MODIS, AIRS, and Midlevel Cloud Phase Shaima Nasiri CIMSS/SSEC, UW-Madison Brian Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory MURI Hyperspectral Workshop 7-9 June, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
Advertisements

Upgrades to the MODIS near-IR Water Vapor Algorithm and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithm For Collection 6 Bo-Cai Gao & Rong-Rong Li Remote Sensing Division,
 nm)  nm) PurposeSpatial Resolution (km) Ozone, SO 2, UV8 3251Ozone8 3403Aerosols, UV, and Volcanic Ash8 3883Aerosols, Clouds, UV and Volcanic.
Volcanic ash and aerosol detection versus dust detection using GOES and MODIS imagery Bernadette Connell Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere.
MODIS/AIRS Workshop MODIS Level 2 Cloud Product 6 April 2006 Kathleen Strabala Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of.
3D Radiative Transfer in Cloudy Atmospheres: Diffusion Approximation and Monte Carlo Simulation for Thermal Emission K. N. Liou, Y. Chen, and Y. Gu Department.
1 An initial CALIPSO cloud climatology ISCCP Anniversary, July 2008, New York Dave Winker NASA LaRC.
1 A First Look at Mid-Level Clouds Using CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS Data Stanley Q. Kidder, J. Adam Kankiewicz, Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute.
MOD06 Cloud Top Properties Richard Frey Paul Menzel Bryan Baum University of Wisconsin - Madison.
16/06/20151 Validating the AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature and Height product using weather radar data COST 722 Expert Meeting Sauli Joro.
CoRP Symposium, 10-11August 2010, Fort Collins, CO 1 A daytime multispectral technique for detecting supercooled liquid water- topped mixed-phase clouds.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
1 NASA Ames Research Center Natural pollution events and their role in ice cloud formation Michal Segal-Rosenheimer, Patrick Hamill, S. Ramachandran ISSCP.
University of Wisconsin - Madison (UW) University of Hawaii (UH) Texas A& M (TAMU) University of Colorado at Boulder (CU) University of Alabama in Huntsville.
MODIS/AIRS Workshop MODIS Level 2 Products 5 April 2006 Kathleen Strabala Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison.
University of Wisconsin - Madison (UW) University of Hawaii (UH) Texas A& M (TAMU) University of Colorado at Boulder (CU) University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
CloudNet: TARA status and database H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
High Spectral Resolution Infrared Land Surface Modeling & Retrieval for MURI 28 April 2004 MURI Workshop Madison, WI Bob Knuteson UW-Madison CIMSS.
DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University Annual Review April 17-19, Development of Satellite Products for the.
New Products from combined MODIS/AIRS Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Allen Huang, Xuebao Wu, and Liam Gumley Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
Hyperspectral Data Applications: Convection & Turbulence Overview: Application Research for MURI Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence Convective Initiation.
Estimation of Cloud and Precipitation From Warm Clouds in Support of the ABI: A Pre-launch Study with A-Train Zhanqing Li, R. Chen, R. Kuligowski, R. Ferraro,
Cloud Top Properties Bryan A. Baum NASA Langley Research Center Paul Menzel NOAA Richard Frey, Hong Zhang CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison MODIS Science.
Hank Revercomb, David C. Tobin, Robert O. Knuteson, Fred A. Best, Daniel D. LaPorte, Steven Dutcher, Scott D. Ellington, Mark W.Werner, Ralph G. Dedecker,
1 Optimal Channel Selection. 2 Redundancy “Information Content” vs. “On the diagnosis of the strength of the measurements in an observing system through.
WATER VAPOR RETRIEVAL OVER CLOUD COVER AREA ON LAND Dabin Ji, Jiancheng Shi, Shenglei Zhang Institute for Remote Sensing Applications Chinese Academy of.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Vertical Structure of the Atmosphere within Clouds Revealed by COSMIC Data Xiaolei Zou, Li Lin Florida State University Rick Anthes, Bill Kuo, UCAR Fourth.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
CBH statistics for the Provisional Review Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller and Dan Lindsey CIRA/Colorado State University 12/27/2013.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
INFRARED-DERIVED ATMOSPHERIC PROPERTY VALIDATION W. Feltz, T. Schmit, J. Nelson, S. Wetzel-Seeman, J. Mecikalski and J. Hawkinson 3 rd Annual MURI Workshop.
Cloud optical properties: modeling and sensitivity study Ping Yang Texas A&M University May 28,2003 Madison, Wisconsin.
Modeling GOES-R µm brightness temperature differences above cold thunderstorm tops Introduction As the time for the launch of GOES-R approaches,
1 CIMSS/SSEC Effort on the Fast IR Cloudy Forward Model Development A Fast Parameterized Single Layer Infrared Cloudy Forward Model Status and Features.
1 N. Christina Hsu, Deputy NPP Project Scientist Recent Update on MODIS C6 Deep Blue Aerosol Products and Beyond N. Christina Hsu, Corey Bettenhausen,
Preparing for GOES-R: old tools with new perspectives Bernadette Connell, CIRA CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA ABSTRACT Creating.
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
BBHRP Assessment Part 2: Cirrus Radiative Flux Study Using Radar/Lidar/AERI Derived Cloud Properties David Tobin, Lori Borg, David Turner, Robert Holz,
Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.
Using MODIS and AIRS for cloud property characterization Jun W. Paul Menzel #, Steve Chian-Yi and Institute.
R = Channel 02 (VIS0.8) G = Channel 04r (IR3.9, solar component) B = Channel 09 (IR10.8) Day Microphysics RGB devised by: D. Rosenfeld Applications: Applications:Cloud.
Bryan A. Baum, Richard Frey, Robert Holz Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Paul Menzel NOAA Many other colleagues MODIS.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
Clouds Ice cloud detection using the 8.7  m channel: areas of ice clouds (in particular thin cirrus) are red (positive difference), clear ground and water.
Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
May 15, 2002MURI Hyperspectral Workshop1 Cloud and Aerosol Products From GIFTS/IOMI Gary Jedlovec and Sundar Christopher NASA Global Hydrology and Climate.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.
Properties of Tropical Ice Clouds: Analyses Based on Terra/Aqua Measurements P. Yang, G. Hong, K. Meyer, G. North, A. Dessler Texas A&M University B.-C.
A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017, Pasadena, CA
Cloud Property Retrievals over the Arctic from the NASA A-Train Satellites Aqua, CloudSat and CALIPSO Douglas Spangenberg1, Patrick Minnis2, Michele L.
Winds in the Polar Regions from MODIS: Atmospheric Considerations
Hyperspectral IR Clear/Cloudy
AIRS Sounding and Cloud Property Study
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
Hyperspectral Cloud Top Retrievals
Cesar Manuel Salazar Aquino Joan Manuel Castro Sánchez
Hyperspectral Cloud Boundary Retrievals
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
MODIS Airborne Simulator (MAS),
Presentation transcript:

