Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

More beam (muons) from the AGS AGS RHIC Users Group Meeting EDM Workshop Brookhaven National Laboratory 7 June 2006 Phil Pile.

Published byWendy Jefferson Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "More beam (muons) from the AGS AGS RHIC Users Group Meeting EDM Workshop Brookhaven National Laboratory 7 June 2006 Phil Pile."— Presentation transcript:

1 More beam (muons) from the AGS AGS RHIC Users Group Meeting EDM Workshop Brookhaven National Laboratory 7 June 2006 Phil Pile

2 Outline AGS Issues V1 Beam Line – present limitations V1 Beam Line – possible improvements To Do More beam from the AGS

3 The experts BNL Hugh Brown – V1  /  Beam Line Design University of Illinois Peter Kammel Paul Debevec Sara Knaack They began studies over two years ago on how to improve Hugh Brown’s V1 beam line design.

4 g-2 short history E821 (as run) Year Weeks HoursIntegrated Protons Remarks 19968196- pulse-on-demand 19978 pulse-on-demand 45460.13 x 10 20 1 st physics run 19982 pulse-on-demand 42540.08 x 10 20 19992 pulse-on-demand 99240.4 x 10 20 2000 12 13120.5 x 10 20 2001 12 7930.6 x 10 20 TOTALS 63 40251.7 x 10 20 E969 (my estimate) 2010 10 960 - Commissioning 2011 21 1920 1.3 x 10 2 15 weeks with RHIC on AGS Total integrated protons (SEB+FEB), 1993-2002 = 6.5 x 10 20

5 PROTON BEAMFY96 FY97 FY98/99FY2000 FY2001 FY2002 SEB SEBFEB (g-2)SEBFEB (g-2)FEB (g-2)FEB (g-2) SEB Beam Energy24 GeV24 GeV24 GeV24 GeV24 GeV24 GeV 24 GeV* 22 GeV* Peak Beam Intensity62 x 10 12 ppp62 x 10 12 ppp46 x 10 12 ppp72 x 10 12 ppp58 x 10 12 ppp61 x 10 12 ppp 63 x 10 12 ppp 76 x 10 12 ppp Total protons accelerated0.9 x 10 20 0.4 x 10 20 0.1 x 10 20 0.9 x 10 20 0.4 x 10 20 0.5 x 10 20 0.6 x 10 20 0.7 x 10 20 Spill Length/Cycle Time1.6 sec/3.6 sec1.6 sec/3.6 sec2.8 sec/5.1 sec2.4 sec/5.4 sec -> Duty Cycle44%44%55% 44% Spill Structure Modulation (peak-average) /average20%20%20%20% Average Availability /Best Week76% / 92%71% / 79%58 % / 67 %71% / 88%55 % / 83 %74 % / 87 %83 % / 88 %85 % / 97 % HEAVY ION BEAMAuAuFe (NASA)AuFe (NASA)Fe (NASA)Fe (NASA)Fe (NASA) Beam Energy /nucleon11 / 4 / 2 GeV11 / 8 / 6 GeV1.0 / 0.6 GeV11 GeV1.0 / 0.6 GeV1.0 GeV1.0 GeV1.0 GeV Peak Beam Intensity4 x 10 8 Au/p 17 x 10 8 Au/p 20 x 10 8 Fe/p 9 x 10 8 Au/bunch36 x 10 8 Fe/p17 x 10 8 Fe/p80 x 10 8 Fe/p49 x 10 8 Fe/p Spill Length/Cycle Time1.4 sec/3.6 sec1.5 sec/4.0 sec1.2 sec/3.0 sec0.9 sec/3.3 sec0.9 sec/3.3 sec0.9 sec/3.3 sec -> Duty Cycle39%38%40 %27%27%27% Spill Structure Modulation (peak-average) /average<20%<20%<20%<20%<20%<20% Average Availability80%82 %96 %81 %90 %90 %97 %84 % * Westinghouse Motor Generator AGS performance T. Roser

6 12:00 o’clock 2:00 o’clock 4:00 o’clock 6:00 o’clock 8:00 o’clock PHOBOS 10:00 o’clock BRAHMS STAR (p) PHENIX (p) RHIC AGS LINAC BOOSTER TANDEMS NSRL (NASA)  g-2 U-line Pol. Proton Source High Intensity Source Slow extraction Fast extraction AGS: Intensity: 7  10 13 protons/pulse Injector to RHIC: < 1 hour about every 4 hours AGS/RHIC Accelerator Complex p gas jet target

7 AGS Complex Booster AGS V1  /  Beam Line  g-2 experiment to RHIC Linac TTB C-AD Admin NSRL AGS and Booster need a re-hab before returning to high intensity

8 3.094 GeV/c muon channel, 8 quads 3.15 GeV/c pion front end Inflector E821 beam line and muon storage ring

