1. PEER REVIEW EXPERIENCE BOYKO MALINOV BULGARIA

2. GOAL TO ASSESS THE EXECUTION OF ALREADY AGREED OBLIGATIONS TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT

3. TIMING AFTER WRAPPING OF THE NEGOTIATIONS AFTER THE IMPLEMENTATION GAINED SPEED BEFORE DEPARTURES FROM THE OBLIGATIONS HAVE DONE DAMAGE

4. INVOLVED PARTIES EU COMMISSION EXPERTS FROM THE MEMBER STATES HOST COUNTRY’S LEGISLATIVE BODIES HOST COUNTRY’S EXECUTIVE BODIES HOST COUNTRY’S NGOs, OTHER CONCERNED

5. STEPS PREPARATION EXECUTION EVALUATION RECOMENDATIONS

6. PREPARATION EU DEFINES THE SUBJECT ACTIVITIES FOR EACH SUBJECT ARE AGREED UPON SCHEDULE OF THE REVIEW IS AGREED UPON WRITTEN EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY INFORMATION ON THE HOT ISSUES

7. EXECUTION ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE SUBJECT FIELD VISITS TO OBSERVE THE REAL WORLD IMPLEMENTATION DIFERENT OPINION – DISCUSSION WITH NGOs

8. EVALUATION PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF THE EXPERTS RESPONSES AND CLARIFFICATIONS FROM THE HOSTING COUNTRY REPORT DRAFTING HOST’S COMMENTS FINAL REPORT: FINDINGS AND RECOMENDATIONS

9. PEER REVIEW EXPERIENCE END