L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Part I Experiments in smaller blocks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Incomplete Block Designs. Randomized Block Design We want to compare t treatments Group the N = bt experimental units into b homogeneous blocks of size.
Advertisements

Topic 12 – Further Topics in ANOVA
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Chapter 6 The 2k Factorial Design
1 Chapter 4 Experiments with Blocking Factors The Randomized Complete Block Design Nuisance factor: a design factor that probably has an effect.
Chapter 4 Randomized Blocks, Latin Squares, and Related Designs
IE341 Problems. 1.Nuisance effects can be known or unknown. (a) If they are known, what are the ways you can deal with them? (b) What happens if they.
Chapter 7Design & Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1 Design of Engineering Experiments Blocking & Confounding in the 2 k Text reference, Chapter.
Design and Analysis of Experiments
1 Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Introduction The special cases of the general factorial design (Chapter 5) k factors and each factor has only.
Chapter 8 Two-Level Fractional Factorial Designs
MAE 552 Heuristic Optimization
Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2k Factorial Design
Fractional factorial Chapter 8 Hand outs. Initial Problem analysis Eyeball, statistics, few graphs Note what problems are and what direction would be.
1 Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2 k Factorial Design.
8. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE 8.1 Elements of a Designed Experiment
Inferences About Process Quality
Split-Plots Designs Used when one (or more ) factors require more experimental material for evaluation Different size experimental units Whole plots Split.
Trigonometrical rules for finding sides and angles in triangles which are not right angled.
1 14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors 14-1 Introduction 14-2 Factorial Experiments 14-3 Two-Factor Factorial Experiments Statistical analysis.
Analysis of Variance. ANOVA Probably the most popular analysis in psychology Why? Ease of implementation Allows for analysis of several groups at once.
Factorial Experiments
For Discussion Today (when the alarm goes off) Survey your proceedings for just one paper in which factorial design has been used or, if none, one in which.
Chapter 8Design and Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1 Design of Engineering Experiments The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference,
CPE 619 2k-p Factorial Design
Chapter 3 The Karnaugh Map. These K-maps are described by the location. Next, each square will be 1 or 0 depending on the value of the function. ABfm.
Dr. Gary Blau, Sean HanMonday, Aug 13, 2007 Statistical Design of Experiments SECTION V SCREENING.
1 Confounding In an unreplicated 2 K there are 2 K treatment combinations. Consider 3 factors at 2 levels each: 8 t.c’s If each requires 2 hours to run,
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments.
Design of Engineering Experiments Part 5 – The 2k Factorial Design
1 The General 2 k Factorial Design Section 6-4, pg. 224, Table 6-9, pg. 225 There will be k main effects, and.
Fractional Factorial Design Full Factorial Disadvantages Full Factorial Disadvantages –Costly (Degrees of freedom wasted on estimating higher order terms)
Common Fractions © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved next #6 Taking the Fear out of Math Dividing 1 3 ÷ 1 3.
Lecture 9 Page 1 CS 239, Spring 2007 More Experiment Design CS 239 Experimental Methodologies for System Software Peter Reiher May 8, 2007.
Equations, Inequalities, and Mathematical Models 1.2 Linear Equations
INTRODUCTION TO ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA). COURSE CONTENT WHAT IS ANOVA DIFFERENT TYPES OF ANOVA ANOVA THEORY WORKED EXAMPLE IN EXCEL –GENERATING THE.
Psych 5500/6500 Other ANOVA’s Fall, Factorial Designs Factorial Designs have one dependent variable and more than one independent variable (i.e.
IE341 Midterm. 1. The effects of a 2 x 2 fixed effects factorial design are: A effect = 20 B effect = 10 AB effect = 16 = 35 (a) Write the fitted regression.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs _ Blocking _ Example _ Four Blocks _ Exercise.
1 Blocking & Confounding in the 2 k Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 7 Blocking is a technique for dealing with controllable nuisance variables.
07 KM Page 1 ECEn/CS 224 Karnaugh Maps. 07 KM Page 2 ECEn/CS 224 What are Karnaugh Maps? A simpler way to handle most (but not all) jobs of manipulating.
Solutions. 1.The tensile strength of concrete produced by 4 mixer levels is being studied with 4 replications. The data are: Compute the MS due to mixers.
Fractional Factorial Designs Andy Wang CIS 5930 Computer Systems Performance Analysis.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 11 Multifactor Analysis of Variance.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 11 Multifactor Analysis of Variance.
The Mixed Effects Model - Introduction In many situations, one of the factors of interest will have its levels chosen because they are of specific interest.
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Advanced Designs -Hard to Change Factors- Split-Plot Design and Analysis.
Whiteboardmaths.com © 2004 All rights reserved
More on regression Petter Mostad More on indicator variables If an independent variable is an indicator variable, cases where it is 1 will.
1 Prof. Indrajit Mukherjee, School of Management, IIT Bombay Blocking a Replicated Design Consider the example from Section 6-2; k = 2 factors, n = 3 replicates.
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Fractional Factorials Not Based on the Powers of 2 – Irregular Designs.
Election Theory A Tale of Two Countries or Voting Power Comes To the Rescue!
Engineering Statistics Design of Engineering Experiments.
LECTURE 11: LINEAR MODEL SELECTION PT. 1 March SDS 293 Machine Learning.
Non-transitivity and Probability Steven Kumer Advised by Dr. Bryan Shader.
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Part I Experiments in smaller blocks.
1 Fractional Factorial Designs Consider a 2 k, but with the idea of running fewer than 2 k treatment combinations. Example: (1) 2 3 design- run 4 t.c.’s.
2 k-p Designs k factors two levels for each factor will only run 2 -p of the possible factor combinations will only run 2 k-p observations total.
Algebra. Factorials are noted by the expression n! and reads “n factorial”
Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2k Factorial Design
Text reference, Chapter 7
Confounding the 2k Factorial Design in Four Blocks
Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments
Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments
Fractional Factorial Design
Design of Engineering Experiments Blocking & Confounding in the 2k
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs
Design matrix Run A B C D E
14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors CHAPTER OUTLINE
Presentation transcript:

L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Part I Experiments in smaller blocks

L. M. LyeDOE Course2 Design of Engineering Experiments Blocking & Confounding in the 2 k Blocking is a technique for dealing with controllable nuisance variables Two cases are considered –Replicated designs –Unreplicated designs

L. M. LyeDOE Course3 Confounding In an unreplicated 2 k there are 2 k treatment combinations. Consider 3 factors at 2 levels each: 8 t.c.’s If each requires 2 hours to run, 16 hours will be required. Over such a long time period, there could be, say, a change in personnel; let’s say, we run 8 hours Monday and 8 hours Tuesday - Hence: 4 observations on each of two days.

L. M. LyeDOE Course4 (or 4 observations in each of 2 plants) (or 4 observations in each of 2 [potentially different] plots of land) (or 4 observations by 2 different technicians) Replace one (“large”) block by 2 smaller blocks

L. M. LyeDOE Course5 Consider 1, a, b, ab, c, ac, bc, abc, M 1 a b ab c ac bc abc TM 1 ab c abc a b ac bc TM 1 ab ac bc a b c abc T Which is preferable? Why? Does it matter? 123

L. M. LyeDOE Course6 The block with the “1” observation (everything at low level) is called the “Principal Block” (it has equal stature with other blocks, but is useful to identify). Assume all Monday yields are higher than Tuesday yields by a (near) constant but unknown amount X. (X is in units of the dependent variable under study). What is the consequence(s) of having 2 smaller blocks?

L. M. LyeDOE Course7 Again consider M 1 ab ac bc a b c abc T Usual estimate: A= (1/4)[-1+a-b+ab-c+ac-bc+abc] NOW BECOMES

L. M. LyeDOE Course8 = (usual estimate) [x’s cancel out] Usual ABC = Usual estimate - x

L. M. LyeDOE Course9 We would find that we estimate A, B, AB, C, BC, ABC - X Switch M & T, and ABC - X becomes ABC + X Replacement of one block by 2 smaller blocks requires the “sacrifice” (confounding) of (at least) one effect.

L. M. LyeDOE Course10 M 1 a b ab c ac bc abc TM 1 ab c abc a b ac bc TM 1 ab ac bc a b c abc T Confounded Effects: Only COnly ABOnly ABC

L. M. LyeDOE Course11 M 1 a b ac ab c bc abc T Confounded Effects: B, C, AB, AC (4 out of 7, instead of 1 out of 7)

L. M. LyeDOE Course12 Recall: X is “nearly constant”. If X varies significantly with t.c.’s, it interacts with A/B/C, etc., and should be included as an additional factor.

