Department of Psychiatry, Department of Computer Science, 3 Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities 1 Department of Psychiatry, 2 Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slide 1 NAMIC at UNC DTI, Shape and Longitudinal registration Closely linked with Utah.
Advertisements

NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Diffusion Imaging Quality Control with DTIPrep Martin Styner, PhD University of.
Slicer Welcome Tutorial
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing [Tutorial Name] [List of authors] [Institution] [ of the first author]
Sponsor: Prof. Sidney Spector Computational anatomy to assess growth pattern of early brain development in healthy and disease populations Guido Gerig.
Caudate Shape Discrimination in Schizophrenia Using Template-free Non-parametric Tests Y. Sampath K. Vetsa 1, Martin Styner 1, Stephen M. Pizer 1, Jeffrey.
Pohl K, Konukoglu E -1- National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Measuring Volume Change in Tumors Kilian M Pohl, PhD Ender Konugolu Slicer3 Training.
-1- Pujol S et al. National Alliance for Medical Image Computing 3D Visualization of FreeSurfer Data Sonia Pujol, Ph.D. Silas Mann, B.Sc. Randy Gollub,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing NAMIC-Kit Update Will Schroeder Jim Miller Bill Lorensen.
-- CTSA at RSNA 2009 PET/CT Analysis using 3D Slicer Jeffrey Yap PhD Ron Kikinis MD Wendy Plesniak PhD Slicer3 Training Compendium.
Automatic Brain Segmentation in Rhesus Monkeys February 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging 2006 Funding provided by UNC Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing shapeAnalysisMANCOVA_Wizar d Lucile Bompard, Clement Vacher, Beatriz Paniagua, Martin.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Algorithms MIT PI: Polina Golland.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Robust Cerebrum and Cerebellum Segmentation for Neuroimage Analysis Jerry L. Prince,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing GAMBIT: Group-wise Automatic Mesh-Based analysis of cortIcal Thickness Clement Vachet,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing NA-MIC Software Engineering Bill Lorensen GE Research NA-MIC Engineering Core PI.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Cortical Thickness Analysis Delphine Ribes (Internship UNC 2005/2006) Guido Gerig.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Cortical Thickness Analysis with Slicer Martin Styner UNC - Departments of Computer.
-1- National Alliance for Medical Image Computing University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Neuro Image Research and Analysis Lab Cedric Mathieu, Clement.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Shape Analysis and Cortical Correspondence Martin Styner Core 1 (Algorithms), UNC.
Jeffrey Yap, PhD Ron Kikinis, MD Wendy Plesniak, PhD -1- CTSA at RSNA 2009 PET/CT Analysis using 3D Slicer Jeffrey Yap PhD Ron Kikinis MD Wendy Plesniak.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer3 Status Update.
Pujol S., Plesniak, W. -1- National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Neuroimage Analysis Center Harvard CTSC Slicer3 minute tutorial Sonia Pujol, PhD.
A longitudinal study of brain development in autism Heather Cody Hazlett, PhD Heather Cody Hazlett, PhD Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center &
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing DTI Atlas Registration via 3D Slicer and DTI-Reg Martin Styner, UNC Clement Vachet,
DICOM to NRRD Conversion Tutorial Martin Styner 1 University of North Carolina Neuro Image Research and Analysis Lab.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing ABC: Atlas-Based Classification Marcel Prastawa and Guido Gerig Scientific Computing.
BIRN Advantages in Morphometry  Standards for Data Management / Curation File Formats, Database Interfaces, User Interfaces  Uniform Acquisition and.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing NAMIC UNC Site Update Site PI: Martin Styner Site NAMIC folks: Clement Vachet, Gwendoline.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Competitive Evaluation & Validation of Segmentation Methods Martin Styner, UNC NA-MIC.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing BRAINSCut General Tutorial Eun Young(Regina) Kim University of Iowa
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing A longitudinal study of brain development in autism Heather Cody Hazlett, PhD Neurodevelopmental.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing National Alliance for Medical Image Computing: NAMIC Ron Kikinis, M.D.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer3 Tutorial Registration Library Case 05: Knee MRI: model/surface registration.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Shape analysis using spherical harmonics Lucile Bompard, Clement Vachet, Beatriz.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Using Annotations in Slicer 4.0 Yong Zhang, Kilian Pohl June 2010.
