1. ANALYSES OF D s * DK (B s * BK) VERTICES J. Y. Süngü, Collaborators: K. Azizi * and H. Sundu 2 nd International Conference on Particle Physics in Memoriam Engin Arık and Her Colleagues, Doğuş University 20-25 June 2011, Istanbul, TURKEY Kocaeli University, Physics Department, Umuttepe Yerleskesi, 41380 Izmit, Turkey * Doğuş University, Physics Division, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Acıbadem-Kadıköy, Turkey

2. Outline Motivation Motivation Method Method QCD Sum Rules QCD Sum Rules QCD Sum Rules for the Coupling Constants QCD Sum Rules for the Coupling Constants Numerical Analysis of the work Numerical Analysis of the work 2ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey

3. Motivation The heavy-light (HL) pseudoscalar mesons are of great importance in evaluating charmonium cross sections. The absorption of charmonium by kaons in a nuclear medium can explain the J/ suppression in heavy-ion collision experiments. J/ suppression is believed to be the signal of Quark-gluon plasma in the early universe. Both B and the new charmonium states ( X’ s, the Y’ s and the Z’ s)decay into an intermediate two body state with D’ s and/or D*’ s A precise determination of the coupling constants in the hadronic vertices is a vital task due to allow obtaining the cross sections. 3ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Why pseudoscalar mesons?

4. Why we need nonperturbative methods? 4 ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Perturbative theory Nonperturbative theory

5. Nonperturbative Methods ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey5 QCD Sum Rules (QCDSR) Lattice QCD Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model (NJL) Heavy-Quark Effective Theory Relativistic Quark Model or Light-front Quark Model Finite Energy Sum Rules (FESR) Chiral Perturbation Theory Linear Sigma Model

6. QCD Sum Rules Shifman, Vainshtein and Zakharov (1979)- Mesons Ioffe (1981)- Baryons = Mass, decay constant, coupling constant, form factor…. 6ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Physical (or Phenomenological side) Hadronic degrees of freedom QCD (or Theoretical side) Quark degrees of freedom Correlation function =

7. Calculation of D s * DK (B s * BK) coupling constant 7 Three point correlation function for D and K offshell states, respectively: Currents associate to meson fields: Physical side for the correlation function: Meson decay constants definitions: ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey 1. Physical Side (1) (2) (3) (5) (4) D s * ’ Here p is D s * ’ momentum, D or K p ' is D or K momentum, q is the transfer momentum

8. Physical side of the correlation function for D(B) off-shell and K off-shell states ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey8 (6) (7)

9. Diagrams contributing to correlation function for D s * DK (B s * BK) 9ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey

10. 10 1960 –Wilson Separate short and long distance quark-gluon interactions 1960 –Wilson Separate short and long distance quark-gluon interactions ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Operator Product Expansion (OPE) Perturbative partNonperturbative part 2. QCD Side (8)

11. 11 Using Cutkosky rule Here, ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Perturbative part of QCD side s and s′ continuum thresholds (9) (10)

12. 12ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16)

13. ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey13 Here, (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22)

14. ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey14 Nonperturbative part of QCD side, Here M and M′ are Borel parameters (23) (24)

15. ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey15 Here,  D(B) off-shell state:  K off-shell state : (25)

16. ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey16 Correlation function QCD Side Quark DoF Physical Side Hadron DoF = Chosen structure is p µ

17. Our Analytic Results ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey17 (26) (27) (28) (29)

18. Fit functions used in our calculations: Fit functions used in our calculations: 18ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Monopolar Exponential Here,

19. 19ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Conclusion Strong coupling constants of bottom and charmed mesons with scalar, pseudoscalar and axial vector kaons. H. Sundu, J.Y. Sungu, S. Sahin, N. Yinelek, K. Azizi H. SunduJ.Y. SunguS. SahinN. YinelekK. Azizi Published in Phys.Rev.D83:114009, 2011. e-Print: arXiv:1103.0943 [hep-ph]

