MI Beam Loss upon Acceleration 5E11/div 11BLMA=LM634 9.28 GeV/c 9.8GeV/c Start of Ramp Fast loss ~10 ms Slow loss.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Advertisements

Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
Electron Cooling in the Accumulator McGinnis Electron Cooling in the Accumulator Dave McGinnis.
11 October 2006Basic Layout of LER G. de Rijk1 Basic Layout of LER  The basic idea  VLHC type magnets  LER in the LHC tunnel  Layout  LER experiment.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Linac4 Beam Commissioning Committee PSB Beam Optics and Painting Schemes 9 th December 2010 Beam Optics and Painting Schemes C. Bracco, C. Carli, B. Goddard,
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
Collimation System for Beam Loss Localization with Slip Stacking Injection in the Fermilab Main Injector Bruce C. Brown Main Injector Department Accelerator.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Accelerator Physics Issues Shekhar Mishra Sept 17-19, 1996 Main Injector DOE Review.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Recycler Status and Plans Shekhar Mishra MID/Beams Division Fermilab AAC Review 2/4/03 Introduction to the Recycler Ring Recycler Improvements and status.
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
#1 Energy matching It is observed that the orbit of an injected proton beam is horizontally displaced towards the outside of the ring, by about  x~1 mm.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
“Beam Losses” Christian Carli PSB H - Injection Review, 9 th November 2011 Several topics more or less related to beam losses, a study still somewhat at.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
1 st September 2005LHC-LUMI 05 - G.Arduini – CERN/AB Optical requirements for the magnetic lattice of the high energy injectors (SSPS in the SPS tunnel)
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
CEPC Booster Zhang Chuang, Cui Xiaohao September 11,2015.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
Slip stacking in Recycler Ioanis Kourbanis 9/14/11.
Analysis of Garren’s 27-Jul-2011 Hybrid Synchrotron Lattice J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting February 2,
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
FFAG 4-Bend Injection Line into EMMA C. Johnstone, Fermilab EMMA phone conference July 24, 2007.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Pre-Meeting Meeting Brian Drendel Accelerator Shift Plot.
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Optics Development for HE-LHC
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Progress of SPPC lattice design
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
Transfer Line for EIC.
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

MI Beam Loss upon Acceleration 5E11/div 11BLMA=LM GeV/c 9.8GeV/c Start of Ramp Fast loss ~10 ms Slow loss

Dynamic Dispersion Bump (Dispersion Un-suppressor) Provide a well contained limiting momentum aperture to “catch” all un-captured beam at the beginning of the ramp. –Apply a dispersion time bump to MI30 zero dispersion straight section only on selected cycles (slip-stacking) to generate dispersion at 302 (and 308). –Use fixed collimator at 302 (radial inside) as the limiting momentum aperture to “catch” the un-captured beam at the start of acceleration –Utilize local dipole time bump to assure limiting aperture –Straight section optics are not effected during pbar transfers (i.e. zero dispersion/ nominal betas) –Bump is turned on after injection (for catching un captured beam) –Collapse bump to return to nominal optics after ~ 10 GeV.

Concept could be expanded to potentially clean up un– captured beam during the slip stacking process itself –Turn dispersion un-suppressor (and dipole time bumps) at injection if a beta wave allows (need to keep matched to MI-8) –Install collimator at 308 (radial outside) and use dipole bump to move higher momentum beam onto collimator Could be expanded even further to collimate vertically (at 301) –Vertical beta function increases from 60 to 80 meters at 301 during dynamic dispersion bump. Dynamic Dispersion Bump II (Dispersion Un-suppressor)

Some numbers Energy spread during slip stacking  f = +/ hz ->  p = +/- 26 MeV bucket separation  Bucket height +/- 7 Mev  Total energy spread  p = +/- 33 MeV  p/p (max) = +/- 0.37%  T = 4.47 mm for  = 60m and  =20    L = 0.65 mm with  p /p = 0.33E-3  How fast does un-captured beam move radially inward? At 6 GeV/sec ->.06 MeV/turn 20G/s ->.2Mev/turn  ->  p/p ~ % %  ->  x ~ 13  m/turn ( D of 2 m) 45  m/turn  So, un-captured beam is scraped in ~10 ms once it contacts the aperture (i.e. 66 MeV/.06MeV/turn = 1100 turns)

How to create Dispersion bump Utilize trim coils in IQC/IQD dispersion suppressor on either side of MI30 to create a symmetric matched non-zero dispersion wave in MI30 –MI dispersion suppressors not matched –For ~ meter dispersions in MI30 phase advance across straight section increases by.25 to.4 Use Main Quad bus to compensate Install trim quads inside MI30 to create phase trombone to compensate (keep it local) Install phase trombone in MI60 –For smaller dispersion bump MI main quad bus is sufficient

Current Layout MI30 Q301 Q305 Q309 Q229 Q314 Q302 Q308 K304 QXR ECOOL (Between 305 & 307)

Potential MI30 Layout Q301 Q305 Q309 Q229 Q314 Q302 Q308 K304 QXR ECOOL H VH MI trim quad Fixed collimator (not motorized) TC1 TC2 TC3 TC4 TC5

Trim Coils and Trim Quads Main Injector Trim quads –Integrated strength T-m/m/A –Assume max current 10A -> Gdl ~.27 T (K1L ~0.01) Trim Coils –16 turns #14 sq. –IQC: R = 2.4 ohms L = 20 mH –IQD: R = 2.8 ohms L = 23.4 mH –Integrated strength T-m/m/A –Assume max strength 10A -> Gdl ~.59 T (K1L ~0.02) –Voltage required to ramp to max in 50 ms V ~ 24 v + IR drop from cable + induced voltage from main coil

Nominal MI30 Lattice functions

Nominal Ring Lattice Functions

Matched -1.2m solution

Circuit Currents for -1.2 m Solution

Matched -.6 m solution

Delta Beta/Beta for 3 Solutions

Revised Delta Beta/Beta for 2 Solutions Plot Hor d  /  at Hor locations and visa versa. Dashed lines indicate dispersion suppressor and straight

Conclusions / Recommendations Solutions for local Dynamic Dispersion insert in MI30 for collimating un- captured beam during acceleration –Small dispersion (< ½ m) done with only IQC/IQD trim coils –Larger dispersion (> ½ m) require trim quads in MI30 straight section Concept expanded to provide transverse and momentum collimation in same straight section Preliminary investigation has included the impact on RR counterwaves, QXR, and Recycler injection/extraction kicker. This needs further investigation Need to determine collimator design (single/double stage) Need to investigate impact on losses in ECOOL section Need to model proposed layout using collimation model (Sasha) Need to model geometry of collimators (Nikolai) Trim coils look to be sufficient (need to look at rms power) Need to determine max current for MQTM trim quads for linear excitation (and rms current) Need to investigate cost/time for required power supplies Since tunnel time is at a premium, I would recommend pulling cables ASAP to IQC/IQD on either side of straight section. These may be used for testing dynamic dispersion concept and lattice function measurements.