1. Information Society Technologies FP5 (1998-2002) update FP 6 (2002-2006) overview IST programme DG INFSO/ F6

2. Outline of presentation Status update of IST in FP5 Status update of IST in FP5 –IST structure & vision –IST facts & figures –Analysis of the programme portfolio WP2002 WP2002 –Main features Overview of IST in FP6 Overview of IST in FP6 –Rationale and context –Elements of IST in FP6 –FP6 instruments –FP6 budget

3. The Fifth Framework Programme (1998-2002) Creating a User friendly Information Society 3.600 B € Creating a User friendly Information Society 3.600 B € Energy, environment & sustainable development 2.125 B € Energy, environment & sustainable development 2.125 B € Improving the quality of life & management of living resources 2.413 B € Improving the quality of life & management of living resources 2.413 B € Promoting competitive & sustainable growth 2.705 B € Promoting competitive & sustainable growth 2.705 B € Total: 14.960 B € 0.475 B € Confirming the international role of Community research 0.363 B € Promotion of innovation & SME participation 1.280 B € Improving human potential & socio-economic knowledge

4. IST Structure and Budget Key Action I: Systems and services for the citizen 646 M€ (18%) 646 M€ (18%) Key Action II: New methods of work and eCommerce 547 M € (15%) 547 M € (15%) Key Action III: Multimedia content and tools 564 M € (16%) Key Action IV: Essential technologies and infrastructures 1,363 M € (38%) 1,363 M € (38%) Future and emerging technologies 319 M € ( 9%) 319 M € ( 9%) Research networking 161 M € ( 4%) Cross-Programme themes at least 10% of programme

5. The IST vision Building the knowledge society for ALL Moving to an era where : ‘Our surrounding is the interface’ to IST applications and services Exploring beyond “the PC, screens & keyboard interfaces”... Multi-sensorial dialogues supported by computing & networking – –‘everywhere’ – –embedded in everyday objects (e.g: furniture, clothes, vehicles, smart materials, …) – –Offering natural interactions (voice, gesture, etc…)

6. Call 7 ? 450 Call 7 ? 450 Call 7 bis ? 25 Call 7 bis ? 25 Call 8 ? 370 Call 8 ? 370 _____ ____ _____ ____ Total ~2200~3522 Total ~2200~3522M€ ~1200 M ~1200 M € ~950 M ~950 M € ~850 M ~850 M € ~370 M ~370 M € 1999 Jan Mar June Oct Jan Mar June Oct2000 Jan Apr Jul Oct 2001 Jan Apr Jun Sept 2002 Jan Apr Jul Oct Call-1Call-2Call-3Call-4Call-5Call-6Call-7Call-8 IST call timetable and inventory Call-7 bis Call ProjectsBudget Call ProjectsBudget 1-6 ~1,754 ~2,598 1-6 ~1,754 ~2,598

7. Participation in IST (calls 1-6) Around 1750 proposals retained out of ~8000 received. Total funding: ~ 2.6 B€ (about 75% of total budget).

8. IPPA : technologies covered by IST portfolio Visualisation virtual reality µsystems µelectronics Mobile Internet Information handling Distributed systems Increased concentration on a clear set of technologies

9. Industry/services sectors covered

10. ~20% ~30% IPPA: time to market for RTD projects A clear move towards addressing the longer term

11. IPPA : summary of observations Clear focussing on the future generations of IST Clear focussing on the future generations of IST in line with the programme's vision A clear move towards longer term A clear move towards longer term away from “traditional” internet technologies In areas where European IST industry is strong In areas where European IST industry is strong a coherent contribution to development of technologies & applications (e.g. mobile/wireless communications, microsystems, micro/optoelectronics) Fragmentation of coverage in areas where European industry is weak Fragmentation of coverage in areas where European industry is weak e.g. Generic and packaged Software...and where technology is still not mature...and where technology is still not mature e.g. advanced interfaces, semantic-based knowledge management ….. Gaps to be bridged in some critical fields Gaps to be bridged in some critical fields e.g. security,.. Forging links between technology & application development Forging links between technology & application development

