Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology

Published byThomasina Woods Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology"— Presentation transcript:

1 ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Bradley.estochen@state.mn.us

2 Outline for Today Overview of Safety Planning efforts Crash Data discussions Breakout sessions Prioritization exercise 2

3 Safety Planning Process Preliminary Crash Analysis Identification of Safety Emphasis Areas Safety strategies identification Strategy prioritization Roadway Risk Assessment Project identification 3

4 Multidisciplinary Focus Driver behavior is a component of most crashes Planning should be broad based Young Driver Alcohol Belts Speeding Infrastructure Breakout session to discuss behavior and infrastructure strategies 4

5 Breakout Sessions Your input is vital NCHRP developed a listing of strategies Help us determine what items are high priority for ATP 1 Prioritization exercise by the entire group will focus our plan development 5

6 Who is doing safety plans? MnDOT Districts 6

7 Who is doing safety plans? Counties (by ATP) 7

8 Highway Safety Funding Highway Safety Improvement Program Federal Transportation Dollars Dedicated for Safety Investments must be data driven Fatal crashes Serious injury crashes Focus on projects/strategies that can be applied to multiple miles Annual funding Statewide - $20 million $12.5 million County Roads $7 million State Roads $768,000 ATP 1 Counties 8

9 Safety Funding Distribution 9 DistrictState HSIPLocal HSIP 1 – Duluth$785,000$768,000 2 - Bemidji$318,000$450,000 3 – Brainerd/St. Cloud$1,120,000$1,870,000 4 – Detroit Lakes$485,000$600,000 5 - Metro$2,347,000$6,106,000 6 - Rochester$935,000$1,429,000 7 - Mankato$441,000$724,000 8 - Willmar$441,000$679,000 TOTAL$6,900,000$12,600,000

10 Safety Funding Distribution 10 DistrictState HSIPLocal HSIP 1 – Duluth$785,000$768,000 2 - Bemidji$318,000$450,000 3 – Brainerd/St. Cloud$1,120,000$1,870,000 4 – Detroit Lakes$485,000$600,000 5 - Metro$2,347,000$6,106,000 6 - Rochester$935,000$1,429,000 7 - Mankato$441,000$724,000 8 - Willmar$441,000$679,000 TOTAL$6,900,000$12,600,000

11 Safety Funding Distribution 11 DistrictState HSIPLocal HSIP 1 – Duluth$785,000$768,000 2 - Bemidji$318,000$450,000 3 – Brainerd/St. Cloud$1,120,000$1,870,000 4 – Detroit Lakes$485,000$600,000 5 - Metro$2,347,000$6,106,000 6 - Rochester$935,000$1,429,000 7 - Mankato$441,000$724,000 8 - Willmar$441,000$679,000 TOTAL$6,900,000$12,600,000 50%

