1. AMIT/DSWG Workshop ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Meeting September 30, 2011 Jay Zarnikau, Frontier Associates

2. Workshop Objective: Increase Demand Response among AMI customers leveraging the infrastructure that has been built in order to implement the law, address market issues, and meet the customer needs. Our task is to prioritize issues that fall into these categories: Short term: May 2012 Medium term: summer 2014 Long term: beyond summer 2014

3. For our review of the barrier/issues list, we have been asked to: 1)Prioritize within short-, medium- and long-term categories (see above) 2)Determine which questions on the list are relevant to your group’s category and cross-reference those questions to each barrier/issue 3)Discuss and document any dependencies among each barrier/issue (what is contingent on something else) 4)Document answers to questions as appropriate. It is also acceptable to note that a question may not be answerable at this time. 5)Discuss issues and recommendations for each barrier/issue. a.Document consensus b.Document alterative positions on areas where consensus was not achieved c.Create short summary to outline the major points (one page) 6)Prepare for next joint workshop a.Materials from number 5 above from each group will be due to ERCOT by Friday 11/11.) b.ERCOT will organize materials for second workshop to be held Wednesday 11/30 at the PUC Commissioners Hearing Room. Details and materials will be posted to the ERCOT calendar web page: http://www.ercot.com/calendar/2011/novemberhttp://www.ercot.com/calendar/2011/november

4. ISS – 02 - ERCOT – assigned ERCOT / DSWG Recommendation - Allow Demand to Bid in Like Supply (Load Resources in SCED). Consider separate standards / requirements for Distributed Mass Market o Demand in this market is not valued like supply Load as compared to Single Point Load Short term urgency around projected system reserves Review best practices and modify them for the Energy Only Design Advanced notification of wholesale prices: o In the current environment, current Load Zone LMP 15 minute prices are already in effect before REPs are notified; ideally notification would be at least 90 seconds prior the interval starting Recommendation – Commission a study of customer tolerance in DR (e.g. how much they would spend for what type of saving, how much control would they give up, etc.) With all DR programs for Austin Energy, communication timing on all programs have a 1 hour notification timing for customers, but the longest DR ramp period in a program is 30 minutes o In general, the longer the ramp period, the more customer participation there will be Recommendation – Have a flag in a retail transaction process for retailers to inform ERCOT of customers enrolled in REP administered DR products