12. Workprogramme 2002 - input documents eEurope: Synergies/contributions eEurope: Synergies/contributions Action Plan (eEurope site), ISTAG WG6 report Recommendations of ISTAG: Recommendations of ISTAG: Report: “WG7 report: FP6 and WP2002” IPPA analysis of calls 1-6 IPPA analysis of calls 1-6 IPPA reports (on Cordis) Consultation meetings FP6+ WP2002 Consultation meetings FP6+ WP2002 15 reports on Cordis FP6 and Specific programmes texts FP6 and Specific programmes texts Programme assessment and monitoring Programme assessment and monitoring 5 year assessment, annual monitoring

13. Workprogramme 2002: objectives Bridging to FP6 Bridging to FP6 –Further concentration/focus –Longer term and/or high-risk effort –Preparing for the instruments –preparing the constituency –ERA related activities Contributing to eEurope Contributing to eEurope –Activities that help sustain the e Europe momentum beyond the 2002 time frame, e.g. Health, transport, security, education,.. Consolidating FP5 Consolidating FP5 –achieve critical mass –Achieve coverage where needed

14. Content Content - visible mapping between priorities and RTD activities - visible mapping between priorities and RTD activities - policy priorities highlighted (e.g. eEurope, 3G communication) - policy priorities highlighted (e.g. eEurope, 3G communication) - technology priorities better specified - technology priorities better specified - a total of 35 Actions Lines (compared to 79 in WP2001) - a total of 35 Actions Lines (compared to 79 in WP2001) - includes 4 Cross-Programme Actions - includes 4 Cross-Programme Actions - includes specific Action Lines for eEurope - includes specific Action Lines for eEurope - includes specific Actions Lines to support the preparation of FP6 - includes specific Actions Lines to support the preparation of FP6 Indicative Budget of 370 M Indicative Budget of 370 M€ Roadmap Roadmap single call (Call 8) in Nov 2001 single call (Call 8) in Nov 2001 IST WP2002: Main characteristics

15. Skeleton and call 8 Skeleton Skeleton –20 RTD Action Lines(46 in 2001) –4 Take-up(11 in 2001) –4 CPAs(13 in 2001) –10 Support Measures(9 in 2001) One Call One Call –Call in Nov 2001 –Deadline 21 February 2002 –Evaluation: March 2002 –Contract signature: June/July 2002

16. Call 8: ~370 M Euro KA I:4 RTD+ 1 take-up KA II:2 RTD + 1 SM/ take-up KA III:1 RTD+ 2 SM KA IV:13 RTD*+ 7 take-up/SM CPAs:4 CPAs FET:2 Proactive +Open

17. KA1 2 RTD ALs in Health 2 RTD ALs in Health 1 RTD in Elderly and disabled 1 RTD in Elderly and disabled 1 AL in Environment (RTD + SMs) 1 AL in Environment (RTD + SMs) 1 AL in Transport preparing for FP6 (Take-up + SMs) 1 AL in Transport preparing for FP6 (Take-up + SMs) – clustering, reflection groups,..

18. KA2 One AL preparing for FP6 One AL preparing for FP6 –with Working Groups, studies, developing roadmaps, links with MSs, One AL on Long Term/exploratory research One AL on Long Term/exploratory research One AM/Take-up + Demons.: consolidating eEurope One AM/Take-up + Demons.: consolidating eEurope

19. KA3 One AL preparing for FP6: One AL preparing for FP6: –WGs, NoE, studies,... Long term/exploratory research Long term/exploratory research One consolidating/disseminating results One consolidating/disseminating results –in particular in the eEurope fields of education, culture and content

20. KA4  Coverage  Computing, Communication & Networks: 3 RTD + 1 Take-up  Mobile/wireless: 2 RTD  Simulation/visualisation, interfaces: 2 RTD  Software: 1 RTD  Microsystems: 2 RTD + 1 Take-up  Microelectronics: 3 RTD + 1 Take-up  Consolidates FP5 and focuses on activities to be introduced/reinforced in FP6, e.g.  4G Mobile, cognitive vision and control at large scale, software technologies, Networked audiovisual systems, micro and nano systems.

