Oracle at Delphi The reason I am smarter than anyone else is because I know I know nothing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Advertisements

The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
Socratic Seminars.
1. 2 The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
UP-LEVELING THE SOCRATIC SEMINAR Let us examine this question together, my friend, and if you can contradict anything that I say, do so, and I shall be.
Dr. Rob Danin Senior English Language Fellow
Conducting a Socratic Seminar Can it be, Ischomachus, that asking questions is teaching? I am just beginning to see what is behind all your questions.
There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance. - Socrates
The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
Socratic Seminars.
An effective Socratic Seminar creates dialogue as opposed to debate. Dialogue creates "better conversation”
What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates Socrates Classical Greek philosopher who developed a Theory of Knowledge.
Introduction to Socratic Seminar. What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates. Socrates (ca B.C.) was a Classical Greek philosopher.
SOCRATIC SEMINAR Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
SOCRATIC SEMINARS Teaching Using Inquiry Based Learning.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
The Socratic Seminar 1. Socrates Socrates was a famous Greek philosopher. His focus was the development of the human character. His method of teaching.
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) (Greek Σωκράτης Sōkrátēs; invariably anglicized as IPA: /'s ɒ k ɹ əti ː z/ S ǒ cratēs) was.
Socratic Seminars Amy Mulholland, M.Ed.
The Socratic Seminar: Where great minds converge..
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) (Greek Σωκράτης Sōkrátēs; invariably anglicized as IPA: /'s ɒ k ɹ əti ː z/ S ǒ cratēs) was.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
It’s Dialogue Not Debate!.  Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right.
Dialogue vs Debate Debate is… competitive or oppositional about proving others wrong close-minded having one right answer about demeaning others.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Preparing for a Socratic Seminar … a what?!. Socrates Socrates was a famous Greek philosopher. His method of teaching encouraged students to question.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
THE VISION Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
Socratic Seminar. What is a Socratic Seminar? In a Socratic Seminar participants seek deeper understanding of complex ideas through thoughtful dialogue.
WHERE QUESTIONS, NOT ANSWERS, ARE THE DRIVING FORCE IN THINKING Socratic Discussion.
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) was a Greek (Athenian) philosopher.June 4470 BCMay 7399 BCAthenianphilosopher.
Socratic Seminar Overview, Guidelines and More!. A Brief History Socrates, a philosopher born in Athens in 469 BC, developed a method of discussion known.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
THE SOCRATIC SEMINAR Guidelines Roles Responsibilities.
Be ready to check 90 seconds after the bell.
Socratic Seminars.
Foundation of Socratic Seminars
Oracle at Delphi. Oracle at Delphi The reason I am smarter than anyone else is because I know I know nothing.
Socratic Seminars.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Socratic Seminars.
Socratic Seminar What it is and isn’t.
Fostering Student Centered Dialogue
Intro to Socratic Seminars
The Socratic Seminar.
Socratic Seminar “True wisdom comes to each of us when we realize how little we understand about life, ourselves, and the world around us. “ – Socrates.
Socratic Seminars.
Journal: Do in your notebook
Socratic Seminars.
The Socratic Seminar.
Socratic Seminars.
The Socratic Seminar.
Monday Warm-Up- Please complete the writing prompt about a choice you made, and how your life might be different if you had gone down the other path.
Socratic Seminar Intro & Rules
Socratic Seminars.
Socratic Seminars.
Socratic Seminars.
The Socratic Seminar.
Socratic Seminars.
Socratic seminar.
Socratic Seminars.
Bringing it all together.
Socratic Seminars.
Oracle at Delphi. Oracle at Delphi The reason I am smarter than anyone else is because I know I know nothing.
Socratic Seminars.
Presentation transcript:

Oracle at Delphi

The reason I am smarter than anyone else is because I know I know nothing.

