1. June 10-15, 2012 Growing Community; Growing Possibilities Dedra Chamberlin, UC Davis Eric Westfall, Indiana University

2. An agile, best-of-breed, community governed, comprehensive IAM solution for higher education 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference2

3.  Build upon existing open source IAM projects  Create a comprehensive, modular IAM stack  Implement open, standards-based architecture  Reduce ops costs (TCO) through improved integration, automation, QA  Focus on needs, challenges distinctive to HE  Avoid vendor lock-in  Do so by pooling community resources 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference3

4. 4

5. What are we talking about, what have we done, and what are we going to do? 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference5

6. 6

7.  Objective of the Group ◦ Develop a plan to identify current gaps in identity registries ◦ Evaluate options for developing a single person registry ◦ Move forward to close the gaps by developing a registry  Involved Partners ◦ UC Berkeley, UCSF, Brown, U. Washington, Internet2, Indiana, Kuali, SFU, PSU, Open Registry, Rutgers, others  What are we looking at? ◦ A central, single authority Registry ◦ Identity Match functionality ◦ Working closely with the Provisioning side of CIFER 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference7

8.  TODO…add an awesome diagram here… 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference8

9.  Identity Registry Functional Model  Core Requirements Evaluation  ID Match ◦ Strawman design for ID match system ◦ Evaluation of OpenEMPI  Evaluations of three different Open Source Identity Registry solutions ◦ OpenRegistry ◦ Penn State’s Central Person Registry (CPR) ◦ Kuali Identity Management (KIM) 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference9

10.  For identity match ◦ Evaluated OpenEMPI and will decide w/in a month to use or explore other options (integrations, self- written)  For Registry ◦ Evaluated OpenRegistry and CPR ◦ Both fairly well-developed, team feels both are viable candidates  Likes/Dislikes of each  What about KIM? 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference10

11.  Next Steps ◦ Work on shared APIs from SOR’s into a registry ◦ Define other common interfaces and integrating id Match tools into OpenRegistry, CPR, or both  Other Potential Goals ◦ Try and get OR out of incubation status ◦ Work with PSU to full “open-source” CPR ◦ Get involvement from other, interested parties  Other Initiatives ◦ Kuali is doing an evaluation of CPR mapping to KIM ◦ UC is doing architectural evaluations 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference11

12. Why are we involved and what do we need 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference12

13.  TODO… 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference13

14.  Kuali Identity Management ◦ Shared identity and access management  Used by many Kuali projects ◦ Finance, research, student, library, HR  “Identity registry-like” functionality ◦ but wasn’t originally designed for this purpose  Serves as an “integration platform” for IAM within Kuali This has worked well for Kuali for a long time…but things are changing. 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference14

15.  Kuali People Management for the Enterprise (KPME)  Kuali Student (KS)  These are traditionally Systems of Record for identity  ID Match is critical for both of these systems  TODO… 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference15

16.  TODO… 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference16

17.  Your Input! ◦ We need your input on the integration points  How to get particular SOR information into CPR or OR?  Development of shared APIs  Your Experiences ◦ If you’ve been or are going through the process, if available, what would you need to make this work 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference17

18.  Summary statement here 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference18

19.  Links 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference19

20. For more information contact: info@ciferproject.org 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference20