Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ilam University Dr. Mozafar Bag-Mohammadi 1 Transport Layer.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ilam University Dr. Mozafar Bag-Mohammadi 1 Transport Layer."— Presentation transcript:

1 Ilam University Dr. Mozafar Bag-Mohammadi 1 Transport Layer

2 Outline Connection Establishment/Termination Sliding Window Revisited Flow Control Adaptive Timeout 2

3 End-to-End Protocols Underlying best-effort network  drop messages  re-orders messages  delivers duplicate copies of a given message  limits messages to some finite size  delivers messages after an arbitrarily long delay Common end-to-end services  guarantee message delivery  deliver messages in the same order they are sent  deliver at most one copy of each message  support arbitrarily large messages  support synchronization  allow the receiver to flow control the sender  support multiple application processes on each host 3

4 Transport Layer Function(s) Multiplexing/demultiplexing between network application processes. Others?  Error Detection within a segment  Reliability  Flow Control.  Congestion control.  Connection Management. Difference between Error detection and reliability? Difference between flow control and congestion control? 4

5 Data Link Versus Transport Potentially connects many different hosts (logical connection)  need explicit connection establishment and termination Potentially different RTT  need adaptive timeout mechanism Potentially reordering packets. (How far?), Maximum segment life time. Currently 120 sec. Potentially long delay in network  need to be prepared for arrival of very old packets  Delay X bandwidth?  Buffer size 5

6 Data Link Versus Transport (cont) Potentially different capacity at destination  need to accommodate different node capacity Potentially different network capacity  need to be prepared for network congestion 6

7 Simple Demultiplexor (UDP) Unreliable and unordered datagram service Adds multiplexing No flow control Endpoints identified by ports  servers have well-known ports  see /etc/services on Unix Header format Optional checksum  pseudo header + UDP header + data 7 SrcPortDstPort ChecksumLength Data 01631

8 Using UDP Non-standard protocols can be implemented on top of UDP.  Non-standard = non-TCP in practice  use the port addressing provided by UDP  implement their own reliability, flow control, ordering, congestion control ? Examples:  remote procedure calls  multimedia  distributed computing 8

9 TCP Overview Connection-oriented Byte-stream  app writes bytes  TCP sends segments  app reads bytes 9 Application process Write bytes TCP Send buffer Segment Transmit segments Application process Read bytes TCP Receive buffer … …… Full duplex Flow control: keep sender from overrunning receiver Congestion control: keep sender from overrunning network

10 High level TCP Characteristics Connection-oriented reliable byte-stream protocol.  Used for file transfers, telnet, web access, …. Two way connections.  control information for one direction piggy-backed on data flow in other direction  header fields fall in three classes: general, forward flow, opposite flow Protocol has evolved over time and will continue to do so.  Nearly impossible to change the header  Uses options to add information to the header  Change processing at endpoints  Backward compatibility is what makes it TCP 10

11 Data delivery in TCP TCP is byte oriented, however transmit data in segments (messages). How TCP knows the time for delivery?  Maximum Segment Size (MSS)  Timer  Pushed by the application. Like telnet. 11

12 Segment Format 12

13 Segment Format (cont) Each connection identified with 4-tuple:  ( SrcPort, SrcIPAddr, DsrPort, DstIPAddr) Sliding window + flow control  acknowledgment, SequenceNum, AdvertisedWinow Checksum  pseudo header + TCP header + data 13 Sender Data(SequenceNum) Acknowledgment + AdvertisedWindow Receiver

14 Segment Format (cont) Flags  SYN, FIN, RESET, PUSH, URG, ACK  SYN and FIN for establish and tear down connection.  ACK indicates the Ack field is valid.  URG shows some part of data is urgent.(Up to UrgPtr).  PUSH shows the sender had push operation.  RESET shows confusion in receiver. 14

15 Connection Establishment and Termination 15 Active participant (client) Passive participant (server) SYN, SequenceNum = x SYN + ACK, SequenceNum = y, ACK, Acknowledgment = y + 1 Acknowledgment = x + 1 Client does active connection. Server must do passive connection first. Closing is symmetric, both side must tear down the connection. Three way handshaking. Connection parameter are exchanged first. Acknowledgment shows the next expected sequence number.