MODIS, AIRS, and Midlevel Cloud Phase Shaima Nasiri CIMSS/SSEC, UW-Madison Brian Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory MURI Hyperspectral Workshop 7-9 June, 2005 UW-Madison

Outline Introduce midlevel/potentially mixed phase clouds MODIS IR phase retrievals for midlevel clouds Frequency of midlevel clouds Radiative transfer calculations for MODIS and AIRS for a variety of cloud heights

Midlevel Clouds Definition: Clouds occurring at a level (height) where water cloud, ice clouds, or mixed-phase clouds could occur (potentially mixed-phase clouds). Typically between 253 and 263 K Cloud height depends on latitude and season ~6 km in midlatitudes ~1 km in polar regions (“midlevel” clouds a misnomer here)

ARM M-PACE: 12 October, 2004 False color cloud phase image: R = 0.65 µm Ref., G = 2.1 µm Ref., B = 11 µm BT 2200 UTC Aqua MODIS False Color Phase Image Barrow N. Alaska Proteus flight track

ARM M-PACE: 12 October, 2004 False color cloud phase image: R = 0.65 µm Ref., G = 2.1 µm Ref., B = 11 µm BT 2200 UTC Aqua MODIS False Color Phase Image Barrow N. Alaska Uniform Cloud Slightly Broken Cloud Ice

ARM M-PACE: 12 October, 2004 MODIS Band 31: 11 µm BT (K) 2200 UTC Aqua MODIS 11 µm Brightness Temperature Uniform Cloud Slightly Broken Cloud Ice

ARM M-PACE: 12 October, 2004 MODIS IR Cloud Phase at 1 km 2200 UTC Aqua MODIS Infrared Cloud Phase Retrieval Uniform Cloud Slightly Broken Cloud Ice

ARM M-PACE: 12 October, 2004 MODIS IR Cloud Phase at 1 km 2200 UTC Aqua MODIS Infrared Cloud Phase Retrieval Scene is “unknown” because BT[11 µm] is between 253 and 263 K, and BTD[ µm] is between -1.0 and 0.25 K

ARM M-PACE: 12 October, 2004 What are we looking at? Lidar shows water cloud with ice precipitating MODIS 11 µm brightness temperature is around 258 and 259 K Aqua MODIS 2200 UTC 11 µm Brightness Temp. AHSRL Circular Depolarization Ratio (%) Barrow N. Alaska

ARM M-PACE: 12 October, 2004 Lidar shows water cloud with ice precipitating MODIS IR phase classifies scene as “Unknown” Aqua MODIS 2200 UTC IR Phase AHSRL Circular Depolarization Ratio (%)

ARM M-PACE: 12 October, 2004 Lidar shows water cloud with ice precipitating MODIS IR phase classifies scene as “Unknown” AHSRL Circular Depolarization Ratio (%) Question remains: What is the infrared cloud phase?