9 Beam Studies Summary March 16 ‘06 Condition NNP2 Fig of Merit for 1x1.000 1 for 2x2.5032.4922.338 for 4x3.7213.6983.180 for 4x pi+3%3.5293.2652.435 for 4x pi+5%3.2442.6501.622 back 1x0.6610.6660.818 back 2x1.9241.7931.606 back 4x2.7032.4601.747 back 4x qs3.0102.6941.787 Forward: + 3% looks promising. Factor 2.4 over E821. Main uncertainties: model/reality difference in P  scaling (factor 2), pion flash prediction, phase space effect. Can largely be verified in beam test run. Investigate K1/K2 improvement. Backward: Factor 1.75 over E821 with effort. Gets hit twice by 2 nd order effects (intensity and phase space losses). Needs to overcome those to remain competitive. Main uncertainties: New injection beam line and 2 nd order effects. Higher cost and effort. Can only be partially verified in beam test run. differences Peter sightly different tunes fit of XX’ sigma (Dave) optimized injection mag in q tune forward -8% due to finite target (Peter Kammel Slide) What I’ll discuss today See http://www.npl.uiuc.edu:8081/ for morehttp://www.npl.uiuc.edu:8081/

10  decay channel (3 GeV/c  ’s) Add 30 new 4Q24’s New Inflector E969 beam line and muon storage ring IMPROVED E821 Beam Line New VQ12

11 So how do we get more muons? The basic approach - Reduce beta function in decay channel (add quads) and get more muons into storage ring with no increase in pions. Some Issues: Pion flash First order beam blow-up due to extended target 2 nd order beam blow-up Inflector/Ring admittance Muon Polarization

12 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam FIRST ORDER CALCULATION and target 0 cm d/s 1. 0.2616 17.0 0.1880 60.0 8.776 1.0 3.1523 /pion/ ; P1 P2

13 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 w/4X FODO beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam FIRST ORDER CALCULATION and target 0 cm d/s 1. 0.2616 15.0 0.1880 80.0 8.776 1.0 3.1513 /pion/ ; P1 P2

14 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam SECOND ORDER CALCULATION and target 0 cm d/s 1. 0.2616 17.0 0.1880 60.0 8.776 1.0 3.1523 /pion/ ; P1 P2

15 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 w/4X FODO beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam SECOND ORDER CALCULATION and target 0 cm d/s 1. 0.2616 15.0 0.1880 80.0 8.776 1.0 3.1513 /pion/ ;

16 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam FIRST ORDER CALCULATION and target 9 cm d/s 1. 0.2616 17.0 0.1880 60.0 8.776 1.0 3.1523 /pion/ ;

17 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 w/4X FODO beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam FIRST ORDER CALCULATION and target 9 cm d/s 1. 0.2616 15.0 0.1880 80.0 8.776 1.0 3.1513 /pion/ ;

18 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam SECOND ORDER CALCULATION and target 9 cm d/s 1. 0.2616 17.0 0.1880 60.0 8.776 1.0 3.1523 /pion/ ;

19 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 w/4X FODO beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam SECOND ORDER CALCULATION and target 9 cm d/s 1. 0.2616 15.0 0.1880 80.0 8.776 1.0 3.1513 /pion/ ;

20 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam SECOND ORDER CALCULATION and target 9 cm u/s 1. 0.2616 17.0 0.1880 60.0 8.776 1.0 3.1523 /pion/ ;

21 16 12 8 4 0 4 8 12 cm or cm/% x (cm) y (cm) dy/dp (cm/%) dx/dp (cm/%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 meters The E821 w/4X FODO beam line (1 % dp/p), 3.15 GeV/c pion beam SECOND ORDER CALCULATION and target 9 cm u/s 1. 0.2616 15.0 0.1880 80.0 8.776 1.0 3.1513 /pion/ ;

22 The target length issue

23

24 Muon momentum (GeV/c) Muon Polarization Pion Flash and polarization issues – study with 3.15 GeV/c ± 90% pion momentum 4X FODO to u/s of P2 (end of decay channel) Primodial muons 3.094 GeV/c ± 0.25%

25 The Pion Flash Issue 4X 1X Note rapid loss vs gradual loss of muons

26 3.094 GeV/c ± 0.25% The Pion Flash Issue

27 The pion flash issue together with polarization loss and admittance issues 3.094 GeV/c ± 0.25%

28 The pion flash issue together with polarization loss and admittance issues E821 muon momentum range Takes into account admittance and polarization

29 Comparing Present (1X) to Proposed (4X) Beam Line includes muon admittance and p 2 factor for polarization Bottom Line - EXPECTED IMPROVEMENT E821 muon momentum range Better  rejection more  stored

