Accreditation Update, General Education, and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost for Assessment and Community.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
David J. Sammons, Dean UF International Center. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools: SACS is our regional accrediting authority. The last SACS.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Co-op at PCC Sylvania Co-op Task Force Findings and Recommendations.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
FOR THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION’S ACADEMY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING YSU’s Sustainability Plan 1.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
The Report of the Provost’s Advisory Group on the SUNY Assessment Initiative September 2009 Tina Good, Ph.D. President Faculty Council of Community Colleges.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Accreditation Who? Regional Accrediting Agency: NWCCU (Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities). What? Self-study followed by on-campus.
SUNY TAACCCT Grant PLA Advisory Board Agenda Review of Charge WordPress Site Policy – Philosophical differences on PLA – What makes a good: Policy?
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Dr. Christopher L. Markwood Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi January 23, 2014.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Assessment and Accreditation Deborah Moeckel Campus Senior Staff Orientation Albany, NY November 17, 2014.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Naz Assessment Workshop – May 13 th 2015.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
Curriculum and Accreditation
HLC
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Curriculum Committee Report
ASSESSMENT Overview January 30, 2006 and February 1, 2006
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Accreditation Update, General Education, and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost for Assessment and Community College Education Fulton Montgomery Community College January 25, 2016

New Standards

There is an increased focus on the student experience and assessment of that experience. Much of the same content is covered. Standards have been approved by the Commission and the member institutions. The new standards include: 1.Mission and Goals 2.Ethics and Integrity 3.Student Learning Opportunities 4.Support of the Student Experience 5.Educational Effectiveness Assessment 6.Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement 7.Governance, Leadership, and Administration NEW STANDARDS

New Guidance Available Eight areas instead of four o Student Identity Verification in Distance and Correspondence Education o Transfer of Credit Policies and Articulation Agreements o Title IV Program Responsibilities and Cohort Default Rates o Institutional Records of Student Complaints o Required Information for Students and the Public o Standing with State and Other Accrediting o Contractual Relationships o Assignment of Credit Hours Implementation in HEOA Compliance

Proposed New Procedures

Draft available on MSCHE website ( Discussion of Processes took place at Town Hall Meetings and the MSCHE annual meeting in December. Member institutions have been voting on revised accreditation cycle. Specifics of new procedures to be developed by committees and sent to member institutions for approval. First step in implementation to be the augmented Annual Institutional Updates, then rolling implementation of other processes. Revised Procedures -- Timeline

Re-affirmation of accreditation every eight years (unless there is a problem at the midpoint) Augmented Annual Institutional Updates (AIUs) with feedback from the Commission. Mid-point review conducted on the basis of accumulated information from AIUs Self-Study consists of off site document review and focus on institutional strategic goals and initiatives which must align with standards (as in current Selected Topics review) Revised Procedures -- Summary

Data points for the augmented AIUs will be selected on the basis of what’s necessary and what’s useful. A task force will be formed to look at what’s available in various frameworks. Rubrics will be developed for all standards. Recommendations will be issued by the Commission and not by visiting evaluation teams. A standard set of recommendations will be created for teams to select from. Commission recommendations will need to be responded to in the AIUs. Progress on Institutional Self- recommendations should be reported in the self-study. Re-affirmation of accreditation every eight years (unless there is a problem at the midpoint) Augmented Annual Institutional Updates (AIUs) with feedback from the Commission. Mid-point review conducted on the basis of accumulated information from AIUs Self-Study consists of off site document review and focus on institutional strategic goals and initiatives which must align with standards (as in current Selected Topics review) Revised Procedures -- Of Note

ISLOs and General Education: SUNY Expectations, MSCHE Expectations, and Assessment

Standard 14: “Clearly articulated statements of expected student learning outcomes … at all levels (institution, degree/program, course) …that are: Appropriately integrated with one another, consonant with the institution’s mission; and consonant with the standards of higher education and of the relevant disciplines.” Standard V: “Clearly stated educational goals at the institution and degree/program levels which are interrelated with one another, with relevant educational experiences, and with the institution’s mission.” Institutional Student Learning Outcomes

Institutional Student Learning Outcomes (ISLOs) are not new requirements. These have been part of Standard 14. They are often used interchangeably with General Education because gen ed is expected of all undergraduate students at the institutional level with the exception of students in certificate programs. Current standards require evidence of proficiency in gen ed in all areas except for critical analysis and reasoning, and information literacy (which is not in the current standard, but addressed in Standard 11). New standards require that curricula are designed so that students “acquire and demonstrate” all elements. ISLOs and General Education

SUNY General Education: 7/10 Categories, 2 competencies, and 30 credits in AA and AS degrees. MSCHE General Education:Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning, Oral and Written Communication, Critical analysis and reasoning, technological competency, information literacy, global awareness and cultural sensitivity. Required of all students except those in certificate programs. Must be mapped and assessed. No credit requirement in the new standards. Institutional Learning Student Learning Outcomes:Required of all students except those in certificate programs. May be the same as MSCHE gen ed, but may also include additional disciplines or competencies. (Sustainability is an example of this.) Definitions

Institutional Student Learning Outcomes and General Education assessment are of increasing concern. Middle States General Education and SUNY General Education are not the same. If the competencies are not included in courses within degree programs themselves, they must be accessible to students in either a co-curricular or extra-curricular manner, and assessed as such. Curriculum maps should demonstrate how all degree seeking students access general education ISLOs and General Education

Standard III: at institutions that offer undergraduate education, a general education program, freestanding or integrated into academic disciplines that: a. offers a sufficient scope to draw students into new areas of intellectual experience, expanding their global awareness and cultural sensitivity, and preparing them to make well-reasoned judgments outside as well as within their academic field; Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience

Standard III: at institutions that offer undergraduate education, a general education program, freestanding or integrated into academic disciplines that: b. offers a curriculum designed so that students acquire and demonstrate essential skills including at least oral and written communication, scientific and quantitative reasoning, critical analysis and reasoning, technological competency, and information literacy. Consistent with mission, the general education program also includes the study of values, ethics, and diverse perspectives.” For graduate and professional education (new and current standards), “opportunities for the development of research, scholarship, and independent thinking…” are required. Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience

15 credits of gen ed for associate degrees, 30 credits for baccalaureate degrees, or the equivalent. (New standards do not include credit amounts.) It is not necessary for gen ed to be delivered within programs or courses; alternative methods of delivery are permissible. You have to be able to demonstrate how all students are able to obtain instruction in these outcomes. You must also be able to assess them. Program learning outcomes are not the same as general education outcomes or ISLOs. They may be limited to programs only. General education and ISLOs should be applicable to students in all degree programs at the institution. Certificate programs are not included in this expectation. MSCHE Expectations

SUNY GER MTP 10-1 Reflects 3 Board Resolutions: Strengthening Transfer and Articulation Amending General Education Requirement Streamlining Assessment Requires 30 credits of gen ed Requires Basic Communication and Mathematics for all GER programs Requires 5 of remaining 8 categories Requires 2 competencies SUNY Expectations

Student Mobility and Gen Ed Board Resolution MTP 13-3 Seamless Transfer Requirements Requires completion of SUNY GER in the first two years SUNY GER certified as met by the sending institution must be accepted as met by the receiving institution Local requirements cannot force the transfer student to exceed the number of credits required of native students Encourages maximum designation of GER courses SUNY Expectations

Policy Implementation Nuances Local General Education must include SUNY GER but is not limited to this. Middle States General Education includes elements not in the SUNY GER. Receiving institutions must accept a category as met by the sending institution if indicated on the GETA. This does not automatically mean that the course is guaranteed to transfer. SUNY Expectations

Policy Implementation Nuances cont’d Courses which have as a prerequisite a course which has been approved for SUNY GER are also approvable in that category. Double dipping (having courses approved in more than one category, allowing students to meet more than one category with a single course) is allowable according to local campus policy. 30 credits of gen ed must still be completed. SUNY Expectations

Assessment Federal pressure on accreditors: the bar keeps moving

22

The Accreditation Alternative

#8 The institution systematically evaluates its educational and other programs and makes public how well and in what ways it is accomplishing its purposes. #9 The institution’s student learning programs and opportunities are characterized by rigor, coherence, and appropriate assessment of student achievement throughout the educational offerings, regardless of certificate or degree level or delivery and instructional modality. #10 institutional planning integrates goals for academic and institutional effectiveness and improvement, student achievement of educational goals, student learning, and the results of academic and institutional assessments. Requirements of Affiliation (new)

MSCHE expectations are for a “mature” assessment program Curricular offerings must be assessed consistently regardless of level, location or modality. General education and/or ISLOs must also be assessed, whether they are delivered within courses or in an extracurricular or co-curricular manner. In this case, mapping is especially important. Assessment

How do SUNY institutions measure up?

27

28

29

Middle States Expectations for Assessment clearly articulated statements of expected student learning outcomes at all levels (institution, degree/program, course) and for all programs that aim to foster student learning and development, that are: o appropriately integrated with one another; o consonant with the institution’s mission; and o consonant with the standards of higher education and of the relevant disciplines; Current Standards

Middle States Expectations for Assessment a documented, organized, and sustained assessment process to evaluate and improve student learning that meets the following criteria: o systematic, sustained, and thorough use of multiple qualitative and/or quantitative measures that: o maximize the use of existing data and information; o clearly and purposefully relate to the goals they are assessing; o are of sufficient quality that results can be used with confidence to inform decisions; and o include direct evidence of student learning; Current Standards

clearly stated educational goals at the institution and degree/program levels, which are interrelated with one another, with relevant educational experiences, and with the institution’s mission; periodic assessment of the effectiveness of assessment processes utilized by the institution for the improvement of educational effectiveness. New Standards

organized and systematic assessments, conducted by faculty and/or appropriate professionals, evaluating the extent of student achievement of institutional and degree/program goals. Institutions should: a. define meaningful curricular goals with defensible standards for evaluating whether students are achieving those goals; b. articulate how they prepare students in a manner consistent with their mission for successful careers, meaningful lives, and, where appropriate, further education. They should collect and provide data on the extent to which they are meeting these goals; c. support and sustain assessment of student achievement and communicate the results of this assessment to stakeholders; New Standards

Changes in Assessment Policy Board Resolution Streamlining the SUNY BOT Policy on Assessment Essential message: Meet or exceed Middle States Standards Include SUNY GER SLOs in your assessment of general education Assessment in SUNY

Implications of Policy Change SUNY no longer collects assessment reports. You are only asked to maintain your own records and produce them on request GEAR approved assessment plans are no longer required Institutions need to assess their general education program including SUNY GER learning outcomes Not every course needs to be assessed every time Assessment in SUNY

Implications of Policy Change: assessing infused competencies Curriculum maps are important. You need to show where students in each program are obtaining instruction on the infused competencies. You also need to be able to demonstrate that the competencies are assessed in each program so that you can be sure that all students are achieving the competencies, and to what degree. You need to be able to demonstrate and document that assessment results are being used to improve teaching and learning. Assessment in SUNY

How do you know? and How do you show? The Catchphrases

Adapted from Lauren Tacke-Cushing at Suffolk Community College

Discussion/Questions