Integrating QDEC with Slicer3 Click to add subtitle.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Process-, Work-Flow in Medical Image Processing Guido Gerig
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer3 Tutorial: Registration Library Case 15 AC-PC Alignment Dominik Meier, Ron.
EMSegmentation in Slicer 3 B. Davis, S. Barre, Y. Yuan, W. Schroeder, P. Golland, K. Pohl.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Diffusion Tensor Imaging tutorial Sonia Pujol, PhD Surgical Planning Laboratory.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Core What We Need from Cores 1 & 2 NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UNC Core 1: What did we do for NA-MIC and/or what did NA-MIC do for us Guido Gerig,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing NA-MIC UNC Guido Gerig, Martin Styner, Isabelle Corouge
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing NAMIC UNC Site Update Site PI: Martin Styner UNC Site NAMIC folks: C Vachet, G Roger,
Sonia Pujol, PhD -1- National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Neuroimage Analysis Center Diffusion Tensor Imaging tutorial Sonia Pujol, Ph.D. Surgical.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing A longitudinal study of brain development in autism Heather Cody Hazlett, PhD Neurodevelopmental.
-1- National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer3 Training Tutorial ARCTIC (v1.2) (Automatic Regional Cortical ThICkness) ‏ University of North.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing A longitudinal study of brain development in autism Heather Cody Hazlett, PhD Neurodevelopmental.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer3 Tutorial Nonrigid Atlas Registration Dominik Meier, Ron Kikinis February.
Statistical Shape Analysis of Multi-object Complexes June 2007, CVPR 2007 Funding provided by NIH NIBIB grant P01EB and NIH Conte Center MH
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Engineering a Segmentation Framework Marcel Prastawa.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Measuring Alcohol and Stress Interactions with Structural and Perfusion MRI Chris.
Corpus Callosum Probabilistic Subdivision based on Inter-Hemispheric Connectivity May 2005, UNC Radiology Symposium Original brain images for the corpus.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer3 Tutorial Registration Library Case 06: Breast Cancer Follow-up Dominik Meier,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing BRAINSCut General Tutorial Eun Young(Regina) Kim University of Iowa
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Measuring Alcohol and Stress Interactions with Structural and Perfusion MRI Chris.
Standard Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) using 3D Slicer Slicer3 Training Compendium Image here. Jeffrey Yap, PhD Wendy Plesniak,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Analysis and Results of Brockton VA study: Controls vs Schizophrenics Personality Disorder Martin.
Ron Kikinis, M.D ‡. Wanmei Ou, MSc §, Polina Golland, Ph.D. §, William Wells III, Ph.D. ‡§, Carsten Richter ‡, Steven Pieper, Ph.D. ¥, Haiying Liu ‡, Wendy.
NAMIC Activities at UNC
Delphine Ribes (Internship UNC 2005/2006) Guido Gerig
A new open-source tool for EEG source reconstruction in infants
A longitudinal study of brain development in autism
shapeAnalysisMANCOVA_Wizard
NWSI Neuroimaging Web Services Interface
Tobias Heimann - DKFZ Ipek Oguz - UNC Ivo Wolf - DKFZ
3D Visualization of FreeSurfer Data
Detecting Gray Matter Maturation via Tensor-based Surface Morphometry
Automatic SPHARM Shape Analysis in 3D Slicer
Presentation transcript:

Department of Psychiatry, Department of Computer Science, 3 Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities 1 Department of Psychiatry, 2 Department of Computer Science, 3 Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities Acknowledgements Research supported by NIMH grants MH61696 and MH64580 (PI: Joseph Piven, MD) and PHS-NIH EB (PI: Kikinis) National Alliance for Medical Image Computing (NA-MIC). Resources Available to the Public All documentation for this application and the Slicer3 toolkit is available on the NAMIC wiki pages, including two tutorials describing the cortical thickness applications developed by our UNC group. ( ARCTIC’s first release is publicly available on the NITRC website ( Pediatric and adult brain atlases used by ARCTIC are also available on MIDAS ( Background The data analysis of neuroimaging data from pediatric populations presents several challenges. There are normal variations in brain shape from infancy to adulthood and normal developmental changes related to tissue maturation (i.e., myelination of white matter) that create problems in the