NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Pete Doorn Special Remediation Branch Superfund Section Division of Waste Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S.L Part 1, Section 3.(b) G.S. 150B-21.3A: PERIODIC REVIEW AND EXPIRATION OF EXISTING RULES.
Advertisements

Business Law Objective 7.02 State and Local Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws.
 Site Assessment and Mitigation Program Department of Environmental Health – County of San Diego.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality July 2013 Environmental Management Commission.
Connecticut Remediation Programs Elsie Patton Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.
EMC Review of Groundwater Corrective Action and Compliance Boundary Rules EVAN KANE NC DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES.
Considerations for Transactions with Environmental Issues Richard M. Fil, Esq.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.
Tier 1 Module 7 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Establishing a TRP.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Three Land Use Decisions.
Joelle Burleson Planning Section, Rules Development Branch Division of Air Quality Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules per Regulatory Reform.
By: Jacob Brumley.  Drafted: 1880  Amended: 1886 in the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act  Nationallly amended by the United States Congress.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
State of Georgia Hazardous Waste Update August 2008.
Environmental Regulation.  Complex set of laws  Constantly changing  Cover: Release, treatment, storage and disposal of Hazardous materials Into air,
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
Division of Waste Management Dexter R. Matthews, Director Mission: to prevent harmful releases of waste to the environment and clean up existing contamination.
Department of Environmental Quality May 11, 2016.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
Department of Environmental Quality Review of 15A NCAC 13A.0101 Hazardous Waste Rules May 12, 2016.
Department of Environmental Quality
SAFE 101 NSC Chapter 14.
Evan Kane, DWR Ken Pickle, DEMLR Jon RisGAARD, DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Regulatory Review of 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Classification and Standards Jeff Manning - Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission.
2015 Definition of Solid Waste Rule
North Carolina Division of Air Quality Mike Abraczinskas
July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Arsenic Acceptable Ambient Level Revision
CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Site Specific Work: Introduction
Department of Environmental Quality
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
Department of Environmental Quality
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
Regulatory Review of 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Classification and Standards Jeff Manning - Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission.
Rulemaking and Readoption of 15A NCAC 02T .1500
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA/Superfund) Kelly Chen Period 1 4/22/11.
Jessica Montie, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Evan Kane Division of Water Resources
Temporary Rulemaking for 15A NCAC 02L Section .0400
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality Scott Bullock
Committee Update: Review of Groundwater Standards/IMACs
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Periodic Review Reports for 15A NCAC 02N, 02O, and 02P
Department of Environmental Quality
Jessica Montie, Division of Waste Management
Regulatory Reform Act (SL ) Periodic review and expiration of existing rules NC Environmental Management Commission March 13, 2014 Jeff Manning.
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Ellen Lorscheider, Division of Waste Management
Presentation transcript:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Pete Doorn Special Remediation Branch Superfund Section Division of Waste Management 15A NCAC 02S Rule Review Dry-cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act Program NC Environmental Management Commission July 10, 2014

Overview Dry-cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act of 1997 and its amendments established: a fund and a program for assessment and cleanup of dry- cleaning solvent contamination at dry-cleaning and wholesale distribution facilities, and authorized the program to develop and enforce rules relating to the prevention of dry-cleaning solvent releases at operating facilities

History 1997Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act 2000Minimum Management Practices rules and funding changes adopted 2007Risk-based rules adopted 2010Program and funding re-authorized

Rule-Making Powers of the Commission under G.S D The Commission may adopt rules for: Cleanup program administration (e.g., site certification/ decertification, prioritization, agreements, etc.); Minimum management practices (e.g., air emission standards, prohibiting discharges, spill containment, etc.)

Rule-Making Powers of the Commission under G.S D The Commission shall adopt rules to: Establish a risk-based approach to assessment, prioritization, and remediation of dry-cleaning solvent contamination

GS 150B-21.3A.(a) Definitions A rule is also "necessary with substantive public interest" if the rule affects the property interest of the regulated public and the agency knows or suspects that any person may object to the rule. (3) Necessary with substantive public interest. – Means any rule for which the agency has received public comments within the past two years. A rule is also "necessary with substantive public interest" if the rule affects the property interest of the regulated public and the agency knows or suspects that any person may object to the rule. (4) Necessary without substantive public interest. – Means a rule for which the agency has not received a public comment concerning the rule within the past two years. A "necessary without substantive public interest" rule includes a rule that merely identifies information that is readily available to the public, such as an address or a telephone number. (5) Public comment. – Means written comments objecting to the rule, in whole or in part, received by an agency from any member of the public, including an association or other organization representing the regulated community or other members of the public. (6) Unnecessary rule. – Means a rule that the agency determines to be obsolete, redundant, or otherwise not needed.

15A NCAC 02S Section General Considerations.0101 – Scope & Purpose: Concerns have been raised about risk-based clean-ups, and objections are anticipated. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest.0102 – Definitions: Stakeholders have expressed interest in amending certain definitions, and comments are expected. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest.0103 – Calculation of Full-time Equivalent Employees: No comments have been received, and none are anticipated. Recommendation: Necessary without substantive public interest

15A NCAC 02S Section.0200 – Minimum Management Practices.0201 – Applicability: No comments objecting to this rule have been received, however, comments on MMPs of.0202, are expected and may affect the applicability of Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest.0202 – Required Minimum Management Practices: Dry cleaners have expressed interest in clarification of MMPs, and comments are expected. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest

15A NCAC 02S Section.0300 – Petitions for Certification.0301 – Filing: No comments on this rule have been received, however, it is expected that we will received comment requesting clarification. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest.0302 – Other Potentially Responsible Parties: No comments on this rule have been received and none are expected. Recommendation: Necessary without substantive public interest

15A NCAC 02S Section.0500 – Risk-Based Corrective Action.0501 – Purpose and Applicability: Concerns have been raised about risk-based clean-ups, and comments and/or objections are anticipated. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest.0502 – Abatement of Imminent Hazard: No objections to this rule have been received, however, it is anticipated that clarification of the rule will be requested. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest.0503 – Prioritization of Certified Facilities & Sites: Verbal comments on prioritization criteria have been received from industry leaders Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest

15A NCAC 02S Section.0500 – Risk-Based Corrective Action.0504 – Contaminated Site Characterization: No comments on this rule have been received and none are expected. Recommendation: Necessary without substantive public interest.0505 – Preliminary Source Removal: No comments on this rule have been received and none are expected. Recommendation: Necessary without substantive public interest.0506 – Tiered Risk Assessment: No objections have been received, however, it is anticipated that clarification of the rule will be requested. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest

15A NCAC 02S Section.0500 – Risk-Based Corrective Action.0507 – Remedial Action Plan: No objections have been received, however, comments requesting clarification on when a RAP is required are anticipated. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest.0508 – Land Use Restrictions: Verbal comments have been received objecting to the use of land-use restrictions, and comments are anticipated. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest.0509 – No Further Action Criteria: No objections have been received, however, comments requesting clarification on the No Further Action Criteria are anticipated. Recommendation: Necessary with substantive public interest

Pete Doorn Special Remediation Branch/Superfund Section Division of Waste Management Questions?