Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Milošev,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Milošev,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Milošev, Simon Kovač, Rihard Trebše, Vesna Levašič, and Venčeslav Pišot J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 94(19): October 3, 2012 ©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

2 Bar graph showing the percentage of major diagnoses at the time of the index operation for patients who received the various types of bearings. Bar graph showing the percentage of major diagnoses at the time of the index operation for patients who received the various types of bearings. MOM = metal-on-metal bearing, MOP = metal-on-polyethylene bearing, COC = ceramic-on-ceramic bearing, OA = osteoarthritis, ONFH = osteonecrosis of the femoral head, OASD = osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia, PT = posttraumatic disorder, RA = rheumatoid arthritis, ID = other inflammatory diseases, and “other” = other diseases. Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94: ©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

3 Photograph showing the BICON-PLUS cementless acetabular cup (center) and the three different bearing couples: the polyethylene bearing (at right), the ceramic bearing (left, rear), and the metal bearing (left, front) (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland... Photograph showing the BICON-PLUS cementless acetabular cup (center) and the three different bearing couples: the polyethylene bearing (at right), the ceramic bearing (left, rear), and the metal bearing (left, front) (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland, now Smith & Nephew). Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94: ©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

4 Photograph showing the SL-PLUS cementless femoral stem (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland, now Smith & Nephew). Photograph showing the SL-PLUS cementless femoral stem (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland, now Smith & Nephew). Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94: ©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

5 Comparison of mean age and mean postoperative activity for patients with three different bearing couples. Comparison of mean age and mean postoperative activity for patients with three different bearing couples. Minimum and maximum data are indicated by range bars. Please note that the left-side y-axis is for age, and the right-side y-axis for activity. The distribution of age groups (i.e., younger than fifty years, younger than sixty-five years, and sixty-five years or older) in the particular group is presented by various patterns. Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94: ©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

6 Survivals for the BICON-PLUS cups with different bearing couples: metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), metal-on-metal (MOM), and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), with revision for any reason (Fig. 4-a) and revision due to aseptic loosening (Fig. 4-b) as the end points. Survivals for the BICON-PLUS cups with different bearing couples: metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), metal-on-metal (MOM), and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), with revision for any reason (Fig. 4-a) and revision due to aseptic loosening (Fig. 4-b) as the end points. The significance between various groups is noted. Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94: ©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Download ppt "Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Milošev,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google