MODULE 5 HERMITICITY, ORTHOGONALITY, AND THE SPECIFICATION OF STATES we have stated that we need Hermitian operators because their eigenvalues are real.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
Advertisements

Mathematical Formulation of the Superposition Principle
10.4 Complex Vector Spaces.
Matrix Representation
Quantum One: Lecture 6. The Initial Value Problem for Free Particles, and the Emergence of Fourier Transforms.
Commutator Algebra.
The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems
Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. The Fundamental Rules of Our Game Any measurement we can make with an experiment corresponds to a mathematical “operator”
Commutators and the Correspondence Principle Formal Connection Q.M.Classical Mechanics Correspondence between Classical Poisson bracket of And Q.M. Commutator.
Dirac’s Quantum Condition
Integrals over Operators
Quantum One: Lecture 5a. Normalization Conditions for Free Particle Eigenstates.
Quantum One: Lecture 17.
Quantum One: Lecture 4. Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for a Free Quantum Particle.
Quantum One: Lecture Postulate II 3 Observables of Quantum Mechanical Systems 4.
Quantum One: Lecture 16.
Boyce/DiPrima 10th ed, Ch 10.1: Two-Point Boundary Value Problems Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 10th edition, by William.
Wavefunction Quantum mechanics acknowledges the wave-particle duality of matter by supposing that, rather than traveling along a definite path, a particle.
Overview of QM Translational Motion Rotational Motion Vibrations Cartesian Spherical Polar Centre of Mass Statics Dynamics P. in Box Rigid Rotor Angular.
Group work Show that the Sx, Sy and Sz matrices can be written as a linear combination of projection operators. (Projection operators are outer products.
P460 - math concepts1 General Structure of Wave Mechanics (Ch. 5) Sections 5-1 to 5-3 review items covered previously use Hermitian operators to represent.
Chapter 3 Formalism. Hilbert Space Two kinds of mathematical constructs - wavefunctions (representing the system) - operators (representing observables)
Peter Atkins • Julio de Paula Atkins’ Physical Chemistry
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
Boyce/DiPrima 9th ed, Ch 11.2: Sturm-Liouville Boundary Value Problems Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 9th edition, by.
Introduction to Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum
Lecture 7 Information in wave function. II. (c) So Hirata, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This material has been.
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering
From the previous discussion on the double slit experiment on electron we found that unlike a particle in classical mechanics we cannot describe the trajectory.
Chap 3. Formalism Hilbert Space Observables
3. Hilbert Space and Vector Spaces
Quantum One: Lecture Representation Independent Properties of Linear Operators 3.
Too Many to Count.
1 Week 5 Linear operators and the Sturm–Liouville theory 1.Complex differential operators 2.Properties of self-adjoint operators 3.Sturm-Liouville theory.
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
MODULE 1 In classical mechanics we define a STATE as “The specification of the position and velocity of all the particles present, at some time, and the.
The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules The Schrödinger equation and how to use wavefunctions Dr Grant Ritchie.
CHAPTER 2 Schrodinger Theory of Quantum Mechanics.
PHYS 773: Quantum Mechanics February 6th, 2012
Angular Momentum Classical radius vector from origin linear momentum determinant form of cross product Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
1 ۞ An eigenvalue λ and an eigenfunction f(x) of an operator Ĥ in a space S satisfy Week 6 2. Properties of self-adjoint operators where f(x) is implied.
5. Quantum Theory 5.0. Wave Mechanics
Mathematical Tools of Quantum Mechanics
Nanoelectronics Chapter 3 Quantum Mechanics of Electrons
MODULE 13 Time-independent Perturbation Theory Let us suppose that we have a system of interest for which the Schrödinger equation is We know that we can.
5. The Harmonic Oscillator Consider a general problem in 1D Particles tend to be near their minimum Taylor expand V(x) near its minimum Recall V’(x 0 )
MODULE 6 ANGULAR MOTION AND ANGULAR MOMENTUM In Module 3 we solved the Schrödinger equation for motion in a circular trajectory about a central, fixed.
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
1 HEINSENBERG’S UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE “It is impossible to determine both position and momentum of a particle simultaneously and accurately. The product.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Mathematical Formulation of the Superposition Principle
Q. M. Particle Superposition of Momentum Eigenstates Partially localized Wave Packet Photon – Electron Photon wave packet description of light same.
Schrodinger wave equation
Properties of Hermitian Operators
Formalism Chapter 3.
Uncertainty Principle
Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
Quantum Two.
The Postulates and General Principles
Quantum One.
Quantum Two.
Quantum One.
The Stale of a System Is Completely Specified by lts Wave Function
Linear Vector Space and Matrix Mechanics
Linear Vector Space and Matrix Mechanics
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