20. Input Parameters (µ=1GeV): 20 ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey

21. Coupling constant versus M 2 and M′ 2 grafs for the D s * DK decay 21ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey

22. Coupling constant versus grafs for the B s * BK decay 22ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey M 2 and M′ 2

23. 23 D s * DK vertex: D off-shell : 8GeV 2 ≤ M 2 ≤ 25GeV 2 ve 5GeV 2 ≤ M′ 2 ≤ 15GeV 2 K off-shell : 6GeV 2 ≤ M 2 ≤ 15GeV 2 ve 4GeV 2 ≤ M′ 2 ≤12GeV 2 B s * BK vertex: B off-shell :14GeV 2 ≤ M 2 ≤ 30GeV 2 ve 5GeV 2 ≤ M′ 2 ≤ 20GeV 2 K off-shell : 6GeV 2 ≤ M 2 ≤ 20GeV 2 ve 5GeV 2 ≤ M′ 2 ≤15GeV 2 ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Working Regions

24. 24ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey

25. References 25 [1] Shifman, M. A., Vainshtein, A. I., Zakharov, V. I., “ QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations ”, Nucl. Phys. B 147, 385, (1979); Shifman M. A., Vainshtein A. I., Zakharov V. I., “ QCD and resonance physics. Applications ”, Nucl. Phys. B 147, 448, (1979). [2] Belyaev, V. M., Ioffe, B. L., “Determination of baryon and baryonic masses from QCD sum rules. Strange baryons”, Sov. Phys. JETP 57 (716), (1982); Ioffe B. L., “QCD at low energies Prog. Part.”, Nucl. Phys. 56 (232), (2006). [3] Reinders, L. J., Rubinstein, H., Yazaki, S., “ Hadron properties from QCD sum rule ”, Phys. Rep. 127, 1, (1985). [4] Wilson, K. G., “ Operator product expansions and anomalous dimensions in the thirring model ”, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1473, (1970). ;Wilson, K. G., “ Confinement of quarks ”, Phys. Rev. D 10, 8, 2445-2459, (1974). [5] Colangelo, P., Khodjamirian, A., “QCD sum rules, a modern perspective at the Frontier of Particle Physics/Handbook of QCD”, edited by M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapore), 3, 1495, (2001). [6] Bracco, M. E., et. al., “The meson and the coupling from QCD sum rules”, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034012, (2010). [7] Montanet, L., and et. al., “Review of particle properties”, Phys. Rev. D 50, 1173,(1994). [8] Eidelman, S., and et. al., “Reviews, tables and plots”, [Particle Data Group], Phys. Lett. B 592, 1, (2004). [9] Amsler, C., et al., “Quark model in Review of particle physics”, Phys. Lett. B 667, (2007). [10] Bracco, M. E., et. al., Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 36, no. 5, September, (2006). [11] Bethke, S., “The 2009 world average of ”, Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 689-703, (2009). ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey

26. 26

27. Our Particles D s * = c s, Mass m = 2112.3 ± 0.5 MeV = 2112.3 ± 0.5 MeV B s * = s b, Mass m = 5415.4 ± 1.4 MeV = 5415.4 ± 1.4 MeV K + = u s, Mass m = 493.677 ± 0.016 MeV = 493.677 ± 0.016 MeV D 0 = c u, Mass m = 1869.57 ± 0.16 MeV = 1869.57 ± 0.16 MeV B − = u b, Mass m B ± = 5279.17 ± 0.29 MeV = 5279.17 ± 0.29 MeV ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey27 vector pseudo

28. Acknowledgement The authors thank E. Veli Veliev for his useful discussions. This work has been supported partly by the Scientic and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the research project 110T284. ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey28

29. Here, Gluon field: Quark-gluon-quark vertex function: 29 ICCP-II, Istanbul, Turkey Fock-Scwinger gauge