direct application of tools designed for adult brain. Our team has created a computer processing tool to produce regional cortical thickness maps appropriate for pediatric MRI data, and is developing a similar pipeline to perform local cortical thickness measures. This application has been integrated into the Slicer3 toolkit. Slicer3 is a cross-platform application for analyzing and visualizing medical images. It is an open source application and is funded by a number of large-scale NIH supported efforts, including the National Alliance for Medical Image Computing (NA-MIC). Use of the Slicer3 toolkit to produce regional cortical thickness measurements of pediatric MRI data Heather Cody Hazlett, PhD 1 ; Clement Vachet, MS 1 ; Cedric Mathieu, BS 1 ; Martin Styner, PhD 2 ; & Joseph Piven, MD 1,3 Methods We have access to a pediatric dataset of T1-weighted MRI scans from 90 cases of 2-4 year olds with typical development, autism, and developmental delay. As part of our collaboration with NA-MIC our UNC group will create separate pipelines to compute regional and local cortical thickness, and algorithms for computing both individual and group analysis. There are a number of critical components required to be able to obtain valid cortical thickness measurements. These include the following: (1) tissue segmentation, (2) cortical thickness measures, (3) surface inflation, (4) cortical correspondence, and (5) statistical analysis/hypothesis testing. REGIONAL CORTICAL THICKNESS Figure 1 A Slicer3 high-level module performing individual regional cortical thickness analysis has been developed by our lab: ARCTIC (Automatic Regional Cortical ThICkness). The default basic steps include (1) probabilistic atlas-based automatic tissue segmentation, (2) atlas parcellation deformable registration, and (3) asymmetric cortical thickness measurement. See example of these steps below (Figure 1): The ARCTIC application provides not only lobar cortical thickness but also tissue segmentation volume information stored in spreadsheets. Moreover a quick quality control can be performed for each step within Slicer3 using a MRML scene displaying output volumes and surfaces. ARCTIC is still in development in order to improve its integration within Slicer3, but upon completion of our NA-MIC collaborative project we plan to have ARCTIC available cross-platform, with Windows and MAC executables available on NITRIC. Plans are also underway to make ARCTIC’s source code publically available via a SVN repository. Regarding validity tests, ARCTIC has been tested on our pediatric dataset. Results are available on the NA-MIC wiki page. Current work is underway to conduct validity tests against other applications (e.g., FreeSurfer). In progress is a test using 40+ cases from FreeSurfer’s publically available tutorial dataset. Future Directions Current work in our lab is underway to develop a pipeline for local cortical thickness. With this application, we will be able to generate cortical thickness maps across the entire surface of the brain and compute group-based comparisons in cortical thickness measurements. Local cortical thickness requires a mesh-based methodology, which involves many more steps than regional cortical thickness applications. Main components for this pipeline include (1) tissue segmentation, (2) atlas-based ROI segmentation, (3) white matter map creation and post-processing, (4) genus-zero white matter map image and surface creation, (5) cortical thickness computation, (6) white matter mesh inflation, (7) sulcal depth computation, (8) cortical correspondence on inflated meshes using a particle system, and (9) statistical analysis. As described above in the description of regional cortical thickness, the Slicer3 application is able to compute steps #1 and #2 (see Figure 1). Currently, several applications have been developed and integrated within Slicer3 for steps #3-7 (see Figure 3 below), and the last step regarding cortical correspondence is undergoing tests. However, as part of our NA-MIC collaboration, we plan to have the whole the mesh-based local cortical thickness analysis pipeline fully working and integrated within Slicer3. Step 1. Step 2. Step 3. these steps if the related images are provided, such as tissue segmentation label maps or parcellation maps. Figure 2. Figure 2. Pipeline steps involved to produce regional cortical thickness measures. The next figure (Fig. 2) provides a summary graphic detailing the main components of the regional pipeline required to generate the regional cortical thickness of the dataset. The user has the possibility to skip some of Figure 3 Figure 3. Steps #3-7 for computing local cortical thickness. Step 3. Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7