16 State Transition Diagram 16 CLOSED LISTEN SYN_RCVDSYN_SENT ESTABLISHED CLOSE_WAIT LAST_ACKCLOSING TIME_WAIT FIN_WAIT_2 FIN_WAIT_1 Passive openClose Send/SYN SYN/SYN + ACK SYN + ACK/ACK SYN/SYN + ACK ACK Close/FIN FIN/ACKClose/FIN FIN/ACK ACK + FIN/ACK Timeout after two segment lifetimes FIN/ACK ACK Close/FIN Close CLOSED Active open/SYN

17 State Transition (cont) Sliding window is in ESTABLISHED. All connections start with CLOSED. Arcs are tagged with event/action. Triggering a transition.  Arriving a segment from a peer.  Envoking by an application. 17

18 Sliding Window Revisited Sending side  LastByteAcked < = LastByteSent  LastByteSent < = LastByteWritten  buffer bytes between LastByteAcked and LastByteWritten 18 Sending application LastByteWritten TCP LastByteSentLastByteAcked Receiving application LastByteRead TCP LastByteRcvdNextByteExpected Receiving side – LastByteRead < NextByteExpected – NextByteExpected < = LastByteRcvd +1 – buffer bytes between LastByteRead and LastByteRcvd

19 Flow Control Send buffer size: MaxSendBuffer Receive buffer size: MaxRcvBuffer Receiving side  LastByteRcvd - LastByteRead < = MaxRcvBuffer  AdvertisedWindow = MaxRcvBuffer - ( NextByteExpected - LastByteRead ) Sending side  LastByteWritten - LastByteAcked < = MaxSendBuffer  block sender if ( LastByteWritten - LastByteAcked ) + y > MaxSenderBuffer  LastByteSent - LastByteAcked < = AdvertisedWindow  EffectiveWindow = AdvertisedWindow - ( LastByteSent - LastByteAcked ) Always send ACK in response to arriving data segment Persist when AdvertisedWindow = 0 19

20 Protection Against Wrap Around 32-bit SequenceNum BandwidthTime Until Wrap Around T1 (1.5 Mbps)6.4 hours Ethernet (10 Mbps)57 minutes T3 (45 Mbps)13 minutes FDDI (100 Mbps)6 minutes STS-3 (155 Mbps)4 minutes STS-12 (622 Mbps)55 seconds STS-24 (1.2 Gbps)28 seconds 20

21 Keeping the Pipe Full 16-bit AdvertisedWindow BandwidthDelay x Bandwidth Product T1 (1.5 Mbps)18KB Ethernet (10 Mbps)122KB T3 (45 Mbps)549KB FDDI (100 Mbps)1.2MB STS-3 (155 Mbps)1.8MB STS-12 (622 Mbps)7.4MB STS-24 (1.2 Gbps)14.8MB 21

22 TCP Extensions Implemented as header options Store timestamp in outgoing segments Extend sequence space with 32-bit timestamp (PAWS) Shift (scale) advertised window 22

23 Adaptive Retransmission (Original Algorithm) Measure SampleRTT for each segment/ ACK pair Compute weighted average of RTT  EstRTT =  x EstRTT +  x SampleRTT  where  +  = 1   between 0.8 and 0.9   between 0.1 and 0.2 Set timeout based on EstRTT  TimeOut = 2 x EstRTT 23

24 Karn/Partridge Algorithm Do not sample RTT when retransmitting Double timeout after each retransmission 24 SenderReceiver Original transmission ACK SampleR TT Retransmission SenderReceiver Original transmission ACK SampleR TT Retransmission

25 Jacobson/ Karels Algorithm New Calculations for average RTT Diff = SampleRTT - EstRTT EstRTT = EstRTT + (  x Diff) Dev = Dev +  ( |Diff| - Dev)  where  is a factor between 0 and 1 Consider variance when setting timeout value TimeOut =  x EstRTT +  x Dev  where  = 1 and  = 4 Notes  algorithm only as good as granularity of clock (500ms on Unix)  accurate timeout mechanism important to congestion control (later) 25


Download ppt "Ilam University Dr. Mozafar Bag-Mohammadi 1 Transport Layer."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google