Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 FY 2013 Call for Projects Candidate Evaluation and Selection Criteria March 20, 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 FY 2013 Call for Projects Candidate Evaluation and Selection Criteria March 20, 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 FY 2013 Call for Projects Candidate Evaluation and Selection Criteria March 20, 2012

2 2  Alignment  Value  Financial Value  Non-Financial/Public Value  Risk  Categorization Evaluation Framework Candidate evaluation is based on four key areas:

3 3 Alignment Governor’s Issue Areas Alignment Score Overall Alignment Score DTMB Strategic Goals Alignment Score Agency Business Plan Alignment Score Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3  Weighting: Each of the three alignment areas is worth the following:  State Priorities 25%  ICT Strategic Plan 25%  Agency Business Plan 50% Goal 1 ………………….Goal 5 Goal 1 ………………….Goal 6 Goal 1 ………………….Goal n

4 4 Financial Value Return on Investment (ROI) Financial Value Total Cost of Ownership Financial Value = (ROI Score x 100) ROI = $ Benefits – Investment Investment TCO = $ Total Amount of all Costs TCO is a component of ROI and is displayed for informational purposes only

5 5 Non-Financial/Public Value All Non-Financial/Public Value Impacts are weighted equally Non-Financial Value Score Non-Financial Value Score = (Non-Financial Value Points Earned) x 100 (Total Possible Non-Financial Value Points) Public Value Economic Strength Value for Money Health & Education Quality of Life Public Safety Value Generators Effectiveness Intrinsic Enhancements Transparency Participation Collaboration How?

6 6 Value Score  Weighting: –Financial Value: 50% –Non-Financial/Public Value: 50% The Financial Value Score and Non-Financial/Public Score are combined to obtain the total Value Score. Financial Value Score Value Score Non-Financial Value Score Value Score = (Financial Value Score x.5) + (Non-Financial/Public Value Score x.5) (ROI Score x 100) (Non-Financial Value Points Earned) x 100 (Total Possible Non-Financial Value Points)

7 7 Sponsorship Score Confidence Score Confidence = [Sponsorship Score x 33.3%+ PM Score x 33.3% + Resource Availability Score x 33.3%] Project Management Score Resource Availability Score PM Confidence = Avg. Points in Category Resource Availability Confidence = Avg. Points in Category Risk Sponsorship Confidence = Avg. Points in Category

8 8 Categorization  Required by legislation with funds (+64 points)  Required by legislation without funds (+50 points)  Virtual Cities (Multi-Gov’t Collaboration)(+45 points)  Replacement of Legacy Application (+40 points)  Executive Initiative (+30 points)  Funded by User Fees (+16 points)  Project Addresses Audit Findings (+12 points) *Note: Answering yes to any of the questions above will award the indicated points on top of your combined alignment, financial value and confidence scores. Each project qualifies for only one categorization bonus.

9 9 Financial Value Score Governor’s Issue Areas Score DTMB Strategic Goals Score Agency Business Plan Score Alignment ScoreConfidence ScoreValue Score Priority Score Priority = (AS + VS)/2 X Confidence + Category Bonus 100 Final Prioritization Score Non-Financial/Public Value Score


Download ppt "1 FY 2013 Call for Projects Candidate Evaluation and Selection Criteria March 20, 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google