21. CPAs: Preparing FP6 –Mobile applications and services IPv6, new interfaces, integration with wireless LANs,..IPv6, new interfaces, integration with wireless LANs,.. location based services, mobile health systems, Mobile ecommerce and ework, entertainmentlocation based services, mobile health systems, Mobile ecommerce and ework, entertainment Complements “Call 7bis”Complements “Call 7bis” –GRIDs Technologies and applications environment, health, media, business & decision support systems, …Grids technologies and development environments,environment, health, media, business & decision support systems, …Grids technologies and development environments, –Sensors technologies and applications in health, environment, transport, work environments, nano, new materials,..in health, environment, transport, work environments, nano, new materials,.. –Technology platforms for cultural & artistic creative expression

22. FET and RNs The open action line The open action line 2 Proactive 2 Proactive –Quantum Information Processing and Communication –Presence Research: Cognitive sciences and future media RN: Complement to GEANT and testbeds RN: Complement to GEANT and testbeds

23. Continuous submission IST2002 - VI.1.1FET Open scheme IST2002 - VI.1.1FET Open scheme IST2002 - VIII.1.1Clustering of Projects IST2002 - VIII.1.1Clustering of Projects IST2002 - VIII.1.2Networks of Excellence & working groups IST2002 - VIII.1.2Networks of Excellence & working groups IST2002 - VIII.1.3Channelling of standardisation IST2002 - VIII.1.3Channelling of standardisation IST2002 - VIII.1.4Improving human capital in IT IST2002 - VIII.1.4Improving human capital in IT IST2002 - VIII.1.5Not existing IST2002 - VIII.1.5Not existing IST2002 - VIII.1.6Enabling RTD co-operation with NAS IST2002 - VIII.1.6Enabling RTD co-operation with NAS IST2002 - VIII.1.7Enabling RTD Co-operation with 3rd Counties IST2002 - VIII.1.7Enabling RTD Co-operation with 3rd Counties IST2002 - VIII.1.8Dissemination & awareness of results IST2002 - VIII.1.8Dissemination & awareness of results IST2002 - VIII.1.9Studies IST2002 - VIII.1.9Studies IST2002 - VIII.1.10Strengthening the ERA in IST domains IST2002 - VIII.1.10Strengthening the ERA in IST domains IST2002 - VIII.1.11Exploratory awards specific measures IST2002 - VIII.1.11Exploratory awards specific measures

24. IST in FP6 Context Context Content Content Tools Tools Budget Budget

25. The timetable for FP6 21 February 2001……..Commission proposal to Council and Parliament 3 March 2001 ………...Presentation to informal Council meeting in Uppsala April 2001 ……………..Starting the IST consultation process 30 May 2001…………..Commission proposal on Specific Programmes June 2001 …………….Research Council Sept 2001 ……………..Commission proposal on participation rules October 2001 …………Parliament ’s first reading of FP6 Oct/Dec 2001………….Council position March 2002……………Parliament second reading Spring 2002……………Conciliation procedure June 2002……………...Final adoption

26. FP6 and the European Research Area Moving to a European level Research Policy Moving to a European level Research Policy Strengthen co-operation between National and EU activities Strengthen co-operation between National and EU activities Concentration and focussing of effort and added-value Concentration and focussing of effort and added-value Improve links between National and EU policies and schemes Improve links between National and EU policies and schemes Further preparation for the EU enlargement process Further preparation for the EU enlargement process Aims to simplify management and implementation procedures Aims to simplify management and implementation procedures FP6 is an essential tool in support of ERA FP6 is an essential tool in support of ERA see …. “Making a reality of the European Research Area” Commission Communication of October 2000

27. Commission proposal “Specific Programmes” (May 2001)

28. Main IST related parts of FP6

29. IST: a high political and policy profile The Union has set an objective for the next decade … The Union has set an objective for the next decade … Lisbon council …. Lisbon council …. “To become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.” with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.” eEurope: A major instrument to attain this objective eEurope: A major instrument to attain this objective providing consolidation in Member States providing consolidation in Member States IST providing the key technologies …. for knowledge creation, sharing and exploitation IST providing the key technologies …. for knowledge creation, sharing and exploitation

30. IST: part of a competitive “race” to knowledge The US invests 3 times more on RTD in IST The US invests 3 times more on RTD in IST 52% of RTD effort in IST in OECD countries is in the US only 17% in Europe (22% in Japan) Public investment in the EU is 50% of the US effort Public investment in the EU is 50% of the US effort …. and the gap is widening The EU effort is fragmented The EU effort is fragmented ….critical mass is rarely reached in the member states … and IST has shorter & shorter life-cycles... … and IST has shorter & shorter life-cycles...

