Twin bunches at FACET-II Zhen Zhang, Zhirong Huang, Ago Marinelli … FACET-II accelerator physics workshop Oct. 12, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg Short Bunches at FLASH.
Advertisements

Nominal and no CSR (R 56-1 = 55 mm, R 56-2 = 59 mm, R 56-3 = 0) L1 phase = 21 deg, V 3.9 = 55 MV CSR OFF BC3 OFF Elegant Tracking  z1 = mm (post.
BC System – Review Options ● BC2 working point (energy-charge-compr.) ● 2BC (rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf) ● table: 2BC (rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf) dogleg + 2BC (rf-dog-rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf)
Tessa Charles Australian Synchrotron / Monash University 1 Bunch Compression Schemes for X-band FELs.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Hard X-ray FELs (Overview) Zhirong Huang March 6, 2012 FLS2012 Workshop, Jefferson Lab.
Does the short pulse mode need energy recovery? Rep. rateBeam 5GeV 100MHz 500MWAbsolutely 10MHz 50MW Maybe 1MHz 5MW 100kHz.
P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Low-Charge LCLS Operating Point Including FEL Simulations P. Emma 1, W. Fawley 2, Z. Huang 1, C.
Juhao Wu Feedback & Oct. 12 – 13, 2004 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Longitudinal Feedback with CSR as Diagnostic.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
New 135-MeV injector energy requires minor changes to linac operating point…
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Gamma Beam Systems a simple introduction. Purpose of the machine Deliver a high performance photon beam: Variable energy Highly polarized High intensity.
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
Dielectric Wakefield Accelerator for an X-ray FEL User Facility
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
Collective Effects in the Driver of the Wisconsin Free-Electron Laser (WiFEL) Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team Synchrotron Radiation Center.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Paul Emma, et. al. Sep. 18, 2013 Paul Emma, et. al. Sep. 18, 2013 Design Considerations for the NGLS (Next Generation Light Source) NGLS.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
R&D opportunities for photoinjectors Renkai Li 10/12/2015 FACET-II Science Opportunities Workshops October, 2015 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II Accel. Phys., J.
The Microbunching Instability in the LCLS-II Linac LCLS-II Planning Meeting October 23, 2013 A. Marinelli and Z. Huang.
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
X-band Based FEL proposal
A single-shot method for measuring fs bunches in linac-based FELs Z. Huang, K. Bane, Y. Ding, P. Emma.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Bunch Shaping for Future Dielectric Wakefield Accelerators W. Gai Mini-Workshop on Deflecting/Crabbing RF Cavity Research and application in Accelerators.
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Short pulse, low charge LCLS operation
Challenges in Simulating EEHG
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Gu Qiang For the project team
Paul Scherrer Institut
BC2 Commissioning Parameters
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Challenges in Simulating EEHG
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Twin bunches at FACET-II Zhen Zhang, Zhirong Huang, Ago Marinelli … FACET-II accelerator physics workshop Oct. 12, 2015

2 Outline Twin bunches at FACET-II  Twin bunches at the LCLS  2-color free-electron lasers  Wakefield effect in the compression of the twin bunches  Increase the time delay  Preliminary simulations of the twin bunches for the FACET-II  Larger charge, higher peak current and how to control the time delay  Summary

3 Twin bunches & Two bunches Twin bunches at FACET-II Born/accelerated in the same RF bucket Initial time delay ~ 10ps Final time delay ~ 10s-100s fs Delay compression of ~200 Twin bunches Two bunches Born/accelerated in different RF buckets Initial time delay ~ several ns Final time delay ~ several ns Almost no delay compression

Twin bunches at the LCLS 4 Photocathode Laser Pulse Adjustable delay stage Double Pulse Electron Gun Linac Few ps delay Bunch Compressor 1 Bunch Compressor 2 Few fs delay ~1% energy separation UNDULATOR time Energy Splitter A. Marinelli et al., Nat. Commun. 6, 6369 (2015) T. Maxwell Power ~35 fs 10 fs E photon Power 35 eV T. Maxwell

5 Wakefield effects  Wakefields in the accelerating structure complicates the compression of the twin bunches. Bunch profile Wake-induced energy loss Two effects: 1.Reduce the energy chirp over the two bunches 2.Reduce the “local” chirp of each single bunch If we fix the compression factor (or the final peak current), the time delay of the twin bunches will be Z. Zhang et al., PRST-AB 18, (2015)

6 Twin bunches at FACET-II Twin bunches for FACET-II  The twin bunches at FACET-II require larger charge and higher peak current. ParametersLCLSFACET-II Charge75pC + 75pC1nC + 1nC Peak current~4kA~10kA Emittance? Time delay10fs~130fs>~100fs Energy spreadSmall for self- seeding ? BC2 4.5 GeV 10 GeV BC1 335 MeV L1S L1X L2-linac L3-linac DL1 135 MeV L0Gun R 56 =-36mm R 56 =-48mm  The layout and parameters of the beamline in the LiTrack simulation. The numbers listed here are fixed and we vary the phases of L1,L2 and L1X, and the initial distribution of the two bunches.

7 Twin bunches at FACET-II Parameters range in the simulations ParameterValueScan step size Charge1nC + 1nC Initial delay6ps -10ps Profile of single bunch parabolic Phase of L1 Phase of L1X Amplitude of L1X0 ~ 25MeV0.5MeV Phase of L2 Phase of L3  For a specific initial distribution of the two bunches, we scan the phases of L1 and L2, the amplitude of L1X to vary the compression in the LiTrack simulation.

8 Simulation results Twin bunches at FACET-II  If we require the final peak current >10kA, we can pick out the “good settings” in the scan results and show them in the histogram with energy separation and time delay.  Case 1: 1nC + 1nC, Initial time delay 6ps, peak current 250A

9 Simulation results (time delay 100fs ~ 500fs)  Case 1: 1nC + 1nC, Initial time delay 6ps, peak current 250A

10 Simulation results  Case 2: 1nC + 1nC, Initial time delay 8ps, peak current 190A When we scale the beam profile to 8ps and 190A, the final time delay ranges from 200fs to 1.2ps.

11 Simulation results  Case 3: 1nC + 1nC, Initial time delay 10ps, peak current 150A When we scale the beam profile to 10ps and 150A, the final time delay ranges from 400fs to 1.4ps.

12 Comments and summary  From the analysis in the reference (PRST-AB 18, ), wakefield effect will increase the final time delay of the twin bunches.  During the simulations for FACET-II, we find the wakefield effects are very strong and the final time delay will become large. It is easy to get >400fs, even ~ps time delay. In order to cover the small delay (~100fs), we have to optimize the initial distribution (let the two bunches initially have some overlap).  Considering the length of single bunch is ~100fs (1nC, 10kA), the two bunches will overlap in the time domain if the delay is too small (<100fs).  The simulation results show that the twin-bunch method can cover the range of the time delay from 100fs to several ps.  The two bunches cannot have the same energy and also there is always large remaining energy chirp. This is because the wakefield at L3 is very strong due to the high peak current (~10kA) and long accelerating tubes.

13 Questions and comments Twin bunches at FACET-II Thanks !