How do we know if our UI is good or bad?.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome Back to School!!! Mr. Sortina.
Advertisements

Testing through user observations User Observation: Guidelines for Apple Developers, Kathleen Gomoll & Anne Nicol, January 1990 Notes based on:
Evaluating interfaces with users Why evaluation is crucial Quickly debug prototypes by observing people use them Methods reveal what a person is thinking.
6.811 / PPAT: Principles and Practice of Assistive Technology Wednesday, 16 October 2013 Prof. Rob Miller Today: User Testing.
HCI 특론 (2007 Fall) User Testing. 2 Hall of Fame or Hall of Shame? frys.com.
Analyzing and Presenting Results Establishing a User Orientation Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Qualitative Evaluation Techniques
Evaluation 3: Approaches and Data Collection Slides adapted from Saul Greenberg’s “Evaluating Interfaces with Users”.
Qualitative Evaluation Techniques
Saul Greenberg Qualitative Evaluation Techniques Quickly debug and evaluate prototypes by observing people using them Specific evaluation methods helps.
1 User Testing. 2 Hall of Fame or Hall of Shame? frys.com.
Observation Watch, listen, and learn…. Agenda  Observation exercise Come back at 3:40.  Questions?  Observation.
User Interface Testing. Hall of Fame or Hall of Shame?  java.sun.com.
Energy Information Administration Usability Testing Colleen Blessing.
Definition How to quickly evaluate prototypes by observing people’s use of them How specific methods can help you discover what a person is thinking about.
James Tam Qualitative Evaluation Techniques Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs with the different approaches.
Human Computer Interaction Design Evaluation and Content Presentation
Saul Greenberg Evaluating Interfaces With Users Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs in evaluation The role of.
ISE554 The WWW 3.4 Evaluation Methods. Evaluating Interfaces with Users Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs.
James Tam Evaluating Interfaces With Users Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs in evaluation The role of ethics.
James Tam Qualitative Evaluation Techniques Quickly debug and evaluate prototypes by observing people using them Specific evaluation methods helps you.
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
Classroom observation and post-observation interview 呂曉娟
REDESIGN PROPOSAL Team 1 Jon Anscher, Carolyn Campbell, Conrado Tapado & Jim Sanders.
User Interface January 14, 2011 CSE 403, Winter 2011, Brun Three Mile Island.
Acting Like a Professional
User Interface Evaluation Usability Testing Methods.
Improving learning in mathematics PD4: Managing discussion.
Presentation: Techniques for user involvement ITAPC1.
Involving Users in Interface Evaluation Marti Hearst (UCB SIMS) SIMS 213, UI Design & Development April 8, 1999.
This slide presentation is Confidential and Proprietary to ProtoTest LLC.
Human Computer Interaction
Usability Testing Chapter 6. Reliability Can you repeat the test?
1 Usability Studies. 2 Evaluate Usability Run a usability study to judge how an interface facilitates tasks with respect to the aspects of usability mentioned.
Midterm Stats Min: 16/38 (42%) Max: 36.5/38 (96%) Average: 29.5/36 (78%)
CS2003 Usability Engineering Usability Evaluation Dr Steve Love.
Designing & Testing Information Systems Notes Information Systems Design & Development: Purpose, features functionality, users & Testing.
The product of evaluation is knowledge. This could be knowledge about a design, knowledge about the user or knowledge about the task.
Design and Qualitative Analysis. Why is Usability Important? We are not the users – Even design experts don’t think the same way as all other humans Users.
Anatomy Anatomy of an Interview
Methods of Research. 1. Laboratory Experiments Research in lab setting Research in lab setting Researcher can be objective and usually provides accurate.
EVALUATION PROfessional network of Master’s degrees in Informatics as a Second Competence – PROMIS ( TEMPUS FR-TEMPUS-JPCR)
The Information School of the University of Washington Information System Design Info-440 Autumn 2002 Session #15.
Ethics in Evaluation Why ethics? What you have to do Slide deck by Saul Greenberg. Permission is granted to use this for non-commercial purposes as long.
User Testing. CSE490f - Autumn 2006User Interface Design, Prototyping, & Evaluation2 Hall of Fame or Hall of Shame? frys.com.
Observing users. What and when to observe Goals & questions determine the paradigms and techniques used. Observation is valuable any time during design.
RESPONDING TO RULES HOW TO: MAKE COMPLAINTS TAKE “NO” FOR AN ANSWER DISAGREE APPROPRIATELY CHANGE RULES.
Spring /6.831 User Interface Design and Implementation1 Lecture 13: User Testing next 3 lectures required for 6.831G only nanoquizzes on those.
Usability Evaluation or, “I can’t figure this out...do I still get the donuts?”
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2007.
Copyright 1999 all rights reserved Evaluating Paper Prototypes n How do you do this? –What are the considerations? –What are the steps? ?
11/10/981 User Testing CS 160, Fall ‘98 Professor James Landay November 10, 1998.
Personal Selling 4 Handling Objections How to use objections to your advantage in a sales presentation.
1 ITM 734 Introduction to Human Factors in Information Systems Cindy Corritore Testing the UI – part 2.
Usability Testing 2 CPSC 481: HCI I Fall 2014 Anthony Tang.
Personality Test based on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
What aspect of usability is this clip illustrating?
Usability Testing 3 CPSC 481: HCI I Fall 2014 Anthony Tang.
Evaluating interfaces with users
Usability Evaluation, part 2
Lesson 1: Buttons and Events – 12/18
SY DE 542 User Testing March 7, 2005 R. Chow
Web User Interface (WUI) Behavior
Skills for a Healthy Life
Evaluating interfaces with users
Revenge of the UI The Final Installment
Chapter 23 Deciding how to collect data
Empirical Evaluation Data Collection: Techniques, methods, tricks Objective data IRB Clarification All research done outside the class (i.e., with non-class.
How to use Open study By blm1.
Presentation transcript:

How do we know if our UI is good or bad?

Naturalistic approach Observation occurs in realistic setting – real life Problems – hard to arrange and do – time consuming – may not generalize

Usability engineering approach Observe people using systems in simulated settings – people brought in to artificial setting that simulates aspects of real world setting – people given specific tasks to do – observations / measures made as people do their tasks – look for problem areas / successes – good for uncovering ‘big effects’

Simple observation method User is given the task Evaluator just watches the user Problem – does not give insight into the user’s decision process or attitude

Constructive interaction method Two people work together on a task – monitor their normal conversations – removes awkwardness of think- aloud Co-discovery learning – use semi-knowledgeable “coach” and novice – only novice uses the interface novice ask questions coach responds – gives insights into two user groups Now, why did it do that? Oh, I think you clicked on the wrong icon

Videos Think aloud (NYC subway) – Critical incidents (DC subway) –

Coding sheet example... tracking a person’s use of an editor Time 09:00 09:02 09:05 09:10 09:13 ErrorsGeneral actions textscrollingimagenewdeletemodifycorrectmiss editingeditingnodenodenodeerrorerror Graph editing x x x x

Retrospective testing interviews Post-observation interview to – perform an observational test – create a video record of it – have users view the video and comment on what they did clarify events that occurred during system use excellent for grounding a post- test interview avoids erroneous reconstruction users often offer concrete suggestions Do you know why you never tried that option? I didn’t see it. Why don’t you make it look like a button?

Critical incident interviews People talk about incidents that stood out – usually discuss extremely annoying problems with fervor – not representative, but important to them – often raises issues not seen in lab tests Tell me about the last big problem you had with Word I can never get my figures in the right place. Its really annoying. I spent hours on it and I had to…

Ethics...and to think that you want me to test it!!!

Ethics Testing can be a distressing experience – pressure to perform, errors inevitable – feelings of inadequacy – competition with other subjects Golden rule – subjects should always be treated with respect