Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-1 Unit 7 Constitutional Limitations Regulatory Takings: Condemnation, Regulation and Impermissible Takings of Private Property.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-1 Unit 7 Constitutional Limitations Regulatory Takings: Condemnation, Regulation and Impermissible Takings of Private Property."— Presentation transcript:

1 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-1 Unit 7 Constitutional Limitations Regulatory Takings: Condemnation, Regulation and Impermissible Takings of Private Property

2 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-2 5th Amendment Takings Clause “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” –Public use –Just compensation

3 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-3 Public Use All governmental uses of property Private, for profit, public utilities Urban renewal

4 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-4 Just Compensation Fair Market Value (FMV) The price that a willing buyer would pay a willing seller

5 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-5 Eminent Domain in NC Power conferred solely by General Assembly Condemnors –Public –Private

6 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-6 Eminent Domain Procedure No prior offer to purchase required Notice Institution of action –Service of summons & complaint –Deposit with the court Answer by defendant

7 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-7 Eminent Domain Procedure Determination of damages & other issues –Commissioners used if sole issue is compensation –Trial de novo from findings of commissioners Vesting of title –Quick take –Standard

8 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-8 Inverse Condemnation No legal action by public entity Corresponds to the torts of trespass or nuisance Physical v. nonphysical Attorney fees available (NC)

9 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-9 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Physical invasion Regulatory takings –Usually, but not necessarily, nonphysical

10 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-10 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council (1992) Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) Loretto v. TelePrompter Manhattan CATV Corp. (1982)

11 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-11 Other cases Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. U.S. (Fed. Cir. 1994) - framework problem [appeal from U.S. Court of Federal Claims] Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. U.S. (Fed. Cir. 1994) - partial taking Bormann v. Bd. Of Supervisors in & for Kossuth Co., Iowa (Iowa Supreme Court 1998)

12 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-12 NC Law Exactions –Meets need created by developer –Commensurate benefit to development –Schools & general road improvements forbidden in N.C.

13 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-13 NC Law No state equivalent of Takings Clause NC cases more generous than federal Partial takings –Calculation FMV before less FMV after –Offsets

14 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-14 Summary of limitations on federal & state power Constitutional Statutory Institutional

15 ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-15 Constitutionality of Zoning Uniform scheme No spot zoning No guarantee of highest & best use


Download ppt "ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-1 Unit 7 Constitutional Limitations Regulatory Takings: Condemnation, Regulation and Impermissible Takings of Private Property."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google