Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 1 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Interleaver for Nss>4 Authors: Date: 2011-01-18.

Published byFlora Sullivan Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 1 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Interleaver for Nss>4 Authors: Date: 2011-01-18."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 1 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Interleaver for Nss>4 Authors: Date: 2011-01-18

2 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 2 Hongyuan Zhang, et al.

3 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 3 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Background BCC interleaver permutations are characterized by three parameters N ROW, N COL and N ROT as in 11n. –In 11ac, N ROW, N COL and N ROT need to be modified to accommodate higher bandwidths and/or more streams. Column depth for 80MHz is 26, i.e., (N COL = 26, N ROW = 9 * N BPSCS ) N ROT and Stream Permutaions: –When Nss <=4 20/40MHz: N ROT and permutation are the same as 11n. –When Nss <=4 80MHz: N ROT = floor(234/4)=58, so cyclic shift [0, 2, 1, 3]* N ROT *N BPSCS ) for Nss=1,2,3,4 respectively (as in current spec framework). –When Nss >4: the SS permutation and N ROT are TBD.

4 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 4 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Best set of SS permutation and N ROT for Nss >4 based on largest D (1/4) Given BW and Nss >4, find SS permutation and N ROT such that average subcarrier distance (D) of two adjacent SS is maximized. Specifically, where ``  ” means the third interleaver permutation, i.e., freq. rotation based on SS permutation and N ROT, A is the normalization factor, i is the data tone index before the third permutation, k,m are the exact tone index after the permutation. |a| is to take the absolute value of a. Note: Objective criterion of the best set of SS permutation and N ROT is to provide best PER performance.

5 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 5 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Best set of SS permutation and N ROT for Nss >4 based on largest D (2/4) One practical issue: More than one set of SS permutation and Nrot give the same D value. For example, for (80M, 7SS), 58*[0 6 4 1 3 5 2], and 58*[0 2 5 3 1 4 6] give the same D of 115.6. Break the tie: Check the average distance of the j-th adjacent SS, where j =2,3… until the tie is resolved. Specifically,  Using the above method, we get one best set of SS permutation and Nrot for most of pair (BW, Nss), except few case such as (80M, 5 ss). For (80M, 5 ss), 47*[0 2 4 1 3] and 47*[ 0 3 1 4 2] give the same D’s for all possible j.

6 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 6 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Best set of SS permutation and N ROT for Nss >4 based on largest D (3/4) One example of the simulation curves: two dimensional search for best SS permutation and N ROT for (80M, 8 ss): each ``*” corresponds the largest D (j=1) for a given Nrot among all the possible SS permutations. Best D corresponds to 28*[0 5 2 7 3 6 1 4] 80M 8ss

7 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 7 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Some considerations The criterion based on largest D requires different Nrot and SS permutation for each pair of (BW, Nss). This criterion may not provide best PER performance, but can be used as a reference of a good PER curve. Nss>4 has stringent SNR requirement and already very high complexity in basic Tx/Rx HW, interleaver design hence should focus on the PER performances. Best set of SS permutation and Nrot for Nss >4 based on largest D (4/4)

8 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 8 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Candidate Nrot and SS permutation for Comparisons 1.Selection based on largest D for each (BW, Nss) combination. 2.Selection based on the second largest D for each (BW, Nss) combination 3.Subset of Nrot*[0 4 2 6 1 5 3 7] for 5~8SS. Nrot=floor(N data-tone /8) 4.Extension of exiting 4ss selection, i.e., subset of floor (N_ data_carr /4) *[ 0 2 1 3 0 2 1 3] 5.Subset of Nrot*[0 5 2 7 3 6 1 4], Nrot = 28, 13, 6 for 80M, 40M and 20M, respectively. i.e. optimize Nrot and permutation based on 8SS for different BW respectively, then take subset for 4<Nss<8.

9 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 9 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Simulation setup Packet length: 1000 byes MIMO: 5x8, 6x8, 7x8, 8x8 for 5, 6, 7, 8ss, respectively Channel: 11ac DNLOS 1000 channel realizations for each PER curve –Therefore, PER > 1% is accountable MCS3 (16QAM ½), and MCS7 (64QAM 5/6) for different (BW, Nss) combinations. 5 sets of Nrot and SS permutation for each (BW, Nss, MCS), as previously discussed.

10 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 10 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Summary of simulation results (1/2) Nrot and SS permutation based on larges D provide best and close to best PER performance in all cases. –Bottom line: Their PER performance can serve as the reference for good selection of Nrot and SS permutation. PER performance depends on many factors including BW, Nss, MCS, etc, in addition to the selection of Nrot and SS permutation. None of the 5 sets of Nrot and SS permutation under test provide the best PER performance in all cases. But some sets show severe degradation in certain configurations, such as Set 4 for (80M, 5ss, MCS3).

11 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 11 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Summary of simulation results (2/2) By checking with the simulation results available, we propose Set 5 to be the selection of Nrot and SS permutation for Nss>4. –Recall: Set 5 is the subset of Nrot *[0 5 2 7 3 6 1 4], Nrot =28, 13 and 6 for 80M, 40M and 20M, respectively. Specifically, Set 5 has following advantages: Good PER performance in most simulated cases, compared with the reference Set 1 and other sets No severe degradation in any case Systematic and Simple formulation by using the subset of 8SS.

