Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

International Conference Classical Problems of Rigid Body Dynamics Donetsk, June 23-25, 2004 Peter H. Richter - Institut für Theoretische Physik The study.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "International Conference Classical Problems of Rigid Body Dynamics Donetsk, June 23-25, 2004 Peter H. Richter - Institut für Theoretische Physik The study."— Presentation transcript:

1 International Conference Classical Problems of Rigid Body Dynamics Donetsk, June 23-25, 2004 Peter H. Richter - Institut für Theoretische Physik The study of non-integrable rigid body problems S3S3S3S3 RP 3 K3K3K3K3 3S 3 (1.912,1.763)VII S 3,S 1 xS 2 2T 2

2 Donetsk, June 25, 20042 Types of rigid bodies: parameter space Translation R 2 or R 3 and Rotation SO(3) or T 3 4 parameters: principal moments of inertia: principal moments of inertia: one point fixed: only 3 rotational degrees of freedom center of gravity: in addition: moments of inertia and direction of axis of Cardan suspension 2 2

3 Donetsk, June 25, 20043 Rigid body dynamics - -Phase spaces and basic equations Full and reduced phase spaces Euler-Poisson equations - -Integrable cases Euler Lagrange Kovalevskaya - -Katok‘s general cases Effective potentials Bifurcation diagrams Enveloping surfaces - -Poincaré surfaces of section Gashenenko‘s version Dullin‘s suggestion Schmidt‘s investigations

4 Donetsk, June 25, 20044 Phase space and conserved quantities 3 angles + 3 velocities 6D phase space energy conservation h=const 5D energy surfaces one angular momentum l=const 4D invariant sets 3 conserved quantities 3D invariant sets 4 conserved quantities 2D invariant sets super-integrable integrable mild chaos

5 Donetsk, June 25, 20045 Reduced phase space 3 components each of  and l 6D phase space but:     (Poisson sphere) und l ·  l (ang.momentum) are Casimirs  effectively only 4D phase space energy conservation h=const 3D energy surfaces integrable 2 conserved quantities 2D invariant sets super integrable 3D phs. sp., 2 integrals 1D invariant sets

6 Donetsk, June 25, 20046 Euler-Poisson equations coordinates Casimir constants effective potential energy integral

7 Donetsk, June 25, 20047 The basic scheme

8 Donetsk, June 25, 20048 Euler‘s case l- motion decouples from  -motion Poisson sphere potential admissible values in (p,q,r)-space (h,l)-bifurcation diagram

9 Donetsk, June 25, 20049 Lagrange‘s case effective potential (p,q,r)-equations integrals I: ½ <  < ¾ II: ¾ <  < 1 RP 3 bifurcation diagrams S3S3S3S3 2S 3 S 1 xS 2 III:  > 1 S 1 xS 2 S3S3S3S3 RP 3

10 Donetsk, June 25, 200410 Enveloping surfaces

11 Donetsk, June 25, 200411 Katok‘s cases s 2 = s 3 = 0 1 2 3 4 56 7 2 3 45 6 7 7 colors for 7 types of bifurcation diagrams 7colors for 7 types of energy surfaces S 1 xS 2 1 2S 3 S3S3S3S3 RP 3 K3K3K3K3 3S 3

12 Donetsk, June 25, 200412 Effective potentials for case 1 (A1,A2,A3) = (1.7,0.9,0.86) l = 0l = 1.68l = 1.71l = 1.763l = 1.773 l = 1.86l = 2.0l = 1.74

13 Donetsk, June 25, 200413 7+1 types of envelopes (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (1.7,0.9,0.86) (h,l) = (1,1) I S3S3 T2T2 (1,0.6) I‘ S3S3 T2T2 (2.5,2.15) II 2S 3 2T 2 (2,1.8) III S 1 xS 2 M32M32

14 Donetsk, June 25, 200414 7+1 types of envelopes (1.9,1.759) VI 3S 3 2S 2, T 2 (1.912,1.763)VII S 3,S 1 xS 2 2T 2 IV RP 3 T2T2 (1.5,0.6) (1.85,1.705) V K3K3 M32M32 (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (1.7,0.9,0.86)

15 Donetsk, June 25, 200415 2 variations of types II and III 2S 3 2S 2 II‘ (3.6,2.8) S 1 xS 2 T2T2 (3.6,2.75) III‘ Only in cases II‘ and III‘ are the envelopes free of singularities. Case II‘ occurs in Katok‘s regions 4, 6, 7, case III‘ only in region 7. A = (0.8,1.1,0.9) A = (0.8,1.1,1.0) This seems to complete the set of all possible types of envelopes.

16 Donetsk, June 25, 200416 Poincaré section S 1

17 Donetsk, June 25, 200417 Poincaré section S 1 – projections to S 2 (  ) S-()S-()S-()S-() S+()S+()S+()S+()  0       0 0

18 Donetsk, June 25, 200418 Poincaré section S 1 – polar circles Place the polar circles at upper and lower rims of the projection planes.

19 Donetsk, June 25, 200419 Poincaré section S 1 – projection artifacts s =( 0.94868,0,0.61623) A =( 2, 1.1, 1)

20 Donetsk, June 25, 200420 Poincaré section S 2 =

21 Donetsk, June 25, 200421 Comparison of the two sections S1:S1: with S2:S2: where

22 Donetsk, June 25, 200422 Poincaré sections S 1 and S 2 in comparison s =( 0.94868,0,0.61623) A =( 2, 1.1, 1)

23 Donetsk, June 25, 200423 From Kovalevskaya to Lagrange (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (2, ,1) (s 1,s 2,s 3 ) = (1,0,0) (s 1,s 2,s 3 ) = (1,0,0)  = 2 Kovalevskaya  = 1.1 almost Lagrange

24 Donetsk, June 25, 200424 Examples B E

25 Donetsk, June 25, 200425 Example of a bifurcation scheme

26 Donetsk, June 25, 200426 Acknowledgement Igor Gashenenko Sven Schmidt Holger Dullin

27

28 Donetsk, June 25, 200428 Integrable cases Lagrange: „ heavy“, symmetric Kovalevskaya: Euler: „gravity-free“

29 Donetsk, June 25, 200429 Kovalevskaya‘s case (p,q,r)-equations integrals Tori projected to (p,q,r)-space Tori in phase space and Poincaré surface of section

30 Donetsk, June 25, 200430 Poincaré section S 1 – projections to S 2 (  ) S-()S-()S-()S-() S+()S+()S+()S+()  0       0 0

31 Donetsk, June 25, 200431 Poincaré section S 1 – polar circles

32 Donetsk, June 25, 200432 Improved projection representation Place the polar circles at upper and lower rims of the projection planes.


Download ppt "International Conference Classical Problems of Rigid Body Dynamics Donetsk, June 23-25, 2004 Peter H. Richter - Institut für Theoretische Physik The study."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google