Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

X Mexican School of Particles and Fields Playa del Cármen, México November 2, 2002 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Recent advances from the STAR Experiment.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "X Mexican School of Particles and Fields Playa del Cármen, México November 2, 2002 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Recent advances from the STAR Experiment."— Presentation transcript:

1 X Mexican School of Particles and Fields Playa del Cármen, México November 2, 2002 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Recent advances from the STAR Experiment Highlights from Inclusive hadron spectra & Azimuthal correlations

2 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Outline  Heavy Ion Physics and QCD  STAR experiment at RHIC  Measurement highlights of interest to High Energy  Case I : Inclusive charged hadron spectra  Case II: Azimuthal anisotropy  Case III: Two-particle correlations  Conclusions

3 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Heavy Ions: How does nuclear matter look at high temperature?  ~ 1-3 GeV/fm 3 High Density QCD Matter in Laboratory Determine its properties QCD Prediction: Phase Transitions Deconfinement to Q-G Plasma Chiral symmetry restoration Relevance to other research areas? Quark-hadron phase transition in early Universe Cores of dense stars High density QCD

4 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider STAR PHENIX PHOBOS BRAHMS RHIC Design PerformanceAu + Aup + p Max  s nn 200 GeV500 GeV L [cm -2 s -1 ]2 x 10 26 1.4 x 10 31 Interaction rates1.4 x 10 3 s -1 6 x 10 5 s -1 Two Superconducting Rings Ions: A = 1 ~ 200, pp, pA, AA, AB

5 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 The STAR Experiment

6 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Detector components in STAR 1 st year detectors (2000) 2 nd year detectors 3 rd year detectors Central Trigger Barrel Time Projection Chamber Magnet Coils TPC Endcap & MWPC RICH Barrel EM Calorimeter Endcap Calorimeter Silicon Strip Detector Photon Multiplicity Detector Zero Degree Calorimeter Silicon Vertex Tracker Forward Time Projection Chambers Vertex Position Detectors + TOF patch

7 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Focus on high p t  We know very little about early time  Au+Au collisions to study strongly interacting matter under extreme conditions  Large momentum transfers  early time scales  Use high p t jet phenomena as probe of medium  Hard scattering has been done… but not in hot medium  Measurement of fragmentation products  insight into gluon density 1 [1] R. Baier, D. Schiff, and B. G. Zakharov, Annu. Rev Part. Sci. 50, 37 (2000).

8 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Centrality and Participants in HI Centrality classes based on mid-rapidity multiplicity Preliminary  s NN = 200 GeV Uncorrected peripheral (grazing shot) central (head-on) collision spectators participants N part (Wounded Nucleons) ~ soft production N bin ~ hard processes

9 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Case I : Leading hadron suppression - Wang and Gyulassy:  E  softening of fragmentation  suppression of leading hadron yield Ivan Vitev, QM02

10 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 High p T hadrons in Au+Au Preliminary (nucl-ex/0206011, PRL in press) STAR

11 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Inclusive charged hadron suppression 130 GeV normalized to NN centrality dependence Clear evidence for high p T hadron suppression in central collisions  significant nuclear interactions to very high p T Now seen by all 4 RHIC collaborations (BRAHMS, PHENIX, PHOBOS, STAR) Preliminary 130 and 200 GeV, Central/peripheral

12 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Case II: Azimuthal Anisotropy, or “Elliptic Flow” STAR Preliminary 130GeV Geometry: asymmetric initial state Fourier analysis  1+2v 2 cos2(  lab -  plane ) Asymmetry + interactions creates final state azimuthal correlations: elliptic flow  lab -  plane

13 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Case II: Azimuthal Anisotropy, or “Elliptic Flow” STAR Preliminary 130GeV Geometry: asymmetric initial state Asymmetry + interactions creates final state azimuthal correlations: elliptic flow  lab -  plane Finite v 2 at high pt p T > 2GeV: v 2 constant

14 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Method I: Direct Jet Identification  jet-jet correlations in p+p?  jet-jet correlations in Au+Au?  Comparison  statistical method

15 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Method II: High p T Correlations  Statistical leading particle analysis  Histogram in 2-d  N:  vs.   project pypy pxpx 2 GeV 4 GeV N trigger : Total number of trigger particles: (4<p T <6)

16 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Mid-Central Au+Au Result: Au+Au Distribution  Harmonic structure  Peaks at 0, |  |  Non-zero mean value  How do we extract jet signal from background?