12 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 12 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Math Expressions of the Proposal At interleaver: if Nss>4, At deinterleaver: if Nss>4

13 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 13 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Pre-motion #1 Do you agree to insert the following text in 3.2.4.3.3 Frequency interleaver of the spec framework? –“For BCC encoding, when Nss>4, the third permutation of the interleaver uses the following parameters: Permutation as the first Nss values of [0 5 2 7 3 6 1 4]*Nrot * N BPSCS. N ROT = 28, 13 and 6 for 80MHz, 40MHz and 20MHz, respectively.” -Yes -No -Abstain

14 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 14 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Appendix: simulation results

15 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 15 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 29*[04261537]

16 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 16 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 29*[04261537]

17 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 17 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 29*[0426153]

18 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 18 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 29*[0426153]

19 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 19 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 29*[042615]

20 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 20 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 29*[042615]

21 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 21 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 29*[04261]

22 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 22 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 29*[04261]

23 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 23 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 13*[04261537]

24 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 24 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 13*[04261537]

25 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 25 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 13*[0426153]

26 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 26 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 13*[0426153]

27 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 27 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 13*[042615]

28 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 28 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 13*[042615]

29 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 29 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 13*[04261]

30 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 30 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 13*[04261]

31 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 31 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 6*[04261537]

32 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 32 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 6*[04261537]

33 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 33 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 6*[0426153]

34 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 34 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 6*[0426153]

35 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 35 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 6*[042615]

36 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 36 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 6*[042615]

37 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 37 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 6*[04261]

38 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 38 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. 6*[04261]

Download ppt "Doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/0048r0 Submission Jan 18, 2011 Slide 1 Hongyuan Zhang, et al. Interleaver for Nss>4 Authors: Date: 2011-01-18."

Similar presentations

PHY Abstraction for TGax System Level Simulations

PHY Abstraction for TGax System Level Simulations
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0309r1 Submission March 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 1MHz Waveform in Wider BW Date: 2012-03-12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0309r1 Submission March 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 1MHz Waveform in Wider BW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0818r0 Submission July 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Padding Date: 2012-07-16 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0818r0 Submission July 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Padding Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0026r0 Submission January 2011 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 VHT Supported MCS Field Date: 2011-01-17 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0026r0 Submission January 2011 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 VHT Supported MCS Field Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/1036-00-00ac Submission Richard van Nee, Qualcomm September 2009 Uplink MU-MIMO Sensitivity to Power Differences and Synchronization.

Doc.:IEEE / ac Submission Richard van Nee, Qualcomm September 2009 Uplink MU-MIMO Sensitivity to Power Differences and Synchronization.
CSI Feedback for MIMO-OFDM Transmission in IEEE aj (45 GHz)

CSI Feedback for MIMO-OFDM Transmission in IEEE aj (45 GHz)
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: 2015-01-12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE 802.11-15/0206r0 Submission January 2015 Shiwen He, Haiming Wang Pilot Design for OFDM PHY for 802.11aj(45 GHz) Authors/contributors: Date: 2015-1-21.

Doc.:IEEE /0206r0 Submission January 2015 Shiwen He, Haiming Wang Pilot Design for OFDM PHY for aj(45 GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:
Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17.

Doc.:IEEE /0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0597r0 Submission May 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Editorial Change on SIG Field Date: 2012-05-15 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0597r0 Submission May 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Editorial Change on SIG Field Date: Authors:
Phase Tracking During VHT-LTF

Phase Tracking During VHT-LTF
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1399r0 Submission November 2014 Multi-Carrier Training Field for OFDM Transmission in 802.11aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:

Doc.: IEEE /1399r0 Submission November 2014 Multi-Carrier Training Field for OFDM Transmission in aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: 2015-01-12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0330r2 SubmissionSameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 PHY Abstraction Date: 2014-03-17 Authors: March 2014.

Doc.: IEEE /0330r2 SubmissionSameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 PHY Abstraction Date: Authors: March 2014.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0647r2 SubmissionSlide 1 PHY abstraction method comparison Date: 2014-05-12 Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek May 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /0647r2 SubmissionSlide 1 PHY abstraction method comparison Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek May 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0823r1 July 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: 2015-07-13 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0823r1 July 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/1279r0 Submission Nov 09, 2010 Slide 1 Minho Cheong, ETRI Segment Parser for 160MHz Authors: Date: 2010-11-08.

Doc.:IEEE /1279r0 Submission Nov 09, 2010 Slide 1 Minho Cheong, ETRI Segment Parser for 160MHz Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: 2011-11-07 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1088r0 September 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: 2015-09-14 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1088r0 September 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0853r3 September 2015 Leonardo Lanante, Kyushu Inst. of Tech.Slide 1 Extensible Preamble Format Design Date: 2015-09-13.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0853r3 September 2015 Leonardo Lanante, Kyushu Inst. of Tech.Slide 1 Extensible Preamble Format Design Date:

Similar presentations

Ads by Google