1. Legal Liability Considerations for Auditors
Chapter 4
Legal Liability Considerations for Auditors 1

2. Learning Objectives
Understand the litigious environment in which CPAs practice.
Explain why the failure of financial statement users to differentiate among business failure, audit failure, and audit risk has resulted in lawsuits.
Use the primary legal concepts and terms concerning accountants’ a basis for studying legal liability of auditors.

3. Learning Objectives
Describe accountants’ liability to clients and related defenses.
Describe accountants’ liability to third parties under common law and related defenses.
Describe accountants’ civil liability under the federal securities laws and related defenses.

4. Learning Objectives
Specify what constitutes criminal liability for accountants.
Describe how the profession and individual CPAs can reduce the threat of litigation.

5. Understand the litigious environment in which CPAs practice.1
Understand the litigious environment in which CPAs practice.

6. Changed Legal Environment
Audit professionals have a contractual responsibility with clients.
Auditors are liable for negligence.
The number of lawsuits and sizes of awards remain high.
Audit professionals have a responsibility under common law to fulfil implied or expressed contracts with clients.
They are liable to their clients for negligence and/or breach of contract should they fail to provide the services or not exercise due care in their performance.
Despite efforts by the profession to address the legal liability of CPAs, both the number of lawsuits and sizes of awards to plaintiffs remain high.

7. Changed Legal Environment
Major contributors:
Growing awareness by financial statement users
Increased consciousness of the SEC
Complexity in business drives complexity in auditing and accounting functions
Litigious society
Growing awareness of responsibilities of public accountants by users of financial statements.
Increased consciousness of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its responsibility for protecting investors’ interests.
Complexity of auditing and accounting functions caused by increasing size of businesses, globalization of business, and complexities of business operations.
Tendency of society to accept lawsuits by injured parties against anyone who might be able to provide compensation, regardless of fault (“deep-pocket” concept of liability)
Large civil court judgments against CPA firms awarded in a few cases encourage attorneys to provide legal services on a contingent-fee basis – offers the injured party a potential gain when the suit is successful, but minimal losses when it is not
Willingness of many CPA firms to settle legal problems out of court in an attempt to avoid costly legal fees and adverse publicity, rather than resolution through judicial process
Judges’ and jurors’ difficulty in understanding and interpreting technical accounting and auditing matters

8. Changed Legal Environment
Major contributors (cont.):
Global recession and tough economic times
Large civil court judgments against CPA firms
Willingness of CPA firms to settle out of court
Judges’ and jurors’ difficulty in understanding technical accounting and auditing matters
Growing awareness of responsibilities of public accountants by users of financial statements.
Increased consciousness of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its responsibility for protecting investors’ interests.
Complexity of auditing and accounting functions caused by increasing size of businesses, globalization of business, and complexities of business operations.
Tendency of society to accept lawsuits by injured parties against anyone who might be able to provide compensation, regardless of fault (“deep-pocket” concept of liability).
Large civil court judgments against CPA firms awarded in a few cases encourage attorneys to provide legal services on a contingent-fee basis – offers the injured party a potential gain when the suit is successful, but minimal losses when it is not.
Willingness of many CPA firms to settle legal problems out of court in an attempt to avoid costly legal fees and adverse publicity, rather than resolution through judicial process.
Judges’ and jurors’ difficulty in understanding and interpreting technical accounting and auditing matters.

9. 2
Explain why the failure of financial statement users to differentiate among business failure, audit failure, and audit risk has resulted in lawsuits.

10. Business Failure, Audit Failure, and Audit Risk
A business is unable to meet its
obligations or investor expectations due
to economic or business conditions.
It occurs when a business is unable to repay its lenders or meet the
expectations of its investors because of economic or business conditions.

11. Business Failure, Audit Failure, and Audit Risk
Auditor issues an incorrect opinion from
a failure to follow GAAS.
Audit failure occurs when the auditor issues an incorrect audit opinion because it
failed to comply with the requirements of auditing standards.

12. Business Failure, Audit Failure, and Audit Risk
The risk that the auditor fails to find a
material misstatement and issues an
unqualified opinion.
Audit risk represents the risk that the auditor will conclude that the financial statements
are fairly stated and an unqualified opinion can be issued when, in fact,
they are materially misstated.

13. 3
Use the primary legal concepts and terms concerning accountants’ liability as a basis for studying legal liability of auditors.