17 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Background Subtraction  di-jets  Flow  Combinatorial background  Resonance decays  jets All  Small  Subtract large  correlations Isolate intra-jet correlations Removes di-jet signal

18 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 First Results: STAR 130 GeV 0-10% Most Central Significant peak remains after subtractionJets?!

19 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV Near angle persists after large  subtractions

20 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV  Shape  Clear near & away side signal  Same sign correlation  Unlikely due to resonance decays Near angle persists after large  subtractions

21 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV  Shape  Clear near & away side signal  Same sign correlation  Unlikely due to resonance decays Near angle persists after large  subtractions di-jets in Au+Au?

22 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jet Charge Expect opposite charge sign between leading, next-to-leading charged particles Measured by DELPHI Well described by LUND string model

23 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV  Charge Ordering  Fragmentation well described by string model  Gaussian fit to near-side: Ratio of Gaussian Yields System opposite/same LUND String2.6 (0.7) p+p2.7 (0.9) 0-10% Au+Au2.5 (0.6)

24 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV Gaussian Width Systemoppositesame p+p 0.17 (.04)0.16 (.05) 0-10% AuAu 0.20 (.05)0.15 (.07)  Charge Ordering  Fragmentation well described by string model  Gaussian fit to near-side:

25 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 What Have we Shown? First direct evidence of jets at RHIC  What about di-jets at RHIC?  Study away side in Au+Au  But… large  subtraction removes away side  Need different method to deal with background

26 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Reference Model  Au+Au correlations:  Jets  di-jets  elliptic flow  multiple hard- scatterings per event  Incorporate known sources of signal and dominant background STAR Preliminary 130 GeV

27 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Reference Model  Algorithm: Au+Au measurement Background term pp measurement Fit B in non-jet region Add p+p to background term

28 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Data Comparison to Ref. Model  Absolute scale  Background contribution increases with centrality  Near side well matched for all centralities  4/7 centrality bins  Other bins qualitatively, quantitatively similar

29 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Data Comparison to Ref. Model  Away-side suppression  Suppression increases with increasing centrality  Quantify with centrality:

30 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Quantify with Ratio Au+Au Measurement p+p Measurement background

31 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002  Dissappearance of the Jets from the Far Side Centrality dependent numerator Common denominator  Sys. errors: v 2 +5/-20%  HIJING model: constant ratio=1 Away-side suppression in central Au+Au

32 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Suppression of away-side jet consistent with strong absorption in bulk, emission dominantly from surface ?

33 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002  s dependence (200/130) at high p T  Inclusive spectra: growth with  s follows pQCD prediction (XN Wang) (systematic uncertainties are correlated – better estimates in progress) Rates change but shape does not.  v 2 : independent of  s for p T >2 GeV/c  Geometric origin of v 2 at high p T ?

34 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Away side suppression: open issues near side away side Preliminary peripheral central Why not 1 for peripheral?  evidently not due to experimental error or uncertainty  not due to mismeasured v 2 : even v 2 =0 has little effect for most peripheral and central Initial state effects: Shadowing in Au+Au? Nuclear k T : Initial state multiple scattering  Hijing estimate: Maximum 20% effect d+Au Resolution: Need to measure in d+Au

35 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Summary of STAR high p T measurements  hadrons at p T >~3 GeV/c are jet fragments  central Au+Au:  strong suppression of inclusive yield at p T >5 GeV/c  suppression factor ~ constant for 5<p T <12 GeV/c  large elliptic flow, finite for non-central to p T ~6 GeV/c  strong suppression of back-to-back hadron pairs  Possible interpretation:  Hard scattered partons (or their fragments) interact strongly with medium  Observed fragments are emitted from the surface of the hot & dense zone created in the collision ?

