Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23, 2015 1.

Published byAugust Patterson Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23, 2015 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23, 2015 1

2 OUTLINE 20to2T5m and 20to4T5m configuration Field map Setting of BE windows Target and beam parameters Comparison of KE spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all positive and negative particles at z = 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 m between 20to2T5m and 20to4T5m configuration. 2

3 20to2T5m Configuration (z max = 52 m) 3

4 20to2T5m Configuration (z max = 15 m) 4

5 20to4T5m Configuration (z max = 52 m) 5

6 20to4T5m Configuration (z max = 15 m) 6

7 Fieldmap on SC axis 7 20to2T5m: B = 2.00 T for z > 10 m 20to4T5m: B = 4.00 T for z > 10 m

8 Target Containment Vessel The containment vessel is cooled by He-gas flow between its double walls. The outer cylinder extends over -46 < z < 170 cm, with outer radius r = 15 cm. The inner cylinder extends over -45 < z < 169 cm, with inner radius r = 14 cm. The downstream faces of the vessels are Be windows,  1 mm thick. 8

9 Magnet Modules (front end for 5 < z < 50 m) The Front End for 5 < z < 50 m consists of nine 5-m-long superconducting magnet modules, each with internal tungsten shielding around the 23-cm-radius beam pipe. The latter has thin Be windows,  0.05 mm thick, at each end of a magnet module, and is filled with He gas at 1 atmosphere. This model does not include a chicane. 9

10 Carbon Target and Beam Parameters Simulation code: MARS15(2014) with ICEM 4 = 1 (default) and ENRG 1 = 6.75, 2 = 0.02, 3 = 0.3, 4 = 0.01, 5 = 0.05, 6 = 0.01, 7 = 0.01 ; Graphite density: 1.8 g/cm 3 ; Beam pipe radius: 14 cm (initial) and 23 cm (final); Proton beam: 6.75 GeV (KE), 1 MW, beam radius at 0.2 cm and beam angle at 65 mrad, waist and 5 μm geometric emittance at z = 0 m (intersection point), launched at z = -100 cm; Carbon rod: target length at 80 cm, rod radius at 0.8 cm and tilt angle to SC axis at 65 mrad. 10

11 Energy Spectra (z = 2 m) pi + : left-up, pi - : left-down, sum: middle, mu + : right-up, mu - : right-down 11

12 Energy Spectra (z = 5 m) pi + : left-up, pi - : left-down, sum: middle, mu + : right-up, mu - : right-down 12

13 Energy Spectra (z = 10 m) pi + : left-up, pi - : left-down, sum: middle, mu + : right-up, mu - : right-down 13

14 Energy Spectra (z = 20 m) pi + : left-up, pi - : left-down, sum: middle, mu + : right-up, mu - : right-down 14

15 Energy Spectra (z = 30 m) pi + : left-up, pi - : left-down, sum: middle, mu + : right-up, mu - : right-down 15

16 Energy Spectra (z = 40 m) pi + : left-up, pi - : left-down, sum: middle, mu + : right-up, mu - : right-down 16

17 Energy Spectra (z = 50 m) pi + : left-up, pi - : left-down, sum: middle, mu + : right-up, mu - : right-down 17

18 Summary (1) More high-KE particles are captured in 20to4T5m configuration. (2) In 20to2T5m configuration, KE selection of 40 < KE < 180 MeV is used to count yield at z = 50 m ( peak around 140 MeV). (3) In 20to4T5m configuration, there is a dent around 100 MeV at z = 40, 50 m. Exchanging with the 20to2T5m transport channel, we still found this dent. However, the dent will disappear if we delete all BE beam windows above z > 15 m. (https://pubweb.bnl.gov/~xding/JINST/energy-spectra).https://pubweb.bnl.gov/~xding/JINST/energy-spectra So both BE windows and field map seem affect our KE spectra. (4) In the 20to4T configuration, what KE selection (40 < KE < 400 MeV?) will be used to count yield at z = 50 m. Should we use this KE selection for 20to2T5m configuration? (5) We expect about only a few percent increase in particle production from 20to2T5m to 20to4T5m with KE selection of 40 < KE < 400 MeV and our present BE window settings until z = 50 m. 18