 COLLECTIVE INQUIRY  AN EXCHANGE OF IDEAS  NOT A TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION  WITHOUT “RIGHT” ANSWERS

 The goal is an enlarged, shared understanding of ideas, issues, or values through DIALOGUE

 It is NOT DEBATE

DIALOGUE IS COLLABORATIVE  Multiple sides work toward shared understanding DEBATE IS OPPOSITIONAL  Two opposing sides try to prove each other wrong

IN DIALOGUE  One listens  To understand  To make meaning  To find common ground IN DEBATE  One listens  To find flaws  To spot differences  To counter arguments

DIALOGUE  Reveals assumptions for examination and reevaluation DEBATE  Defends assumptions as truth

DIALOGUE  Creates an open-minded attitude:  an openness to being wrong  An openness to change DEBATE  Creates a close-minded attitude:  A determination to be right

IN DIALOGUE  One submits one’s best thinking, expecting other people’s reflections will help improve it, rather than threaten it IN DEBATE  One submits one’s best thinking and defends it against challenge to show that it is right

DIALOGUE  Calls for temporarily suspending one’s beliefs DEBATE  Calls for investing wholeheartedly in one’s beliefs

IN DIALOGUE  One searches for strengths in all positions IN DEBATE  One searches for weaknesses in the other position

DIALOGUE  Respects all the other participants and seeks NOT to alienate or offend DEBATE  Rebuts contrary positions and may belittle or deprecate other participants

DIALOGUE  Assumes that many people have pieces of answers and that cooperation can lead to greater understanding DEBATE  Assumes a single right answer that somebody already has

DIALOGUE  Remains open-ended. DEBATE  Demands a conclusion.

INNER CIRCLE  SPEAKING OUTER CIRCLE  OBSERVING

 Inner Group #1 – discusses the topic for 15 minutes  Outer Group #1 – May enter discussion by posing questions and assertions to inner participants based upon their outer circle tasks notes. This involves both circles and lasts 10 minutes  Inner Group #2 – assumes the inner circle seats and discusses same or new topic for 15 minutes  Outer Group #2 – gets to enter discussion for the following 10 minutes based on outer circle task sheet notes  This leaves approximately 10 minutes for a wrap up of key points

SOCRATIC SEMINAR GUIDELINES  PARTICIPANTS  LEADER  TEXT  All participants read the text in advance.  QUESTIONS  Prepare open-ended questions in advance that reflect genuine curiosity, and have no ‘one right answer’! OTHER COMPONENTS

SOCRATIC SEMINAR GUIDELINES  DON’T RAISE HANDS  LISTEN CAREFULLY  WAIT FOR YOUR TURN- BE SENSITIVE AND DO NOT INTERRUPT OTHERS  ADDRESS ONE ANOTHER RESPECTFULLY OTHER COMPONENTS

SOCRATIC SEMINAR GUIDELINES  ADDRESS COMMENTS TO THE ENTIRE GROUP ( NO SIDE CONVERSATIONS)  MONITOR ‘AIR TIME’ (NO HOGGING – LET EVERYONE HAVE A CHANCE TO SPEAK)  BASE ALL OPINION ON THE TEXT AND BE ABLE TO REFER OTHERS TO IT OTHER COMPONENTS

SOCRATIC SEMINAR GUIDELINES  BE COURAGEOUS IN PRESENTING YOUR OWN THOUGHTS AND REASONING, BUT BE FLEXIBLE AND WILLING TO CHANGE YOUR MIND IN THE FACE OF NEW AND COMPELLING EVIDENCE OTHER COMPONENTS

SOCRATIC SEMINAR GUIDELINES  Refer to the text when needed during the discussion. A seminar is not a test of memory. You are not “learning a subject;” your goal is to understand ideas, issues and values reflected in the text.  It s OK to “pass” when asked to contribute (but you need to make at least 2 comments to receive credit).  Do not participate if you are not prepared. A seminar should not be a bull session  Do not stay confused; ask for clarification.  Stick to the point currently under discussion; make notes about ideas you want to come back to.  Speak so that everyone can hear you.  YOU are responsible for the seminar. (If the seminar sucks, that’s on you; if it rocks, that’s on you too!) OTHER COMPONENTS

POSITIVE  Taking a position  Making a relevant comment  Offering evidence to support your position  Drawing another person into the discussion  Asking a clarifying question  Making an analogy  Recognizing a contradiction  Recognizing an irrelevant comment NEGATIVE  Not paying attention (in inner or outer circle)  Interrupting the seminar  Making an irrelevant comment  Making a personal attack  Monopolizing the conversation