Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Use the ion stripper in TT2 to increase the emittance and thereby limit the accumulated brightness: Case 1:192 bunches, Accumulated Brightness~134 (192*0.70),

Published byPiers Cook Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Use the ion stripper in TT2 to increase the emittance and thereby limit the accumulated brightness: Case 1:192 bunches, Accumulated Brightness~134 (192*0.70),"— Presentation transcript:

1 Use the ion stripper in TT2 to increase the emittance and thereby limit the accumulated brightness: Case 1:192 bunches, Accumulated Brightness~134 (192*0.70), Brightness (N b /ε n )=0.70 [10 11 /um], Beta =20 m @ TT2 stripper, Increase ε n from 1.4 to 1.86 [um] Case 2:240 bunches, Accumulated Brightness~134 (240*0.56), Brightness (N b /ε n )=0.56 [10 11 /um], Beta =40 m @ TT2 stripper, Increase ε n from 1.4 to 2.32 [um]

2 Case 1: (192,0.70) DISP1DISP2ALFA11BETA11 DISP3DISP4ALFA22BETA22 Entry stripper -2.4290-0.04690.0000020.00-0.03210.03050.000020.00 Exit stripper -2.4290-0.0469-0.0000115.05-0.03210.03050.000015.05 Adjusting the beta function at the stripper to 20m in both horizontal and vertical planes, gives an increase of the normalized emittance from 1.4 um to 1.86 um. The optical functions before and after the stripper: The following magnets are used for the matching of beta =20 m at the stripper (position 208) and for the matching the optical functions at the end of TT10 to the same values as the Q20 optics: NB! The same magnets are also used for case 2 (40m at the stripper), because they give a precise matching (and extra flexibility to change the matching) and can also avoid the maximum current limits of the magnets and power supplies. For comparison, here is the similar table for the Q20 optics QFO165QDE180QFO205QDE207QDE210QFO215QDE220SQFO225SQDE240SQFO375QIID1001QIIF1002QIID1003QIF1004QID1005 K1 [Gradient/Bρ]0.0727-0.07240.0610.000-0.10420.0713-0.10440.1069-0.10420.1322-0.09760.138-0.06910.1193-0.0866 Current [A]146.95-146.56123.470.00-207.69144.09-206.95211.70-207.69262.46-193.46274.33-137.24197.35-143.39 Max Current [A]350 500450400500350 400300200 Max rms Current [A]NA 360 500NA 400275200 QFO165QDE180QFO205QDE207QDE210QFO215QDE220SQFO225SQDE240SQFO375QIID1001QIIF1002QIID1003QIF1004QID1005 K1 [Gradient/Bρ]0.0744-0.05860.1269-0.1082-0.07380.0667-0.10560.1046-0.10070.1505-0.1150.1314-0.06970.1177-0.0858 Current [A]150.37-118.68256.67-218.68-147.34134.95-209.32207.12-200.84300.31-227.99260.77-138.53194.68-142.11 Max Current [A]350 500450400500350 400300200 Max rms Current [A]NA 360 500NA 400275200

3 Case 1: (192,0.70) Notice that the optical functions in the majority part of the TT10 line is exactly like the Q20 optics i.e. the matching to 20m is essentially kept in TT2

