1. Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 October 22, 2014

2. 2 http://education.ky.gov/teachers/PGES/TPGES/Pages/TPGES-Student-Growth-Percentile-Medians.aspx

3.  Next Generation Instructional Programs and Support Program Reviews o Arts/Humanities o Practical Living/Career Studies o Writing o Primary/World Languages  Next Generation Learner Achievement Gap Growth (SGP) College/Career Readiness Graduation Rate Unbridled Learning: Next-Generation Accountability Model  Next Generation Professionals Teachers and Leaders 2

4. CLASSROOMGRADE BELOW 40 SGP AT 40 or HIGHER SGP Smith - Math 5617 Smith - Reading 5 7 16 Rodriguez - Math 4917 Rodriguez - Reading 4226 Total Number of Scores 2476 Percentage for State Accountability 24%76% State Accountability Use of SGP Elementary Accountability Calculation: 76% (students at 40 or higher SGP) X 40% Weight = 30.4 Points Earned for Growth Component of Unbridled Learning 4

5.  Next Generation Instructional Programs and Support Program Reviews o Arts/Humanities o Practical Living/Career Studies o Writing o Primary/World Languages  Next Generation Learner Achievement Gap Growth College/Career Readiness Graduation Rate Unbridled Learning: Next-Generation Accountability Model  Next Generation Professionals Teachers and Leaders 2

6. Student Growth Two types of Student Growth will factor into a teacher’s overall Student Growth Rating: 1.Local Student Growth Goals (all teachers) 2.State Student Growth Percentiles (approximately 20% of teachers)  NO Goal is written by a teacher for this data point 6

7. Teacher Student Growth Percentile Median Student Growth Percentiles are used Up to three years of data are combined A minimum number of 10 students are required to receive SGP (100 Days) Attribution is determined at the local level It is a lagging indicator (will not be available until the next fall) (11-12;12-13) 7

8. Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model SGP measures change in an individual student’s performance over time. ◦ How much did John improve in mathematics from grade 4 to grade 5 can be answered by showing:  How John improved from grade 4 to 5 compared to his academic peers. 8

9. Student Growth Percentile: Key Points Focuses on the relative standing of a student from year to year compared to the student’s academic peers. ◦ The academic peers are students who perform very similarly to the student on the test. The student is only compared to students who start at the same place. ◦ In year two, the question is: Did the student outpace his peer group? 9

10. Student Growth Percentile Key Points The rate of change is expressed as a percentile. ◦ How much did John improve in mathematics from grade 4 to grade 5, relative to his academic peers? ◦ If John improved more than 65 percent of his academic peers, then his student growth percentile would be 65. 10

11. Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Requirements Must have two test scores from two different years for each student. Tests must be in same subject. ◦ In Kentucky only Reading and Mathematics are tested each year from grades 3-8. 11

12. Student Growth Percentiles Available for teachers of students in grades 4-8 who take K-PREP in Reading and/or Math Available for both classroom teachers and contributing professionals Not available for Grade 11 (PLAN-ACT) for teacher effectiveness because there may be more than one teacher impacting that student’s growth 12

13. Student Growth Percentile Kentucky Classroom Mrs. Smith Grade 5 13

14. Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom Beginning of Year Incoming Mathematics Scale Scores 210195 220185193208187222 219 203197201 Grade 4 213199 188196218196194185 200 205231 Grade 4 14

15. 210 Academic Peer Group (Statewide) Students Scoring at 210 on Grade 4 Mathematics Mrs. Smith’s Grade 5 Student 15

16. Academic Peer Group (Statewide) Grade 5 Mathematics Scale Scores for Grade 4 “210” Group 210 Grade 4 210 215 212 213 214211218209 221 213204200 Grade 5 216 199 227214212211210213 221 213214220 Grade 5 Grade 4 … 16

17. Rank Ordered Grade 4 Mathematics “210” Academic Peer Group Based on Grade 5 Mathematics Score 210 Grade 4 210 199 200 209210212 211 213 204 Grade 5 213 214 216218215214 221 220227213 Grade 5 Grade 4 Student is at the 70 th Percentile 17

18. Grade 4 Mathematics Score is 210. Grade 5 Mathematics Score is 215. The student outpaces 70% of the statewide Academic Peer Group. The student’s SGP is 70. Mrs. Smith’s Grade 5 Student Student Summary 18

19. Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom SGP for Each Student Based on Grade 5 Mathematics Test 70 SGP 65 92 85 57 5553 5251 49 4746 42 SGP 41 44 43 40 38 32 26 23 21 19