12 October Averaged S-HIS spectra with averaged MODIS observations overlaid MODIS Band 32 MODIS Band 31 MODIS Band 29

Modeling Beginning set of modeling studies to characterize HSR IR cloud sensitivities for the M-PACE case Simulations using LBLDIS MODIS 12 µm MODIS 11 µm MODIS 8.5 µm Still need to simulate mixed-phase and overlapping cloud cases

How much of a problem are these potentially mixed phase clouds? Unable to answer the question directly, but we can look at frequency of MODIS IR phase retrievals of ice, water, unknown. Consider 8 days (and nights) of global Aqua MODIS data from 1-8 April 2003.

Aqua MODIS 1-8 April, 2003 Water Clouds Cloudy pixels classified as liquid water using IR MODIS channels Between 60 S and 60 N, Water Cloud Frequency: 52%

Ice Clouds Cloudy pixels classified as ice using IR MODIS channels Aqua MODIS 1-8 April, 2003 Between 60 S and 60 N, Ice Cloud Frequency: 28%

Aqua MODIS 1-8 April, 2003 Unknown Clouds Cloudy pixels classified as unknown phase using IR MODIS channels Scale is from 0 to 0.5 Between 60 S and 60 N, Unknown Cloud Frequency: 14%

Aqua MODIS 1-8 April, 2003 Mixed Phase Clouds Cloudy pixels classified as mixed phase using IR MODIS channels (mixed phase should be considered another flavor of unknown) Scale is from 0 to 0.5 Between 60 S and 60 N, Mixed Cloud Frequency: 6%

Zonal frequencies of cloud phase (frequency out of all cloudy data) Mean cloud phase frequencies between 60°S and 60°N Water: 52 % Ice: 28 % Unknown: 14 % Mixed (Unknown): 6 % Aqua MODIS 1-8 April, 2003 Sum of curves = 1 20% 10%

Mean cloud phase frequencies between 60°S and 60°N Water: 35 % Ice: 18 % Unknown: 9 % Mixed (Unknown): 4 % Zonal frequencies of cloud phase (frequency out of all data) Aqua MODIS 1-8 April, 2003 Sum of curves = Frequency of cloudiness

Mid-talk Summary ~20% of MODIS IR cloud retrievals are classified as “unknown” Because of the IR phase algorithm, these unknown classifications are likely due to midlevel or potentially mixed-phase clouds

The Question Can hyperspectral IR data improve our characterization of midlevel/potentially mixed phase clouds?

Brightness Temperature Differences for Water and Ice Clouds Optical thickness at 11 µm MODIS sims from DISORTAIRS sims from CHARTS Midlatitude winter atmospheric profile

Brightness Temperature Differences for Water and Ice Clouds Optical thickness at 11 µm MODIS sims from DISORTAIRS sims from CHARTS 9 km, T = 226 K 7 km, T = 238 K 3 km, T = 262 K 2 km, T = 265 K 1 km, T = 269 K

Brightness Temperature Differences for Water and Ice Clouds Optical thickness at 11 µm MODIS sims from DISORTAIRS sims from CHARTS  = 1 K

Brightness Temperature Differences for Midlevel Water and Ice Clouds Optical thickness at 11 µm MODIS sims from DISORTAIRS sims from CHARTS Z3_water

Brightness Temperature Differences for Midlevel Water and Ice Clouds Optical thickness at 11 µm MODIS sims from DISORTAIRS sims from CHARTS  = 0.5 K

Brightness Temperature Differences for Midlevel Water and Ice Clouds Optical thickness at 11 µm MODIS sims from DISORTAIRS sims from CHARTS AIRS Sims show little sensitivity to water cloud height

Summary ~20% of MODIS IR cloud retrievals are classified as “unknown” Because of the IR phase algorithm, these unknown classifications are likely due to midlevel or potentially mixed-phase clouds Simulations shows that hyperspectral IR data can potentially differentiate between ice and water in midlevels ( 

Future Plans Continue simulations for More atmospheric profiles Overlapping clouds (cirrus over water) Mixed-phase clouds Consider different channel combinations Apply what we learn from simulations to S-HIS and AIRS data from M-PACE Consider combined hyperspectral and MODIS phase algorithm