productive services

3/16/2016rd5 Replacement Factors Recognition and acceptance of past errors unable to see future, bad estimates Sunk costs (forget the past, and the book value) Use existing asset value and outsider viewpoint Economic life of best challenge Remaining economic life of defender Income tax considerations (sunk cost relevant here)

Replacement Assumptions Infinite Horizon (repeatability) No technological change Do Nothing option is not feasible (or Keep defender is the do nothing option) Economic life of asset is the age at which costs are minimized. 3/16/2016rd6

3/16/2016rd7 Identify Participants of Comparison De fender Marginal Cost Increasing Defender Marginal Cost Data Find lowest EUAC for Defender no Find EUAC over Given Life yes AT# 1 Compare next year marginal cost with C-EUAC AT# 2 Compare lowest D-EUAC with C-EUAC at min cost life Lacking defender data, compare D-EUAC over life with C-EUAC at minimum cost life Available Not available Defender Best Challenger

Annualize the Costs Find the annual cost for the cash flow below. n cf-15M-500K-825K 7.68M & -1.36M 3/16/2016rd8 $15M $500K 825K 1.36M $7.68M

Economic Life You bought a car for $3K. Determine economic life at 12%. Year Annual Expenses Market Value Loss in Market Value Loss in interest Total Marginal costs Find EUAC of Total Marginal Costs. (EUAC '( ) 12) 3/16/2016rd9

Problem First cost = $1050K; Salvage value = $225K at any time; O&M = $235K with $75K gradient. MARR = 10%. Find economic service life. nCRO&MCR+O&MEUAC *** /16/2016rd10

3/16/2016rd11 Example Defender has AOC of $60K per year, a life of 5 years with zero salvage. Present market value is $30K. Challenger costs $120K with AOC of $30K and a salvage after 5 years of $50K. Use before tax MARR of 20%. AT#3 PW D (20%) = -30K – 60K(P/A, 20%, 5) = -$209, PW C (20%) = -120K - 30K(P/A, 20%, 5) + 50K(P/F, 20%, 5) = -$189, Choose the challenger.

Example Defender bought 3 years ago for $120K with expected life of 10 years and $25K salvage value with AOC of $30K. Current book value is $80K and current life is 3 years. Challenger available for $100K with trade-in of $70K for defender. Useful life is 10 years, salvage value is $20K and ASOC is $20K. Market value for defender is $70K. DefenderChallenger First cost$70K$100K AOC 30K 20K Salvage 10K 20K Life (years) /16/2016rd12

3/16/2016rd13 Example First cost (sunk 5 years)$12,500 DepreciationStraight Line (salvage = $2,500) Market Value$8,000 Useful Life10 years Annual Operating Cost$3,000 Annual Benefit$4,500 Market Value after life$1,500 Combined tax rate34% n BTCFDep TITax Rate (34%)ATCF 0 8K $7830 (sell) 0 -8K $7830 (keep) Cost Basis = 12, * (12,500 –2500) / 10 = $7500 $8000 – 7500 = $500 (depreciation recapture)

3/16/2016rd14 Example 13-1 $7500(A/P) $900(A/G) $500+$400(A/G, 8%, n) n CRWR Maint Operating Total EUAC

3/16/2016rd15 Example 13-1

3/16/2016rd16 Marginal Costs Challenger First Cost = $25K; Annual O&M = $2K with -$500 gradient; Annual Risk $5K for 3 yrs; then Gradient Market value ($ )K from 1 to 7 years; MARR = 15% n Lost MarketLost InterestO&MRiskTotal MC EUAC 1$7K 0.15*25K=$3750 $2.0K$5.0K$17,750 17, K K 5.0K 15,200 16, K K 5.0K 13,950 15, K K 6.5K 14,350 15, K K 8.0K 14,900 15,427 *** 6 1K K 9.5K 15,600 15, K K 11.0K 16,950 15,582 (AGP (List-pgf '( ) 15) 15 7)  $15, (EUAC cash-flow 15)

3/16/2016rd17 Example 13-3 Defender's Market value= $15K; Annual O&M = $10K with a $1500 gradient; Market value ($ )K from 1 to 5 years; MARR = 15% n Lost MarketLost Interest O&MTotal Marginal Cost 1$1K 0.15*15K=$2250 $10.0K$13, K K 14, K K 15,950 > $15,427 ** 4 1K K 17, K K 18,650 Note that the marginal costs are increasing each year => AT #1

Problem 13-4 Maintenance costs are expected to be higher. Fully depreciated and other factors irrelevant. Cost this year is expected to be $800. AT#1 one year, 3/16/2016rd18

3/16/2016rd19 Problem First cost = $1050K; Salvage value = $225K at any time O&M = $235K with $75K gradient. MARR = 10%. Find economic service life. nCRO&MEO&MEUAC 1$930K235K235K1165K K310K270.71K K K385K305.24K659K K460K338.59K K K535K370.76K K *** K610K401.77K K CR = (P – S)(A/P, i%, n) + Si 3/16/2016rd19

3/16/2016rd20 nOperating Cost MaintMVLost MV Lost int Total Marginal Cost NPWEUAC 0120K 115K 9K85K35K24K83K K10K65K20K17K62K K12K50K15K13K57K K18K40K10K 58K K20K35K 5K 8K58K K25K30K 5K 7K67K K30K25K 5K 6K76K Big-J Construction Problem MARR = 20%

Problem MARR = 10% YearD-MC D-EUAC C-EUAC 1$2500 $ $ *** *** a)What is the lowest EUAC of the defender? $ b)What is minimum cost life of challenger? $2600 c)When should defender be replaced with challenger? Never 3/16/2016rd21

Problem n MCD-DEUAC-C MARR = 10% 1 $3000$ (EUAC '( ) 10)  Shouldn't replace Defender at all, but had year 1 for D > 3300 etc., replace then/now. 3/16/2016rd22

3/16/2016rd23 Problem Old forklift MARR = 8% AT#1 n Maint Cost /year YearBTCF Depc TI Tax 40% ATCF $160-$240 Challenger YearBTCF Depc TI Tax 40% ATCF $ $ EUAC = 6500(A/P, 8%, 10) – 230 = $ – $230 = $ => keep old forklift for another year.

Example The economic service life given current market value of asset is $15K and expected cash flows shown below and MARR at 10% is YearSalvage ValueO&M Cost 1 $10K$50K 2 8K 53K 3 5K 60K 4 0K 68K a) i year b) 2 years c) 3 years d) 4 years EUAC 1 = (15 – 10)K(A/P, 10%, 1) + 10K* K = $56.50K EUAC 2 = (15 – 8)K (A/P, 10%, 2) + 8K* K = 56.36K *** EUAC 3 = (15 – 5)K (A/P, 10%, 3) + 5K* K = 58.54K 3/16/2016rd24

Example When should the defender be replaced? a) now b) 1 year from now c) 2 years from nowd) 3 years from now 3/16/2016rd25 YearAW-D CostAW-C Cost 1$24K$31K 2 25K 28K 3 26K 25K 4 27K 25.9K 5 28K 27.5K

Economic Life Asset bought at $8K at 8% cost of money. n Aexpense 3K3K3.5K4K4.5K5.52K MV Loss in MV Loss in Int Total Margin (EUAC '( ) 8) $ years 3/16/2016rd26

PW of ATCF Present Worth of After Tax data, find economic life of each and when to replace defender. YearDefenderChallenger (mapcar #' AGP '( ) (list-of 5 12) (upto 5))  ( ) (mapcar #' AGP '( ) (list-of 3 12)(upto 3)) /16/2016rd27