Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Spatio-temporal variation in pike demography and dispersal: effects of harvest intensity and population density Thrond O Haugen Spatio-temporal variation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Spatio-temporal variation in pike demography and dispersal: effects of harvest intensity and population density Thrond O Haugen Spatio-temporal variation."— Presentation transcript:

1 Spatio-temporal variation in pike demography and dispersal: effects of harvest intensity and population density Thrond O Haugen Spatio-temporal variation in pike demography and dispersal: predator- prey interactions under varying harvest intensity

2 Previously on Windermere Pike Trilogy  Presented the data series 1949–2001 (N = 5560) Individually tagged pike All the covariates you can dream of  Presented a parameterisation that works Multistate Cormack-Jolly-Seber model MS-GOF tells us to proceed (Pradel et al. 2003) Low or no over-dispersion  Presented preliminary results

3 z t = c 1 x t-1 + c 2 y t-1 + c 3 z t-1 x t = a 1 x t-1 + a 2 y t-1 + a 3 z t-1 y t = b 1 x t-1 + b 2 y t-1 + b 3 z t-1 b1b1 c1c1 c2c2 a3a3 a1a1 a2a2 b3b3 b2b2 c3c3 Pike and Perch Interactions Linear system!!!!

4 Density-dependence x t = a 1 x t-1 + a 2 y t-1 + a 3 z t-1 y t = b 1 x t-1 + b 2 y t-1 + b 3 z t-1 z t = c 1 x t-1 + c 2 y t-1 + c 3 z t-1 x = young pike y = older pike z = perch Population model on log scale (making things linear): N t = exp(y t ) = N t-1 exp(  1 y t-1 +  2 y t-2 +  3 y t-3 ) x t =  1 x t-1 +  2 x t-2 +  3 x t-3 y t =  1 y t-1 +  2 y t-2 +  3 y t-3 z t =  1 z t-1 +  2 z t-2 +  3 z t-3 May be written (after some matrix algebra): = N t-1 R Hence, we expect a three-lagged structure in survival = N t-1 (Bs 1 + s 2 ) B = reproduction rate s 1 = survival first year s 2 = survival older ones

5 Degree-days over 14 °C Juvenile instantaneus mortality All aspects? Age 1 Age 2–3 Age >3

6 Spatial aspects  Two basins  Differ in productivity and morphology Northern basin Deep, Steep and stony littoral Mesotrophic Southern basin Shallow Sheltered and weedy littoral Eutrophic

7 1234512345 Age Kipling (1983), J. Anim. Ecol. Sex  Differential growth  Differential reproductive effort Males: fighting costs Females: gonad costs

8 1234512345 Age Kipling (1983), J. Anim. Ecol. Harvest and sex

9 Hypotheses  Three-lagged density structure of survival S females >S males S a=1 is size-dependent and more correlated with prey density than S a>1  Fishing mortality (a>1) is correlated with effort and highest for females  Recruitment to fisheries is size-dependent and highest for females  Dispersal is density-dependent

10 Perch trap (PT) – for tagging 64 mm gillnet (PGN) – retrieved 46/64 mm gillnet (GN) – for tagging MAMJJASONDFJ MAFJ M p GN (t) p PT (t) p GN (t+2) p PT (t+2) p PGN (t+1) Right-censoring  (t)  (t+1) 7 months 5 months Data structure p (t)p (t+2)

11 Parameterisation (CAS) A:NSN… B:S0N… Pr(A): Pr(B): moves stays S i = survival (from) p j = capture probability (to)  ij = transition probability (from-to) Conditional Arnason-Schwartz Model

12 General Model Constraints  Right censoring at winter occasions Neither S or  are separatetly estimable for winter-to-spring intervals  w—>s = 0 S w—>s = S s—>w  p could be estimated for each occasion Different methods and efforts during spring P s (t) Consistent winter fisheries throughout the study Covariate-specific estimates

13 Results

14 Fishing mortality (a>1) Logit[p(a>1) t ] = logit[F(a>1) t ] = -1.01 + 0.58B + 0.12sex + 0.37e t

15 Recruitment to winter fisheries Logit[p(a=1)] = -1.61 + 0.79B + 0.01sex + 0.57l + 0.32e t North South e = 0

16 Dispersal (a=1) logit[  (a=1)] = -2.17 + 1.64B – 0.11sex + 0.09l – 0.14B*l

17 Dispersal (a>1) logit[  (a>1) t ] = -3.94 + 1.16sex + 1.11B + 0.33g t – 1.03B*g t Increasing relative density in south

18 Survival (a=1) logit[S(a=1) t ] = 9.74 – 0.53B – 1.45sex + 0.14Z t - 2.01N t + 7.36l – 1.98N t *l logN = 3 Z = 0

19 Survival (a>1) logit[S(a>1) t ] = 2.95 – 1.23B – 0.47N t + 0.29B*N t – 0.22N t-1 - 0.03N t-2 + 0.25sex + 0.06Z t logN t-1 and t-2 = 3 Z = 0

20 Summary  Models with delayed density structure on survival are generally supported Though—no more than two delays Highly size-dependent survival at a=1 Inverse sex effect for a=1 and a>1  Dispersal is density dependent Males migrate more than females for a>1 Inverse size-dependence between basins for a=1  Fishing mortality is basin and effort dependent Recruitment to fisheries is not sex dependent and can be predicted from size distribution Fishing mortality is highest in northern basin


Download ppt "Spatio-temporal variation in pike demography and dispersal: effects of harvest intensity and population density Thrond O Haugen Spatio-temporal variation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google