12 07/19/2010 ATP 1 Crash Data Overview 5 Year Crashes ATP 1 27,411 806 5 Year Crashes ATP 1 27,411 806 State System 12,355 – 45% 384 – 48% State System 12,355 – 45% 384 – 48% CSAH/CR 5,766 – 21% 273 – 34% CSAH/CR 5,766 – 21% 273 – 34% Rural 3,019 – 52% 204 – 75% Rural 3,019 – 52% 204 – 75% Urban 2,747 – 48% 69 – 25% Urban 2,747 – 48% 69 – 25% All Way Stop 136 – 10% 1 – 4% All Way Stop 136 – 10% 1 – 4% Run off Road 1,154 – 64% 79 – 62% Run off Road 1,154 – 64% 79 – 62% On Curve 486 – 42% 37 – 47% On Curve 486 – 42% 37 – 47% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 246 (48%), 6 (55%) “Not Applicable” – 14 (3%), 2 (18%) SS. Opp – 21 (4%), 1 (9%) Left Turn – 43 (8%), 1 (9%) Right Angle – 246 (48%), 6 (55%) “Not Applicable” – 14 (3%), 2 (18%) SS. Opp – 21 (4%), 1 (9%) Left Turn – 43 (8%), 1 (9%) Thru-Stop 508 – 39% 11 – 44% Thru-Stop 508 – 39% 11 – 44% Left Turn – 52 (17%), 4 (67%) Rear End – 109 (36%), 1 (17%) Right Angle – 68 (23%), 1 (17%) Head On – 20 (7%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 52 (17%), 4 (67%) Rear End – 109 (36%), 1 (17%) Right Angle – 68 (23%), 1 (17%) Head On – 20 (7%), 0 (0%) Signalized 301 – 23% 6 – 24% Signalized 301 – 23% 6 – 24% Inters-Related 714 – 26% 53 – 28% Inters-Related 714 – 26% 53 – 28% City, Twnshp, Other 9,290 – 34% 149 – 18% City, Twnshp, Other 9,290 – 34% 149 – 18% Inters-Related 1,312 – 48% 25 – 36% Inters-Related 1,312 – 48% 25 – 36% Not Inters-Related 1,205 – 44% 41 – 60% Not Inters-Related 1,205 – 44% 41 – 60% Run Off Road – 294 (24%), 18 (44%) Head On – 90 (8%), 6 (15%) Rear End – 286 (24%), 4 (10%) Right Angle – 119 (10%), 3 (7%) Run Off Road – 294 (24%), 18 (44%) Head On – 90 (8%), 6 (15%) Rear End – 286 (24%), 4 (10%) Right Angle – 119 (10%), 3 (7%) Animal 301 – 10% 16 – 8% Animal 301 – 10% 16 – 8% Not Inters-Related 1,794 – 66% 127 – 68% Not Inters-Related 1,794 – 66% 127 – 68% Head On, SS Opp 130 – 7% 19 – 15% Head On, SS Opp 130 – 7% 19 – 15% On Curve 59 – 45% 5 – 26% On Curve 59 – 45% 5 – 26% Unknown/Other 230 – 8% 3 – 4% Unknown/Other 230 – 8% 3 – 4% Unknown/Other 208 – 8% 8 – 4% Unknown/Other 208 – 8% 8 – 4% Other/Unknown 367 – 28% 7 – 28% Other/Unknown 367 – 28% 7 – 28% Right Angle – 115 (38%), 10 (50%) “Other” – 58 (19%), 3 (15%) Run Off Road – 35 (12%), 2 (10%) Head On – 19 (6%), 2 (10%) Right Angle – 115 (38%), 10 (50%) “Other” – 58 (19%), 3 (15%) Run Off Road – 35 (12%), 2 (10%) Head On – 19 (6%), 2 (10%) Thru-Stop 303 – 42% 20 – 38% Thru-Stop 303 – 42% 20 – 38% Run Off Road – 128 (37%), 9 (31%) Left Turn – 25 (7%), 5 (17%) “Other” – 30 (9%), 5 (17%) Rear End – 56 (16%), 3 (10%) Run Off Road – 128 (37%), 9 (31%) Left Turn – 25 (7%), 5 (17%) “Other” – 30 (9%), 5 (17%) Rear End – 56 (16%), 3 (10%) Other/Unknown 344 – 48% 29 – 55% Other/Unknown 344 – 48% 29 – 55% Not Animal 2,717 – 90% 188 – 92% Not Animal 2,717 – 90% 188 – 92% All Way Stop 51 – 7% 4 – 8% All Way Stop 51 – 7% 4 – 8% Signalized 15 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 15 – 2% 0 – 0% Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2006-2010 Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). Includes Chisago County