19 Back-Up Slides Follow 19

20 Setting of BE Windows The MAT is the material. The z i is the beginning and the z f is the end. The OR is the outer radius in my setting. MAT z i (cm) z f ( cm ) OR ( cm ) THICKNESS ( cm ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#1: BE 169.0 169.1 14 0.1 HE 169.1 170.0 15 0.9 BE 170.0 170.1 15 0.1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#2: BE 430.5 430.55 22 0.05 HE 430.55 431.45 23 0.9 BE 431.45 431.5 23 0.05 BeWind#3: BE 993.5 993.55 22 0.05 HE 993.55 994.45 23 0.9 BE 994.45 994.5 23 0.05 20

21 Setting of BE Windows (Cont’d) MAT z i (cm) z f ( cm ) OR ( cm ) THICKNESS ( cm ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#4: BE 1005.5 1005.55 22 0.05 HE 1005.55 1006.45 23 0.9 BE 1006.45 1006.5 23 0.05 BeWind#5: BE 1495.0 1495.05 22 0.05 HE 1495.05 1495.95 23 0.9 BE 1495.95 1496.0 23 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#6: BE 1507.0 1507.05 22 0.05 HE 1507.05 1507.95 23 0.9 BE 1507.95 1508.0 23 0.05 BeWind#7: BE 2018.5 2018.55 22 0.05 HE 2018.55 2019.45 23 0.9 BE 2019.45 2019.5 23 0.05 21

22 Setting of BE Windows (Cont’d) MAT z i (cm) z f ( cm ) OR ( cm ) THICKNESS ( cm ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#8: BE 2030.5 2030.55 22 0.05 HE 2030.55 2031.45 23 0.9 BE 2031.45 2031.5 23 0.05 BeWind#9: BE 2542.0 2542.05 22 0.05 HE 2542.05 2542.95 23 0.9 BE 2542.95 2543.0 23 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#10: BE 2554.0 2554.05 22 0.05 HE 2554.05 2554.95 23 0.9 BE 2554.95 2555.0 23 0.05 BeWind#11: BE 3065.5 3065.55 22 0.05 HE 3065.55 3066.45 23 0.9 BE 3066.45 3066.5 23 0.05 22

23 Setting of BE Windows (Cont’d) MAT z i (cm) z f ( cm ) OR ( cm ) THICKNESS ( cm ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#12: BE 3077.5 3077.55 22 0.05 HE 3077.55 3078.45 23 0.9 BE 3078.45 3078.5 23 0.05 BeWind#13: BE 3589.0 3589.05 22 0.05 HE 3589.05 3589.95 23 0.9 BE 3589.95 3590.0 23 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#14: BE 3601.0 3601.05 22 0.05 HE 3601.05 3601.95 23 0.9 BE 3601.95 3602.0 23 0.05 BeWind#15: BE 4112.5 4112.55 22 0.05 HE 4112.55 4113.45 23 0.9 BE 4113.45 4113.5 23 0.05 23

24 Setting of BE Windows (Cont’d) MAT z i (cm) z f ( cm ) OR ( cm ) THICKNESS ( cm ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#16: BE 4124.5 4124.55 22 0.05 HE 4124.55 4125.45 23 0.9 BE 4125.45 4126.5 23 0.05 BeWind#17: BE 4636.0 4636.05 22 0.05 HE 4636.05 4636.95 23 0.9 BE 4639.95 4637.0 23 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BeWind#18: BE 4648.0 4648.05 22 0.05 HE 4648.05 4648.95 23 0.9 BE 4648.95 4649.0 23 0.05 BeWind#19: BE 5159.5 5159.55 22 0.05 HE 5159.55 5160.45 23 0.9 BE 5160.45 5160.5 23 0.05 24

25 25

Download ppt "Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23, 2015 1."

Similar presentations

Comparison of Particle Production between MARS and FLUKA (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Aug. 8, 2013 18/8/13.

Comparison of Particle Production between MARS and FLUKA (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Aug. 8, /8/13.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)

SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25, 2014 1.

Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,

Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Meson Production Comparison between HG and GA at 8 GeV (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 18, 2011.

Meson Production Comparison between HG and GA at 8 GeV (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 18, 2011.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ. 2015 MAP Spring.

Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.

Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.

Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.

MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
1 Meson Production Simulations X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL N u F a c t 0 9 11th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams.

1 Meson Production Simulations X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL N u F a c t th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.

SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, 2011 1 The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.

KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.

Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.

Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, 2011 1 Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.

KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
1 Muon Yield Comparisons for Different ICOOL Versions and Lattices X. Ding Front End, Nov. 23, 2010.

1 Muon Yield Comparisons for Different ICOOL Versions and Lattices X. Ding Front End, Nov. 23, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.

IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google