Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Contribution to the joint OECD/Eurostat Task Force on “Performing Revisions Analysis for Sub-Annual Economic Statistics” Leendert Hoven Statistics Netherlands.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Contribution to the joint OECD/Eurostat Task Force on “Performing Revisions Analysis for Sub-Annual Economic Statistics” Leendert Hoven Statistics Netherlands."— Presentation transcript:

1 Contribution to the joint OECD/Eurostat Task Force on “Performing Revisions Analysis for Sub-Annual Economic Statistics” Leendert Hoven Statistics Netherlands Using results from revisions analysis to improve compilation methods: a case study on revisions of Dutch estimates of GDP volume growth

2 Subsequent estimates of GDP growth Quarterly Accounts, flashafter 45 days Quarterly Accounts, regularafter 90 days Yearly estimate, based on QAApril t+1 National Accounts, provisionalJuly t+1 National Accounts, revised provisionalJuly t+2 National Accounts, finalJuly t+3

3

4

5 Summary statistics mean revisionmean absolute revision Flash – QA regular 0.060.23 QA regular – NA 1st annual estimate 0.070.15 NA 1st annual estimate – NA provisional 0,100.32 NA provisional – NA revised provisional 0.040,22 NA revised provisional – NA final 0.200.26 Flash – NA final 0.470.58

6 Graph 3. Mean revision and mean absolute revision between consecutive estimates of GDP volume growth, 1990 – 2003

7 Average contribution of components to revision of GDP growth between QA regular and NA final, 1990-1998 production approachweight %contribution % agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing315 mining & quarrying27 industry15-4 electricity, gas & water2-3 construction5-18 wholesale, retail trade, repair, hotels &restaurants 1430 transport, storage, communications720 financial intermediation & business services 2435 government1110 banking services1012 health & social care, other services101

8 Average contribution of components to revision of GDP growth between QA regular and NA final, 1990- 1998 expenditure approachweightcontribution household final consumption expenditure 4951 government consumption expenditure 24 gross fixed capital formation 23-11 exports minus imports 415 changes in inventories 027

9 Two important findings  biggest mean revision between revised provisional estimate and final estimate. Quite large differences between short-term statistics and structural business statistics. Methodological shortcomings (matched pairs approach sts insufficiently allows for effects of population dynamics).  within production approach, commercial services and trade have contributed most to the revisions of GDP growth; short-term source situation particularly bad.

10 How can we improve early estimates?  improve methodology short-term statistics  improve short-term source situation for commercial services and trade  more research needed on: ovalidity different assumptions; oeffects of balancing process; o ……………….. o........................

11 Bias correction at the aggregate level?  no guarantee that average bias of past period will also hold in the future  ignores the underlying data and subaggregates  impact of introduction mew methodologies, changes in data collection, sampling or data processing difficult to capture in the short term


Download ppt "Contribution to the joint OECD/Eurostat Task Force on “Performing Revisions Analysis for Sub-Annual Economic Statistics” Leendert Hoven Statistics Netherlands."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google