36 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 And back to our original question… If partons absorbed: large  E  large  gluon But have not yet proven partonic  E: where does absorption occur? Is it an initial state, partonic effect, or late hadronic effect? theory input: what are experimental handles to distinguish hadronic from partonic absorption? (e.g. correlation function widths) ? JETS JETS

37 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Extra Slides

38 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Look for partonic energy loss in dense matter Thick plasma (Baier et al.): Linear dependence on gluon density  glue : measure  E  gluon density at early hot, dense phase High gluon density requires deconfined matter (“indirect” QGP signature) Gluon bremsstrahlung Thin plasma (Gyulassy et al.):

39 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Future Coming run: 50% of full barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter triggers: high tower, E T, jet jets,  0,  electrons d+Au: Cronin effect/nuclear enhancement of inclusive yield suppression of back-to-back pairs gluon shadowing Long term:  -jet coincidences (“ultimate” jet energy loss experiment) heavy quark jets (dead cone effect) surprises….

40 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Soft Physics  Chemical Freezeout ~ 170 MeV  Lattice 160 - 180 MeV  Collective motion  Large “Elliptic flow” Large pressure gradients in the system  System seems to approach thermodynamic equilibrium  Kinetic freezeout ~ 110 MeV  Freezeout seems to be very fast, almost explosive

41 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Energy loss in cold matter Wang and Wang, hep-ph/0202105 Modification of fragmentation fn in e-A: dE/dx ~ 0.5 GeV/fm for 10 GeV quark F. Arleo, hep-ph/0201066 x1 Drell-Yan production in  -A: dE/dx <0.2 GeV/fm for 50 GeV quark

42 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Inclusive hadron suppression at RHIC Phenix    peripheral and central over measured p+p STAR charged hadrons: central/peripheral

43 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 v 2 : comparison to parton cascade Parton cascade (D. Molnar) Detailed agreement if: 5x minijet multiplicity from HIJING or 13x pQCD gg  gg cross section  extreme initial densities or very large cross sections

44 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 v 2 : centrality and p T dependence broad plateau, v 2 finite at p T ~10 GeV/c except for most central collisions  significant in-medium interactions to very high p T Shuryak (nucl-th/0112042): plateau exhausts initial spatial anisotropy Preliminar y

45 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Near-angle correlations at high p T Jet core  x  0.5 x 0.5  look at near-side correlations (  ~0) of high p T hadron pairs Complication: elliptic flow high p T hadrons that are correlated with reaction plane orientation are also correlated with each other (~v 2 2 ) but elliptic flow has long range correlation (  > 0.5) Solution: compare azimuthal correlation functions for  and 

46 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Non-flow effects? Non-flow: few particle correlations not related to reaction plane jets, resonances, momentum conservation,…  contrast v 2 from reaction plane and higher-order cumulants (Borghini et al.) Non-flow effects are significant 4 th order cumulants consistent with other non-flow estimates But large finite v 2 and saturation persist at high p T Preliminary

47 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Single Particle Selection       beam

48 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Away side suppression and nuclear k T near side away side Preliminary peripheral central  same thresholds for AuAu and pp  nuclear :  enhances near-side in Au+Au  suppress away-side in Au+Au  similar centrality dependence Stronger near-side correlation for p T trig >3 GeV/c than p T trig >4 GeV/c

49 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Full dataset: 4<pt(trig)<6 GeV/c

50 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Central Au+Au: 6<p T (trigger) <8 GeV/c Stronger signal but limited statistics in non-central bins

51 Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Combinatorial Background  Au+Au: many hard scatterings per event  Expect peak at 0, |  |  Flat, non-zero background  p+p: 1 hard scattering per event  Expect peak at 0, |  |  zero background


Download ppt "X Mexican School of Particles and Fields Playa del Cármen, México November 2, 2002 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Recent advances from the STAR Experiment."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google