Chapter 92 – NPDES Permits Watershed Permits Issue: Some pollutants persist and accumulate in the watershed, resulting in a threat to water quality standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antideg and Municipal Stormwater Discussion Sept. 23, 2009.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
Improving Water Quality: Controlling Point and Nonpoint Sources Chapter 15 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview
CT DEP LONG ISLAND SOUND MONITORING PROGRAM. TOTAL NITROGEN LOAD DELIVERED TO LONG ISLAND SOUND (Lbs TN/Day) Total Load from all Sources = 366K Lbs TN/day.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Summary Department of Health (DOH), Clean Water Branch (CWB) Background. Introduction to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits.
JT Petty: WMAN 445 Lecture Notes Lecture 5.2: STATE POLICY.
Monitoring Framework Development of a monitoring program must take into account what type of water is being monitored. This should be transposed against.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Clean Water Act (CWA) (1977, 1981, 1987). Description and Affects This Act was put into place in order to regulate the amount of pollutants that were.
ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS IWRM for River Basin Organisations.
Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia Tech
Water Quality Trading in Washington Helen Bresler (360)
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
Implementing Strategies: Marketing, Finance/Accounting, R&D, and MIS Issues Chapter 6.
Tool Box Implementation Schedule DO TMDL Subcommittee Meeting June 19, 2012.
Wherever there’s water, there’s Clean Water.. Water Quality Trading in Oregon’s Tualatin River Watershed Charles Logue, PE Director, Regulatory Affairs.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Class 7 Environmental Policy Tools
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Great Bay Municipal Coalition New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association June 13, 2013 Dean Peschel Peschel Consulting
Water Quality Management Plan Update Board of Directors March 25, 2009.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Critical Issues in Implementing Trading Programs in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed STAC Workshop May 14, 2013 Annapolis, MD.
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
James A. Klang, PE Senior Project Engineer Kieser & Associates, LLC 536 E. Michigan Ave., Suite 300 Kalamazoo, MI America’s Ag Water Management Summit.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 14 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Lecture: 5 Development and Environmental Economics By Miss Pratiti Singha, Assistant Professor(Part Time), Department of Economics, Radhamadhab College,
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
3 STUDENT ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Role of Environmental Justice in Land Use Planning Shankar B. Prasad, M.B.B.S. Community Health Advisor California Air Resources Board May 11, 2001 Statewide.
Framework for Water Management – challenges at national/local and trans-boundary scale Water Framework Directive implementation Gordana Kozhuharova, REC,
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Markets and Regulation: Alternative or Complements?
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Жирэмслэлт ба тархины харвалт
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 92 – NPDES Permits Watershed Permits Issue: Some pollutants persist and accumulate in the watershed, resulting in a threat to water quality standards only after a threshold loading or concentration is reached at some point in the watershed. Biological monitoring detects problem Existing process poorly positioned to address watershed-wide water quality concerns effectively and at minimum cost

New methods and tools have enabled the Department to better determine when watershed- wide concerns apply, and to assign appropriate limits to address the problem. The ability to issue watershed-based NPDES permits for point source discharges will provide the implementation process to complement these watershed-wide assessments. Chapter 92 – NPDES Permits Watershed Permits

Challenge: Minimize costs. Watershed permits avoid need for broad-brush, excessively conservative approaches. Customized wasteload allocation is the standard. Watershed permits provide the framework for pollutant credit trading. This flexibility is required to control costs and provide incentive for highest, cost-effective degree of treatment (because excess credits can be sold). Chapter 92 – NPDES Permits Watershed Permits