L. M. LyeDOE Course13 Basic idea can be viewed as follows: STUDY IMPORTANT FACTORS UNDER MORE HOMOGENEOUS CONDITIONS, With the influence of some of the heterogeneity in yields caused by unstudied factors confined to one effect, (generally the one we’re least interested in estimating- often one we’re willing to assume equals zero- usually the highest order interaction). We reduce Exp. Error by creating 2 smaller blocks, at expense of confounding one effect.

L. M. LyeDOE Course14 All estimates not “lost” can be judged against less variability (and hence, we get narrower confidence intervals, smaller  error for given  error, etc.) For large k in 2 k, confounding is popular- Why? (1) it is difficult to create large homogeneous blocks (2) loss of one effect is not thought to be important (e.g. in 2 7, we give up 1 out of 127 effects- perhaps, ABCDEFG)

L. M. LyeDOE Course with 4 replications: Partial Confounding 1 ab ac bc a b c abc 1 ab c abc a b ac bc 1 b ac abc a ab c bc 1 a bc abc b ab c ac Confound ABC Confound AB Confound AC Confound BC

L. M. LyeDOE Course16 Can estimate A, B, C from all 4 replications (32 “units of reliability”) AB from Repl.1, 3, 4 ACfrom1, 2, 4 BCfrom1, 2, 3 ABCfrom2, 3, 4 24 “units of reliability”

L. M. LyeDOE Course17 Example from Johnson and Leone, “Statistics and Experimental Design in Engineering and Physical Sciences”, 1976, Wiley: Dependent Variable:Weight loss of ceramic ware A: Firing Time B: Firing Temperature C: Formula of ingredients

L. M. LyeDOE Course18 Only 2 weighing mechanisms are available, each able to handle (only) 4 t.c.’s. The 2 3 is replicated twice: 1 ab ac bc a b c abc 1 ab c abc a b ac bc Confound ABCConfound AB Machine 1 Machine 2Machine 1 Machine 2 A, B, C, AC, BC, “clean” in both replications. AB from repl. ; ABC from repl

L. M. LyeDOE Course19 Multiple Confounding Further blocking: (more than 2 blocks) 1 cd abd abc a acd bd bc b bcd ad ac c d abcd ab = 16 t.c.’s Example: RSTU

L. M. LyeDOE Course20 Imagine that these blocks differ by constants in terms of the variable being measured; all yields in the first block are too high (or too low) by R. Similarly, the other 3 blocks are too high (or too low) by amounts S, T, U, respectively. (These letters play the role of X in 2-block confounding). (R + S + T + U = 0 by definition)

L. M. LyeDOE Course21 Given the allocation of the 16 t.c.’s to the smaller blocks shown above, (lengthy) examination of all the 15 effects reveals that these unknown but constant (and systematic) block differences R, S, T, U, confound estimates AB, BCD, and ACD (# of estimates confounded at minimum = 1 fewer than # of blocks) but leave UNAFFECTED the 12 remaining estimates in the 2 4 design. This result is illustrated for ACD (a confounded effect) and D (a “clean” effect).

L. M. LyeDOE Course22 1 a b ab c ac bc abc d ad bd abd cd acd bcd abcd Sign of treatment -R +S -T +U -T +S -R +U -T +S -R +S -T +U block effect Sign of treatment -R -S -T -U -T -S -R +U +T +S +R +S +T +U block effect ACD D

L. M. LyeDOE Course23 In estimating D, block differences cancel. In estimating ACD, block differences DO NOT cancel (the R’s, S’s, T’s, and U’s accumulate). In fact, we would estimate not ACD, but [ACD - R/2 + S/2 - T/2 + U/2] The ACD estimate is hopelessly confounded with block effects.

L. M. LyeDOE Course24 Summary How to divide up the treatments to run in smaller blocks should not be done randomly Blocking involves sacrifices to be made – losing one or more effects In the next part, we will examine how to determine what effects are confounded.

L. M. LyeDOE Course25 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Part II Determining what is confounded

L. M. LyeDOE Course26 We began this discussion of multiple confounding with 4 treatment combo’s allocated to each of the four smaller blocks. We then determined what effects were and were not confounded. Sensibly, this is ALWAYS REVERSED. The experimenter decides what effects he/she is willing to confound, then determines the treatments appropriate to each smaller block. (In our example, experimenter chose AB, BCD, ACD).

L. M. LyeDOE Course27 As a consequence of a theorem by Bernard, only two of the three effects can be chosen by the experimenter. The third is then determined by “MOD 2 multiplication”. Depending which two effects were selected, the third will be produced as follows: AB x BCD = AB 2 CD= ACD AB x ACD = A 2 BCD = BCD BCD x ACD = ABC 2 D 2 = AB

L. M. LyeDOE Course28 Need to select with care: in 2 5 with 4 blocks, each of 8 t.c.’s, need to confound 3 effects: Choose ABCDE and ABCD. (consequence: E - a main effect) Better would be to confound more modestly: say - ABD, ACE, BCDE. (No Main Effects nor “2fi’s” lost).

L. M. LyeDOE Course29 Once effects to be confounded are selected, t.c.’s which go into each block are found as follows: Those t.c.’s with an even number of letters in common with all confounded effects go into one block (the principal block); t.c.’s for the remaining block(s) are determined by MOD - 2 multiplication of the principal block.

L. M. LyeDOE Course30 Example: 2 5 in 4 blocks of 8. Confounded: ABD, ACE, [BCDE] of the 32 t.c.’s: 1, a, b, ……………..abcde, the 8 with even # letters in common with all 3 terms (actually the first two alone is EQUIVALENT):

L. M. LyeDOE Course31 1, abc, bd, acd, abe, ce, ade, bcde a, bc, abd, cd, be, ace, de, abcde b, ac, d, abcd, ae, bce, abde, cde e, abce, bde, acde, ab, c, ad, bcd ABD, ACE, BCDE Prin. Block * Mult. by a: Mult. by b: Mult. by e: any thus far “unused” t.c. * note: “invariance property”

L. M. LyeDOE Course32 Remember that we compute the 31 effects in the usual way.Only, ABD, ACE, BCDE are not “clean”. Consider from the 2 5 table of signs:

L. M. LyeDOE Course33 1 abc bd acd abe ce ade bcde Block 1 (too high or low by R a bc abd cd be ace de abcde Block 2 (too high or low by S) b ac d abcd ae bce abde cde Block 3 (too high or low by T e abce bde acde ab c ad bcd Block 4 (too high or low by U ABDACEABD CONFOUNDEDCLEAN BCDE

L. M. LyeDOE Course34 If the influence of the unknown block effect, R, is to be removed, it must be done in Block 1, for R appears only in Block 1. You can see when it cancels and when it doesn’t. (Similarly for S, T, U).

L. M. LyeDOE Course35 In general: (For 2 k in 2 r blocks) 2 r number of smaller blocks 2 r -1 number of confounded effects r number of confounded effects experimenter may choose 2 r -1-r number of automatically confounded effects

L. M. LyeDOE Course36 It may appear that there would be little interest in designs which confound as many as, say, 7 effects. Wrong! Recall that in a, say, 2 6, there are 63 = effects. Confounding 7 of 63 might well be tolerable.

L. M. LyeDOE Course37 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Part III Analysis of Blocked Experiments

L. M. LyeDOE Course38 Blocking a Replicated Design This is the same scenario discussed previously If there are n replicates of the design, then each replicate is a block Each replicate is run in one of the blocks (time periods, batches of raw material, etc.) Runs within the block are randomized

L. M. LyeDOE Course39 Blocking a Replicated Design Consider the example; k = 2 factors, n = 3 replicates This is the “usual” method for calculating a block sum of squares

L. M. LyeDOE Course40 ANOVA for the Blocked Design

L. M. LyeDOE Course41 Confounding in Blocks Now consider the unreplicated case Clearly the previous discussion does not apply, since there is only one replicate This is a 2 4, n = 1 replicate

L. M. LyeDOE Course42 Example Suppose only 8 runs can be made from one batch of raw material

L. M. LyeDOE Course43 The Table of + & - Signs

L. M. LyeDOE Course44 ABCD is Confounded with Blocks Observations in block 1 are reduced by 20 units…this is the simulated “block effect”

L. M. LyeDOE Course45 Effect Estimates

L. M. LyeDOE Course46 The ANOVA The ABCD interaction (or the block effect) is not considered as part of the error term The rest of the analysis is unchanged

L. M. LyeDOE Course47 Summary Better effects estimates can be made by doing a large experiments in blocks Choice of effect to sacrifice must be made carefully – avoid losing main and 2 f.i.’s. Luckily, most good software will do the blocking and subsequent analysis for you – but you must check to make sure that the effects you want estimated are not confounded with blocks.