31. IST - Europe can react... A new generation of technologies is emerging A new generation of technologies is emerging –helps build an ALL inclusive knowledge society and economy –Europe is well positioned Europe can build on strengths, e.g. Europe can build on strengths, e.g. - in Mobile and Wireless, - embedded software, - consumer electronics, - rich content & service provision EU RTD in IST provides a unique opportunity EU RTD in IST provides a unique opportunity - to aggregate fragmented effort (ERA) - build consensus and provide a “global approach”

32. IST in FP6: Strategy Concentration and focus Concentration and focus –building critical mass Capitalise on Europe’s strengths Capitalise on Europe’s strengths Visionary, forward looking (longer term / high risk) Visionary, forward looking (longer term / high risk) Address key societal, economic & industrial challenges Address key societal, economic & industrial challenges Combine flexibility with greater speed in implementation Combine flexibility with greater speed in implementation

33. IST in FP6 : key elements Policy Framework (Lisbon conclusions, eEurope) Policy Framework (Lisbon conclusions, eEurope) Vision of “Ambient Intelligence” Vision of “Ambient Intelligence” providing natural & enjoyable interactions with IST applications & services Objectives Objectives Strengthening Europe’s competitiveness & technology base Building the information and knowledge society for ALL Scope Scope Core technologies & “pull-through” applications Challenges Challenges Bring the users, “people”, to the foreground Embed trustful technologies in the background (almost invisible)

34. An overview of IST in FP6 Context Context Content Content Instruments Instruments Budget Budget

35. “Ambient Intelligence” tomorrow “Our surrounding” is the interface Use all senses, intuitive Context-based knowledge handling Infinite bandwidth, inter-operable,.. Mobile/Wireless full multimedia Nano-scale different materials Wide adoption (eHealth, eLearnng, …) >70% of world-wide population on line IST : the way to an “all inclusive knowledge society” IST today PC based …………………………….. “Writing and reading”…………….…. “Word” based information search……. Low bandwidth, separate networks…. Mobile telephony (voice)…………..… Micro scale……………………………. Silicon based………………………….. eServices just emerging………………. Only 5% of global population on-line..

36. Anywhere anytime natural and enjoyable access to IST services for ALL Miniaturised, low cost low power components & µsytems Natural interactions with ‘ knowledge ’ with ‘ knowledge ’ Pervasive, mobile, wireless, trustful infrastructures Communication & networking Software µ, nano & opto electronics µ and nano systemsKnowledgetechnologiesinterfaces Applied IST for major societal and economic challenges Trust & Confidence IST for societal challenges IST for economic challenges Demanding Demandingapplications Specific Generic integration Building blocks Security, privacy IPRs, dependabilty Smart cards,... E and m business, e and m work, learning GRIDS for science, engineering business and society Health, eInclusion, mobility, environment safety, cultural heritage Mobile: beyond 3G Fixed:All optical Integrated (IPv6) Adaptive Reliable Embedded Distributed Adaptable CMOS : the limit System-on-Chip Nano-scale New materials Multidiscplines New Sensing Networked New materials Nano-scale Context based Semantic based Agent based Scaleable All senses Multilingual Intuitive ‘Surrounding’

37. Other IST activities in FP6 Exploring future visions and paradigms Exploring future visions and paradigms - Anticipation of S&T needs - “Parts” of current FET Support to eEurope Support to eEurope - Anticipation of policy needs Building Research Infrastructures Building Research Infrastructures - Research Networks - access to RTD facilities Enhancing the impact Enhancing the impact - Innovation and support to SMEs Extending global co-operation Extending global co-operation Fighting the skills gap Fighting the skills gap - mobility of researchers..

