1 Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Working Group IETF-57

2 All slides accessible at:

3 Agenda, Monday, 15: :30 Preliminaries (20 minutes) – Bluesheets – Minute Takers – Agenda Bash – Document Status – Liason Statements RFC 2869bis update (3 minutes), Bernard Aboba RFC 2284bis (20 minutes), Henrik Levkowetz EAP State Machine (20 minutes), Pasi Eronen

4 Agenda, Monday Cont’d Network Selection (5 minutes), Farid Adrangi EAP Compound Binding (20 minutes), Jose Puthenkulam EAP SIM & AKA (5 minutes) P. Eronen EAP-SIM Security Analysis (20 minutes), Uri Blumenthal Analysis response (5 minutes) P. Eronen Discussion (10 minutes)

5 Agenda, Thursday 13:00-15:00 EAP Keying Framework (30 minutes), Bernard Aboba EAP Keying for DHCP Bootstrap (10 minutes), H. Tschofenig EAP Key Derivation for Multiple Apps (10 minutes), H. Zhou EAP IKEv2 (10 minutes), H. Tschofenig EAP Client Side Transport (10 minutes), B. Boursetty

6 Agenda, Thursday Cont’d EAP LDAP (10 minutes), H. Mancini EAP Support in Smartcard (10 minutes), P. Urien PEAP Version 2 (10 minutes), J. Salowey/A. Palekar EAP Archie (10 minutes), Jesse Walker

7 EAP WG Document Status IETF-57 Jari Arkko & Bernard Aboba

8 WG Documents 2284bis –WG last call just finished, with 4 open issues left 3 minor issues 1 new function request (separate work?) –Correct the found issues and send the draft to the IESG

9 Other Documents 2869bis –Approved by the IESG –A new i 2869bis inconsistency found Diameter EAP –Draft 02 is “2869bis” for Diameter –Adds key AVP and proxy-free operation –Discussion in AAA WG on Thursday Keying Framework –Significantly revised new unofficial version available

10 Other Documents Cont’d State machine –Significant work during the last period –Adopt as official WG item? Binding problem –New revision issued –Status of reported issues? –Need this approved before tunnel methods can be considered

11 Other Documents Cont’d Methods –Many proposals exist –Not currently WG items –Per new EAP IANA considerations and AD direction in IETF-56: Methods need Expert Review Can be either Informational or Standards Track documents Can not progress (even as Informational) until base documents in the EAP working group are done