14. Legal Concepts Affecting Liability
Prudent person concept
Liability for the acts of others
Lack of privileged communication
The standard of due care is often called the prudent person concept.
Under an LLP or LLC, the liability for one owner’s actions does not extend to another owner’s personal assets unless the other owner was directly involved in the actions of the owner causing the liability.
CPA’s do not have the right to withhold information from the courts on the grounds that the information is privileged.

15. Legal Terms Affecting CPAs’ Liability
Terms related to negligence and fraud:
Ordinary negligence
Gross negligence
Constructive fraud
Fraud
Ordinary negligence is the absence of reasonable care that can be expected of a person in a set of circumstances.
Gross negligence is the lack of even slight care tantamount to reckless behavior that can be expected of a person.
Constructive fraud is the existence of extreme or unusual negligence even though there was no intend to deceive or do harm.
Fraud occurs when a misstatement is made and there is both the knowledge of its falsity and the intent to deceive.

16. Legal Terms Affecting CPAs’ Liability
Contract Law
Breach of
contract
Third party
beneficiary
A breach is the failure of one or both parties in a contract to fulfill the requirements of the contract.
A third party beneficiary is one who does not have the privity of contract but is known to the contracting parties and is intended to have certain rights and benefits under the contract.

17. Legal Terms Affecting CPAs’ Liability
Other terms:
Common law
Statutory law
Joint and several liability
Common law and laws that have been developed through court decisions rather than through government statutes.
Statutory law are laws that have been passed by the U.S. Congress and other governmental units.
Joint and several liability is the assessment against a defendant of the full loss suffered by a plaintiff, regardless of the extent to which other parties shared in the wrongdoing.
Separate and proportionate liability is the assessment against a defendant of that portion of the damage caused by the defendant’s negligence.
Separate and proportionate liability

18. Describe accountants’ liability to clients and related defenses.4
Describe accountants’ liability to clients and related defenses.

19. Four Major Sources of Auditors’ Legal Liability

20. Liability to Clients The most common source of lawsuits
against CPAs is from clients.

21. Auditor’s Defenses Against Client Suits
Lack of duty to perform
Nonnegligent performance
Contributory negligence
Absence of causal connection
Lack of duty to perform means that the CPA firm claims that there was no implied or expressed contract.
Non-negligent performance means that the CPA firm claims that the audit was performed in accordance with auditing standards. Even if there were undiscovered misstatements, the auditor is not responsible if the audit was conducted properly.
Contributory negligence exists when the auditor claims the client’s own actions either resulted in the loss that is the basis for damages or interfered with the conduct of the audit in such a way that prevented the auditor from discovering the cause of the loss.
To succeed in an action against the auditor, the client must be able to show that there is a close causal connection between the auditor’s failure to follow auditing standards and the damages suffered by the client. In defense of such litigation, the auditor would attempt to refute any connection. This defense is called an “Absence of causal connection”.

22. 5
Describe accountants’ liability to third parties under common law and related defenses.

23. Liability to Third Parties Under Common Law
Ultramares
doctrine
Foreseen
users
Ultramares --- the creditors of an insolvent corporation relied on the audited financials and subsequently sued the accountants alleging that they were guilty of negligence and fraudulent misrepresentation. The court held that the accountants had been negligent but ruled that accountants would not be liable to 3rd parties for honest blunders beyond the bounds of the original contract unless they were primary beneficiaries.
Foreseen users are members of a limited class of users that the auditor knows will rely on the financial statements.

24. Foreseen Users Credit alliance Restatement of torts Foreseeable user
A case against Arthur Andersen decided that to be liable, the auditor must know and intend that the work product would be used by the third party for a specific purpose, and the knowledge and intent must be evidenced by the auditor’s product.
Restatement of torts states that foreseen users must be members of a reasonably limited and identifiable group of users that have relied on the CPA’s work.
Foreseeable users are any users the auditor should have reasonably been able to foresee as likely users of the client's financial statements.

25. Auditor Defenses Against Third-Party Suits

26. 6
Describe accountants’ civil liability under the federal securities laws and related defenses.

27. Securities Act of 1933 The Securities Act imposes an
unusual burden on the auditor.
Any 3rd party who purchased securities described in the registration statement may sue the auditor for material misrepresentations or omissions in the audited financial statements included in the registration statement.
Users must only prove that the audited financial statements contained a material misrepresentation or omission.
Auditor must demonstrate that an adequate auditor was conducted or all or a portion of the plaintiff’s loss was caused by factors other than the misleading financial statements.
Section 11 of the 1933 act defines the
rights of third parties and auditors.

28. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Auditor liability under this act often
centers on the audited financial statements
issued to the public in annual reports
The liability of auditors under this act often centers on the audited financial statements
issued to the public in annual reports or submitted to the SEC as a part of
annual Form 10-K reports.

29. Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 10 and rule 10b-5 are often called
the antifraud provisions of the 1934 act.
“Scienter” states that auditors must have
the knowledge and intent to deceive in
order to be liable for violation of
Rule 10b-5.
In Hochfelder v. Ernst, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that scienter, which is the knowledge and intent to deceive, is required before CPA’s can be held liable for violation of Rule 10b-5.

30. SEC and PCAOB Sanctions
SEC and PCAOB can sanction or suspend
practitioners.
SEC has temporarily suspended a number of
individual CPAs from auditing SEC clients.
The SEC has the power in certain circumstances to sanction or suspend practitioners from
doing audits for SEC companies.
In recent years, the SEC has temporarily suspended a number of individual CPAs
from doing any audits on SEC clients.

31. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977
Bribing a foreign official for the purpose
of exerting business related influence
is illegal.
This act makes it illegal to offer a bribe to an official of a foreign country for
the purpose of exerting influence and obtaining or retaining business.

32. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 CEO and CFO are required to certify
financial statements filed with the SEC.
Management must report on the
effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting.
This act requires the CEO and CFO to certify the annual and quarterly financial
statements filed with the SEC.
Management must report its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting.
The auditor must issue an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting .
Auditors must provide an opinion on internal controls over financial reporting.

33. Specify what constitutes criminal liability for accountants.7
Specify what constitutes criminal
liability for accountants.

34. Criminal Liability

35. Sarbanes-Oxley Act This act makes it a felony to destroy
or create documents to impede or
obstruct a federal investigation.

36. Auditor Defenses – 1933 & 1934 Acts

37. 8
Describe how the profession and individual CPAs can reduce the threat of litigation.

38. The Profession’s Response to Legal Liability
Seek protection from
nonmeritorious litigation
Improve auditing to better meet
user’s needs
Educate users about the limits of
auditing
The IAASB, AICPA, and PCAOB must constantly set standards and revise them to meet the changing needs of auditing.
The AICPA leaders of CPA firms, and educators should educate investors and others who read financial statement as to the meaning of an auditor’s opinion and to the extent of and nature of the auditor’s work.

39. The Profession’s Response to Legal Liability
Standard and rule setting
Oppose lawsuits
Education of users
Sanction members for improper conduct
and performance
Lobby for changes in laws
A profession must police its own membership. The AICPA and PCAOB have made progress in dealing with problems of inadequate CPA performance, but more rigorous review of alleged failures is still needed.
Since the 1990’s several changes in state and federal laws have favorable impacted the legal environment for the profession. The passage of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 significantly reduced potential damages in federal securities related litigation by providing for proportionate liability in most instances.

40. Protecting Individual CPAs from Legal Liability
Honest Clients
Qualified
Personnel
Deal only with clients possessing integrity
Hire qualified personnel
Follow the standards of the profession
Maintain independence
A CPA firm needs procedures to evaluate the integrity of clients and should dissociate itself from clients found lacking integrity.
Independence requires an attitude of responsibility separate from the client’s interest.
Follow
Professional
Standards
Maintain
Independence

41. Protecting Individual CPAs from Legal Liability
Deal only with clients possessing integrity
Maintain independence
Understand the client’s business
Perform quality audits
Document the work properly
Exercise professional skepticism
Lack of knowledge of industry practices and client operations has been a major factor in audit failures (e.g., Adelphia fraud).
Quality audit documentation is essential if an auditor has to defend an audit in court.

42. Protecting Individual CPAs from Legal Liability
Carry adequate insurance
Seek legal counsel
Choose a form of organization with limited liability
Auditors are often liable when they are presented with information indicating a problem that they fail to recognize. Auditors need to strive to maintain a healthy level of skepticism so that they can recognize misstatements when they exist.

43. Are there any questions?

44. Copyright
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.