Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quantifying methane emissions from North America Daniel Jacob with Alex Turner, Bram Maasakkers, Jianxiong Sheng, Melissa Sulprizio.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quantifying methane emissions from North America Daniel Jacob with Alex Turner, Bram Maasakkers, Jianxiong Sheng, Melissa Sulprizio."— Presentation transcript:

1 Quantifying methane emissions from North America Daniel Jacob with Alex Turner, Bram Maasakkers, Jianxiong Sheng, Melissa Sulprizio

2 The Paris Climate Conference (December 2015) Countries pledge to keep global warming to less than 2 o C above pre-industrial; aim for climate neutrality by 2050. Voluntary measures by individual countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; developed nations are “expected”, developing nations are “encouraged” $100B/year aid from developed to developing nations to promote decarbonisation, remediation of climate change impacts

3 Global rise in surface air temperature GISTEMP [2016]

4 Radiative equilibrium of the Earth Solar constant F s = 1,370 W m -2 0.4-3  m Surface T o Atmosphere T 1 IR absorptivity f (greenhouse effect) blackbody flux σT o 4 (1-f)σT o 4 fσT14fσT14 fσT14fσT14 5-20  m Albedo A Radiative equilibrium: Increase greenhouse effect by  f:

5 Rising atmospheric CO 2 and methane The last 50 years (remote sites) CO 2 Methane CO 2 The last 1000 years (ice cores) Radiative forcing since 1750 is 1.7 W m -2 for CO 2, 1.0 W m -2 for methane

6 Global atmospheric methane budget Wetlands: 160 Fires: 20 Livestock: 110 Rice: 40 Oil/Gas: 70 Coal: 50 Waste: 60 Other: 40 2012 EDGAR inventory (Tg a -1 ): Emission rate = (Activity rate)  (Emission factor) CH 4 Atmospheric oxidation Lifetime 9 years Global distribution of emissions Emission 550  60 Tg/year

7 US methane emissions from EPA national inventory (2012) enteric fermentation (6.7) rice (0.4) onshore (0.9) offshore (0.6) Natural gas 6.2 production (2.0) processing (0.9) transmission (2.1) distribution (1.2) Oil 1.5 Coal mines 3.2 Agriculture 9.6 landfills (4.9) wastewater (0.6) Waste 5.5 Other 1.4 US EPA [2014]

8 Gridded EPA inventory of methane emissions (2012) Maasakkers et al., in prep.

9 EDGARv4.2 inventory

10 Using satellite observations of atmospheric methane to improve emission inventories EDGAR emission inventory atmospheric transport model simulated concentrations observed concentrations compare Bayesian optimization Improved emissions

11 Observing methane from space in the near infrared CH 4 H2OH2O CO 2 N2ON2O CO surface solar backscatter Retrieval of the backscattered spectrum  mean methane mixing ratio (mole fraction) in atmospheric column 1.65 µm 2.3 µm Atmospheric optical depths CH 4

12 Methane observed by GOSAT satellite instrument Turner et al. [2015]

13 Correction to EDGAR methane emissions using GOSAT data GOSAT observations, 2009-2011 Optimization at coarse resolution Dynamic boundary conditions Optimization at fine resolution Turner et al. [2015] correction factors to EDGAR v4.2 + LPJ prior

14 Correction factors for North America CONUS anthropogenic emission of 40-43 Tg a -1 vs. EPA value of 27 Tg a -1 Is the underestimate in livestock or oil/gas emissions or both? Turner et al. [2015]

15 Optimized top-down inventory CONUS anthropogenic emission of 40-43 Tg a -1 vs. EPA value of 27 Tg a -1 Is the underestimate in livestock or oil/gas emissions or both? Turner et al. [2015]

16 16 EPA EDGARv4.2 Livestock Oil & Gas Waste Maasakkers et al., in prep. Attribution of emission correction to oil/gas or livestock requires reliable information on source patterns Eagle Ford Shale, Texas Source-resolved emissions in the South-Central US

17 2002-present NOAA data from Oklahoma show rise in US methane vs. background Turner et al., submitted Implies 3.6%/year rise in US methane emissions affecting Oklahoma… but EPA says that emissions have stayed flat during that time!

18 GOSAT shows rising methane emissions across midwestern US 2010-2014 trend in difference between nadir (land) and glint (Pacific) methane columns; black dots indicate significant (>95%) trends on 4 o x4 o grid Implies 2010-2014 rise of 7.0% /year in CONUS emissions – but cause is unclear Turner et al., submitted

19 Global implications of rise in US methane emissions Trend in global atmospheric methane E. Dlugokencky, NOAA Global methane trend since 2006 implies an emission increase of 3.4-4.4 Tg/year [Kirschke et al., 2013] We find that US emissions during that period grew by 3-7% a -1 or 1.1-2.5 Tg/year Rising US emissions could account for 30-60% of the global rise in methane Turner et al., submitted

20 Building a North American methane monitoring system CalNex INTEX-A SEAC 4 RS EPA national inventory 2016 satellite launches: TROPOMI global daily mapping with 7  7 km 2 pixels GHGSat targeted sampling with 50  50 m 2 pixels Integrate satellite data with surface, aircraft observations Improved understanding of emissions to serve climate policy

21 Working with IBM: application to oil/gas fields Oil/gas production field IBM surface monitors How can we best combine surface and satellite data to monitor emissions at device level. detect super-emitters? TO BE CONTINUED!


Download ppt "Quantifying methane emissions from North America Daniel Jacob with Alex Turner, Bram Maasakkers, Jianxiong Sheng, Melissa Sulprizio."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google