13 07/19/2010 ATP 1 Crash Data Overview 5 Year Crashes ATP 1 27,411 806 5 Year Crashes ATP 1 27,411 806 State System 12,355 – 45% 384 – 48% State System 12,355 – 45% 384 – 48% CSAH/CR 5,766 – 21% 273 – 34% CSAH/CR 5,766 – 21% 273 – 34% Rural 3,019 – 52% 204 – 75% Rural 3,019 – 52% 204 – 75% Urban 2,747 – 48% 69 – 25% Urban 2,747 – 48% 69 – 25% All Way Stop 136 – 10% 1 – 4% All Way Stop 136 – 10% 1 – 4% Run off Road 1,154 – 64% 79 – 62% Run off Road 1,154 – 64% 79 – 62% On Curve 486 – 42% 37 – 47% On Curve 486 – 42% 37 – 47% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 246 (48%), 6 (55%) “Not Applicable” – 14 (3%), 2 (18%) SS. Opp – 21 (4%), 1 (9%) Left Turn – 43 (8%), 1 (9%) Right Angle – 246 (48%), 6 (55%) “Not Applicable” – 14 (3%), 2 (18%) SS. Opp – 21 (4%), 1 (9%) Left Turn – 43 (8%), 1 (9%) Thru-Stop 508 – 39% 11 – 44% Thru-Stop 508 – 39% 11 – 44% Left Turn – 52 (17%), 4 (67%) Rear End – 109 (36%), 1 (17%) Right Angle – 68 (23%), 1 (17%) Head On – 20 (7%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 52 (17%), 4 (67%) Rear End – 109 (36%), 1 (17%) Right Angle – 68 (23%), 1 (17%) Head On – 20 (7%), 0 (0%) Signalized 301 – 23% 6 – 24% Signalized 301 – 23% 6 – 24% Inters-Related 714 – 26% 53 – 28% Inters-Related 714 – 26% 53 – 28% City, Twnshp, Other 9,290 – 34% 149 – 18% City, Twnshp, Other 9,290 – 34% 149 – 18% Inters-Related 1,312 – 48% 25 – 36% Inters-Related 1,312 – 48% 25 – 36% Not Inters-Related 1,205 – 44% 41 – 60% Not Inters-Related 1,205 – 44% 41 – 60% Run Off Road – 294 (24%), 18 (44%) Head On – 90 (8%), 6 (15%) Rear End – 286 (24%), 4 (10%) Right Angle – 119 (10%), 3 (7%) Run Off Road – 294 (24%), 18 (44%) Head On – 90 (8%), 6 (15%) Rear End – 286 (24%), 4 (10%) Right Angle – 119 (10%), 3 (7%) Animal 301 – 10% 16 – 8% Animal 301 – 10% 16 – 8% Not Inters-Related 1,794 – 66% 127 – 68% Not Inters-Related 1,794 – 66% 127 – 68% Head On, SS Opp 130 – 7% 19 – 15% Head On, SS Opp 130 – 7% 19 – 15% On Curve 59 – 45% 5 – 26% On Curve 59 – 45% 5 – 26% Unknown/Other 230 – 8% 3 – 4% Unknown/Other 230 – 8% 3 – 4% Unknown/Other 208 – 8% 8 – 4% Unknown/Other 208 – 8% 8 – 4% Other/Unknown 367 – 28% 7 – 28% Other/Unknown 367 – 28% 7 – 28% Right Angle – 115 (38%), 10 (50%) “Other” – 58 (19%), 3 (15%) Run Off Road – 35 (12%), 2 (10%) Head On – 19 (6%), 2 (10%) Right Angle – 115 (38%), 10 (50%) “Other” – 58 (19%), 3 (15%) Run Off Road – 35 (12%), 2 (10%) Head On – 19 (6%), 2 (10%) Thru-Stop 303 – 42% 20 – 38% Thru-Stop 303 – 42% 20 – 38% Run Off Road – 128 (37%), 9 (31%) Left Turn – 25 (7%), 5 (17%) “Other” – 30 (9%), 5 (17%) Rear End – 56 (16%), 3 (10%) Run Off Road – 128 (37%), 9 (31%) Left Turn – 25 (7%), 5 (17%) “Other” – 30 (9%), 5 (17%) Rear End – 56 (16%), 3 (10%) Other/Unknown 344 – 48% 29 – 55% Other/Unknown 344 – 48% 29 – 55% Not Animal 2,717 – 90% 188 – 92% Not Animal 2,717 – 90% 188 – 92% All Way Stop 51 – 7% 4 – 8% All Way Stop 51 – 7% 4 – 8% Signalized 15 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 15 – 2% 0 – 0% Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2006-2010 Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). Includes Chisago County

14 Crash Reporting is IMPORTANT Thank you for completing the reports It’s not just for insurance companies Today we are making decisions based on your reports $768,000, annually as of today Be objective, report what you find You are our eyes and ears on the road Video 14

Download ppt "ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology"

Similar presentations

Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.

Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.
Strategic Highway Safety Plan Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Welcome.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Welcome.
Strategic Highway Safety Plan/Developing Local Road Safety Plans Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan/Developing Local Road Safety Plans Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS.

AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS.
All Roads Transportation Safety Roadway Departure Crash- 2013 (Formerly Jurisdictionally Blind Safety)

All Roads Transportation Safety Roadway Departure Crash (Formerly Jurisdictionally Blind Safety)
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.

Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.

County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash- 2013.

Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
GAMPO. Randy Clayton Operations Manager, Strategic Highway Safety Plan Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety.

GAMPO. Randy Clayton Operations Manager, Strategic Highway Safety Plan Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.

Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
I-94 West Corridor Reference Map To Brainerd Lakes Region St. Cloud Urbanized Area 111,000 2010 Census Twin Cities Urbanized Area 2.7 Million 2010 Census.

I-94 West Corridor Reference Map To Brainerd Lakes Region St. Cloud Urbanized Area 111, Census Twin Cities Urbanized Area 2.7 Million 2010 Census.
T.H. 23 / South Saratoga Street Reduced Conflict Intersection and Pedestrian Overpass Project Project hearing October 14, 2014 City Council Presenters.

T.H. 23 / South Saratoga Street Reduced Conflict Intersection and Pedestrian Overpass Project Project hearing October 14, 2014 City Council Presenters.
High Risk Rural Roads 23 U.S.C. § 148 (a)(1) & (f) Leslie Wright Local/Tribal Road Safety Program Manager Office of Safety, FHWA Leslie Wright Local/Tribal.

High Risk Rural Roads 23 U.S.C. § 148 (a)(1) & (f) Leslie Wright Local/Tribal Road Safety Program Manager Office of Safety, FHWA Leslie Wright Local/Tribal.
Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011 -- Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/2012 5 Year Crashes Carver.

Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver.
Red-Light Running. 2 Traffic Signals Red-Light Running 3 Intersection Fatalities There were 8,657 intersection fatalities in 2007.

Red-Light Running. 2 Traffic Signals Red-Light Running 3 Intersection Fatalities There were 8,657 intersection fatalities in 2007.
BIO Az DPS Assignments Masters from Northern Arizona University

BIO Az DPS Assignments Masters from Northern Arizona University
DRAFT.  Its Mandated for funding › Strategy, activity or project  It is a Guide › How to  It is a story › History (where we were) › Possible look.

DRAFT.  Its Mandated for funding › Strategy, activity or project  It is a Guide › How to  It is a story › History (where we were) › Possible look.
Federal Traffic Safety Program History HES (Hazard Elimination Set aside) TEA-21 1998 - 2005 19981998 20042004.

Federal Traffic Safety Program History HES (Hazard Elimination Set aside) TEA
Mandy Chu Office Chief Highway System Information and Performance Division of Research, Innovation and System Information Introduction to HPMS Highway.

Mandy Chu Office Chief Highway System Information and Performance Division of Research, Innovation and System Information Introduction to HPMS Highway.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google