Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ray Casper - Foundations Engineer John Scanlon - Structural Engineer Jimmy Mounnarat - Fluid System Engineer Igor Babushkin - Solar Thermal Engineer Preliminary.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ray Casper - Foundations Engineer John Scanlon - Structural Engineer Jimmy Mounnarat - Fluid System Engineer Igor Babushkin - Solar Thermal Engineer Preliminary."— Presentation transcript:

1 Ray Casper - Foundations Engineer John Scanlon - Structural Engineer Jimmy Mounnarat - Fluid System Engineer Igor Babushkin - Solar Thermal Engineer Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

2 PDR Agenda Introduction Floor plan layout House elevation drawings Foundation analysis Roof Truss analysis Hydronic subsystem analysis Heat Transfer analysis Building and Flat Plate Collector F-Chart analysis

3 Floor Plan Layout

4 House Elevation Drawings

5 Foundation Options Poured ConcreteCement Block Low labor cost Quicker Requires more material Prevents water intrusion Better heat retention Low material cost High Labor Cost Joints allow for water intrusion Weaker

6 Foundation Calculations 8’ Soil Depth 50’ x 30’ foundation 15 degree slope M Max on 50’ North wall Soil Density 100lb/ft 3 House load = 200lb/ft 2 8 inch thick poured FOS COMPRESSION = 87.2 FOS BENDING = 2.2

7 Roof Truss Analysis A “Double Howe” truss using 2X8 beams proved to be suitable for our application. Roof pitch is variable depending upon FPC placement.

8 Hydronic Subsystem Analysis Schematic Head Loss, Pump size, Performance Curves Copper vs CPVC Cost Comparison

9 Hydronic Schematic http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles/hackleman65.html

10 Head Loss Max Head Loss per system 51.4 ft. Assuming 3 FPC’s. Pump Size 2 pump options in series. Taco pump – 2 x $219.75 Grundfos pump – 2 x $269.75

11 Taco Cast Iron Model 009-F5

12 Grundfos UP26-96F

13 Cost Analysis Copper vs CPVC ~ 33% Copper – corrodes, promotes corrosion, expensive. CPVC – higher reistance to heated water, no soldering, no corrosion, cheaper. Pumps ~ 19%

14 Heat Transfer Analysis

15 Solar Thermal  Compare Two FPC’s  Determine Number of Panels  Determine Angle

16 Alternative Energy– AE-26 Roof angle is Best at around 31 degrees Best area is around 54 ft 2

17 Economics of the AE-26 Chose 6 Panels because of the Thermal Output Data Panel : $825.00 Price per ft 2 : $34.88 Area: 25.35 ft 2

18 Sun Earth, Inc -- EP-21 Very strange slop calculation, 28 degrees is best slope Collector Panel area seems to be the best at 41.11 ft 2

19 Economics of the EP-21 Similarly to the previous choice, 6 panels are chosen Panel: 609.97 Price per ft 2 : $34.88 Area: 21.35 ft 2

20 Questions?


Download ppt "Ray Casper - Foundations Engineer John Scanlon - Structural Engineer Jimmy Mounnarat - Fluid System Engineer Igor Babushkin - Solar Thermal Engineer Preliminary."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google