20. Theoretical Premise: When students with “like” scores are placed in an academic peer group and then compared one year later, we assume teacher and school actions happened between the two tests to cause a student to stay even with or out- perform the academic peer group. The actions may include instruction, curriculum, on-going assessments, etc. 20

21. Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom SGP for Each Student Based on 2014 Grade 5 MATHEMATICS Test 70 SGP 65 92 85 57 5553 5251 49 4746 42 SGP 41 44 43 40 38 32 26 23 21 19 21 Mrs. Smith’s Median Math SGP=46 The median SGP is the middle number in the teacher’s list of student SGP scores; or the average of the two middle numbers in the case of an even number of students.

22. Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom SGP for Each Student Based on 2014 Grade 5 READING Test 70 SGP 69 89 81 68 6763 6059 53 52 42 SGP 41 49 48 39 38 32 26 23 15 13 22 Mrs. Smith’s Median Reading SGP=52

23. Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom SGP for All Students in Reading Classes 70 SGP 47 92 81 49 53 51 68 65 60 57 59 40 SGP 42 41 38 3226 23 44 21 13 23 70 52 8985 52 53 69 67 63 59 58 55 38 53 42 40 3226 23 43 15 46 19 SGP Median SGP for Mrs. Smith = (51+49)/2= 50

24. Student Growth Rating Teachers will receive one of 3 ratings on their overall student growth: Low, Expected, or High. For research purposes median student growth percentiles were calculated for all teachers statewide. Using the distribution of median student growth percentiles, cutoffs were created to indicate Low, Expected, and High Student Growth. 24

25. Rationale for Ratings Expected Student Growth should constitute approximately 2/3 of teachers. Cut scores for Low, Expected and High were determined using the distribution of median SGPs for teachers. 25

26. Distribution of Teachers’ SGPs 26 67% of all Teachers 18% of all Teachers 15% of all Teachers ExpectedLowHigh

27. Student Growth Percentile Ratings Growth RatingMedian SGP% of Population LowLess than 3018% MediumBetween 30 and 6567% HighAbove 6515% 27

28. What was Mrs. Smith’s Reading Rating? Mrs. Smith had a median SGP of 50 for her Reading Students; therefore, she would have a state student growth rating of Expected. Up to 3 years of Data Scores can be used. 28

29. What was Mrs. Smith’s Math Rating? 29 Mrs. Smith had a median SGP of 46 for her Math Students; therefore, she would have a state student growth rating of Expected. Up to 3 years of Data and Math/Reading Scores can be used.

30. Contributing Professionals and SGP Median Teachers set up for a course/section as a contributing teacher in Infinite Campus. All students are assigned to each teacher/ contributing professional of record in the same manner as the primary teacher. Contributing professionals may have students in- accurately attributed because of the way positions are designated for LEAD reports. Reviewing data locally with your principals to create correct attribution is important. KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 30

31. 31

32. 32

33. Don’t forget best practice with data sets Data that contains unique student/teacher identifiers should be kept secure You are obtaining data from a secure system, so continue to ensure that it is kept secure Consider who will have access to the data and reports and how this information will be stored securely 33

34. Accessing the Results in CIITS KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 34 http://media.education.ky.gov/video1/On-Demand2013/CIITS_12-3-2013.mp4

35. KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 35

36. KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 36

37. KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 37

38. Questions to Consider for SG%? How will you address the SG% Median in your CEP? How will you help teachers understand the reports and (more importantly) implications for teaching and learning? 38

39. Special Education and Student Growth Goal Setting Two types of Student Growth will factor into a teacher’s overall Student Growth Rating:  Local Student Growth Goal (all teachers)  State Student Growth Percentiles (approximately 20% of teachers) 39

40. Student Growth Goals Student Growth Goals All teachers are required to write one Local Student Growth Goal for one group of students to be entered in CIITS. The SGG process accounts for growth for all students, including students with disabilities.

41. How can you support a Special Education teacher, an EL Teacher, and other alternate setting teachers in setting Student Growth Goals? Using the documents provided (available on the KDE Student Growth page) 1. Develop key points/guidance for your group’s given role/situation. 2. Be prepared to share your ideas with the group. 41 ACTIVITY

42. Key Points to Remember Special Education teachers should first consider their role/position and the type of support they give to students. Special Education teachers should focus on ELA or Math enduring learnings whenever possible. 42