MODULE 5 HERMITICITY, ORTHOGONALITY, AND THE SPECIFICATION OF STATES we have stated that we need Hermitian operators because their eigenvalues are real This is so they can be related to experimentally determined observables (always real) A definition of Hermiticity (see Barrante, chap 10) is To prove the real property consider the eigenvalue equation with the eigenket normalized

MODULE 5 Now form the complex conjugate of both sides From the Hermiticity condition the two LHS are equal and therefore the two RHS are equal i.e.  which is only possible if  is real

MODULE 5 More about Orthogonality We have stated, and used a symmetry argument to show, that “eigenfunctions corresponding to different eigenvalues of the same operator are orthogonal.“ Now we can be a little more rigorous and prove the condition According to the orthogonality statement, if we have two eigenkets of the Hermitian operator  ^ having eigenvalues   and where  then According to the orthogonality statement, if we have two eigenkets of the Hermitian operator  ^ having eigenvalues   and   where   =/=    then

MODULE 5 Now form the complex conjugate of the RH equation and subtract it from the LH one Suppose we have two eigenstates That satisfy the two EV equations LH is zero (Hermitian condition)

MODULE 5 Our initial condition was that the two eigenvalues are different. The only way to satisfy the last equation is for And sincethen Thus different eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator having different eigenvalues are orthogonal.

MODULE 5 The Specification of States Three questions: Can a state be simultaneously an eigenstate of all possible observables, A, B, C, … ? Are there restrictions in the number or type of variables that can be simultaneously specified? And if so, how can we identify such things? If simultaneity is possible then if we measure the observable represented by the operator we shall get exactly as the outcome (P 4) and likewise for the other observables. If simultaneity is possible then if we measure the observable represented by the operator A^ we shall get exactly a as the outcome (P 4) and likewise for the other observables.

MODULE 5 We first find the conditions under which two observables may be specified simultaneously with arbitrary precision. we need to establish the conditions whereby a given ket can be simultaneously an eigenket of two Hermitian operators We assume that the property is true and find conditions that allow it to be so. Thus we assume that ket Iq> is an eigenket of A^ and B^

MODULE 5 Write the following chain: Thus the two operators commute (Barrante, chap 10) This is the condition that is necessary for Iq> to be a simultaneous eigenstate of the two operators.

MODULE 5 However, we need to find out whether commutation of the operators is a sufficient condition for simultaneity. Or, if is it certain that the ket is also an eigenstate of B^?

MODULE 5 with This is an eigenvalue equation (with eigenvalue a) and by comparing it with where b is a constant of proportionality. Thus, is an eigenstate of B^, as we set out to prove.

MODULE 5 Thus if we wish to know whether a pair of observables can be specified simultaneously we need to inspect whether the corresponding operators commute. The converse is also true, i.e., if a pair of operators does not commute, then their corresponding observables will not have simultaneously precisely defined values. We can extend this to more than two observables by taking them successively in pairs in which one of the pair is common to all pairs.

MODULE 5 For example Is the simultaneous specification of the position and linear momentum of a particle allowed? The three operators for the x, y, and z coordinates commute with each other (these operators tell us to multiply by the variable and multiplication is always commutative). Also the three operators for the components of momentum commute with each other.

MODULE 5 There are no constraints on the complete specification of position or of momentum as individual observables. What about the position and momentum pairs? To proceed we need to find the commutator of

MODULE 5 Similarly And we see that momentum and position cannot be simultaneously specified with arbitrary precision

MODULE 5 In general we can see that the operator for any component of momentum does not commute with its own position operator, z pypy pzpz x y pxpx pzpz pypy z But it does with the other position operators. Lines link those observables that can be specified simultaneously; those that cannot be so specified are not linked.

MODULE 5 Observables that cannot be simultaneously specified are said to be complementary. This is completely against the tenets of classical physics which presumed that no restrictions existed on the simultaneous determination of observables (no complementarity). Quantum mechanics tells us there can be restrictions on the extent that we can specify a state. Refer to the final segment of Module 5 about Complementarity and Uncertainty