1. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Overview Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003

2. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory2 This talk Introduction to LIGO and terrestrial gravitational wave detectors The LIGO mission and the upgrade strategy The scientific reach and impact of Advanced LIGO How we are organized for Advanced LIGO Broader impacts

3. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory3 Advanced LIGO In Context LIGO construction is complete »NSF investment in LIGO now totals about $400 million »Construction cost $292 million »LIGO facilities represent ~ 2/3 of the construction investment and are intended to support successive detectors Initial LIGO detectors are operating and have carried out early scientific running »Initial LIGO should accomplish its sensitive observation goal by late 2006 Advanced LIGO development is defining the detailed design and retiring risks The experienced LIGO team will be ready to install Advanced LIGO in 2007 Observations for probable gravitational wave detection can commence in 2010

4. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Overview "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA)

5. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory5 Gravity as a “Strain” of Flat Space-Time gravitational radiation from binary inspiral of compact objects

6. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory6 Evidence for Gravitational Waves Neutron Binary System – Hulse & Taylor PSR 1913 + 16 -- Timing of pulsars   17 / sec Neutron Binary System separated by 10 6 miles m 1 = 1.4m  ; m 2 = 1.36m  ;  = 0.617 Prediction from general relativity spiral in by 3 mm/orbit rate of change orbital period ~ 8 hr Emission of gravitational waves

7. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory7 Direct Detection Detectors in space LISA Gravitational Wave Astrophysical Source Terrestrial detectors LIGO, GEO, TAMA, Virgo

8. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory8 Astrophysics Sources by Frequency l EM waves are studied over ~20 orders of magnitude »(ULF radio  HE  -rays) l Gravitational Waves over ~10 orders of magnitude » (terrestrial + space) Audio band SpaceTerrestrial

9. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory9 A New Window on the Universe Gravitational Waves will provide a new way to view the dynamics of the Universe

10. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory10 Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Waves Compact binary inspiral: “chirps” »NS-NS waveforms are well described »BH-BH need better waveforms »search technique: matched templates Supernovae / GRBs: “bursts” »burst signals in coincidence with signals in electromagnetic radiation »Challenge to search for untriggered bursts Pulsars in our galaxy: “periodic signals” »search for observed neutron stars (frequency, doppler shift) »all sky search (computing challenge) »r-modes Cosmological Signals “stochastic background” Thorne

11. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory11 Detecting a passing wave …. Free masses

12. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory12 Detecting a passing wave …. Interferometer

13. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory13 Interferometer Concept Laser used to measure relative lengths of two orthogonal arms As a wave passes, the arm lengths change in different ways…. …causing the interference pattern to change at the photodiode  Arms in LIGO are 4km  Measure difference in length to one part in 10 21 or 10 -18 meters

14. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory14 An International Network of Interferometers LIGO Simultaneously detect signal (within msec) detection confidence locate the sources decompose the polarization of gravitational waves GEO Virgo TAMA AIGO Hough, Willke McClelland

15. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory15 LIGO Organization & Support LIGO Laboratory MIT + Caltech ~170 people LIGO Scientific Collaboration 44 member institutions > 400 scientists U.S. National Science Foundation UK Germany Japan Russia India Spain Australia $ SCIENCE Detector R&D DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION Saulson

16. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory16 The Laboratory Sites Hanford Observatory Livingston Observatory Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO)

17. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory17 LIGO Livingston Observatory

18. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory18 LIGO Hanford Observatory

19. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory19 GEO 600 Hough, Willke

20. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory20 LIGO Beam Tube LIGO beam tube under construction in January 1998 65 ft spiral welded sections girth welded in portable clean room in the field 1.2 m diameter - 3mm stainless 50 km of weld NO LEAKS !!

21. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory21 LIGO Vacuum Equipment

22. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory22 A LIGO Mirror Substrates: SiO 2 25 cm Diameter, 10 cm thick Homogeneity < 5 x 10 -7 Internal mode Q’s > 2 x 10 6 Polishing Surface uniformity < 1 nm rms Radii of curvature matched < 3% Coating Scatter < 50 ppm Absorption < 0.5 ppm Uniformity <10 -3

23. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory23 Core Optics installation and alignment LIGO team now expert in this very demanding work

24. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory24 What Limits Sensitivity of Interferometers? Seismic noise & vibration limit at low frequencies Atomic vibrations (Thermal Noise) inside components limit at mid frequencies Quantum nature of light (Shot Noise) limits at high frequencies Myriad details of the lasers, electronics, etc., can make problems above these levels Running at 10 -7

25. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory25 LIGO Sensitivity Livingston 4km Interferometer May 2001 Jan 2003 Whitcomb

26. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory26 Commissioning and the First Science Runs Whitcomb

27. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory27 2007

28. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory28 Advanced LIGO Reach Science from a few hours of Advanced LIGO observing should be comparable to 1 year of initial LIGO! Advanced LIGO

29. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory29 Historical Background LIGO was approved for construction of »a platform suitable for successive and additional interferometers »an initial set of interferometers 1996 McDaniel report endorsed plans for: » NSF support of an Advanced R&D program to lead to the detectors beyond initial LIGO »formation of a scientific collaboration –LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC) R&D proposals from LIGO Lab and LSC received late 1996 »NSF defined a budget and program in 1998 »R&D was organized and initiated in 1997 – 2001 period

30. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory30 Establishing a Supported Development Program LSC authored a White Paper on an advanced LIGO detector in 1998 and described a reference concept and R&D program »This was an international R&D program from the start LIGO Lab and LSC jointly submitted a revised White Paper and a project conceptual document to NSF in late 1999 »Proposed upgrade of 3 interferometers, all 4 km arms, simultaneous installation »Peoples panel endorsed concept and urged support of the development program »NSF decided to support further R&D for Advanced LIGO development

31. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory31 The Current LIGO Laboratory Development Program In 2000, LIGO Lab proposed to NSF continuation of LIGO operations and R&D for the period FY2002 – FY2006 »Program and budget included support of –Operating initial LIGO –Analyzing data and producing science –Developing Advanced LIGO through Final Design »Permanent LIGO staff scientists and engineers engaged in Advanced LIGO development were to be supported from the basic operating budget »Equipment, fabrications, incremental labor were to be supported from an Advanced R&D budget line

32. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory32 Proposal Budget LIGO Operations (2002 – 2006) FY 2001 ($M) FY 2002 ($M) FY 2003 ($M) FY 2004 ($M) FY 2005 ($M) FY 2006 ($M) Total 2002-6 ($M) Currently funded Operations 22.9223.6324.3225.0525.8726.65125.52 Increase for Full Operations 5.215.204.794.864.9525.01 Advanced R&D2.702.772.862.953.043.1314.76 R&D Equipment for LSC Research 3.303.843.1410.28 Total Budgets25.6234.9136.2135.9333.7734.74175.57 FY 2001 currently funded Operations ($19.1M for ten months) is normalized to 12 months and provided for comparison only and is not included in totals.

33. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory33 “Revised” Proposal Budget LIGO Operations (2002-2006) $28 million provided for FY 2002 Operations in February and May 2002 »Reduced or deferred hiring, Adv R&D, equipment, outreach, etc Priority for commissioning and toward LIGO 24x7 Operations Full $33 million awarded for FY2003 (6 months late) FY 2002 ($M) FY 2003 ($M) FY 2004 ($M) FY 2005 ($M) FY 2006 ($M) Operations$24$29$30 Advanced R&D $4 $3

34. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory34 Funding for LIGO Laboratory Program NSF award for continuing LIGO operations is at a level less than requested FY2003 appropriations delayed 6 months Initial LIGO operations and data analysis/science is highest priority Nevertheless, the Advanced LIGO development program has accomplished much of what was proposed »The LSC has been a full partner in all of these activities »Advanced LIGO R&D not run as a firm project though we are ready

35. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory35 A Development Project Across the LSC Since late 1999, we have planned the Advanced LIGO development program as if it was part of a construction project »Work Breakdown Structure »Cost estimate »Schedule »Management structure »Requirements documented and systems engineering and modeling »Design process established This “projectized” development program has been operating in a serious collaborative manner across the LSC »LSC Working Groups –Advanced detector configurations working group –Core optics working group –Laser working group –Suspensions working group

36. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory36 Advanced LIGO Proposal R&D through final design and full prototypes now underway »supported by LIGO and partner funds already awarded »a true LSC-wide activity Proposal requests funding for the construction »$123 million beginning in 2005 »Some early purchases in 2004 International partners propose support of additional $25.5 million »GEO (UK) - $11.5 million (approved) »GEO (Germany) - $11.5 million »ACIGA - $2.5 million Hough, Willke McClelland 

37. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory37 What are we proposing? Replace all three interferometers »Provides sensitive suite of detectors during “discovery” phase »Versatile and robust during post-detection exploration Convert current 2 km interferometer in Hanford to a 4 km interferometer »Emphasis placed upon sensitivity »Cost is a fraction of one percent of the project Shoemaker

38. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory38 Phasing of Interferometer Replacements Initial LIGO installation and commissioning taught us many lessons »How to effectively use expert teams »How to properly phase rework and installation »How to interleave installation with early commissioning »How to transfer lessons from one interferometer to the others »Properly phasing the work on the three interferometers can optimize the progress »Complete R&D before final installation Minimizing scientific “down time” is a major goal of the LSC »How we accomplish this should be coordinated with the international network of detectors through the Gravitational Wave International Committee Installation into LIGO vacuum system should take place after prototype program retires most risk »R&D program tests advanced prototypes fully

39. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory39 Phasing Implementation of the 3 Interferometers Replacing all 3 interferometers simultaneously »minimizes duration of LIGO down time »very expensive in expert staffing and resulting rework Strict serial replacement of 3 interferometers »reduces duplication of skilled teams and tooling »maintains at least one interferometer operating as much as possible »stretches out period before the upgraded set of detectors is available Rapid and overlapping phasing of replacement/upgrade »Balances application of skilled teams and resources with scientific imperative to bring set of detectors on line International community and scientific review will enable us to further optimize this balance 

40. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory40 Buildup of Education and Outreach LIGO Lab outreach has been primarily observatory centered LIGO Lab renewal called for increased activity Supported new effort and formed a strategy and Local Educator’s Networks at each observatory This process led to a new proposal with partners for a greatly expanded program »Next slide has some details NSF is beginning an effort to produce a “half-hour” video on LIGO Advanced LIGO proposal calls for an LSC-wide education and outreach program

41. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory41 February 2003 Proposed Education & Outreach Program Proposal submitted to NSF Feb. 10 for major enhancement to outreach activity: »Collaboration of Caltech, SUBR, La Board of Regents, Exploratorium of San Francisco Construct an educational outreach center on-site at LLO. Place hands-on exhibits from Exploratorium in center (with subset at LHO). Implement teacher pre-service and in-service training initiative to teach inquiry based science techniques at SUBR – extend to LHO communities Use LIGO staff to provide science leadership in selection of exhibits, development of science content in teacher training programs La Board of Regents, through La Systemic Initiative with leveraged resources from US Dept of Education LA GEAR UP program, will facilitate teacher training and student visits to outreach center from underserved communities.

42. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory42 LSC Outreach Program Startup l FY2004 – Recruit LSC Outreach Director and assistant l FY2004 – Survey all LSC education and outreach activities and develop a descriptive survey document l FY2004 – Formation of LSC Educators Advisory Network l FY2004 – August 2004 LSC meeting hosts an additional two day LSC Outreach Workshop at which all LSC activities are showcased and attendees, including outside consultants and advisory network members participate in design discussions for an enhanced, coordinated LSC program l FY2005 – LSC Outreach Director develops detailed program plan with review meetings and educators advisory network participation l FY2005 – March 2005 LSC meeting hosts one day LSC Outreach Workshop to finalize and approve program plan l FY2005 – Initial elements of the plan implemented l FY2005 – Supplemental proposals to NSF are submitted as necessary l FY2006 – Initial operation of the coordinated LSC outreach programs

43. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory43 Advanced LIGO In Context LIGO construction is complete »NSF investment in LIGO now totals about $400 million »Construction cost $292 million »LIGO facilities represent ~ 2/3 of the construction investment and are intended to support successive detectors Initial LIGO detectors are operating and have carried out early scientific running »Initial LIGO should accomplish its sensitive observation by late 2006 Advanced LIGO development is defining the detailed design and retiring risks The experienced LIGO team will be ready to install Advanced LIGO in 2007 Observations for probable gravitational wave detection can commence in 2010

44. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory44 Mission and Strategy Observe gravitational waves directly Initiate gravitational wave astronomy Bring initial LIGO to design sensitivity and observe for one integrated year at that sensitivity »“plausible” chance to detect gravitational waves Upgrade detector with a very significant increment in sensitivity »“probable” detection of gravitational waves

45. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory45 Plenary Talks LIGO Overview – Sanders LIGO Commissioning and First Results – Whitcomb Astrophysics – Thorne Advanced LIGO – Shoemaker Cost, Schedule and Management - Sanders

46. LIGO-G030250-01-M LIGO Laboratory46 Specific Charge l Is the scientific case for the needed upgrade convincing? Are the scientific requirements achieved in a cost-effective manner? l Is the specific proposed Advanced Detector upgrade appropriate to accomplish the scientific goals? In particular, is the decision to convert the 2-km Hanford interferometer to a second 4-km interferometer well founded, and will the specific subsystems each meet the required performance specifications? l Are the requested budget (including contingency) and manpower levels appropriate to carry out the proposed upgrade? l Are the schedule and milestones achievable with the proposed resources? Does the phasing of the downtime of detectors achieve a proper balance of cost, manpower, and observation time? l Is the proposed management plan appropriate to oversee the R&D, construction, installation and commissioning of the upgrade? l Has the issue of cost effectiveness in operating the more complex Advanced LIGO system been addressed? l Is the proposed education and outreach plan well designed, and are the proposed manpower and funds appropriate to carry it out?