Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Datums and Datum Transformations Geomatics Industry Association of America December 4, 2008 Dave Doyle NGS Chief Geodetic Surveyor

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Datums and Datum Transformations Geomatics Industry Association of America December 4, 2008 Dave Doyle NGS Chief Geodetic Surveyor"— Presentation transcript:

1 Datums and Datum Transformations Geomatics Industry Association of America December 4, 2008 Dave Doyle NGS Chief Geodetic Surveyor dave.doyle@noaa.govdave.doyle@noaa.gov, 301-713-3178

2 GEODETIC DATUMS HORIZONTAL 2-D (Latitude and Longitude) (e.g. NAD 27, NAD 83 (1986)) VERTICAL/GEOPOTENTIAL 1-D (Orthometric Height) (e.g. NGVD 29, NAVD 88, Local Tidal) GEOMETRIC 3-D (Latitude, Longitude and Ellipsoid Height) Fixed and Stable(?) - Coordinates seldom change (e.g. NAD 83 (1993), NAD 83 (2007)) also 4-D (Latitude, Longitude, Ellipsoid Height, Velocities) Coordinates change with time (e.g. ITRF00, ITRF05)

3 HORIZONTAL DATUMS 8 Constants 3 – specify the location of the origin of the coordinate system. 3– specify the orientation of the coordinate system. 2 – specify the dimensions of the reference ellipsoid

4 VERTICAL DATUMS A set of fundamental elevations to which other elevations are referred. Datum Types Tidal – Defined by observation of tidal variations over some period of time (MSL, MLLW, MLW, MHW, MHHW etc.) (NOS Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services) (CO-OPS) Geodetic – Tided to Local Mean Sea Level at one or more points at some epoch (NAVD 88, IGLD85)

5 HISTORICAL VERTICAL DATUMS OF THE UNITED STATES Second General Adjustment - 1903 Sea Level Datum of 1929 National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29) First General Adjustment - 1899 Third General Adjustment - 1907 Fourth General Adjustment - 1912 Guam 1963

6 The National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 is referenced to 26 tide gauges in the US and Canada

7 The North American Vertical Datum of 1988 is referenced to a single tide gauge in Canada

8 VERTICAL DATUMS OF THE UNITED STATES Current Reference Systems North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) American Samoa Vertical Datum of 2002 (ASVD 02) Northern Marians Vertical Datum of 2003 (NMVD 03) Guam Vertical Datum of 2004 (GUVD 04) Federal Register Notice: Vol. 58, No. 120, June 24, 1993, pg. 34245 “Affirmation of Vertical Datum for Surveying and Mapping Activities” Federal Register Notices for American Samoa, Guam and Northern Marians are ready for publication

9 VERTICAL DATUMS OF THE UNITED STATES Works in Progress Puerto Rico Vertical Datum of 2002 (PRVD 02) Virgin Island Vertical Datum of 2009(?) (VIVD 09?) Hawaiian Islands Vertical Datum (HIVD)

10 DATUM TRANSFORMATIONS 1. WHAT DATUM ARE THE EXISTING COORDINATES/HEIGHTS ON? 2. WHAT DATUM DO I WANT THE NEW COORDINATES/HEIGHTS ON? 3. HOW LARGE A GEOGRAPHICAL AREA DO I WANT TO CONVERT AT ONE TIME? 4. HOW MANY POINTS ARE COMMON TO BOTH DATUMS? 5. WHAT IS THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE COMMON POINTS? 6. HOW ACCURATE ARE THE EXISTING COORDINATES/HEIGHTS? 0.01 Meter 0.1 Meter 1.0 Meter 7. HOW ACCURATE DO I WANT THE NEW COORDINATES/HEIGHTS?

11 DATUM TRANSFORMATION IDEAL METHOD SATISFIES ALL USERS’ REQUIREMENTS CAPABLE OF TRANSFORMING LARGE DATASETS NEAR-REAL TIME APPLICATIONS SIMPLE - METHOD SHOULD NOT REQUIRE AN EXPERT OR DECISIONS TO BE MADE ACCURATE

12 NGS DATUM TRANSFORMATION MODELS VERTCON (NGVD 29 only) NADCON (NAD 27, OLD HAWAIIAN, PUERTO RICO, 3 ALASKA ISLANDS) (HPGN/HARN) Federal Register Notice: Vol. 55, No. 155, August 10, 1990, pg. 32681 “Notice to Adopt Standard Method for Mathematical Horizontal Datum Transformation” Federal Register Notice: Vol. 72, No. 132, July 11, 2007, pg. 37732 “Notice to Adopt a Standard Model fro Mathematical Vertical Datum Transformations”

13 3065 Projects included:  67,693 total stations  Typical shifts 1-3 cm in both horizontal/ellipsoid height  No national transformation model (e.g. NADCON) NAD 83 National Readjustment

14 HISTORICAL HORIZONTAL DATUMS OF THE UNITED STATES New England Datum North American Datum of 1927 Bessel Ellipsoid U.S. Standard Datum North American Datum Puerto Rico Datum Old Hawaiian Datum UnAlaska Datum SE Alaska Datum Point Barrow Datum St. Paul Island Datum St. Lawrence Island Datum Barter Island Datum Flaxman Island Datum Valdez Datum American Samoa Datum 1962 Guam Datum 1963 Golofnin Bay Datum Kripniyuk Datum Port Clarence Datum Pribilof Islands Datum St. Michael Datum Yakutat Datum Yukon Datum St. George Island Datum

15 HORIZONTAL DATUM OF THE UNITED STATES Current Reference System North American Datum of 1983 NAD 83 (1986) – 2D & passive NAD 83 (199x) – 3D & passive NAD 83 (CORS96) – 4D & active NAD 83 (2007) – 3D & passive Federal Register Notice: Vol. 54, No. 113, June 14, 1989, pg. 25318 “Affirmation of Datum for Surveying and Mapping Activities”

16 ARE NAD 83 & WGS 84 THE SAME? Federal Register Notice: Vol. 60, No. 157, August 15, 1995, pg. 42146 “Use of NAD 83/WGS 84 Datum Tag on Mapping Products” IT DEPENDS If requirements are greater than 3m then Yes If requirements are less than 3m then No

17 DATUM = WGS 84(G730) Datum redefined with respect to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 1992 (ITRF92) +/- 20 cm in each component (Proceedings of the ION GPS-94 pgs 285-292) DATUM = WGS 84(G873) Datum redefined with respect to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 1994 (ITRF94) +/- 10 cm in each component (Proceedings of the ION GPS-97 pgs 841-850) DATUM = WGS 84 RELEASED - SEPTEMBER 1987 BASED ON OBSERVATIONS AT MORE THAN 1900 DOPPLER STATIONS DATUM = WGS 84(G1150) Datum redefined with respect to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2000 (ITRF00) +/- 2 cm in each component (Proceedings of the ION GPS-02) http://earth-info.nima.mil/GandG/sathtml/IONReport8-20-02.pdf HOW MANY WGS 84s HAVE THERE BEEN???? WORLD GEODETIC SYSTEM 1984

18 ARE NAD 83 & WGS 84 THE SAME? NAD 83 to ITRF00 dX = 0.9956 m dY = - 1.9013 m dZ = - 0.5215 m S = 0.62 x 10 -9 rX = 25.915 mas rY = 9.426 mas rZ = 11.599 mas

19 MY SOFTWARE SAYS I’M WORKING IN WGS-84 Project tied to WGS-84 control points obtained from the Defense Department -- Good Luck! You’re really working in the same reference frame as your control points -- NAD 83? Unless you are doing autonomous positioning (point positioning +/- 6-10 meters) you’re probably NOT in WGS-84

20 EARLY NAD 83 NETWORK PROBLEMS NOT “GPSABLE” POOR STATION ACCESSIBILITY IRREGULARLY SPACED POSITIONAL ACCURACY

21 HIGH ACCURACY REFERENCE NETWORKS (HARN) 1989 - 1997 “GPSABLE” Clear Horizons for Satellite Signal Acquisition EASY ACCESSIBILITY Few Special Vehicle or Property Entrance Requirements REGULARLY SPACED Always within 20-100 Km HIGH ACCURACY A-Order (5 mm + 1:10,000,000) (3 5.5 hr sessions) B-Order (8mm + 1:1,000,000) (2 5.5 hr sessions)

22 FEDERAL & COOPERATIVE BSE NETWORKS (FBN/CBN) 1997 - 2004 MORE STATE PARTNERSHIPS REMOVE DISTORTIONS IN EARLY HARNS (3-10 CM) ENSURE CONNETIONS TO CORS IMPROVE ELLIPSOID HEIGHT ACCURACY (Not more than 2 cm)

23

24 HPGN – HARN FBN - CBN

25 National Geodetic Survey, Retrieval Date = DECEMBER 1, 2008 HV7843 *********************************************************************** HV7843 DESIGNATION - OBSERVATORY HV7843 PID - HV7843 HV7843 STATE/COUNTY- VA/CAROLINE HV7843 USGS QUAD - HV7843 HV7843 *CURRENT SURVEY CONTROL HV7843 ___________________________________________________________________ HV7843* NAD 83(1993)- 38 12 06.79868(N) 077 22 22.35067(W) ADJUSTED HV7843* NAVD 88 - 68.201 (meters) 223.76 (feet) ADJUSTED HV7843 ___________________________________________________________________ HV7843 LAPLACE CORR- -2.29 (seconds) DEFLEC99 HV7843 GEOID HEIGHT- -32.55 (meters) GEOID03 HV7843 DYNAMIC HT - 68.159 (meters) 223.62 (feet) COMP HV7843 MODELED GRAV- 980,023.3 (mgal) NAVD 88 HV7843 HV7843 HORZ ORDER - FIRST HV7843 VERT ORDER - FIRST CLASS I HV7843 HV7843.The horizontal coordinates were established by classical geodetic methods HV7843.and adjusted by the National Geodetic Survey in November 1994. HV7843 HV7843.The orthometric height was determined by differential leveling HV7843.and adjusted in June 1991. HV7843 HV7843.The Laplace correction was computed from DEFLEC99 derived deflections. HV7843 HV7843.The geoid height was determined by GEOID03.

26 HV7843 SUPERSEDED SURVEY CONTROL HV7843 HV7843 NAD 83(1993)- 38 12 06.80060(N) 077 22 22.36460(W) AD( ) 1 HV7843 NAD 83(1986)- 38 12 06.79974(N) 077 22 22.36479(W) AD( ) 1 HV7843 NAD 27 - 38 12 06.33162(N) 077 22 23.42777(W) AD( ) 1 HV7843 NAVD 88 (09/21/92) 68.20 (m) 223.8 (f) LEVELING 3 HV7843 NGVD 29 (02/12/90) 68.449 (m) 224.57 (f) ADJUSTED 1 1

27 DATUM TRANSFORMATIONS MOLODENSKY For continental regions accuracy can be +/- 8 to 10 meters Does not model network distortions very well. Assumes heights in both systems are ellipsoidal (NAD 27 did not have ellipsoidal heights).

28 DATUM TRANSFORMATIONS MOLODENSKY Converts latitude, longitude and ellipsoidal height to X,Y,Z Earth-Centered Coordinates. Applies a 3-dimensional change in the origin (dX, dY,dZ) Applies a change in the size and shape of the reference ellipsoid Converts new X,Y,Z Earth-Centered Coordinates back to latitude, longitude and ellipsoidal height

29 MOLODENSKY TRANSFORMATION

30 NADCON d  = +0.12344 dλ = -1.87842 d  = +0.12249 dλ = -1.88963  = +0.12423 λ = -1.81246 d  = +0.12568 dλ = -1.83364 d  = +0.12449 dλ = -1.88905 d  = +0.12499 dλ = -1.86543 d  = +0.12640 dλ = -1.85407 d  = +0.12438 dλ = -1.86547 d  = +0.12354 dλ = -1.8594 d  = +0.12431 dλ = -1.86291 d  = +0.12441 dλ = -1.83879 d  = +0.12396 dλ = -1.85209

31 COORDINATE COMPARISON NAD 27 to NAD 83(1993) MOLODENSKY ADJUSTED vs. TRANSFORMED Station: OBSERVATORY (HV7843) LATITUDE LONGITUDE 38-12-06.79868 077-22-22.35067 - PUBLISHED 38-12-06.59040 077-22-22.34223 - MOLODENSKY.20828”.00844” 6.422 m 0.205 m THIS CORRESPONDS TO A POSITIONAL DIFFERENCE OF 6.425 m (21.08 ft)

32 COORDINATE COMPARISON NAD 27 to NAD 83(1993) NADCON ADJUSTED vs. TRANSFORMED Station: OBSERVATORY (HV7843) LATITUDE LONGITUDE 38-12-06.79868 077-22-22.35067 - PUBLISHED 38-12-06.79920 077-22-22.34823 - NADCON.00052”.00244” 0.016 m 0.059 m THIS CORRESPONDS TO A POSITIONAL DIFFERENCE OF 0.061 m (0.20 ft)

33 GOOD COORDINATION BEGINS WITH GOOD COORDINATES GEOGRAPHY WITHOUT GEODESY IS A FELONY


Download ppt "Datums and Datum Transformations Geomatics Industry Association of America December 4, 2008 Dave Doyle NGS Chief Geodetic Surveyor"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google