IPv4 Transfer Proposal. What does a transfer proposal do? Transfer Proposal allows APNIC to reflect records of transfers undertaken by APNIC account holders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPv4 Address Transfer proposal APNIC prop-050-v002 Geoff Huston.
Advertisements

Experimental Internet Resource Allocations Philip Smith, Geoff Huston September 2002.
Proposal-062: Use of Final /8 Jonny Martin, Philip Smith & Randy Bush Policy APNIC 26 28th August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand.
Policy SIG report 29 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei Toshiyuki Hosaka Randy Bush Jian Zhang.
1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language. Problem Statement Current policy prevents an organization that receives BLOCK A in the previous 12 months from.
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfer of ASNs.
Draft Policy ARIN Improved Registry Accuracy Proposal.
ARIN Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers Dan Alexander- Primary Shepherd David Farmer- Secondary Shepherd.
Allocations vs Announcements A comparison of RIR IPv4 Allocation Records with Global Routing Announcements Geoff Huston May 2004 (Activity supported by.
Update on RIPE NCC Inter- RIR Transfer proposal Adam Gosling APNIC 38 Policy SIG Meeting 18 September 2014.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make forecasts or predictions.
APNIC Last /8 Policy Implementation Report Sanjaya Services Area Director.
Final Stages of IPv4 Distribution Guangliang Pan Resource Services Manager, APNIC.
Implementation Update Adam Gosling APNIC Policy SIG Meeting Thursday, 18 September 2014.
Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG 27 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei.
Proposal of “Time-Limited” IPv4 Address Allocation Policy Project leader : Jun Murai Project officiers: –Hiroshi Esaki –Akira Kato –Osamu Nakamura –Masaki.
Regional PDP Report Einar Bohlin Senior Policy Analyst.
APNIC Update RIPE 59 October Overview APNIC Services Update APNIC 28 policy outcomes APNIC Members and Stakeholder Survey Next APNIC Meetings.
POLICY EXPERIENCE REPORT Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
CONFIDENTIAL IPv4 Current Market Conditions and Information Matt Talarico October,
18th APNIC Open Policy Meeting SIG: DB Thursday 2 September 2004 Nadi, Fiji Chair: Xing Li.
Prop-080: Removal of IPv4 Prefix Exchange Policy Guangliang Pan Resource Services Manager, APNIC.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
PROP Leif Sawyer. Draft Policy ARIN Eliminating Needs-based Evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 Netblocks Author:
Erik Bais, May 13 th 2015 PP – unassigned yet General Transfer Policy Presenter : Erik Bais –
6bone address registry proposal Bob Fink ESnet 17 July 2002 Yokohama.
What is the Recovered IPv4 Address Pool ? APNIC Services Guangliang Pan 9 September 2015 Jakarta.
Einar Bohlin Regional PDP Report. Proposal topics at the 5 RIRs ARIN portion Q (35) Q (32) Q (50) Q (52) 0 Total.
and Inter-RIR Transfers And Lengthening the Justification Period to 24 Months Sandra Brown IPv4 Market Group What did the IPv4 Address.
Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
Prop-097: Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA Alejandro Acosta, Nicolas Antoniello, S. Moonesamy, Douglas Onyango,
ARIN Update RIPE 66 Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services.
ARIN Update Aaron Hughes ARIN Board of Trustees Focus Increased focus on customer service – Based on feedback and survey Continued IPv4 to IPv6.
ARIN Allow Inter-RIR ASN Transfers. Problem Statement We already allow transfer of ASNs within the ARIN region. Recently APNIC implemented a policy.
Overview of Policy Proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 31 August 2011.
IPv4 Address Lifetime SANOG IV Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
APNIC 32 AMM Policy SIG Report Andy Linton Thursday 1 September 2011.
Prop-073 Automatic allocation/assignment of IPv6 Terry Manderson Andy Linton.
Políticas en discusión en otros RIRs Juan Alejo
Prop-077: Proposal to supplement transfer policy of historical IPv4 addresses Wendy Zhao Wei, Jane Zhang & Terence Zhang Yinghao.
Policy SIG Report APNIC AGM Friday 29 August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand 1.
1 IPv6 Allocation and Policy Update Global IPv6 Summit in China 2007 April 12, 2007 Guangliang Pan.
Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Proposal for IPv6 Policy for Essential Infrastructure in the AP region Izumi Okutani IP Address Section.
Policy SIG report AMM, APNIC 27 Manila, Philippines.
Draft Policy ARIN Amy Potter
Regional Internet Registries
A Coordinated Proposal Regional Internet Registries
Prop-093: Reducing the minimum delegation size for the final /8
A Proposal for IPv4 Essential Infrastructure
APNIC 29 Policy SIG report
Requiring aggregation for IPv6 subsequent allocations
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8
Policy SIG Wednesday 3 March 2010
IPv6 Policy and Allocation Update
Policy SIG Chair Report
Policy SIG Thursday 26 February Manila, Philippines
Permitted Uses of space reserved under NRPM 4.10
Randy Bush & Philip Smith
Overview of policy proposals
Recovery of Unused Address Space prop-017-v001
Experimental Internet Resource Allocations
IPv4 Transfer Policy Amendments
Overview of policy proposals
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
Supporting Historical Resource Transfers
Removing aggregation criteria for IPv6 initial allocations
prop-081-v001: Eligibility for assignments from the final /8
Presentation transcript:

IPv4 Transfer Proposal

What does a transfer proposal do? Transfer Proposal allows APNIC to reflect records of transfers undertaken by APNIC account holders

Discussion Points 1.Should we allow address transfers between APNIC account holders? 2.What should be the conditions of the transfer? a.Minimum size b.Recipient to justify use c.Seller may/may not get more space for some time period d.APNIC to maintain a public log of all transfers 3.What should be the timeline of the implementation? 4.What are the parties that are recognized to do transfers under APNIC policy?

Should we allow address transfers? Should APNIC recognize transfers between APNIC current account holders*? –APNIC will reflect the records of the transfer with requests from both the source and the recipient * Current APNIC account holders = Current APNIC member and non-member account holders

Conditions – Minimum Size What should be the minimum size of address space to be allowed to transfer? a./24 Likely to reflect the reality of size of address space to be transferred b.Consistent with minimum allocation size/portable assignment size Consideration for routing table growth

Conditions – Justification of Use Should we request the recipient to justify address requirements at the time of transfer? a.Should justify address requirements to APNIC Maintain the current practice b.No justification should be required Stick to the role as “registry” (record keeping) once address pool runs out

Conditions – Restricting allocations Should we add restrictions to the source of address transfer to receive subsequent allocations from APNIC? a.Should add restrictions (e.g. no allocations or assignments from APNIC for two years) Prevent people from requesting space from APNIC for the sake of making transfers to other organizations b.Should not add any restrictions doesn’t make a difference

Conditions – Log of transfers Should APNIC publicly provide a log of all address transfers? a.Yes, a public log should be provided Helps in assessment of risks /workload required to make the address usable b.No, a public log is not necessary Not particularly useful

Timeline of the implementation When should this policy take effect? a.Implement it as soon as it is ready Will make the problem worse if we wait too long b.Wait around the time IANA/APNIC pool runs out May encourage transfers/create other problems if it is implemented too early

Scope of the transfer what extent should recognized to transfer between different parties? a.between APNIC account holders only b.between APNIC account holder and account holders of other Internet registries (*) 1.Account holders of NIRs(option of NIR policy) 2.Account holders of RIRs(option of RIR policy) (*) given it can be accomodated in their respective policies

Discussion Topics 1.Address transfers should be permitted between APNIC account holders. 2.Minimum size, /24 or then current size 3.Recipient to justify use 4.Seller may/may not get more space for some time period 5.APNIC to maintain a public log of all transfers 6.To take effect now or on last /8 received 7.Address transfers should be permitted between APNIC members and NIR members 8.Inter-NIR transfer (between members of different NIRs) 9.Inter-RIR transfer