Geometric Uncertainty in Truss Systems: An Interval Approach Rafi L. Muhanna and Ayse Erdolen Georgia Institute of Technology NSF Workshop on Modeling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite Element Method CHAPTER 4: FEM FOR TRUSSES
Advertisements

MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
AERSP 301 Finite Element Method
Modeling of Neo-Hookean Materials using FEM
Reliable Dynamic Analysis of Structures Using Imprecise Probability Mehdi Modares and Joshua Bergerson DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL AND EVIRONMENTAL.
Point-wise Discretization Errors in Boundary Element Method for Elasticity Problem Bart F. Zalewski Case Western Reserve University Robert L. Mullen Case.
Beams and Frames.
Erdem Acar Sunil Kumar Richard J. Pippy Nam Ho Kim Raphael T. Haftka
LECTURE SERIES on STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION Thanh X. Nguyen Structural Mechanics Division National University of Civil Engineering
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
Physics Based Modeling II Deformable Bodies Lecture 2 Kwang Hee Ko Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Basic FEA Concepts. FEA Project Outline Consider the physics of the situation. Devise a mathematical model. Obtain approximate results for subsequent.
FE analysis with bar elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
MECh300H Introduction to Finite Element Methods Finite Element Analysis (F.E.A.) of 1-D Problems – Applications.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements Numerical Integration in 1D Prof. Suvranu De.
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
One-Dimensional Problems
INTRODUCTION INTO FINITE ELEMENT NONLINEAR ANALYSES
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
ANALYSIS OF STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN ROOTS OF BOLT THREADS Gennady Aryassov, Andres Petritshenko Tallinn University of Technology Department of Mechatronics.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
Interval-based Inverse Problems with Uncertainties Francesco Fedele 1,2 and Rafi L. Muhanna 1 1 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2 School.
Finite Element: Theory, Applications & Implementation Presented By: Arthur Anconetani Barbara Gault Ryan Whitney.
The Finite Element Method
Outline Lesson 1. Introduction to ANSYS Lesson 2. Basics Lesson 3. Solution phases Lesson 4. Modeling Lesson 5. Material Lesson 6. Loading Lesson 7. Solution.
General Procedure for Finite Element Method FEM is based on Direct Stiffness approach or Displacement approach. A broad procedural outline is listed.
ME 475 Computer Aided Design of Structures Finite Element Analysis of Trusses – Part 1 Ron Averill Michigan State University.
Dr.M.V.Rama Rao Department of Civil Engineering,
ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis
3 RD NSF Workshop on Imprecise Probability in Engineering Analysis & Design February 20-22, 2008 | Georgia Institute of Technology, Savannah, USA On using.
An introduction to the finite element method using MATLAB
6-Bar Elements in 2-D Space Dr. Ahmet Zafer Şenalp Mechanical Engineering Department Gebze Technical.
Penalty-Based Solution for the Interval Finite Element Methods Rafi L. Muhanna Georgia Institute of Technology Robert L. Mullen Case Western Reserve University.
Eng Ship Structures 1 Matrix Analysis Using MATLAB Example.
1 20-Oct-15 Last course Lecture plan and policies What is FEM? Brief history of the FEM Example of applications Discretization Example of FEM softwares.
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
MECH593 Finite Element Methods
Chapter 4 Axial Load. Saint -Venant's Principle Saint-Venant's Principle claims that localized effects caused by any load acting on a body will dissipate.
11/11/20151 Trusses. 11/11/20152 Element Formulation by Virtual Work u Use virtual work to derive element stiffness matrix based on assumed displacements.
THE ANALYSIS OF BEAMS & FRAMES
Last course Bar structure Equations from the theory of elasticity
Illustration of FE algorithm on the example of 1D problem Problem: Stress and displacement analysis of a one-dimensional bar, loaded only by its own weight,
Nonlinear Interval Finite Elements for Structural Mechanics Problems Rafi Muhanna School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology,
BAR ELEMENT IN 2D (TRUSS, LINK)
MECH4450 Introduction to Finite Element Methods
Principles of Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Second Edition 2004 ISBN Author: Prof. Farid. Amirouche University of Illinois-Chicago.
11 10-Jan-16 Last course Interpretations and properties of the stiffness matrix (cont’d) The DSM for plane and space trusses.
NSF WORKSHOP ON RELIABLE ENGINEERING COMPUTING MODELING ERRORS AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS Reliability of Structural Reliability Estimation.
Interval Finite Element Methods for Uncertainty Treatment in Structural Engineering Mechanics Rafi L. Muhanna Georgia Institute of Technology USA Second.
STATIC ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAIN STRUCTURES USING INTERVAL EIGENVALUE DECOMPOSITION Mehdi Modares Tufts University Robert L. Mullen Case Western Reserve University.
RELIABLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Mehdi Modares, Robert L. Mullen and Dario A. Gasparini Department of Civil Engineering Case Western.
Finite Element: Theory, Applications & Implementation Presented By: Arthur Anconetani Barbara Gault Ryan Whitney.
Interval Finite Element as a Basis for Generalized Models of Uncertainty in Engineering Mechanics Rafi L. Muhanna Georgia Institute of Technology NSF workshop.
Structures Matrix Analysis
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Rafi L. Muhanna Georgia Institute of Technology USA
1D OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD Session 4 – 6
Boundary Element Analysis of Systems Using Interval Methods
Overview of Finite Element Methods
Iwona Skalna Department of Applied Informatics Cracow, Poland
FEA convergence requirements.
Introduction to Finite Element Analysis for Skeletal Structures
FEM Steps (Displacement Method)
CHAPTER 2 BASIC CONCEPTS OF DISPLACEMENT OR STIFFNESS METHOD:
Structural Analysis II
F = 10,000 lb A = 2 in2 E = 30 x 106 psi L = 10 ft θ = 45°
Plane Trusses (Initial notes are designed by Dr. Nazri Kamsah)
Presentation transcript:

Geometric Uncertainty in Truss Systems: An Interval Approach Rafi L. Muhanna and Ayse Erdolen Georgia Institute of Technology NSF Workshop on Modeling Errors and Uncertainty in Engineering Computations February 22-24, 2006,Georgia Institute of Technology, Savannah, USA Robert L. Mullen Case Western Reserve University

Outline Introduction Introduction Interval Finite Elements Interval Finite Elements Geometric Uncertainty Geometric Uncertainty Examples Examples Conclusions Conclusions

Center for Reliable Engineering Computing (REC) We handle computations with care

 Uncertainty is unavoidable in engineering system  structural mechanics entails uncertainties in material, geometry and load parameters Introduction- Uncertainty

Engineering systems are usually designed with a pre-described geometry in order to meet the intended function for which they are designed Introduction- Engineering Systems

 Geometric uncertainty due to fabrication and/or thermal changes in engineering systems  tolerances (geometrical uncertainty)  uncertainty in the components' length Introduction- Uncertainty

Introduction- Truss Systems

Introduction- Uncertainty

 Interval number represents a range of possible values within a closed set L  L,  Represents an uncertain quantity by giving a range of possible values L = [Lo   L, Lo +  L]  How to define bounds on the possible ranges of uncertainty?  experimental data, measurements, statistical analysis, expert knowledge Introduction- Uncertainty

 Simple and elegant  Conforms to practical tolerance concept  Describes the uncertainty that can not be appropriately modeled by probabilistic approach  Computational basis for other uncertainty approaches (e.g., fuzzy set, random set) Introduction- Why Interval?  Provides guaranteed enclosures

Finite Element Method (FEM) is a numerical method that provides approximate solutions to partial differential equations Introduction- Finite Element Method

Interval arithmetic  Interval number:  Interval vector and interval matrix, e.g.,  Notations

Interval Finite Elements Local and global coordinate systems for a truss bar element c=cos  and s=sin 

Interval Finite Elements  Interval axial forces for bar element E = modulus of elasticity A = cross sectional aria  L = [-  L, +  L] interval deviation from the nominal value of the bar’ s length  L = [-  T, +  T] interval of the temperature change  = coefficient of thermal expansion

Interval Finite Elements  Nodal forces induced by a given bar due fabrication error or temperature change P 0i = Interval vector of nodal forces obtained as a result of missfitting problem

Interval Finite Elements  In the absence of external loading the final interval finite element system of equations K = stiffness matrix of the system U = vector of interval displacements

Interval Finite Elements

 In the absence of external loading the final interval finite element system of equations M = a matrix that relates the system’ s degrees of freedom with elements loads

Interval Finite Elements  Internal force in each bar S i = interval force of the ith bar of truss K i = ith element stiffness matrix L i = Boolean matrix with 1 and 0 entries

Numerical example-Truss structure A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6 : 0.01m 2 cross-sectional area E: 200 GPa modulus of elasticity of all elements  L=[-0.001, 0.001] same fabrication error for all members  m          

Truss structure-results Table 1: One Bay Truss (6 Elements)-nodal displacement- Present solution NodeUxUx UyUy 1[0, 0] 2[ , ][0, 0] 3[ , ][ , ] 4[ , ][ , ]

Truss structure-results NodeUxUx UyUy 1[0, 0] 2[ , ][0, 0] 3[ , ][ , ] 4[ , ][ , ] Table 2. One Bay Truss (6 Elements), nodal displacement for all possible  L

Truss structure-results Table 3. One Bay Truss (6 Elements) – nodal displacement without accounting for dependency NodeUxUx UyUy 1[0,0] 2[-0.03,0.03][0,0] 3[ , ][-0.03,0.03] 4[ , ][ ,0.0331]

Conclusions Geometric uncertainty for truss systems in form of tolerances is presented IFEM is used Exact enclosure on the deformed geometry is obtained

“ Interval finite elements for infinite beauty…. ”