30 Summary of Beam Line Changes V Primary Transport New VQ12 – to reduce primary beam losses V1 pion production target Unchanged V1  /  Beam Line Reposition V1P1 upstream (more  ’s collected) Add 30 New 4Q24 magnets in  decay channel Add earth shielding over V1 transport tunnel Improve shielding between beam line and storage ring New Inflector (open end)

31 VQ12 replaced with 4” dia quad g-2  /  beam line front end

32 No Changes

33 Move V1P1 upstream (longer decay channel) Shielding mods

34 Add 30 quads to pion decay channel, collect more muons

35 Improve shielding New open-end inflector Less multiple scattering, more muons stored

36 To Do List Complete simulations to include transport to K3K4 and inflector for both the present beam line and the proposed beam line, done but with little thought and is not optimized. –Include 19 cm length in simulation Can we reconcile differences between beam line measurements and simulations Are 30 quads (4X) in decay channel optimum? There’s room for more but pole tip field becomes a problem…

37 Supplementary Information

38

39 What is needed to baseline the costs (not included in construction cost estimate) 1.0 g-2 Ring/Building maintenance –1 man month to engineer an air conditioning system for bldg 919 1.1 V/V1 Beam Lines –1 man-months engineering –1 man-months physicist 1.2 Inflector (see Meng talk) –A quote from the Furukawa Company for superconductor 1.3 E Quads –Nothing new, defendable 1.8 Kicker –Nothing new, defendable 1.11 Cryogenics (to determine scope) –2 man-months engineering –1 man-month tech 1.12 Vacuum System –1 man-month engineering 1.14 Booster/AGS –0.5 man month engineering –0.5 man month physicist ES&H – review operation within present guidelines –1 man-month physicist –1 man month engineer Preparation of Cost Books, Resource Loaded Schedules, CD0-1 documents etc –4 man-months engineering –4 man--months physicist Summary –11 man-month engineering – 7 man-month physicist – 1 man-month tech Required Budget ~ $360K Calendar Time Required ~ 6-8 months

40 Muon g-2 Experiment Construction, Cost Summary Experiment Construction, Direct CostsM$ Contingency –G-2 Ring and building$ 0.5621% –V/V1 Beam Line modifications$ 2.5918% –Inflector (open ends)$ 0.6419% –E-Quad rebuild$ 0.1315% –Additional muon Kicker$ 0.4115% –Cryogenic plant rehab$ 0.74233% –Ring Vacuum System $ 0.1629% –Equipment Testing$ 0.6320% –Project Office$ 0.3720% Sub-Total, direct costs$ 6.2 Indirects (reduced)$ 2.2 Contingency (44%)$ 3.7 Sub-Total, with indirects$ 12.1 University (Detectors/DAQ)$ 1.4 Total (DOE)$ 13.6 University (Detectors/DAQ - NSF)$ 1.0 FY 2006 $’s

41 AGS/Booster Restoration to High Intensity, Cost Summary AGS/Booster, Direct CostsM$ Contingency –ES&H (CAPS)$ 2.6328% –Electrical Modifications$ 2.1122% –Mechanical Modifications$ 1.2520% –RF System Modifications$ 0.6722% –Instrumentation$ 0.3420% –Project Support$ 0.3334% –Controls $ 0.1624% Sub-Total, direct costs$ 7.5 Indirects (reduced)$ 1.9 Contingency (24%)$ 2.3 Total$ 11.7 FY 2006 $’s

42 g-2 Experiment Operations, Cost Summary Base Plan (0.25 ppm experiment) Year Wks w/RHICWks Stand-Alone Physics Wks Cost (M$) 1 st 12 0 3 $ 5.8 2 nd 20 0 15 $ 7.8 Total 34 0 18 $ 13.6 Additional 10-15 week year of running with RHIC adds ~$6-7M FY 2006 $’s

43 g-2 Experiment Operations, Cost Summary DOE Costs Baseline Costs (C-AD pre-construction) $ 0.4 Experiment Construction (mostly C-AD)$ 12.1 Universities$ 1.4 AGS/Booster restoration to high intensity$ 11.7 Operations$ 13.6 Total$ 39.2 NSF Costs Universities$ 1.0 FY 2006 $’s

44 g-2 Experiment Operations Plan

45 g-2 Experiment Operations (0.5 ppm) FY 2006 $’s

46 g-2 Experiment Operations (0.25 ppm) FY 2006 $’s

47 g-2 Experiment Operations (0.2 ppm) FY 2006 $’s

48 LEP Quads http://www-ap.fnal.gov/~bcbrown/Sources/LEP_Quad_Info.html

Download ppt "More beam (muons) from the AGS AGS RHIC Users Group Meeting EDM Workshop Brookhaven National Laboratory 7 June 2006 Phil Pile."

Similar presentations

Muon g-2 Inflector AEM Meeting 11/25/2013 Chris Polly Muon g-2 Project Manager.

