1. Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, 2015 41 st International Forum on Traffic Records and Highway Information Systems, Costa Mesa, CA, October 25-28, 2015

3. Oregon crash trend

4. Oregon averages 1800 fatalities and serious injuries per year Based on 2009-2013 data

5. Traditionally ODOT spent all HSIP funding on state highways New program to address safety on all roads MAP-21 requirement Half of the fatalities and serious injuries occur on local agency roads Why ARTS program?

6. ODOT met with representatives from League of Oregon Cities (LOC) and Association of Oregon Counties (AOC) Need for developing a safety program for all public roads Memorandum of understanding between ODOT, AOC, and LOC Agreed to All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) program Jurisdictionally blind safety

7. Reduce fatalities and serious injuries Address safety on all public roads Data-driven and blind to jurisdiction Funding allocation based on K & A Overseen by ODOT Regions Engage local agencies in the project selection process ARTS program principles

8. ARTS program timelines

9. ARTS program ARTS Hot Spot (50%) Systemic (50%) Roadway Departure (50%) Intersection (36%) Bike/Ped (14%) Numbers in ( ) represent approximate funding split (statewide)

10. ARTS funding- statewide (2017-2021)

11. ODOT CRF list

12. Hot spot Targets locations with histories of fatal and serious injury crashes

13. Hot spot countermeasures Courtesy: FHWA

14. Hot spot project selection A 150% list of potential project locations (for each Region)- prepared by consultant Data-driven analysis At least one fatal or serious injury crash (ODOT reported crashes only between 2009 and 2013) ODOT approved screening method Countermeasures from ODOT CRF List Prioritized based on B/C Ratio Courtesy: FHWA

15. Hot spot project selection

16. Total projects: 219 (based on 150% list) Projects in roadways owned by 16 cities and 12 counties By FundingBy Number of Projects

17. Systemic Systemic approach uses low-cost countermeasures that can be widely implemented to reduce fatalities and serious injuries

18. Systemic countermeasures Courtesy: FHWA

19. Systemic projects Application-based selection ODOT and Local Jurisdictions within a Region competed against each other Regions processed the applications and prepared a 150% list

20. Systemic projects Not necessary to have a history of F & A and preferably used on priority corridors from Systemic Plans

21. Systemic project selection Countermeasures from approved ODOT CRF List Projects prioritized based on B/C Ratio or Cost- Effectiveness Index (bike/ped projects)

22. Systemic project selection 150% list for each focus area

23. Systemic project selection Total projects: 268 (based on 150% list) Projects in roadways owned by 14 cities and 20 counties By Funding

24. Systemic project selection Roadway DepartureIntersection Bike/Ped

25. Systemic & Hot spot Lists Next Steps

26. Over-representation of urban signalized intersections in hotspot selection process Lack of proven countermeasures, especially for bike/ped projects Lack of technical expertise/staff for some local jurisdictions HSIP requirement of local match is a concern for many local agencies Engaging stakeholders early in the process is a key Conclusions

27. Questions? Contact: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/TRAFFIC-ROADWAY/Pages/ARTS.aspx Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Highway Safety Engineer ODOT Technical Services (503) 986-3573 Zahidul.Q.Siddique@odot.state.or.us