38. An overview of IST in FP6 Context Context Content Content Instruments Instruments Budget Budget

39. Instruments: Rationale Higher integration and building critical mass Higher integration and building critical mass –Realising ERA Simplifications of procedures Simplifications of procedures Larger autonomy Larger autonomy –higher responsibility for the consortium Higher flexibility Higher flexibility

40. FP6: Three (+1) instruments for “priority areas” Integrated Projects Integrated Projects –Objective driven Networks of Excellence Networks of Excellence –Exploratory research Article 169 Article 169 –Member states initiative + Targeted research projects + Targeted research projects –Address specific issues

41. Integrated projects: characteristics Integration Integration –All elements of the technology chain to attain high-impact goals –Different type of activities: RTD, technology transfer, training, dissemination, demonstration…RTD, technology transfer, training, dissemination, demonstration… –Global funding involving public & private funds Size Size –The necessary size to attain its goals Participation Participation –3 legal entities at least (2 from MSs) – minimum can be changed in the WP –supports industry-academia collaboration including SMEs

42. IPs: implementation Selection on a call for proposal basis Selection on a call for proposal basis –possible call for expression of interests, to select themes Large degree of autonomy Large degree of autonomy –Allocations of budgets –P ossibility to launch calls for participation Subsequent calls for additional “tasks” and funding by the Commission Subsequent calls for additional “tasks” and funding by the Commission Funding Funding –Grant to the budget up to 50% –Different ceilings depending on the activity

43. IPs : Three possible implementations “Monolithic” Partners known at outset Tasks identified budget known “Incremental” participation Tasks identified budget known not all participants are in “Incremental” funding objectives known technology roadmap known tasks to be completed budget to be changed Participants as well

44. Networks of Excellence (NoEs): characteristics “Virtual” centre of excellence “Virtual” centre of excellence –brings together the research effort on a particular topic –a clearly identified “joint programme of activity” –established or emerging fields Size Size –Several MEuro funding per year for the “Integrated effort” –Support to different types of activities: RTD, training, transfer, mobility...RTD, training, transfer, mobility... Participants Participants –Minimum 3: Universities, Research Labs, Industrial Labs Special Measures planned for SME’s

45. NoEs: Implementation Selection on the basis of calls for proposals Selection on the basis of calls for proposals Large degree of autonomy Large degree of autonomy –Possibility to modify plans and allocation of work –possibility to launch a call for participation Funding Funding –Grant for integration –Up to 25% of total effort that is put together

46. NoE: example of what to fund The area: Software technologies NoE theme: Next generation Programming languages Grant for Integration covering e.g. RTD on specific new concepts e.g.: - Aspects based programming - …. Training, exchange of reserachers Transfer to industry, SMEs… Partner 1 Partner 2 Partner 4 Partner 3 Software technologies Programming languages Aspects based programming, …..

47. Article 169 At the initiative of the member states At the initiative of the member states Support to “national” programmes jointly executed according to article 169 Support to “national” programmes jointly executed according to article 169 Joint or co-ordinated calls for proposals Joint or co-ordinated calls for proposals EC funding used to support the jointly executed programmes EC funding used to support the jointly executed programmes

48. Targeted RTD projects Principle: Similar to current RTD contracts Principle: Similar to current RTD contracts Funding: Grant to budget up to 50 % Funding: Grant to budget up to 50 % Launching: Calls for proposals Launching: Calls for proposals Participation: At least two MSs Participation: At least two MSs Under the same instrument: Under the same instrument: –Coordinating activities (e.g. current thematic networks) will be added as well.

49. FP6: Instruments for “anticipating & strengthening” “Strengthening…” “Strengthening…” –Grants : to co-ordination of RTD –Grants : for development of a coherent policy Support to specific International Cooperation activities Support to specific International Cooperation activities –EU’s foreign policy & development aid policy Support to SMEs Support to SMEs –Collective.. (SMEs’ Associations + Research Centers) –Cooperative.. ( >2 SMEs + research centers) RTD supporting policies RTD supporting new S&T areas RTD supporting policies RTD supporting new S&T areas –Targeted RTD Projects, similar to current shared cost contracts –Networking of Member State research activities –Focused Calls with annual workprogrammes

50. Participation Who? Who? Member States AND Associated candidate Countries, same rights & obligations Member States AND Associated candidate Countries, same rights & obligations European scientific cooperation organisations (ESA etc) European scientific cooperation organisations (ESA etc) Minimum nbr of legal entities Minimum nbr of legal entities - IP and NoE: 3 (2 from MS) - Other instruments: 2 (1 from MS). - Fellowships & support actions: 1 possible (Nbr can be adjusted by work-programme) 3rd Countries l IN ‘Integrating’ part All countries All countries Funding possible for INCO countries Funding possible for INCO countries l OUTSIDE ‘Integrating’ part Countries with co-operation agreement under specified conditions Countries with co-operation agreement under specified conditions Other countries if necessary Other countries if necessary

