Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Riemara M. Schuivens GCET 2010, Bangkok Source: www.flickr.com/photos/rijkv.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Riemara M. Schuivens GCET 2010, Bangkok Source: www.flickr.com/photos/rijkv."— Presentation transcript:

1 Riemara M. Schuivens GCET 2010, Bangkok Source: www.flickr.com/photos/rijkv

2  Key data of the Netherlands 2009  Historical overview Dutch Energy Tax 1996 - 2010  Recognisable trends  Future development of the Dutch Energy Tax

3  Population  Households  Surface area  GDP  GDP per person  Tax + social security (in % of GDP)  Total tax revenue (2008) -> indirect taxes of which Energy Tax  GHG emissions (IPCC)  Energy consumption 16.532.0007.334.000 33.729 km 2 € 571.979 million € 34.598 38,0% € 135.578 million € 67.770 million € 3.992 million 201 Mton CO 2 eq. 3.260 PJ Source: CBS

4 Environmental taxes on energy products/electricity (1):  1970s-1980s: several environmental charges on energy products at a national local level, earmarked for specific environmental costs.  1988-1992: general fuel charge on mineral oils and natural gas (revenue is earmarked) to replace the before mentioned charges.  1992-2003: general fuel charge becomes fuel tax (revenue is not earmarked, it goes into general budget).  1996-2003: regulatory energy tax on mineral oils (not used as motor fuel), electricity and natural gas.  2003: taxation of energy products and electricity is harmonised at a European level, the Energy Taxation Directive would have to be implemented by 1-1-2004.

5 Environmental taxes on energy products/electricity (2):  2004-2010: the regulatory energy tax is named energy tax because of implementing the Energy Taxation Directive and merging the fuel tax on mineral oils (not used as motor fuel) and natural gas into the energy tax.  2004-2010: the fuel tax on mineral oils used as motor fuel is merged into the excise duties on mineral oils; only coal remains taxed with fuel tax (hence it is named coal tax since 2008). The excise duties on mineral oils must not be forgotten in this overview. Even though the main purpose of this tax has always been to generate revenue, it is nowadays also considered to be an environmentally related tax.

6 1996199820012004*20072010 0-800 kWh--0,05830,06540,07160,1114 800-10 000 kWh0,0134 10 000-50 000 kWh0,01940,02120,03690,0406 50 000-10 mln kWh-0,00590,00650,01020,0108 >10 mln kWh non-business use ---0,0010 > 10 mln kWh business use ---0,0005 Annual tax reduction ---181199318,62 Electricity: regular rates Energy Tax 1996–2010 ( Electricity: regular rates Energy Tax 1996–2010 (€/kWh) * EU minimum rates electricity: Non-business use € 0,0010 per kWh/ Business use € 0,0005 per kWh

7 Natural gas: regular rates Energy Tax 1996–2010 () Natural gas: regular rates Energy Tax 1996–2010 (€/m 3 ) 1996199820012004*20072010 0-800 m 3 --0,12030,14290,15310,1629 800-5 000 m 3 0,01450,0432 5 000-170 000 m 3 0,05620,07270,13420,1411 170 000-1 mln m 3 -0,01040,02270,03720,0391 1-10 mln m 3 --0,01130,01180,0124 >10 mln m 3 non-business use ---0,01060,01100,0116 > 10 mln m 3 business use ---0,00750,00780,0082 * EU minimum rates natural gas (for heating purposes): Non-business use € 0,0106 per m 3 / Business use € 0,0053 per m 3

8 96979899000102 € mln4248158231408177523202003 Revenue Energy Tax 1996 – 2008 (CBS) 030405060708 € mln213228483716407033143992 Estimated effect of Energy Tax on national energy use and thus CO 2 emissions (based on studies by the Dutch central planning bureau): Deviation from a central projection of the national Deviation from a central projection of the national energy use would be almost -4% in 2010. energy use would be almost -4% in 2010. 1996-1998: 1,5-2 Mton CO 2 reduction in 2000 1996-1998: 1,5-2 Mton CO 2 reduction in 2000 1999-2001: 3,6-3,8 Mton CO 2 reduction in 2010 1999-2001: 3,6-3,8 Mton CO 2 reduction in 2010 2005-2007: 0,2-0,3 Mton CO 2 reduction in 2010 2005-2007: 0,2-0,3 Mton CO 2 reduction in 2010

9  Shift of tax burden from direct taxes to indirect taxes without increasing total tax revenue.  The role negative effects of an Energy Tax on energy- intensive businesses and businesses subject to global competition have played.  Abandoning rates based on energy content/CO 2 emissions to benefit other objectives.  Energy products/electricity exempted from Energy Tax when used to generate electricity.  The introduction of specific facilities in the Energy Tax to stimulate renewable energy proved to be inefficient.  Development of the Energy Tax due to many reasons.

10  The Dutch Energy Tax: a tax with a relatively stable revenue that can simultaneously support environmental policies.  Environmental taxation strategy: maintain, evolve or reform the Dutch Energy Tax?  Reports by ECN and the Tax System Study Committee: what are the options?  Developments at a European level: a possible review of the European Energy Taxation Directive?  A new Cabinet: consequences for the Dutch Energy Tax?

11 Riemara M. Schuivens GCET 2010, Bangkok Source: www.flickr.com/photos/rijkv


Download ppt "Riemara M. Schuivens GCET 2010, Bangkok Source: www.flickr.com/photos/rijkv."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google