Gregg v Georgia By: Sarah Jaskie. FACTS Troy Leon Gregg convicted of two counts of armed rubbery and two counts of murder. Judge give the jury the option.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Juvenile Law.
Advertisements

Gregg vs. Georgia Ethan Reinheimer 10/28/13 Block 2.
Gregg v. Georgia Tiffany Browne Karisa Myers 2 nd Hour.
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 330 Race, Ethnicity and Criminal Justice Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali Color of.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
JUVENILE LAW CREATED BY REBECCA SWINNEY, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW STUDENT, STREET LAW COURSE, 2010
By Bianca Kue Atkins v. Virginia. Background June 20 th 2002 Daryl Renard Atkins  Convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder  Forensic.
FrontPage: Do you support capital punishment? Why or why not?
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Boy Scouts of America v Dale By: Sarah Jaskie. Facts James Dale a member of BSA(Boy Scouts of America) was expelled from BSA after he came out as gay.
Capital Punishment McCleskey v. Kemp 481 U.S. 279.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
Supreme Court Cases Continued Civics. Furman V Georgia 1972 William Henry Furman convicted on Murder and Sentenced to Death – Supreme Court hears his.
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
Ohio Death Penalty.
 Gather evidence  Arrest warrant  Booking – finger prints, picture, possible lineup.
Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.
Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,
Death Penalty Debate: Resolved… The use of the death penalty, if fairly applied, does not violate the Constitution and is a just method of punishing perpetrators.
Chapter 4 The Supreme Court and the Constitution
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
ADVANCED AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. BAIL AND PREVENTATIVE DETENTION  BAIL  Sum of money the accused may be required to post as a guarantee that he or she.
The Death Penalty: Deterrence and Question of Racial Equality
The BILL OF RIGHTS Proposed 9/25/1789 Ratified 12/15/1791 Proposed 9/25/1789 Ratified 12/15/1791.
Sentencing What purpose is served by establishing a system of punishment for those who commit crimes?
Defendant’s Rights and the Right to Privacy AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
Death Penalty Comparing the death penalty in Georgia and the United States to the rest of the World.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
Graham v. Florida By Bianca Kue. Graham v. Florida May 17 th, 2010 Terrence Graham (Juvenile)  Convicted of armed burglary and robbery  Convicted again.
The Constitution explicitly permits capital punishment – if you may not be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law,” then you.
Civil Liberties The 8 th Amendment Phil Egan, Tom Koegel, Angie Nalepa.
Do you support the use of the Death Penalty? Is it a cruel form of punishment?
Can you answer the big questions? Grab a textbook off the shelf and lets find out.
Essential Questions: What rights are guaranteed to all Americans who are accused of crimes?
Atkins v. Virginia Peter Diddy Period 6 Constitutional Law.
  excessive bail shall not be required,  nor excessive fines imposed,  nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. The Text:
Chapter 4 (cont’d) 4.3 The Power to Make Criminal Law 4.4 Summary Conviction and Indictable Offences.
PROTECTIONS PROVIDED BY THE CONSTITUTION UNIT II – CONSTITUTION AND RIGHTS.
LECTURE 4: THE CONSTITUTION AND DUE PROCESS. The Constitution and Due Process The US Constitution set out how US laws are passed and enforced. – The legislative.
Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Protections Provided by the Constitution
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
April 17, 2017 CNN Student News Review Questions Rights of the accused
Death Penalty.
9 Sentencing.
What would you do? A student is caught in the bathroom with two other students who are found smoking. When called to the principal’s office, he sees the.
How do the fifth, sixth and eighth amendments protect rights within the judicial system? LESSON 32.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
Capital Punishment.
Chapter 9 Sentencing. Chapter 9 Sentencing This sentencing goal is the act of taking revenge on a criminal perpetrator. Rehabilitation Retribution.
By: Lindsey Haney and Jessica Cunningham
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
Rights of Criminal Suspects
The Judicial Branch.
Death Penalty DBQ EQ: Does the death penalty violate our Constitutional protection from cruel and unusual punishment?
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
Path to Prison Gallery Walk (APIATS)
The 8th amendment Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Punishment.
8th Amendment: Cruel and unusual punishments
Capital Punishment.
SAGE Lecture Spark March 5, 2019.
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
Ap u.s. government & politics
The 8th Amendment And the death penalty.
Gregg vs Georgia.
The First 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief”
Presentation transcript:

Gregg v Georgia By: Sarah Jaskie

FACTS Troy Leon Gregg convicted of two counts of armed rubbery and two counts of murder. Judge give the jury the option of life in prison or death penalty. Jury and judge both choice the death penalty Gregg took it to the Supreme Court Died July 29, 1980

Issue What freedom or right was at issue? Curl and unusual punishment, under 8 th amendment and the 14 th amendment. Why was it at issue? Furman v. Georgia 1972 How and why did the Supreme Court decide the case as it did? Ruled in favor of Georgia stating that with proper cause given the circumstances of the case the death penalty is okay. How did this case change how we understand or interpret the Constitution/Amendments? Its showed that privies decisions are not permanent and can be over turned at a later date and time.