Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

RadTherm Analysis EcoStud Z Furring versus Steel Stud (Winter)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "RadTherm Analysis EcoStud Z Furring versus Steel Stud (Winter)"— Presentation transcript:

1 RadTherm Analysis EcoStud Z Furring versus Steel Stud (Winter)

2 2 FOUO UNCLASSIFIED RadTherm Model Setup Polystyrene Foam Board (1.5 inch) Gypsum Board (0.5 inch) Concrete Wall Top View -100 W/m 2 Stud 25 gauge Steel Versus 0.09inch EcoStud (16 inches on center) (Heat Loss for a ~32F Winter Day)

3 3 FOUO UNCLASSIFIED RadTherm Model Setup Concrete (10 inch) Wall Side View Polystyrene Foam Board (1.5 inch) Gypsum Board (0.5 inch) -100 W/m 2

4 4 FOUO UNCLASSIFIED Results EcoStudSteel Stud Interior Surface Temperatures of Gypsum Concrete

5 5 FOUO UNCLASSIFIED Results EcoStudSteel Stud Interior Surface Temperatures of Foam and Stud Concrete

6 6 FOUO UNCLASSIFIED Results EcoStudSteel Stud Exterior Concrete Surface Temperatures Concrete

7 7 FOUO UNCLASSIFIED Conclusion Steel studs pull heat away from the interior gypsum wall. The heat conducts along the stud and through to the exterior wall of the building. Steel studs pull heat away from the interior gypsum wall. The heat conducts along the stud and through to the exterior wall of the building. EcoStuds are considerably less conductive and minimize the heat that is transferred (lost) to the exterior environment. This results in less energy requirements to maintain a comfortable air temperature within the building. EcoStuds are considerably less conductive and minimize the heat that is transferred (lost) to the exterior environment. This results in less energy requirements to maintain a comfortable air temperature within the building.


Download ppt "RadTherm Analysis EcoStud Z Furring versus Steel Stud (Winter)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google