51. Financing Grant for integration Grant to the budget Grant as a lump sum Networks of Excellence Integrated Projects Targete projects Specific Research activities for SMEs Integrated initiatives for Infrastructure Actions to promote human resources and mobility Coordination actions Specific support actions

52. IPR As in FP5 As in FP5 –Knowledge fully funded by Community: property by Community –Knowledge partly funded by Community: property by participants Simplification & flexibility added Simplification & flexibility added –All rules can be fixed within the consortium agreement –principles provided: participants may agree additional rights –rules identical for all participants

53. Other “new” financial aspects Joint and several financial liability Joint and several financial liability –Rationale: avoid financial viability checks –In line with the larger autonomy in budget allocation within the same project Different funding ceilings in the same Integrated project Different funding ceilings in the same Integrated project No eligible costs, only non-eligible expenditures No eligible costs, only non-eligible expenditures Advance payments Advance payments –85% of every year budget

54. An overview of IST in FP6 Context Context Content Content Instruments Instruments Budget Budget

55. Budgets for the Specific Programmes Integrating & strengthening Integrating & strengthening –Genomics 2,000 B –Genomics 2,000 B€ –IST3,600 B –IST3,600 B€ –Nanotechnologies, int.. 1,300 B –Nanotechnologies, int.. 1,300 B€ –Aeronautics and space1,000 B –Aeronautics and space1,000 B€ –Food safety0,600 B –Food safety0,600 B€ –Sustainable development1,700 B –Sustainable development1,700 B€ –Citizens in knowledge 0,225 B –Citizens in knowledge 0,225 B€ –Anticipation of S&T needs SMEs0,450 BSMEs0,450 B€ InCo0,300 BInCo0,300 B€ Policies and Frontier0,880 BPolicies and Frontier0,880 B€ –Reinforcing ERA basis0,450 B –Reinforcing ERA basis0,450 B€ Structuring ERA Structuring ERA –Research and Innovation0,300 B –Research and Innovation0,300 B€ –Human resources1,800 B –Human resources1,800 B€ –Research Infrastructures0,900 B –Research Infrastructures0,900 B€ –Science/Society0,050 B –Science/Society0,050 B€ Joint Research Centre 0,730 B Joint Research Centre 0,730 B€ 12,505 B€ 3,050 B€ 16, 270 B€ 730 B€

56. IST-in-FP6 : Conclusions A new generation of technologies and applications is emerging A new generation of technologies and applications is emerging Europe is well positioned to shape the future and compete Europe is well positioned to shape the future and compete The pace of development is increasingly fast The pace of development is increasingly fast The aim is “people first” in all-inclusive knowledge society The aim is “people first” in all-inclusive knowledge society Concentration, critical mass and flexibility are key Concentration, critical mass and flexibility are key Simplification of procedures and fast reactivity Simplification of procedures and fast reactivity Need to address the (steep) learning-curve FP5  FP6 Need to address the (steep) learning-curve FP5  FP6

57. The timetable for FP6 21 February 2001……..Commission proposal to Council and Parliament 3 March 2001 ………...Presentation to informal Council meeting in Uppsala April 2001 ……………..Starting the IST consultation process 30 May 2001…………..Commission proposal on Specific Programmes June 2001 …………….Research Council Sept 2001 ……………..Commission proposal on participation rules October 2001 …………Parliament ’s first reading of FP6 Oct/Dec 2001………….Council position March 2002……………Parliament second reading Spring 2002……………Conciliation procedure June 2002……………...Final adoption Prepare workprogrammes Prepare workprogrammes Prepare new instruments Prepare new instruments Communicate details Communicate details Start Partner building Start Partner building Move toward IST ERA Move toward IST ERA Support the learning curve Support the learning curve

58. For further information IST helpdesk IST helpdesk Fax : +32 2 296 83 88 E-Mail : ist@cec.be www.cordis.lu www.cordis.lu/ist www.cordis.lu/rtd2002 - Official Journal (call texts) - Workprogrammes - Guides for Proposers - Evaluation manuals