Muon g-2 Inflector AEM Meeting 11/25/2013 Chris Polly Muon g-2 Project Manager.
High power target design and operation considerations for kaon production Philip Pile Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton,

High power target design and operation considerations for kaon production Philip Pile Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton,
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.

Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
B. Lee Roberts, P5: 27 March 2006 - p. 1/25 Muon (g-2) to 0.25 ppm B. Lee Roberts on behalf of the New Muon (g-2) Collaboration: E969.

B. Lee Roberts, P5: 27 March p. 1/25 Muon (g-2) to 0.25 ppm B. Lee Roberts on behalf of the New Muon (g-2) Collaboration: E969.
KICKOFF AS PRESENTED 6/17/11, SEE THIS WEEKS SCHEDULE FOP THE LATEST UPDATE Shutdown Shutdown ‘11.

KICKOFF AS PRESENTED 6/17/11, SEE THIS WEEKS SCHEDULE FOP THE LATEST UPDATE Shutdown Shutdown ‘11.
Costing Meeting Ajit Kurup 13 th June 2011. Page 2 Costing Meeting 13 th June 2011 Ajit Kurup Summary of CERN costing workshop. Proposed Level 3 breakdown.

Costing Meeting Ajit Kurup 13 th June Page 2 Costing Meeting 13 th June 2011 Ajit Kurup Summary of CERN costing workshop. Proposed Level 3 breakdown.
All Experimenters’ Meeting January 09, 2012. Accelerator Operation Summary Calendar Week # 51 NuMI Weekly Integrated Intensity 8.81E18 protons BNB Weekly.

All Experimenters’ Meeting January 09, Accelerator Operation Summary Calendar Week # 51 NuMI Weekly Integrated Intensity 8.81E18 protons BNB Weekly.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.

FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
T. Kirk’s 4 Dec 04 letter to DOE Construction Cost - $11M+ –Beam line g-2 ring upgrades etc - $11M –Cost sharing with RSVP of AGS/Booster rehab – discussed.

T. Kirk’s 4 Dec 04 letter to DOE Construction Cost - $11M+ –Beam line g-2 ring upgrades etc - $11M –Cost sharing with RSVP of AGS/Booster rehab – discussed.
T. Kirk’s 4 Dec 04 letter to DOE Construction Cost - $11M+ –Beam line g-2 ring upgrades etc - $11M –Cost sharing with RSVP of AGS/Booster rehab – discussed.

T. Kirk’s 4 Dec 04 letter to DOE Construction Cost - $11M+ –Beam line g-2 ring upgrades etc - $11M –Cost sharing with RSVP of AGS/Booster rehab – discussed.
Yannis K. Semertzidis, CERN flavour, 15 May 2006 - p. 1/26 The next muon g-2 experiment to 0.25 ppm Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Yannis K. Semertzidis, CERN flavour, 15 May p. 1/26 The next muon g-2 experiment to 0.25 ppm Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Fermilab Neutrino Beamline to DUSEL Mike Martens Fermilab PAC November 3, 2009.

Fermilab Neutrino Beamline to DUSEL Mike Martens Fermilab PAC November 3, 2009.
1 Near-term machine performance — The next 5 years, before e-cooling — Wolfram Fischer Run Coordinator for RHIC Run-4 Open Meeting on RHIC Planning Berkner.

1 Near-term machine performance — The next 5 years, before e-cooling — Wolfram Fischer Run Coordinator for RHIC Run-4 Open Meeting on RHIC Planning Berkner.
AGS Polarized Proton Development toward Run-9 Oct. 3, 2008 Haixin Huang.

AGS Polarized Proton Development toward Run-9 Oct. 3, 2008 Haixin Huang.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)

Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
1 QM2006 D.I.Lowenstein RHIC : The Path Forward Presented to Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai, PRC Derek I. Lowenstein Brookhaven National Laboratory November.

1 QM2006 D.I.Lowenstein RHIC : The Path Forward Presented to Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai, PRC Derek I. Lowenstein Brookhaven National Laboratory November.
AGS/Booster PP Setup Plan Jan. 11, 2013 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.

AGS/Booster PP Setup Plan Jan. 11, 2013 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Muon Campus Projects Jerry Annala Jan 23, 2013. µ AIP Scope Recycler RF system to provide needed bunch structure to future Muon Experiments Recycler RF.

Muon Campus Projects Jerry Annala Jan 23, µ AIP Scope Recycler RF system to provide needed bunch structure to future Muon Experiments Recycler RF.
Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL DOE review: 19 April 2006 - p. 1/25 Muon g-2 (E969) to 0.25 ppm Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory We made.

Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL DOE review: 19 April p. 1/25 Muon g-2 (E969) to 0.25 ppm Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory We made.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google