Nitrogen efficiency in our N systems study fields Peter Scharf, Newell Kitchen, and Ken Sudduth University of Missouri and USDA-ARS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tim Reinbott University of Missouri Bradford Research and Extension Center.
Advertisements

Current Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Corn in Nebraska Richard Ferguson Bob Caldwell.
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
Using aerial photography & fertigation to fine-tune N management
Land Section #1: How We Use Land. How Can We Find Out How Land is Used? Maps Aerial photographs Field surveys Computerized mapping systems.
SOIL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT TO GUIDE PRODUCTION PRACTICES Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, MO Translating.
Nursery Production 3 Commercial Plant Production.
Real-Time Corn Assessment for Variable Rate Nitrogen Management Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Peter Scharf, Harlan Palm,
Improving NUE in Corn With Crop Sensing: Reflections, Concerns, and Needed Research Rain fed Southern Corn Belt.
Due to (1) the impact of N on plant production, its economical and environmental impact, (2) the scale of energy needed to face worldwide demand, (3) the.
Millar, N. and G. P. Robertson Nitrogen transfers and transformations in row-crop ecosystems. Pages in S. K. Hamilton, J. E. Doll, and G.
Lauer © University of Wisconsin – Agronomy Establish Realistic Yield Goals Yield Potential of Soil Growing Season.
Soil Nitrogen Cycling & Budgeting
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell. Goal 1.Explain purpose of partial budgets 2.Illustrate their structure and use 3.Give some examples.
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
Nutrient cycles and flows in agroecosystems Dissipation into the surrounding environment What is missing?
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell. Goal 1.Explain purpose of partial budgets 2.Illustrate their structure and use 3.Give some examples.
Can You Pay $300/acre Land Rent with $4 Corn? November 18-20, 2013 Greg Halich 311 CE Barnhart Dept. Agricultural Economics.
ISU Agronomy Extension Fertilizer Price Effect on Optimum Corn N Rate Recommendations John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Effectively Using GPS in Management Terry Griffin & Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer Site Specific Management Center Purdue University.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Iowa CREP Meeting/Tour October 15, 2007 Why off-field practices/buffers? Jim Baker, IDALS (professor emeritus, Dept. Agric. and Biosystems Eng. Iowa State.
Precision Agriculture: The Role of Science Presented by Dr. Eduardo Segarra Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University.
Field-Scale Sensor Evaluation Ken Sudduth, Newell Kitchen, Scott Drummond USDA-ARS Columbia MO.
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
Mixed Annual-Perennial Systems: Diversity on Iowa’s Land Matt Liebman Wallace Chair for Sustainable Agriculture Iowa State University.
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
Soil productivity Assessment for Bioenergy and Conservation (Sparc)
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives Peter Scharf University of Missouri Peter Scharf Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, Glenn Davis, John Lory, Vicky Hubbard,
G RAIN M ARKETS AND C OST OF P RODUCTION Paul D. Mitchell Associate Professor of Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison
Fertilizer Management
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
Economics of Alternative Rotations North Central Research Association March 11, 2004.
Precision Agriculture an Overview. Precision Agriculture? Human need Environment –Hypoxia –$750,000,000 (excess N flowing down the Mississippi river/yr)
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science.
Gross nutrient balances: German experiences Volker Appel, BMELV-425 WORKING PARTY "AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT" OF THE STANDING.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Corn Nitrogen Management: Progress in Missouri Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth, and John Hummel USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Peter.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
An Environmental Assessment of Sensor-Based Variable-Rate N Management in Corn Darrin Roberts Dr. Newell R. Kitchen, Advisor Thesis Committee Members:
Manure Management and Water Quality By Jeff Lorimor, Iowa State University, Ames 32-1.
Part 2: Answers to practical fertilizer management problems Fundamentals of Nutrient Management December 16-17, 2009 West Virginia University Extension.
Figure 1. Rodale Farming Systems Trial with rotations. Note the presence of cover crops and amendment in organic systems. Synthetic fertilizer herbicide.
Grain Markets and Cost of Production
Alternatives to Using a Reference Strip for Reflectance-Based Nitrogen Application in Corn (Presented at 8th International Conference on Precision Agriculture,
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Manure management plan summary – MMP NBs
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
Precision Agriculture an Overview
Precision Agriculture
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
Precision Agriculture an Overview
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
REVIEW.
Manure’s Fertility Value
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
By Nolan Spina and Alex Joyner
Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO
In-field Experiment.
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Presentation transcript:

Nitrogen efficiency in our N systems study fields Peter Scharf, Newell Kitchen, and Ken Sudduth University of Missouri and USDA-ARS

Nitrogen efficiency Lots of definitions Each with a different purpose Lots of scales Within-field… … to global

N efficiency: system definition Production system N inputs N removed In grain Efficiency = N removed in grain / N inputs

Slide from Cliff Snyder, PPI

What is the highest N efficiency we can achieve? Assume that soil organic matter is at steady state i.e., we’re not mining organic N to support crop growth or losing it in any other way Then the highest efficiency that we can achieve is defined by crop N removal If N supplied (fertilizer, manure, forage legumes) equals crop removal, then there is no N leakage from the system as a whole But leakage is inevitable in row-cropping systems

What is the highest N efficiency we can achieve? With corn, N removal is about 0.75 to 0.8 lb N/bu We’re applying 1 lb fertilizer N per bu to supply that 0.75 to 0.8 lb i.e., 75 to 80% of what we apply as fertilizer equals grain removal If we ignore manure and forage legumes, this would imply 75 to 80% efficiency of our N fertilizer Maximum efficiency is: 1 / 0.8 = 1.25 to 1 / 0.75 = 1.33 bu/lb N supplied

What is the highest N efficiency we can achieve? In a corn/soybean system, efficiency must be lower than the 1.25 to 1.33 bu/lb N ceiling Soybean is a net sink for N Supplied from soil organic matter Low residue does not replace lost organic matter Long-term continuous soybean mines organic matter and results in lower soil organic matter To have steady-state soil organic matter, the organic N lost in the soybean year must be replaced by N in corn residue Thus N supply to corn must exceed N removed in grain, just to keep soil organic matter at steady state

Slide from Cliff Snyder, PPI

Increasing N efficiency We’re already doing a pretty good job But there is room for improvement Role of sensors: identify areas where the soil is supplying a substantial proportion of the crop’s N requirement In these areas, efficiency of fertilizer N use is low Cutting back on N in these areas will increase field-average N efficiency Also, N timing with sensors is close to period of rapid crop uptake—the chance of N loss to air or water is reduced

N efficiency in out N systems study fields 8 field-scale experiments from 2000 to 2002 Three soil regions Claypan Deep loess Mississippi delta

Claypan 2000: map of N efficiency at EONR (kg grain/kg N) 70 kg grain contains about 1 kg N

What do we see in this map? Nitrogen efficiency was spatially variable Possibly a connection to landscape Over much of the field, N removed in grain was about the same as N applied (at EONR) In areas that appeared pink or red, N efficiency was 70 to 130%

Total N efficiency Kg grain/kg N at EONR

Total N efficiency Kg grain/kg N at EONR Red = more N removed in grain than applied in fertilizer

Efficiency at EONR In 5 of 8 fields, over most of the field we were removing more N in grain at EONR than we were applying This is not sustainable But it’s desirable in fields that have a rich organic N supply, as many fields have that have a history of generous N applications Overall, N efficiency at EONR was excellent except in a few fields with wet soils and probable N loss

N efficiency: EONR vs. 165 kg N/ha Deep loess 2000 N effic. at EONR (variable) N effic. at 165 Red >70 kg/kg Pink <70 kg/kg

N efficiency: EONR vs. 165 kg N/ha Variable-rate application of N rates near EONR can increase N efficiency relative to uniform application of typical N rates

Summary Harvested corn grain in the U.S. contains about 75 to 80% as much N as is applied to corn in fertilizer (we’re doing a good job!) We can do better. In the long-term we may be able to increase this to as much as 90% of the total N supplied to corn (fertilizer, manure, & forage legumes) We probably cannot exceed this limit due to: Inevitable N loss from row crop systems Soil organic N depletion during soybean years

Summary At economically optimal N rates in our 8 field- scale experiments, N efficiency was high: more N was removed in grain than was applied as fertilizer (>100% efficient!) Variable-rate N that matches or approaches EONR patterns can increase efficiency relative to conventional uniform N rates

8 Maps of partial N efficiency (kg grain yield increase/kg N) at EONR

Nitrogen inputs (fertilizer, manure, forage legumes) Soil Crop Soil org. matter Water Air (NH 3, N 2 ) Increasing N efficiency = reducing N loss