2005 All Hands Meeting Data & Data Integration Working Group Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ontolog Open Ontology Repository Review 19 February 2009.
Advertisements

Enabling Access to Sound Archives through Integration, Enrichment and Retrieval WP1. Project Management.
Data Integration & Ontology Working Group(s) Report and Deliverables.
Fungal Semantic Web Stephen Scott, Scott Henninger, Leen-Kiat Soh (CSE) Etsuko Moriyama, Ken Nickerson, Audrey Atkin (Biological Sciences) Steve Harris.
New Approaches to GIS and Atlas Production Infrastructure for spatial data integration: across scales and projects Ilya Zaslavsky David Valentine San Diego.
The information integration wizard (Iwiz) project Report on work in progress Joachim Hammer Presented by Muhammed Al-Muhammed.
Lecture Two Database Environment Based on Chapter Two of this book:
NOAA Metadata Update Ted Habermann. NOAA EDMC Documentation Directive This Procedural Directive establishes 1) a metadata content standard (International.
Annual SERC Research Review - Student Presentation, October 5-6, Extending Model Based System Engineering to Utilize 3D Virtual Environments Peter.
Database Environment 1.  Purpose of three-level database architecture.  Contents of external, conceptual, and internal levels.  Purpose of external/conceptual.
Common Data Elements and Metadata: Their Roles in Integrating Public Health Surveillance and Information Systems Ron Fichtner, Chief, Prevention Informatics.
SCIENCE-DRIVEN INFORMATICS FOR PCORI PPRN Kristen Anton UNC Chapel Hill/ White River Computing Dan Crichton White River Computing February 3, 2014.
1 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group SEA Plenary Daniel J. Crichton, Chair NASA/JPL 12 September 2005.
The MMI Tools Carlos Rueda Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute OOS Semantic Interoperability Workshop Marine Metadata Interoperability Project Boulder,
BIRN Update Carl Kesselman Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering Information Sciences Institute Fellow Viterbi School of Engineering University.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
1 Technologies for distributed systems Andrew Jones School of Computer Science Cardiff University.
CHRIS NELSON METADATA TECHNOLOGY WORK SESSION ON STATISTICAL METADATA GENEVA 6-8 MAY 2013 Designing a Metadata Repository Metadata Technology Ltd.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
1 Ontology-based Semantic Annotatoin of Process Template for Reuse Yun Lin, Darijus Strasunskas Depart. Of Computer and Information Science Norwegian Univ.
EU Project proposal. Andrei S. Lopatenko 1 EU Project Proposal CERIF-SW Andrei S. Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
Knowledge Modeling, use of information sources in the study of domains and inter-domain relationships - A Learning Paradigm by Sanjeev Thacker.
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Local Data Requirements and Definitions USACE SDSFIE Training Prerequisites: Creating a Data Dictionary for.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Ocean Observatories Initiative Data Management (DM) Subsystem Overview Michael Meisinger September 29, 2009.
JISC: Middleware for Distributed Cognition Project Team: Colin Tatham – technical lead David Gilks – database programmer Howard Noble – project manager.
Knowledge Representation of Statistic Domain For CBR Application Supervisor : Dr. Aslina Saad Dr. Mashitoh Hashim PM Dr. Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah.