4 Case 2: (240,0.56) Adjusting the beta function at the stripper to 40m in both horizontal and vertical planes, gives an increase of the normalized emittance from 1.4 um to 2.32 um. The optical functions before and after the stripper: The following magnets are used for the matching of beta =40 m at the stripper (position 208) and for the matching the optical functions at the end of TT10 to the same values as the Q20 optics: For comparison, here is the similar table for the Q20 optics QFO165QDE180QFO205QDE207QDE210QFO215QDE220SQFO225SQDE240SQFO375QIID1001QIIF1002QIID1003QIF1004QID1005 K1 [Gradient/Bρ]0.0727-0.07240.0610.000-0.10420.0713-0.10440.1069-0.10420.1322-0.09760.138-0.06910.1193-0.0866 Current [A]146.95-146.56123.470.00-207.69144.09-206.95211.70-207.69262.46-193.46274.33-137.24197.35-143.39 Max Current [A]350 500450400500350 400300200 Max rms Current [A]NA 360 500NA 400275200 DISP1DISP2ALFA11BETA11 DISP3DISP4ALFA22BETA22 Entry stripper -2.5040-0.0686040.00-0.23010.0205040.00 Exit stripper -2.5040-0.0686-0.0000124.14-0.23010.0205-0.0000124.14 QFO165QDE180QFO205QDE207QDE210QFO215QDE220SQFO225SQDE240SQFO375QIID1001QIIF1002QIID1003QIF1004QID1005 K1 [Gradient/Bρ]0.0418-0.00270.1021-0.1078-0.06820.0798-0.08360.1081-0.10630.1305-0.15870.1356-0.07130.1119-0.0851 Current [A]84.72-5.50206.19-217.83-136.13161.34-165.88214.22-211.84259.10-317.82269.40-141.55185.00-140.96 Max Current [A]350 500450400500350 400300200 Max rms Current [A]NA 360 500NA 400275200 NB! The power supplies for the magnets in TT2 are in the building 250 and 269, while the power supplies for TT10 are all in BA1. That the power supplies are in different buildings will make the interlock harder to make. However, it is unfortunately not possible to only use the magnets in TT2 – doing so, would leave the resulting currents at the limit and the optics functions at the end of TT10 would not be matched correctly.

5 Case 2: (240,0.56) Notice that the optical functions in the majority part of the TT10 line is exactly like the Q20 optics i.e. the matching to 40 m is essentially kept in TT2

Download ppt "Use the ion stripper in TT2 to increase the emittance and thereby limit the accumulated brightness: Case 1:192 bunches, Accumulated Brightness~134 (192*0.70),"

Similar presentations

5/3/2015J-PARC1 Transverse Matching Using Transverse Profiles and Longitudinal Beam arrival Times.

5/3/2015J-PARC1 Transverse Matching Using Transverse Profiles and Longitudinal Beam arrival Times.
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, 16.01.2014 TWIICE.

Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
A) 80 b) 53 c) 13 d) 25. 53 -25 372 5 x 2 = 10 37 : 10 = 3,7 - 309 063 103 x 3 = 309.

A) 80 b) 53 c) 13 d) x 2 = : 10 = 3, x 3 = 309.
July 22, 2005CESRc miniMAC1 Introduction to CESRc Optics M. Billing.

July 22, 2005CESRc miniMAC1 Introduction to CESRc Optics M. Billing.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014

Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
E.Benedetto, 30/05/13, LIU-PSB Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam.

E.Benedetto, 30/05/13, LIU-PSB Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam.
5.2 Inverse Function 2/22/2013.

5.2 Inverse Function 2/22/2013.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.

Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
FFS Issues in the 2011 autumn continuous operation Toshiyuki OKUGI (KEK) 1/13/2011 The 11 th ATF2 project meeting SLAC, USA.

FFS Issues in the 2011 autumn continuous operation Toshiyuki OKUGI (KEK) 1/13/2011 The 11 th ATF2 project meeting SLAC, USA.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.

Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.

A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Yauhen Kot 25.02.2013 Current Status of XFEL Simulations.

Yauhen Kot Current Status of XFEL Simulations.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.

Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.

RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting October 24, 2012 CTF3 Experimental program for end 2012 R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.

R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting October 24, 2012 CTF3 Experimental program for end 2012 R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
Specifications for PSB Injection System Upgrade C. Bracco, J. Abelleira on behalf of BTP Acknowledgments: E. Benedetto, C. Carli, V. Dimov, L.M. Feliciano,

Specifications for PSB Injection System Upgrade C. Bracco, J. Abelleira on behalf of BTP Acknowledgments: E. Benedetto, C. Carli, V. Dimov, L.M. Feliciano,
Comparison between simulations and measurements in the LHC with heavy ions T. Mertens, R. Bruce, J.M. Jowett, H. Damerau,F. Roncarolo.

Comparison between simulations and measurements in the LHC with heavy ions T. Mertens, R. Bruce, J.M. Jowett, H. Damerau,F. Roncarolo.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google