Clinical Measures Genotype Local Storage BIRN Rack SRB MCAT HID/ XNAT/ LONI DUP Calibration & Analysis Tools GRID Portal Mediator Institution A BIRN Rack.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Database Environment Chapter 2. Data Independence Sometimes the way data are physically organized depends on the requirements of the application. Result:
1 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group Daniel J. Crichton, Chair NASA/JPL 14 September 2005.
Database Environment Session 2 Course Name: Database System Year : 2013.
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
Data Integration Progress. BIRN Data Integration Framework 2. Create conceptual links to a shared ontology 1. Create multimodal databases 3. Situate the.
OGC ® ® OGC HY_Features model - progress report, next steps - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of.
Neuroinformatics Working Group Update 10/26/2009 H Jeremy Bockholt.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
Data Registry to support HIPAA standards The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Title II - Subtitle F Administrative Simplification.
User-Driven Integrated Statistical Solutions: Government for the People by the People Open Forum on Metadata Registries Santa Fe, New Mexico January 20,
No Euphemisms Required: BIRN on the Leading Edge of Community Ontology Development.
Djc -1 Daniel J. Crichton NASA/JPL 9 May 2006 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group.
LCG Distributed Databases Deployment – Kickoff Workshop Dec Database Lookup Service Kuba Zajączkowski Chi-Wei Wang.
Jemerson Pedernal IT 2.1 FUNDAMENTALS OF DATABASE APPLICATIONS by PEDERNAL, JEMERSON G. [BS-Computer Science] Palawan State University Computer Network.
OOI Cyberinfrastructure and Semantics OOI CI Architecture & Design Team UCSD/Calit2 Ocean Observing Systems Semantic Interoperability Workshop, November.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Semantic Data Extraction for B2B Integration Syntactic-to-Semantic Middleware Bruno Silva 1, Jorge Cardoso 2 1 2
2005 AHM Mouse BIRN. Goals Review progress on mouse BIRN milestones Update priorities and milestones for SFN, next spring, and next fall 2006 Clarify.
REQUIREMENTS GATHERING Moderators: M Miller Goals: To allow participants to provide feedback to the developers (BIRN-CC and test bed applications) of what.
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
1 Steve Hughes Daniel J. Crichton NASA/JPL January 16, 2007 CCSDS Information Architecture Working.
Biomedical Informatics Research Network The BIRN Architecture: An Overview Jeffrey S. Grethe, BIRN-CC 10/9/02 BIRN All Hands Meeting 2002.
Database Environment CPSC 356 Database Ellen Walker Hiram College.
IPT + Darwin Core OBIS XML Schema OBIS Database Schema Explained Mike Flavell OBIS Data Manager OBIS Nodes Training Course, Oostende, Belgium, 6 May 2014.
GoRelations: an Intuitive Query System for DBPedia Lushan Han and Tim Finin 15 November 2011
Provenance Work Plans and Deliverables October 2005  Data Provenance information in SRB and HID Test upload to SRB (March) Give DB working group formal.
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
BIRN: Where We Have Been, Where We are Going. Carl Kesselman BIRN Principal Investigator Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering Information Sciences.
Final review 24th Nov 2014 Brussels
Grid Computing 7700 Fall 2005 Lecture 18: Semantic Grid
Progress Update MSIS: Bratislava, April 2005
Eurostat activities update
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
Grid Computing 7700 Fall 2005 Lecture 18: Semantic Grid
Data Model.
Metadata Construction in Collaborative Research Networks
Metadata The metadata contains
Signet & Privilege Management
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2014.
Challenge Grant Update
Presentation transcript:

2005 All Hands Meeting Data & Data Integration Working Group Summary

Data interchange and identification Objectives  Requirements Ability for users and applications to access data using a “simple” identifier - uniquely identify data objects Ability for users and applications to understand data sets or objects they download - XML data descriptions Ability for data to be exchanged between applications and data stores - Data Services (w/ Workflow Working Group) Ability to query distributed and heterogeneous data - Semantic Data Integration (w/ Ontology Working Group)

Data interchange and identification Objectives  Requirements Ability for users and applications to access data using a “simple” identifier - uniquely identify data objects Ability for users and applications to understand data sets or objects they download - XML data descriptions Ability for data to be exchanged between applications and data stores - Data Services (w/ Workflow Working Group) Ability to query distributed and heterogeneous data - Semantic Data Integration (w/ Ontology Working Group)

Data Identification in Support of Data Sharing  BIRN is making data available for public use  Researchers need a way to cite/reference BIRN data  BIRN needs a way to provide unique identifiers to all BIRN data (i.e. similar to an accession number) Life Science Identifiers

Ability for users and applications to access data using a “simple” identifier - uniquely identify data objects Life Science Identifiers (LSIDs; ) are the standard adopted by the Object Management Group (OMG) for the identification of life science data objects. They are a little like DOIs ( used by many publishers. They provide a standard mechanism for retrieving data and metadata across different life science databases, containing diverse information and information types. LSID are used to refer to one unchanging data object each. Unlike the familiar URLs of the World-Wide-Web, LSIDs are location independent. This means that a program or a user can be certain that what they are dealing with is exactly the same data if the LSID of any object is the same as the LSID of another copy of the object obtained elsewhere.

Utilization of LSID in BIRN  Develop draft of BIRN LSID implementation Participants from each test bed and BIRN-CC Preliminary set of requirements gathered at this AHM Draft of implementation & target datasets - Early December  Finalize policies for BIRN LSID usage Spring 2006  Beta Implementation for 4.0 release Each test bed selects one data set to identify with BIRN LSIDs Register data from each data set

Data interchange and identification Objectives  Requirements Ability for users and applications to access data using a “simple” identifier - uniquely identify data objects Ability for users and applications to understand data sets or objects they download - XML data descriptions Ability for data to be exchanged between applications and data stores - Data Services (w/ Workflow Working Group) Ability to query distributed and heterogeneous data - Semantic Data Integration (w/ Ontology Working Group)

Improving Data Description and Interchange  Is there a way to describe & annotate BIRN data in a common framework Test-beds are developing “similar” XML schema  Is a cross test-bed XML representation a possibility?  A cross test-bed XML Working Group is being formed to investigate XML representation (e.g. XCEDE, WashU, Mouse BIRN)

XML Working Group  Dave Keator, Syam Gadde, Jeffrey Grethe – XCEDE  Dan Marcus – XNAT  Karen Crawford -- Mouse BIRN  Jeremy Bockholt – MIND Clinical Assessments  Relevant XML descriptions to be provided by end of November  First draft of merged schema - end of January  Face to Face meeting to resolve conflicts - fBIRN AHM

Data interchange and identification Objectives  Requirements Ability for users and applications to access data using a “simple” identifier - uniquely identify data objects Ability for users and applications to understand data sets or objects they download - XML data descriptions Ability for data to be exchanged between applications and data stores - Data Services (w/ Workflow Working Group) Ability to query distributed and heterogeneous data - Semantic Data Integration (w/ Ontology Working Group)

Data interchange and identification Objectives  Requirements Ability for users and applications to access data using a “simple” identifier - uniquely identify data objects Ability for users and applications to understand data sets or objects they download - XML data descriptions Ability for data to be exchanged between applications and data stores - Data Services (w/ Workflow Working Group) Ability to query distributed and heterogeneous data - Semantic Data Integration (w/ Ontology Working Group)

Use of Ontologies  Provide an “intuitive” and “natural” interface for the researcher based on concepts they are familiar with. Ontological Based Queries Data Source Requirements

Ontologies and Data Integration  Mark up will be provided to approved ontologies by the source provider All registered sources will export ontology mark up, definitions and relationships  Form, procedures and tools for source markup will be provided by Data Integration Team  The OTF will arrange for training sessions for BIRN participants in two areas: “Ontology Mark Up Boot camp”  December or January, prior to the test bed AHM’s Ontology development workshop in conjunction with the Stanford Team Conceptual issues involved in mapping sources

Concept Based Query Builder  User interface for ontology based query Consider recommendations of existing interfaces and preliminary discussions held at this AHM Project managers identify a group of test bed users to form a focus group (by SFN) Gather feedback at boot camp  Sit down with the domain scientists to review design Prototype by Spring (to be reviewed at the testbed AHM’s)